
What Trump will never understand about the Kennedy Center
In February, Trump fired the Kennedy Center's leadership and appointed himself chair. He wishes to end DEI and 'woke' programming and instead showcase classics. Many artists canceled. Others stayed, noting that art speaks for itself.
Last week, the administration fired more senior officials there, and the ones who have stayed note they live in fear.
Two instances, one involving an 'avant-garde' program and the other a traditional one, provide counterpoints to Trump's unpolished maneuvers at the Center.
On the avant-garde, this month the Center presented the celebrated British-Bangladeshi choreographer-dancer Akram Khan's retelling of the classic Indian epic the Mahabharata in 70 minutes of spell-binding dance.
Khan's choreography and music blend several classical Indian genres. The avant-garde lies in pushing the boundaries of the old to create something new. Like every other place on earth, the 'puritans' in India can often be heard complaining when their notion of the 'classical' changes.
To the Kennedy Center audiences, Khan represents globalized arts. Like foreign-manufactured goods in a tariffs-obsessed Washington, that label might itself make people think that Khan's dance forms with non-white people are part of DEI.
Khan's Mahabharata is called 'Gigenis.' The title comes from Greek mythology, meaning earth-born. Khan's genius: Indian classical dance is earth-bound, while in Western ballet feet take flight. In signaling Greek mythology and in re-presenting an Indian epic, we expect a drama of epic proportions. Khan's program notes explain the Mahabharata as a story about a 'family breaking up because they want power. I used that idea to revisit that old story of what power and greed can do to a family and what it can do to people.'
We reflect on epics like we reflect on our families. After the passions, wars and killings, we are left wondering about our history. We look back at the Homeric myths the same way that we see Mahabharata. We see our heroics and frailties in these epics.
Storytellers — be they filmmakers, novelists or choreographers — provide the contemporary meanings. They contain multitudes.
Let's now turn to something traditional: opera. The Kennedy Center continually presents some of the most conservative performances of opera anywhere in the world, foremost in its stage and artistic directions. Characters in 'Macbeth' appear in vaguely Scottish costumes, Madama Butterfly wears a kimono and characters in 'Tosca' wear what we think they wore in 19th-century Rome. One would be hard put to find such performances anywhere in the opera strongholds of Berlin, Paris or New York
Every now and then, the Kennedy Center breaks out of its shell to present new works, such as the current offering of an opera about Steve Jobs, or an earlier opera about drones in warfare, are examples. These are American stories, and the Kennedy Center is the appropriate place to premier them.
Opera — like all art — in 21st century must create new meanings, sometimes through the insights of critical theory (there, I said it, even though libertarians such as myself recoil from it). In this vein, Edward Said, one of the founders of critical theory, notes in his essay about Verdi's 'Aida' that although this opera was written as an imperial project for the opening of the Suez Canal, knowing its politics need not deter us from enjoying the music.
Edward Said himself paved the way. With the Jewish conductor Daniel Barenboim, he founded the Barenboim-Said Academy in Berlin after creating the Divan Orchestra, which brings together Israeli, Palestinian and Middle Eastern musicians. This is the Said who taught in the Middle East Studies department at Columbia University and has so rankled Trump's allegedly pro-Jewish sympathies.
The Said-Barenboim academy finds new meanings in Wagner, Hitler's favorite composer, who was mostly banned in Israel for decades.
The Robert Bosch Academy, where I am a fellow, is located opposite the Said-Barenboim Academy in Berlin. The fellows met with Barenboim himself a few years ago. I asked Barenboim how he found music in Wagner and other composers when his dear friend Said found politics. He looked at me intently and said, 'We disagreed on that sometimes. I always find the music.'
Barenboim's statement could mean that he saw more than critical theory in music. Most of us would agree. We should also reflect on the fact that a Jewish conductor was eager to play Wagner, while his Palestinian critical theorist friend would hesitate.
Art is almost always pluralistic and polysemic. Trump's ideas of 'non-woke' programming will be a failure, foremost because institutions like the Kennedy Center have always presented the traditional even when presenting the avant-garde. To go to the right of the traditional is the path toward cultural fascism.
President Kennedy's legacy to our country is bedecked with quotes from him. One of them reads, 'And I look forward to an America which commands respect throughout the world not only for its strength but for its civilization as well. And I look forward to a world which will be safe not only for democracy and diversity but also for personal distinction.'
