San Jose Police will use drones to ramp up enforcement on illegal fireworks
San Jose will use drones to crack down on people using illegal fireworks
San Jose will use drones to crack down on people using illegal fireworks
With the 4th of July just around the corner, the city of San Jose is stepping up its efforts to stop the use of illegal fireworks with more eyes on the ground and in the skies.
Jeff Levine has lived in San Jose for over a decade and said the illegal fireworks problem has gotten out of control.
"It's awful. It's dangerous. It's illegal. Cars tossing … Anything from the little fire crackers to the big explosive M-1000s out in the street, and they zoom off, and then they blow up, and cars come in and are swerving to avoid the explosion," Levine said.
But this year, the city is launching a more coordinated ground and aerial effort.
And for the first time this 4th of July, San Jose Police will launch drones to capture footage of illegal fireworks use, joining several other cities like Elk Grove.
The built-in GPS will allow the city to locate hot spots and go after associated property owners.
"The information gathered from the drones will be real-time, so they will be relayed to the operator," said police spokesperson Stacie Shih. "And that's the message we want to relay. Have fun on the 4th of July but be safe. We'll be watching. Fireworks are illegal in the city of San Jose and have always been."
And the city's largest neighborhood group is supporting and participating in increasing enforcement efforts.
"We, as a neighborhood group, along with the city, want to make sure that more people are involved in reporting illegal fireworks use," said Steve Spivak.
Spivak is part of San Jose's All District Leadership Group that is working to encourage neighbors to report illegal fireworks using the 311 app, which now has a dedicated tab just for that purpose.
Reports from the app will help police and fire to track hotspots, and this year, code enforcement officers will be issuing citations directly to homes connected to illegal fireworks use.
And for neighbors who are afraid to speak up, the 311 app allows reports to be made anonymously.
"I get it — People are scared of retaliation. But it helps when the city backs us up and makes reporting easy and safe," Spivak said.
As the 4th of July approaches, San Jose hopes that with stronger community involvement and a few more eyes in the sky, this holiday can be a little quieter and a lot safer.
But if it's not, San Jose is also planning to use its social host ordinance to hold property owners liable, plus fines and even possible citations for spectators.
Fire officials said "safe and sane" fireworks are illegal in San Jose. Violators could face fines of up to $1,000.
Illegally selling fireworks could lead to jail time and $50,000 in fines.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Florida police under fire as video of Black man punched, dragged by deputies during traffic stop goes viral
A cell phone video showing a white Jacksonville, Florida, police officer striking a Black man in the face during a February traffic stop before he's dragged from his car has gone viral, sparked outrage and led to conflicting accounts of the incident from civil rights lawyers and law enforcement. William McNeil Jr.'s lawyers Ben Crump and Harry Daniels say the video, which McNeil took from inside his car, is a clear depiction of brutality, coming as law enforcement officials – from masked ICE agents to local police officers – have been scrutinized for their use of force, particularly against people of color. The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office argued the viral video doesn't show the full context of the situation. 'Yes, there absolutely was force used by the arresting officers, and yes, that force is ugly,' Sheriff TK Waters said Monday at a news conference. 'Just because force is ugly does not mean it's unlawful or contrary to policy.' He said he wouldn't stay silent while 'facts and information are buried to advance an anti-police agenda.' Here's what we know: New police bodycam video released Monday shows McNeil, 22, opening his car door to speak to an officer, who tells him he was pulled over for driving without his headlights or seatbelt on. 'It's daylight, I don't need the lights. And it's not weather – it's not raining,' McNeil says in the video. McNeil asked the officer to call his supervisor, refused to give him his license, and closed his door. He locked it as the officer asked him to step out of the vehicle, bodycam video shows. 'Open the door and exit, or we are going to break the window,' the officer says as another patrol car pulls up in front of McNeil's vehicle. McNeil was warned seven times that he was under arrest and needed to open his door, Waters said. The video from inside McNeil's car begins with him sitting in the driver's seat, talking to another officer through the passenger side window. He asks the officer to show him the law stating that he must have his headlights on. One officer then says he's going ahead with breaking the window, according to body camera footage. 