logo
Hunting tourism's hidden value: $2.5 billion boost for South Africa's economy and conservation efforts

Hunting tourism's hidden value: $2.5 billion boost for South Africa's economy and conservation efforts

Daily Maverick11 hours ago
A new study shows the local hunting industry's important economic footprint.
South Africa's hunting sector generates about $2.5-billion for the economy annually, creating badly needed jobs while conserving habitat and wildlife, according to the findings of a new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Wildlife Research.
This is a significantly larger sum than previous estimates, underscoring the importance of hunting to a barely growing economy that faces many challenges.
The study's findings come at a time when the hunting industry in Africa is in the cross ­hairs of animal welfare and rights organisations and Western public opinion, with campaigns in the UK and elsewhere to ban the import of trophies from hunts.
Hunting is a hot-button culture issue. Critics maintain that it is a needlessly cruel activity, that its economic and conservation contribution is often inflated by its backers and that it endangers a number of species. This strikes a chord with the educated, middle-class people who tend to spearhead anti-hunting campaigns.
But such views have little traction in Africa outside the urban middle class, and African governments such as Namibia, Botswana and others have lobbied against trophy hunting bans in large part because of the economic benefits hunting brings for their developing economies and the rural communities who must live alongside dangerous wildlife.
There is a growing body of objective, peer-reviewed research in academic journals that highlights hunting's economic and conservation importance. And pointedly, there are no such studies that suggest that properly regulated hunting is driving any species to extinction.
This study is the latest in this vein to objectively assess the economic impact of hunting and its conservation spin-offs. Titled Assessing the Contributions of Hunting Tourism to the South African Economy: A Post-Covid Analysis, it was written by Peet van der Merwe and Andrea Saayman, professors focused on tourism management and economics at North-West University. It does not address the thorny issues of animal welfare or cruelty, which are legitimate concerns beyond its scope, but provides a clinical and dispassionate dollars-and-cents examination of the issue.
The authors used surveys of international and domestic hunters to reach an estimate of their expenditure. They then applied a 'production multiplier', an economic tool that tries to measure the snowball effects of expenditure and investment.
'The result revealed that hunting tourism's total impact on the South African economy is $2.5-billion. Hunting represents a production multiplier of 2.97, indicating that for every $1 spent by hunting tourists, production increases by an additional $1.97,' they write.
'Agriculture, trade, accommodation and personal services are the industry sectors most dependent on hunting tourism.'
The questionnaires for the survey were sent between August 2022 and October 2023, and 414 international and 1,864 domestic hunters completed them. From this sample, the authors used other sources such as Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment data to estimate the total number of hunters from both categories – about 200,000.
'It is evident that the typical local hunter spends approximately $3,594 during a season on hunting. Game hunted by hunters accounted for $2,033. […] Accommodation, transport and meat processing are also significant hunting categories for local hunting tourists,' the authors write.
The total spending of an international hunter was estimated to be $27,170. This includes gear, ammunition, transport, food and beverages, guiding fees and costs related to taxidermy and trophies.
The total expenditure was estimated to reach $888-million, with the production multiplier bringing the total to about $2.5-billion.
The authors noted several broad findings. 'The first finding of the research is that hunting tourism makes a significant economic contribution to the South African economy. […] The findings imply that hunting tourism drives production, household income and employment across various sectors, particularly for the agriculture and services delivery sectors,' they write.
'Any disruption or decline in this activity would significantly impact dependent industries and the economy of the country.'
The second finding 'is that hunting tourism plays an important role in income generation and poverty reduction in South Africa. The implication is that hunting tourism has a high income multiplier, generating substantial income gains for the country's low- and middle-income households.'
The study highlights the role that hunting plays in job creation for low-skilled workers, because it is a labour-intensive sector. 'The reduction of hunting tourism could disproportionately harm these workers, thus exacerbating the unemployment challenges in South Africa,' the authors write.
Another key takeaway is the linkages of hunting to various sectors, including agriculture – South Africa allows private ownership of wildlife, and game farming is big business – as well as trade, accommodation and personal services.
Beyond its economic spoor, the hunting sector has also blazed conservation trails as former farmland has been transformed to wildlife habitat. 'Hunting tourism contributes to the rewilding of previously crop and livestock farming areas as these are replaced with wildlife reserves. Reduction in hunting tourism activities will negatively impact land use for wildlife as landowners will revert back to alternative agricultural activities,' the authors write.
At about R45-billion in local currency, hunting is clearly material to the economy and not far behind the wine industry's estimated contribution to GDP of R56-billion, according to data compiled by Wines of South Africa.
Critics of hunting in South Africa and Africa more widely often insist that it can be replaced with photographic tourism, which also creates jobs and economic value. But many hunting areas are ill-suited to game viewing, defined by a dull landscape, thick bush and the difficulty of providing the amenities that such clients typically demand.
Debates about hunting will continue to rage. Many people simply detest hunting, and unscrupulous operators involved in canned hunting and other questionable practices have done the industry a great deal of harm.
But the tracks of its economic and conservation value are in plain sight. There is a reason South Africa's government and other African governments oppose trophy hunting bans sought by mostly non-Africans up north. DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keeping up with technology
Keeping up with technology

