logo
Fresh hope for thousands of households suffering with extreme service charges planned by government law change

Fresh hope for thousands of households suffering with extreme service charges planned by government law change

The Sun16 hours ago
THOUSANDS of households will be able to challenge extortionate leasehold service charges more easily, the government has said.
Households who live in leasehold properties pay fees to the person who owns the building or their managing agents for services including building insurance and maintenance.
These service charges can include repairs and maintenance for things such as the roof, windows, drains and gutters.
The payments are usually due twice a year and the exact amount can vary depending on the costs the landlord incurs.
This can mean that they can be hit with surprise bills that can often run into thousands of pounds.
Almost five million homeowners pay service fees, which have risen by 11% in the last year to an average of £2,300 a month, according to Hamptons.
Leaseholders have been promised that the system will change by several governments and Labour when it was in opposition.
The government is hoping to tackle this problem by forcing companies to be transparent about the fees they are charging, Sky News reports.
The reforms will be introduced after a consultation, the government said.
Leaseholders will receive standardised service charge documentation that will explain clearly and in detail how the fees are calculated and where their money is being spent.
Other reforms will stop leaseholders from automatically having to pay for a landlord's legal costs even if they have won their case.
The changes will allow homeowners to challenge unreasonable service charges more easily, housing minister Matthew Pennycook said.
He added that the changes will put pressure on managing agents to reduce the fees.
It will also introduce a strict new qualification system for managing agents to try and improve standards in the sector.
Mr Pennycook told Sky News: "The system has some inherent inequities in it that do allow leaseholders to be gouged and particularly when it comes to managing agents there are unscrupulous people out there.
"They are abusing leaseholders and there's poor practice.
How do service charges work?
Service charges are fees paid by a leaseholder or resident and are set by the landlord.
The amount varies every year depending on costs to the landlord.
The details are usually set out in your lease.
Landlords usually calculate the fee based on what they think they will spend.
At the end of the year they should provide a statement.
Some leases allow landlords to ask for contributions towards a "sinking fund" which is a reserve that can be built up for larger scale works.
These could include repairing the roof of the building or fixing issues with the foundations.
"The reforms we are announcing today and reforms that are to come are going to bear down managing agents and ensure the sector as a whole is properly regulated."
Unfair charges
Some leaseholders have said that they have been charged unfair fees.
Judges have made some landlords pay back up to £100,000 after the leaseholders took them to tribunal.
In one example, the leaseholders were charged £135 to change two lightbulbs.
In February 2023, it was revealed that landlords and insurance brokers were taking up to 60% of the £1.6billion leaseholders paid for building insurance as hidden commissions.
New rules now stop insurance companies from choosing policies just to earn the highest commission.
But brokers and managing agents are still allowed to take commissions.
The government has previously promised to ban excessive building insurance commissions through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024.
Instead, landlords will only be able to charge a straightforward and fair "permitted insurance fee" for the work they actually do, making costs clearer and protecting leaseholders from hidden charges.
However, these proposed laws still need further legislation to come into effect, and the government hasn't yet provided a timetable for this.
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing previously sold The Sun that "far too many leaseholders" are being hit with "unreasonable and extortionate charges".
New rules planned by the government also plan to introduce commonhold agreements to replace leasehold ones.
Commonhold allows flat owners to jointly own and manage their buildings, which cuts out landlords and property management companies.
But the proposed rules only apply to new homes.
How to challenge fees
Leaseholders have the right to request extra information from their landlord within six months of receiving a summary of costs.
You can challenge a cost if you think it's unreasonable, the standard of work is poor or you don't think you should have to pay it.
For example, you could question why you need to pay for lift maintenance if you live in a ground-floor flat and it's not included in your lease.
Or you can challenge for communal services, such as a garden that is always closed or a concierge that never has any staff.
To challenge these services you need to apply to a tribunal which has the power to rule on whether the service charge is reasonable or payable.
In England this is the first-tier tribunal (property chamber).
In Wales it's the leasehold valuation tribunal.
Applying to the tribunal usually costs a fixed fee of £114, but you may be able to waive it if you have certain benefits.
If your case is transferred from court to the tribunal, you'll only pay the difference between the court fees and the tribunal fee - or nothing if you've already paid more than £114 in court fees.
If a hearing is scheduled, you'll need to pay an additional £227 hearing fee.
Speak to the Leasehold Advisory Service online at lease-advice.org or call them on 020 7832 2500 to find out more and get free advice on service charge issues.
You could also apply to the Housing Ombudsman if you want to complain about how your service charge fees have been managed.
The Ombudsman said cases have jumped by 25 per cent in the last four years.
.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes
Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes

Daily Mail​

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Domesday Book village is up in arms as new owner of £585,000 historic cottage applies to bulldoze it in favour of 'modern, bland new-build' homes