'All right, go for it,' a second police officer is heard saying. Seconds later, the driver's window is smashed in, McNeil is punched in the face, and officers open the door and pull him to the ground next to his car, striking his face again, McNeil's video shows. McNeil's lawyers say he sustained a tooth fracture, concussion and a traumatic brain injury. He also had cognitive impairment and short-term memory deficits after the traffic stop, they added. The body camera footage released Monday didn't show the initial strike between the arresting officer and McNeil, Waters admitted. McNeil was arrested following the incident on February 19 and charged with resisting a police officer without violence, driving on a suspended license and possession of less than 20 grams of marijuana, Waters said. The next day, he pleaded guilty to the resisting and suspended license charges. D. Bowers, the arresting officer who pulled McNeil over, made no mention of McNeil being punched in his police report. He wrote that the suspect, McNeil, refused to comply, which led him to break the window to open the driver's door. 'Physical force was applied to the suspect and he was taken to the ground,' Bowers continued. A second officer, however, described in a separate report six punches to McNeil's leg before he stopped resisting, according to the Associated Press. 'He simply asks for a supervisor and then they break his window and beat him yet, somehow, the report failed to mention that,' McNeil's lawyers said in a statement. Bowers' report also claimed McNeil was 'reaching for the floorboard of the vehicle where a large knife was sitting,' as he was removed from the car. Deputies found a knife while they searched McNeil's vehicle after taking him into custody, according to police reports. Crump and Daniels said Bowers' report that McNeil reached toward the knife was a 'fabrication,' according to the AP. 'The only time he moves at all is when the officer knocks him over by punching him in his face,' they said. 'Then this young man calmly sits back straight and holds his empty hands up.' When asked Monday about what he saw in the footage, Waters, the sheriff, said he couldn't see where McNeil's hands were. Waters said McNeil hadn't filed a complaint or shared his video with the department before it was released on social media. Had he done so, he said, the department would have started an investigation. The sheriff said the cell phone footage showed there were aspects of the arrest the department needed to investigate, but said he assumed the video was 'intended to inflame the public.' 'The context of this video should tell you everything you need to know,' he said. A criminal investigation at the sheriff's office began Sunday, as soon as it became aware of the viral footage, Waters said, adding the State Attorney's Office determined Monday no officers involved in the arrest violated any criminal laws. An administrative review over whether the deputies violated department policies is also ongoing, Waters said. The arresting officer has been 'stripped of his law enforcement authority' pending the outcome of the administrative review, according to the sheriff. McNeil's attorney Daniels said he was disgusted but not surprised by the actions of the officers. 'The Jacksonville Sheriff's Office has a long history of this kind of needless violence and brutality,' Daniels said in a press release. 'It should be obvious to anyone watching this video that William McNeil wasn't a threat to anyone,' Crump added. 'He was calmly exercising his constitutional rights, and they beat him for it.' CNN's Jillian Sykes, Isabel Rosales, Meridith Edwards, Devon Sayers, and Jason Morris contributed to this report.
CNN
18 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: Trump's latest bid to end Epstein storm: Weaponizing the federal government
Donald Trump's bid to smother the uproar over accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein shows that he's already achieved one goal his critics most feared from his second presidency. The Justice Department and the head of the US intelligence community are now openly operating as fully weaponized tools to pursue the president's personal political needs in a degradation of a governing system meant to be an antidote to king-like patronage. This new dynamic underpinned a wild Oval Office press appearance by Trump on Tuesday, his latest attempt to put out the Epstein fire that had only the now-familiar effect of feeding the flames. The extent of the president's capture of two key agencies that are vital to keeping Americans safe was revealed when a reporter asked a question about his administration's refusal to open all files related to the Epstein case. The president pivoted to a tirade against Barack Obama, accusing the former president of staging a treasonous coup against him — basing his assault on a convenient and misleading memo about Russia's 2016 election meddling that was released last week by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. The Justice Department has also been activated, yet again, to give Trump cover. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche announced Tuesday that he will take the highly unusual move of meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell — who was sentenced to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a yearslong scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls — to ask what she knows but hasn't so far told. Epstein died in jail while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. 