TimesLIVE

time2 hours ago

  • TimesLIVE

Keeping up with technology

In a fast-changing world, it is often difficult for the formal education system to keep up with the needs of society. The skills that are sorely needed today are not necessarily the same as those which were required ten or even five years ago. Technology is streaking ahead of the rest of society and, if we do not keep up, we run the risk of having, in the near future, an educated but unskilled population. In this edition of Skills Development, our focus is on how we can keep up with technological changes and how we can prepare our youth to face the future with confidence. Among many other issues, we look at how government, through the TVET colleges, universities and SETAs, is having to reimagine its role, and how the private sector, through some innovative projects, is trying to fill the gaps. We look at how young people are upskilling each other in South African townships, giving life to the old student slogan, Each One, Teach One. We also look at the rise of technology learning and teaching in townships. More and more, skills are being needed in South Africa's green economy and we ask whether enough is being done to prepare young people for the future of climate resilience. We also look at how entrepreneurs are grabbing the opportunities presented by new technologies to impact positively on society. But it is not only about preparing young people for the digital age; it is also about preparing some of them for tried-and-tested artisanal jobs, the kinds that have been around for ages and which will be around for ages, such as plumbing, welding and mechanics.

The real price of not filing your tax return in South Africa
The real price of not filing your tax return in South Africa

The Star

time3 hours ago

  • The Star

The real price of not filing your tax return in South Africa

Mthobisi Nozulela | Published 8 hours ago The 2025 tax season is in full swing, but many South Africans are still not filing their returns, unaware that this could lead to mounting penalties and legal trouble. The tax season officially began on Monday, July 7 2025, with the South African Revenue Service (SARS) setting deadlines for different categories of taxpayers. According to the revenue collector, individual taxpayers must file their returns by October 20, 2025. Provisional taxpayers, meanwhile, have until January 19, 2026 to submit. "Taxpayers who do not receive notifications from SARS that they are automatically assessed are encouraged to submit their tax returns in a timely and accurate manner from July 21, 2025," SARS said. Failing to file, even when no tax is owed, can lead administrative penalties of up to R250 to R16,000 per month for each return outstanding. "In more severe cases, persistent non-compliance may result in criminal charges, including prosecution for tax evasion. Importantly, SARS uses advanced data-matching systems and international reporting standards to detect undeclared income, so assuming you're not "under the Radar" is a risky gamble," Tax Consulting South Africa said. Tax Consulting South Africa, a firm specialising in South African and international tax law, as well as SARS compliance. "Even if no tax is owed, filing your tax return ensures your tax affairs are in order and protects you from retrospective assessments or penalties. In a country where tax compliance is both a legal requirement and a civic duty, many South Africans still believe that if they don't owe anything, they don't need to file a tax return. "Unfortunately, that assumption could have costly financial and legal consequences. Whether due to oversight, uncertainty, or misinformation, failing to submit your annual return — even when you think there's no tax due — is a risk that can escalate over time. Tax Consulting South Africa also advised those who have not filed for several years to first check which past tax years they were supposed to file for. To fix this, they recommend that taxpayers can work with a tax practitioner to gather all relevant documents and submit the outstanding returns as soon as possible. "To avoid any further incurrence of penalties, it would be advisable to stay vigilant of any notices shared by the commissioner requiring returns for assessments of a normal tax return, within the period prescribed in that notice, per section 66 of the Income Tax Act. As such, ensure that you file your tax returns as and when they become due or on or before the prescribed deadline" IOL News [email protected] Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.

