Windsor, Ont., police chief made racist comments, internal investigation finds
An internal investigation into allegations the police chief of Windsor, Ont., made racist remarks to a Black officer has found the claims to be true, CBC News has learned.
"The investigation has substantiated that Chief Jason Bellaire made comment(s) that constitute a breach of WPS Directive(s)," according to an internal summary of the investigation.
CBC News obtained, and verified, the confidential document that summarized the outcome of a complaint filed by Ed Armstrong, the service's first Black inspector. The summary didn't outline which specific allegations were substantiated.
The summary states "the investigator found that the comment(s) were made in what [Bellaire] believed to be a 'safe space' based on his existing relationship with [Armstrong] and do not amount to a poisoned work environment."
When asked in an email to confirm whether the allegations against Bellaire were substantiated, Windsor police's corporate communications director, Gary Francoeur, said, "The information in your message is not entirely accurate.
"However, as the matter is still before the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (HRTO), we cannot comment further at this time," he said.
Francoeur refused to clarify what he meant by "not entirely accurate."
Human rights report filed last year
CBC News reached out to both Armstrong and Bellaire and did not receive a response by publication time.
Armstrong filed the HRTO complaint last year, saying Bellaire made several racist remarks to him at work.
In those HRTO documents, Armstrong indicated he filed the same complaint internally. That process concluded in January, while the human rights dispute is ongoing.
Armstrong said Bellaire asked him to use his "Black magic" to ease criticism from a local university professor and referred to her as a "Black radical."
He also stated Bellaire suggested there is telepathic communication among Black people and said he preferred "whiter" things.
Armstrong said that in a separate instance, Bellaire mentioned needing a "Black friend" to accompany him to certain events.
In a statement to CBC News last month, Windsor Police Association president Kent Rice said he's "genuinely concerned about how minority members feel coming into a work environment where the chief has been found to make discriminatory remarks."
"This raises serious questions about the culture of the workplace and the message it sends to those who already face challenges based on their identity," he added.
Rice also rejected the investigator's findings that Bellaire believed it was a "safe space" when the racist remarks were made.
"[It's] not only deeply offensive, but it also completely disregards the principles of decency and professionalism that are expected of any leader within an organization," Rice said.
The investigation was completed in January. On Feb. 5, Bellaire announced he will be retiring in November — halfway through his five-year contract.
Bellaire didn't provide a reason for his early retirement.
The investigation also "substantiated" offensive comments made toward the Indigenous community by Insp. Jill Lawrence, although it didn't specify what those were.
The Windsor Police Service declined to comment on that matter, citing the human rights tribunal proceedings.
Consequences for police chief remain unknown
The summary of the third-party investigation said the Windsor Police Service Board "will be taking appropriate action to address breaches."
However, the board wouldn't specify what sort of consequences, if any, Bellaire would face for his actions.
"The Windsor Police Service Board will make no comment on personnel matters regarding a specific employee," said Norma Coleman, administrative director for the board.
Windsor police board chair Drew Dilkens comments on allegations against police chief Jason Bellaire
7 months ago
Duration 1:26
In August, Windsor Mayor Drew Dilkens, who stepped aside as police board chair last month, told CBC News he wanted to wait for an investigation into the allegations to finish "to understand what is true, what is fact from the fiction."
"At the end of the day, I don't get too fussed about these types of things until they've gone through a judicial or quasi-judicial process like this one will, and when we get to the end we'll be in a much better position to have an intelligent conversation on the topic."
Dilkens has not responded to CBC's request for a comment about the findings of the internal investigation.
The police association is seeking accountability from the board.
"What I do find troubling is that the police services board has been aware of this issue for several weeks and has yet to address it, either with my membership or the public. This lack of transparency and action is deeply concerning," Rice said.
The police service did not respond to CBC's request for a comment on why Bellaire is retiring early.
Armstrong's human rights complaint was filed on March 15, 2024, roughly a month after Armstrong pleaded guilty under the Police Services Act for making inappropriate comments to female employees dating back to 2005. Armstrong was demoted for one year to staff sergeant and will automatically regain his rank of inspector after that time.