Trump's performative spectacles, like his hostile takeover of the Kennedy Center, are almost always crude pronouncements of undemocratic strength. To have a poet or a singer sing his song, he would need to show some art or grace. With the subtlety of Attila the Hun, Trump is unlikely to deliver.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
31 minutes ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: Solid earnings beats might mask tariff volatility these two weeks
Friday, Aug. 1 — the "hard deadline" of U.S. President Donald Trump's updated tariffs — is less than two weeks away. Investors, however, seem mostly unbothered thus far. For last week, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dipped marginally, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite rose 0.6% and 1.5% respectively. Even a report that Trump wanted a minimum of 15%-20% tariffs on the European Union only dealt a minimal blow to markets, which mostly closed unchanged Friday. Although those figures are higher than the universal 10% baseline tariff Trump reportedly wanted — and which the EU is hoping to secure — they are still lower than the 30% Trump said he will impose on the bloc in his July 12 letter. An upbeat start to earnings season has alsohelped to quell tariff fears for now. Around 83% of the S&P 500 companies that have reported earnings have exceeded expectations, according to FactSet data. In particular, big banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, which serve as barometers for economic activity, had solid beats, boosting investor sentiment. Next in the spotlight are Big Tech earnings, which will be released in the weeks right before Aug. better than expected, they might dispel geopolitical jitters — or cause investors to dismiss trade fears too readily. In these stormy times, every silver lining has a dark cloud. Aug. 1 is a 'hard deadline' for new tariffs. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said Sunday that the tariffs will take effect next month, but left open the possibility of continuing trade negotiations after the date. Trump wants a minimum tariff of 15%-20% on the EU. The Financial Times, which cited three people briefed on trade talks between the U.S. and the bloc, reported the news Friday. The European Union had been hoping for a deal similar to the U.K.'s. Scott Bessent reportedly urged Trump not to fire Jerome Powell. However, the U.S. president denied a Wall Street Journal report that Bessent had warned him about the potential economic, political and legal consequences of dismissing the Federal Reserve Chair. U.S. stock futures are little changed Sunday stateside. On Friday, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite closed around the flatline. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, however, lost 0.32%. The Stoxx Europe 600 was mostly unchanged. [PRO] The Magnificent Seven are due to report earnings. Alphabet and Tesla will announce their second-quarter financial results Wednesday. If they top the results that investors are expecting, markets could receive a boost. '30% is untenable': From Irish whiskey to Italian cheese, Trump's tariff threat rattles EU exporters Along the "last road in Ireland," on the country's rugged west coast, June O'Connell's business Skellig Six18 makes gin and whiskey — a time-intensive process guided by the wind, rain and cool temperatures that roll in year-round off the Atlantic. America was a natural target market once their first spirits were ready to sell in 2019, according to O'Connell, given its strong familiarity with Ireland and big appetite for premium drinks. Her first products left County Kerry in November 2023 for a U.S. launch in early 2024. Then the political tide started turning in the White House.