Trump tariffs threaten thousands of Eastern Cape manufacturing jobs — but mitigating action can be taken
Trump tariffs threaten thousands of Eastern Cape manufacturing jobs — but mitigating action can be taken

Daily Maverick

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Trump tariffs threaten thousands of Eastern Cape manufacturing jobs — but mitigating action can be taken

The announcement by US President Donald Trump that South African goods will be subject to 30% import tariffs from 1 August is the latest addition to the clamour of alarm bells about the viability of manufacturing in the Eastern Cape, potentially putting thousands of jobs on the line. The reality is that a number of countries will now have significant cost advantages over South Africa, including countries on this continent, while other countries have the flexibility to absorb the tariffs. In addition, this will strengthen countries with lower tariffs that we did not compete with in the past. And if imports from South Africa are replaced with products made by new US manufacturers, there will be an oversupply of these products in the global marketplace. Analysis by the Nelson Mandela Bay (NMB) Business Chamber indicates that thousands of direct and indirect jobs in manufacturing in the Eastern Cape are at risk from the impacts of the new US tariffs. This is in terms of reduced competitiveness and economies of scale of SA manufacturing against more favourable locations worldwide, as well as the knock-on effects on other trading relationships and the responses of other countries in an escalating global tariff war. Such job losses will have a vast socioeconomic impact, given that each employed breadwinner supports an estimated 10 other people in extended families and communities. Alarm bells over the loss of manufacturing capacity and employment in NMB have been ringing for some time, as evidenced by the downsizing of operations and outright plant closures. This has been particularly evident in the tyre industry, where over the past few years we have seen Bridgestone and ContiTech closing factories, while Goodyear is restructuring its operations, which may result in the closure of its plant in Kariega. Over recent years, we have also seen the restructuring and, in some instances, the closures of catalytic converter and seat manufacturing companies. Automotive sector faces crisis On the vehicle manufacturing side, General Motors left South Africa at the end of 2016, resulting in the Chevrolet brand leaving the market and job losses at the company, suppliers and dealers. Alongside this, vital community support initiatives in the education and housing areas disappeared. Mercedes-Benz, which exports vehicles to the US, has suspended production at its operations for six weeks until the end of this month. This follows a restructuring last year that saw the plant shed 700 jobs. The NMB Business Chamber's Enabling Environment Barometer indicates that more direct and indirect jobs are at risk, while several manufacturers have imposed hiring freezes. Deindustrialisation is not in itself the issue. The shift from heavy industry and manufacturing to the services sector and high-tech, innovation-oriented businesses is a natural progression in advanced, maturing economies, especially where services are exported, which is not necessarily the case in South Africa. The country is in line with global trends in developed economies of a declining contribution of manufacturing to GDP and employment. However, in our developing economy with rising unacceptably high levels of unemployment (the Eastern Cape has the second-highest unemployment rate in SA, which recently rose by 2.7 percentage points to 39.3%), this is not a sign of positive economic progress; it is a trend that urgently needs to be reversed. Deindustrialisation in South Africa stems from a weakening economy characterised by increasing costs of production and doing business, inefficiencies in logistics and infrastructure, and a lack of basic service delivery. The enabling policy environment is also lagging in incentives to support local manufacturing in general, and particularly the shift to new energy vehicle technologies and e-mobility solutions, all of which are exacerbated by the US tariffs and their knock-on effects. Multinationals can move production between facilities around the globe, which gives them the most competitive base from which to operate. This becomes a barometer — the greater the number of multinationals closing or downsizing, the bigger the systemic problems in a region. Why Nelson Mandela Bay and the Eastern Cape can't afford to fail The economy of Nelson Mandela Bay and the Eastern Cape is in a vulnerable position, as the region remains centred on manufacturing, with the automotive sector the foundation of deep value chains and a surrounding ecosystem of component manufacturing, logistics providers and suppliers of indirect goods and services. The strength of