'I don't know anything about it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Tuesday. This seems a stretch, since Blanche is Trump's former personal lawyer and plans to speak with a prisoner who has a clear incentive to offer testimony that could help a president who has the power to let her out of prison. Other new developments in the deepening Epstein intrigue Tuesday only underscored the president's failed attempts to extinguish it. House Speaker Mike Johnson has said he does not plan to allow votes on any measures related to the Epstein matter until September, effectively bringing forward a summer recess to postpone consideration of a bipartisan measure demanding transparency and the release of files on the Epstein case. Meanwhile, the House Oversight Committee is expected to subpoena Maxwell as 'expeditiously as possible,' a committee source told CNN. And CNN's KFile on Tuesday reported new details about Trump's relationship with Epstein, including photos taken at the future president's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples. The pictures pre-date any of Epstein's known legal issues, and the White House described them as out-of-context frame grabs of videos and pictures to 'disgustingly infer something nefarious.' Trump's aim in the Oval Office was clear. He was cooking up a new slate of programing — featuring his favorite targets, including Obama and Hillary Clinton, among others — for the MAGA media machine, hoping to replace days of coverage of his administration's missteps. But there was also a more sinister aspect to his comments. Even though Gabbard's claims are easily disproved, the president implied that he was serious about training the power of the US government on his political foes. 'It's time to start — after what they did to me and — whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people,' Trump said. 'Obama's been caught directly … his orders are on the paper. The papers are signed, the papers came right out of their office.' Obama has not been 'caught directly.' Gabbard's memo, which included newly declassified documents, claimed that the administration hatched a 'treasonous conspiracy' that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to help Trump. Gabbard, who has a political incentive to repair her relationship with the president, highlighted intelligence findings that the Russians did not change election results in 2016 through attacks on voting systems. But the Obama administration never said that this happened, focusing instead of cyberattacks on Democratic campaign officials and other online disruption efforts. Gabbard appears to be arguing that since there was no successful hacking of election machines, there was no election meddling, and that therefore the whole saga was invented by the Obama team to keep Trump out of power. Obama's office rebutted what it called the White House's latest example of 'nonsense and misinformation,' calling it bizarre, ridiculous and 'a weak attempt at distraction.' But in Trump's looking-glass world, that statement was taken as evidence of guilt. 'It's the art of deflection coming from former President Obama, as well as his friends who are still in Congress today,' Gabbard said on Fox News in an interview with the president's daughter-in-law Lara Trump. As he often does, Trump seemed to project offenses of which he was accused, with far more evidence, onto his opponents. 'What they did to this country in 2016 … but going up all the way to 2020 and the election — they tried to rig the election and they got caught,' he said. The president's furious tirade again revealed his frenetic mindset over a situation he repeatedly tries to fix but keeps worsening. The episode started because some MAGA fans are angry that Trump and his team have not lived up to vows to release all Epstein files after promising to do so during the campaign. This means they've become, in the eyes of some base activists, the 'deep state' they once decried. The FBI and Justice Department issued a memo this month saying there was no evidence for a conspiracy theory that Epstein left a list of famous clients or that he was murdered in prison rather than taking his own life in 2019. Trump is deeply frustrated his supporters won't accept this. 'We had the Greatest Six Months of any President in the History of our Country, and all the Fake News wants to talk about is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax!' he wrote on Truth Social, after news channels spent all afternoon showing footage of his latest diatribe. It's impossible for outsiders to know whether the Epstein controversy is the result of a true cover-up or is one of the classic political screw-ups that often make Washington scandals worse. But after blasting supporters who worry about the Epstein case as 'weaklings,' and now going after Obama in his latest attempt at moving the goalposts, it's Trump who is now making it impossible not to ask the question: Why is he so desperate for this to go away? The second arm of the Trump pincer movement to try to put the Epstein saga in the past came from the Justice Department. Only two weeks ago, the FBI and the DOJ declared in their memo that 'we did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.' Yet on Tuesday morning, Blanche announced that he'd test that proposition by visiting Maxwell. 'Justice demands courage,' Blanche wrote on X, insisting that 'no lead is off limits.' In a statement posted by Attorney General Pam Bondi on social media, Blanche added that if Maxwell 'has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' The latest gambit may just be an attempt to create a splash that MAGA activists concerned with the case might accept as transparency. But it is fraught with political and even legal risks for the Justice Department. And like Trump's previous attempts to douse the scandal, it seems already to have failed in its primary objective. 