Fox News
31 minutes ago
- Fox News
Keith Olbermann pours cold water on claims Colbert was fired for political reasons
Ex-MSNBC host Keith Olbermann has weighed in on whether Stephen Colbert was canceled by CBS for political reasons, throwing cold water on the theory he was axed for his criticism of Trump. "Sorry. That's not what happened here. If it had, they wouldn't be keeping him on until next MAY," Olbermann said in a post on X. CBS announced they'd canceled "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert" Thursday, stating that the over 30-year-long franchise would come to an end in May 2026 with no subsequent host taking over following Colbert's departure. The show was previously hosted by David Letterman from 1992-2015. Olbermann authored the post in response to an X user who posted that Colbert's firing was a sign that the United States had descended into fascism. "We are officially at the 'pulling comedians off the air who criticize our dear leader' phase of fascism," the user posted over a picture of the late night host. Following the network's announcement of Colbert's ouster, numerous left-wing politicians and journalists spoke out, alleging that the talk show host was fired for political reasons, speculating that axing Colbert – a fierce critic of President Trump – was an attempt to placate White House officials amid a pending merger between CBS' parent company Paramount and Skydance. "CBS's billionaire owners pay Trump $16 million to settle a bogus lawsuit while trying to sell the network to Skydance. Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal. Days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO," Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders posted on X. "If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better," Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wrote on X. CBS settled with President Trump after he sued the network alleging election interference over a "60 Minutes" interview with his 2024 opponent former Vice President Kamala Harris which he alleged was deceptively edited. A clip from the interview, in which Harris was asked about the war in Gaza, was released on "Face the Nation" prior to the "60 Minutes" broadcast and featured the former VP delivering an answer that was widely derided as "word salad." When the interview was finally broadcast, a different, more concise response was swapped in its place. CBS, however, claimed that "The Late Show's" cancellation was due to financial reasons, saying the show lost some $40 million a year. Colbert is No. 1 in the late night timeslot among network talk show hosts (though he regularly comes behind Fox's Gutfeld), averaging around 2.4 million viewers per episode. Overall viewership for late night talk shows has steadily declined in recent years, leading to a decrease in total ad revenues. Colbert was tapped to host the "Late Show" following Letterman's retirement after he hosted the widely acclaimed "Colbert Report" on Comedy Central. Upon taking the reins of the franchise, Colbert eschewed the well-known formula of hosting a show that appeals to the broadest swath of Americans, opting instead for a highly partisan, Trump-critical program. Fox News Digital has reached out to CBS for comment. When former President Joe Biden won the 2020 election, Colbert popped champagne on air and danced, proclaiming his joy in the election result. "Ladies and gentlemen, Joe Biden did it! He's our next president! I'm so happy!" he proclaimed, adding that he cried tears of joy upon learning Trump would no longer be president.

Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
101 on Section 232: What it means for U.S. chip stocks
-- The Trump administration's Section 232 investigation into semiconductors is shaping up to be a major policy lever with potential consequences across the U.S. chip industry. Initiated in April, the probe aims to assess whether imports of semiconductors and related equipment threaten national security, a determination that could justify broad tariffs. A final report may be out soon. Section 232, part of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, gives the President sweeping powers to impose remedies—including tariffs—if imports are deemed to harm national security. Compared to other tariff tools, it offers 'much broader authority to impose remedies,' Bernstein analysts said. Importantly, the probe's scope includes not just standalone chips but also the products that contain them. While the U.S. imported about $45 billion in semiconductors in 2024, much of the value comes embedded in finished goods. 'Out of the ~$3.3T in goods imported in 2024, the top 3 categories s (machinery, electrical equipment, and vehicles) accounted for ~$1.4T,' and many of those products are 'semi-rich,' analysts led by Stacy A. Rasgon said, with chips making up a significant share of their cost structure. Phones and PCs are key examples. Tariffs could be applied either at the chip level or based on semiconductor content inside devices, with the latter possibly including incentives for using U.S.-made components. 'The most effective way to tariff the value of imported semiconductors is likely to go after component-level content,' the team said. However, such a strategy could be difficult to administer given the complexity of global supply chains. Among potential beneficiaries, Bernstein highlights Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:TXN) and Intel (NASDAQ:INTC) as standouts. The broker points out that these chipmakers 'are really the only two that have large global capacities with a U.S. footprint exceeding 50%.' Texas Instruments has been building greenfield capacity in the U.S., while Intel operates multiple fabs and packaging sites domestically. 'Texas Instruments has clearly been prepping for a scenario like this for some time and is one of the few companies that is actually building substantial amounts of greenfield capacity in the U.S.,' the note states. Other firms with relatively high U.S. manufacturing footprints include Microchip (NASDAQ:MCHP), Qorvo (NASDAQ:QRVO), Skyworks (NASDAQ:SWKS), Broadcom (NASDAQ:AVGO), NXP (NASDAQ:NXPI), and Analog Devices (NASDAQ:ADI). According to its analysis, Bernstein sees potential for tens of billions of dollars to be raised through these tariffs, which could lift device costs significantly. While tariffs are broadly seen as negative for demand, the policy may offer a relative advantage to U.S.-centric manufacturers if implemented. Related articles 101 on Section 232: What it means for U.S. chip stocks Surge of 50% since our AI selection, this chip giant still has great potential Apollo economist warns: AI bubble now bigger than 1990s tech mania Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data