the automotive sector and its investment in innovation and technology, and the skills associated with it, bring immense value to the area. Alongside this, manufacturing in other sectors, such as beverages, pharmaceuticals and agro-processing, has emerged in NMB. Given the economic knock-on impact of manufacturing, the sector's contribution to the Nelson Mandela Bay economy is probably far greater than its direct contribution of 25%. Similarly, the approximately 64,000 jobs in the metro directly linked to the automotive sector, representing more than 40% of auto manufacturing employment in South Africa, have an estimated multiplier effect of four additional jobs in direct supply chains and sectors such as retail, tourism and property. The SA automotive industry is highly export-oriented, with almost two-thirds of local vehicle production destined for export markets and more than 50% of that emanating from Eastern Cape manufacturers. South African manufacturers need to retain these levels of exports to maintain the economies of scale that enable competitiveness, which in turn supports local vehicle manufacturing and employment. However, manufacturers that do completely knocked down (CKD) vehicle manufacturing, where the entire vehicle is assembled from imported or locally made parts, are losing ground to the rapid rise of cheap fully assembled vehicles and the semi-knocked-down (SKD) assembly of vehicles that are imported partly assembled. Sales of locally built vehicles have declined from 46% of domestic vehicle sales in 2018 to 37% last year, and five of the 10 top-selling passenger cars in the local market are now from brands that do not do CKD assembly in South Africa. Due to its deep value chains and interconnectedness with component manufacturers, and the surrounding network of local suppliers of goods and services, as well as the ripple effect into other sectors, CKD manufacturing supports far greater levels of investment, employment and localisation of manufacturing than does SKD assembly. Policy reform While addressing the issues of ineffective service delivery, crumbling infrastructure, logistics bottlenecks and safety and security are critical to ensuring an enabling environment for business, the other key to reversing deindustrialisation lies in reforming the policy landscape. Attempting to protect local manufacturing through retaliatory tariffs is not the solution, as this is likely to result in further rounds of counter-tariffs and impacts on South Africa's trade relationships with the US and other countries — an unproductive approach with few likely positive outcomes. Rather than using tariffs to eliminate external competition, South Africa needs to be looking at how to support and strengthen local manufacturing through incentives that encourage investment in CKD over SKD manufacturing, localisation of components, and give local operations a competitive advantage over other locations within a multinational brand. Moreover, we need to reduce complexity and make it as easy as possible to retain and attract investment to our country. Incentives should be structured to attract and encourage new investment without imposing massive bureaucratic challenges. Alongside efforts to improve SA's trade offer to the US, we need to explore and strengthen other trading partnerships, particularly with BRICS countries, the European Union and Southeast Asia, to diversify our markets. We should be driving towards finalising the rules of origin for vehicles to activate the potential under the African Continental Free Trade Area agreement. Exports to BRICS markets currently generally comprise unbeneficiated raw materials and agricultural products. SA's exports to the European Union and the US represent greater diversity and integration, and more opportunities for job creation that are backed and supported by trade agreements. SA needs to be a source of high-margin value-added products and beneficiated minerals, not a source of low-margin minerals. We must do everything possible to retain and strengthen our manufacturing capabilities so that we can create and unlock downstream employment opportunities. Manufacturing is the bedrock of the Nelson Mandela Bay and Eastern Cape economy. The economic future of this region depends on strategic action to ensure that we offer a competitive value proposition for manufacturing, in terms of the basic enabling environment and forward-thinking policy. Our business community wants this to happen and is not simply whining about the issues; rather, we will continue to roll up our sleeves to take action and be part of the solution to retain investment and employment in NMB. The chamber remains positive that we can realise the potential of the Bay of Opportunity as a diversified manufacturing and export hub for Africa, if we start now. This requires a multi-stakeholder response centred on speed and taking action. DM

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store