'Seems like a massive cope,' far-right activist Laura Loomer, said in a text to CNN. 'Why didn't they ask to meet with her before the memo was released on 4th of July weekend when they essentially said the case would be closed? Seems like this should have already taken place,' Loomer said. The possibility that the approach to Maxwell is motivated by more than a political public relations exercise must also be considered. She has an incentive to offer the White House what it wants — information that could put the focus of the spotlight on somebody else. 'There is every reason to think she would give false testimony,' Ryan Goodman, a New York University law professor, told CNN's Erin Burnett. 'She has no fear of giving false testimony because otherwise she is going to be spending until she's 75 years old in prison. The only other choice is if she maybe gives the kind of testimony she thinks the White House wants to hear, then she maybe can get off.' The idea that Maxwell is holding something back belies both the recent Justice Department memo and a wide-ranging prosecution against her that started with charges during the first Trump administration and ended in a conviction and a 20-year prison sentence during the Biden administration. An obvious approach for Maxwell's lawyers would be to seek to secure concessions, perhaps a shortening or a commutation of her sentence, in return for information she might provide. Jeremy Saland, a former Manhattan prosecutor, paraphrased what her counsel might request on 'CNN News Central' on Tuesday: 'Get me my out. Give me an opportunity.' Still, if Maxwell did have information implicating others in Epstein's alleged crimes, it's unclear why she did not offer it during her own prosecution, when she might have been able to save herself. Of course, by the time she was found guilty in 2021, Epstein was gone, and the value of testimony she might have been able to provide against him as a cooperating witness was moot. Six years after his death, however, the political implications of the hideous crimes of which he was accused are growing uncontrollably.
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Families of the Idaho students Bryan Kohberger stabbed to death are set to see him sentenced
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A judge is expected to order Bryan Kohberger to serve four life sentences without parole this week for the brutal stabbing deaths of four University of Idaho students nearly three years ago. Wednesday's sentencing hearing will give the families of Xana Kernodle, Madison Mogen, Ethan Chapin and Kaylee Goncalves the opportunity to describe the anguish they've felt since their loved ones were killed in the early morning hours of Nov. 13, 2022. Kohberger was a graduate student at Washington State University when he broke into a nearby rental home through a kitchen sliding door and killed the four friends who appeared to have no connection with him. Police initially had no suspects, and the killings terrified the normally quiet community in the small, western Idaho city of Moscow. Some students at both universities left mid-semester, taking the rest of their classes online because they felt unsafe. But investigators had a few critical clues. A knife sheath left near Mogen's body had a single source of male DNA on the button snap, and surveillance videos showed a white Hyundai Elantra near the rental home around the time of the murders. Police used genetic genealogy to identify Kohberger as a possible suspect, and accessed cellphone data to pinpoint his movements the night of the killings. Online shopping records showed Kohberger had purchased a military-style knife months earlier, along with a sheath like the one at the home. Kohberger was arrested in Pennsylvania about six weeks after the killings. He initially stood silent when asked to enter a plea, so a judge entered a 'not guilty' plea on his behalf. Both the investigation and the court case drew widespread attention. Discussion groups proliferated online, members eagerly sharing their theories and questions about the case. Some self-styled armchair web-sleuths pointed fingers at innocent people simply because they knew the victims or lived in the same town. Misinformation spread, piling additional distress on the already-traumatized community. As the criminal case unfolded, Latah County Prosecutor Bill Thompson announced that he would seek the death penalty if Kohberger was convicted. The court-defense team, led by attorney Anne Taylor, challenged the validity of the DNA evidence, unsuccessfully pushed to get theories about possible 'alternate perpetrators' admitted in court, and repeatedly asked the judge to take the death penalty off of the table. But those efforts largely failed, and the evidence against Kohberger was strong. With an August trial looming, Kohberger reached a plea deal. Prosecutors agreed to drop their efforts to get a death sentence in exchange for Kohberger's guilty plea to four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. Both sides agreed to a proposed sentence of four consecutive life sentences without parole, plus an additional 10 years for the burglary charge. Kohberger also waived his right to appeal any issues in the case.