Armstrong said in the HRTO application that prior to that, he hadn't received any complaints against him in his 25-year career.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
22 minutes ago
- CTV News
Tennessee inmate says he hurt badly during lethal injection without deactivating defibrillator
This undated booking photo provided by the Tennessee Department of Corrections shows Byron Black. (Tennessee Department of Corrections via AP, File) NASHVILLE, Tenn. - An inmate executed by Tennessee without deactivating his implanted defibrillator said he was hurting badly shortly after the lethal injection began, according to several witnesses. Byron Black was put to death despite uncertainty about whether the device would shock his heart when the lethal chemicals took effect. His attorney said they will review data kept by the device as part of an autopsy. Black died at 10:43 a.m., prison officials said. It was about 10 minutes after the execution started and Black talked about being in pain. Black looked around the room as the execution started and could be heard sighing and breathing heavily. All seven media witnesses to the execution agreed he appeared to be in discomfort. Black was executed after a back-and-forth in court over whether officials would need to turn off his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or ICD. Black, 69, was in a wheelchair, suffering from dementia, brain damage, kidney failure, congestive heart failure and other conditions, his attorneys have said. The nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center said it's unaware of any other cases in which an inmate was making similar claims to Black's about ICDs or pacemakers. Black's attorneys said they haven't found a comparable case, either. Black killed his girlfriend and her 2 daughters Black was convicted in the 1988 shooting deaths of his girlfriend Angela Clay, 29, and her two daughters, Latoya Clay, 9, and Lakeisha Clay, 6. Prosecutors said he was in a jealous rage when he shot the three at their home. At the time, Black was on work-release while serving time for shooting Clay's estranged husband. Clay's sister said Black will now have to take up what he did with a higher power. 'His family is now going through the same thing we went through 37 years ago. I can't say I'm sorry because we never got an apology,' Linette Bell, Angela Clay's sister, said in a statement read by a victim's advocate after the execution. Black's lawyer said the execution was shameful. 'Today, the state of Tennessee killed a gentle, kind, fragile, intellectually disabled man in a violation of the laws of our country simply because they could,' attorney Kelley Henry said. The legal fight over Black's defibrillator In mid-July, a trial court judge agreed with Black's attorneys that officials must have the defibrillator deactivated to avert the risk that it could cause unnecessary pain and prolong the execution. But the state Supreme Court intervened Thursday to overturn that decision, saying the other judge lacked authority to order the change. The state disputed that the lethal injection would cause Black's defibrillator to shock him and said he wouldn't feel them regardless. Henry said Black's defense team will carefully review autopsy results, EKG data from Black and information from the defibrillator to determine what exactly happened during the execution. She said she was especially concerned about his head movement and complaints of pain because the massive dose of pentobarbital used to kill inmates is supposed to rapidly leave them unconscious. 'The fact that he was able to raise his head several times and express pain tells you that the pentobarbital was not acting the way the state's experts claim it acts,' Henry said. Prison officials did not comment on witnesses and Black's attorney saying he appeared conscious or his complaints of pain. It was Tennessee's second execution since May, after a pause for five years, first because of COVID-19 and then because of missteps by state corrections officials. Twenty-eight men have died by court-ordered execution so far this year in the U.S., and eight other people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. The number of executions this year exceeds the 25 carried out last year and in 2018. It is the highest total since 2015, when 28 people were put to death. Black's condition Black had an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, which is a small, battery-powered electronic device that is surgically implanted in the chest. It served as a pacemaker and an emergency defibrillator. Black's attorneys have stated that to ensure it's off, a doctor must place a programming device over the implant site, sending it a deactivation command, with no surgery required. The legal case also spurred a reminder that most medical professionals consider participation in executions a violation of health care ethics. Intellectual disability claim In recent years, Black's legal team has unsuccessfully tried to get a new hearing over whether he is intellectually disabled and ineligible for the death penalty under U.S. Supreme Court precedent. His attorneys have said that if they had delayed a prior attempt to seek his intellectual disability claim, he would have been spared under a 2021 state law. Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk contended in 2022 that Black is intellectually disabled and deserved a hearing under that 2021 law, but the judge denied it. That is because the 2021 law denies a hearing to people on death row who have already filed a similar request and a court has ruled on it 'on the merits.' In Funk's attempt, he focused on input from an expert for the state in 2004 who determined back then that Black didn't meet the criteria for what was then called 'mental retardation.' But she concluded that Black met the new law's criteria for a diagnosis of intellectual disability. Black also sought a determination by the courts that he was incompetent to be executed. By Jonathan Mattise. Jeffrey Collins in Columbia, South Carolina, contributed to this story.
Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
Tennessee executes inmate by lethal injection without deactivating his implanted defibrillator
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Tennessee executed an inmate Tuesday without deactivating his implanted defibrillator, despite uncertainty about whether the device would shock his heart when the lethal chemicals took effect. Byron Black was executed after a back-and-forth in court over whether officials would need to turn off his implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, or ICD. Black, 69, was in a wheelchair, suffering from dementia, brain damage, kidney failure, congestive heart failure and other conditions, his attorneys have said.
Winnipeg Free Press
14 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Tennessee readies for execution of man with working implanted defibrillator
NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — Tennessee is gearing up for an execution on Tuesday that experts say would likely mark the first time a man has been put to death with a working defibrillator in his chest. Gov. Bill Lee declined Monday to grant a reprieve, clearing the way for Byron Black's execution after a legal battle and ongoing uncertainty about whether the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator will shock his heart when the lethal drug takes effect. The nonprofit Death Penalty Information Center said it's unaware of any other cases in which a person on death row made similar claims to Black's about defibrillators or pacemakers. Black's attorneys said they haven't found a comparable case, either. Lee said the courts have 'universally determined that it is lawful to carry out the jury's sentence of execution given to Mr. Black for the heinous murders of Angela Clay and her daughters Lakeisha, age 6, and Latoya, age 9.' The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Black's appeals. The execution would be Tennessee's second since May, after a pause for five years, first because of COVID-19 and then because of missteps by state corrections officials. Twenty-seven men have died by court-ordered execution so far this year in the U.S., and nine other people are scheduled to be put to death in seven states during the remainder of 2025. The number of executions this year exceeds the 25 carried out last year and in 2018. It is the highest total since 2015, when 28 people were put to death. Black's condition Black, 69, is in a wheelchair, and he has dementia, brain damage, kidney failure, congestive heart failure and other conditions, his attorneys have said. The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator he has is a small, battery-powered electronic device that is surgically implanted in the chest. It serves as a pacemaker and an emergency defibrillator. Black's attorneys say in order to be sure it's off, a doctor must place a programming device over the implant site, sending it a deactivation command, with no surgery required. In mid-July, a trial court judge agreed with Black's attorneys that officials must have his device deactivated to avert the risk that it could cause unnecessary pain and prolong the execution. But the state Supreme Court intervened July 31 to overturn that decision, saying the other judge lacked the authority to order the change. The state has disputed that the lethal injection would cause Black's defibrillator to shock him. Even if shocks were triggered, Black wouldn't feel them, the state said. Black's attorneys have countered that even if the lethal drug being used, pentobarbital, renders someone unresponsive, they aren't necessarily unaware or unable to feel pain. Kelley Henry, Black's attorney, said the execution could become a 'grotesque spectacle.' The legal case also spurred a reminder that most medical professionals consider participation in executions a violation of health care ethics. Black's case Black was convicted in the 1988 shooting deaths of his girlfriend Angela Clay, 29, and her two daughters. Prosecutors said he was in a jealous rage when he shot the three at their home. At the time, Black was on work-release while serving time for shooting Clay's estranged husband. Linette Bell, whose sister and two nieces were killed, recently told WKRN-TV: 'He didn't have mercy on them, so why should we have mercy on him?' Intellectual disability claim Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. In recent years, Black's legal team has unsuccessfully tried to get a new hearing over whether he is intellectually disabled and ineligible for the death penalty under U.S. Supreme Court precedent. His attorneys have said that if they had delayed a prior attempt to seek his intellectual disability claim, he would have been spared under a 2021 state law. Nashville District Attorney Glenn Funk contended in 2022 that Black is intellectually disabled and deserved a hearing under that 2021 law, but the judge denied it. That is because the 2021 law denies a hearing to people on death row who have already filed a similar request and a court has ruled on it 'on the merits.' In Funk's attempt, he focused on input from an expert for the state in 2004 who determined back then that Black didn't meet the criteria for what was then called 'mental retardation.' But she concluded that Black met the new law's criteria for a diagnosis of intellectual disability. Black also sought a determination by the courts that he is incompetent to be executed.