Villagers are up in arms after the new owner of a £585,000 historic cottage applied to bulldoze it to make way for new-build homes. Eric Abbott has also hit out at new owners of the property he lived in for more than 60 years after claiming they only sold it on the condition that it would be lived in by a family. Almost a thousand people have now signed a petition to stop the development in Swanmore, Hampshire, and 200 objections were written during the public consultation period for the plans. New owner Simon Smith has submitted an application to Winchester City Council to demolish the house and build two two-storey modern houses with four bedrooms each, parking for three cars and gardens. Neighbours think that the new build won't fit in well with the character of the village, and will cause traffic problems on an already busy street which is around the corner from a primary school. Houses on the street cost an average of £800,000, and some buildings in Swanmore - which is mentioned in the Domesday Book - date back to the 16th or early 17th centuries. Villagers received flyers about the petition against the redevelopment, which has 931 signatures, through their letterboxes. The flyers said that the cottage, known as Hiawatha, is being 'flattened' and replaced with 'two modern, bland new-builds'. Former company director Mr Abbott, 94, raised his family in the property with his wife Peggy. It was sold after being put on the market last year for £585,000. In an objection he wrote against the planning application, Mr Abbott said: 'As the previous owner of Hiawatha I was totally dismayed to see the change of heart of the new owners attempting to destroy Hiawatha and replace with totally unsuitable houses. 'I instructed the estate agent to ensure my wonderful house was only sold to a family who would love it like I did and not destroy it. 'The estate agent assured me that he had made this clear to the new owners and that they had agreed it to be their forever home which is all I ever wanted for another family to love it like I had for the last 64 years. 'It seems they lied and were buying Hiawatha for financial gain. 'I had been offered to sell to many builders and I declined as this house is part of history, it was there before Chapel Road was even made. 'I would never have sold it had I known this was their intention and they knew that. 'There is an ancient well that in the deeds demands that it should be operable for future water shortages in the village and this was a legal requirement. 'I believe Hiawatha was built in the 15th century it is a beautiful flint cottage which should not be replaced with two identical new builds. 'I feel it should remain standing and let the slow worms, birds, bats and many other species carry on living as they have been for many years. 'I strongly object and do hope that this does not go ahead it would be a great shame to the wonderful village of Swanmore.' David Hughes, 63, lives nearby and hopes he's not a 'nimby' for wanting the house to keep its character. The scientist said: 'I put in [an objection] saying I wasn't very keen on it, hopefully not from a nimby point of view. 'If we're not careful, we'll have a lot of new houses here. 'It's an unusual-looking house, it breaks up some of the monotony of the architecture.' The villager admitted that he was surprised 'how many other people were that bothered about it'. Swanmore local John Allen thinks that the council like the idea of the demolition because replacing the house with two houses will bring in more council tax. The 79 year old retiree said: 'The council like it, wouldn't it, more council tax, more money, that sort of thing.' Paraphrasing film producer Samuel Goldwyn in reference to Mr Abbott's agreement with the new owners, he said 'a verbal agreement isn't worth the paper it's written on'. 'He should've got it done legally,' he said. A middle-aged female neighbour who wanted to remain anonymous said she had signed the petition against the redevelopment. She said: 'I don't think it's the prettiest building in the village, but my main concern for it is if they put two properties in it. 'The road is already abused enough with traffic, I know there's three bedrooms [in each house].' 'As we all know, if you've got three teenagers moved in all of a sudden you haven't got enough parking.' An elderly female neighbour who also didn't want to be named said that it's 'bad' that the new owners didn't honour the agreement not to demolish the house. 'That's pretty poor, actually, I think,' she said. 'I mean, they knew what they were going to be doing with it - that doesn't seem very honest.' Ash Bennett, Mr Abbott's former neighbour, a 54 year old air traffic controller said: 'I've lived here 18, 19 years. 'I was aware when they sold the house, I didn't know until more recently about what was going to happen to it. 'I didn't follow it closely, but my understanding was that there was an agreement it wasn't going to be knocked down and developed, it would be renovated which isn't what they wanted to do. 'Personally speaking, I would rather they wouldn't knock it down.' The father of three added that the house needs 'a lot of work'. He said: 'I went in it 18 years ago, nothing much has been done to it since. 'My understanding is it would require a lot of work to it.' On the planning application, Historic England said that there is no evidence to indicate that the building predates the 19th century - it is believed to have been built between 1840 and 1868. It said: 'The building does not illustrate an important aspect of the nation's history, nor does it have the historic associations with nationally important individuals, groups, or events, which might give it historic special interest.' A decision is due to be made about the planning application on July 18.

'Just ignore Farage': Boris Johnson tells Tories how to counter the rise of Reform - as calls grow for former PM to lead the Conservatives once again
'Just ignore Farage': Boris Johnson tells Tories how to counter the rise of Reform - as calls grow for former PM to lead the Conservatives once again

Daily Mail​

time38 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

'Just ignore Farage': Boris Johnson tells Tories how to counter the rise of Reform - as calls grow for former PM to lead the Conservatives once again

Boris Johnson has suggested that the best way for the Conservative Party to tackle the rise of Reform is to simply ignore them. The former prime minister, who led the Tories when the Brexit Party, now known as Reform, was polling at 'zero per cent,' believes that attacking them head-on is a waste of energy. Speaking about his time leading the Conservative Party, Mr Johnson pointed out that Reform's popularity in the polls was practically non-existent when he was in charge. He said that his approach was clear: 'My strategy with the individuals that you mention is don't talk about them.' He added: 'I think Conservatives need to focus on the economy and making life better for people and giving people opportunity. 'I think if we concentrate on the economy we mount full spectrum warfare on all the things that Starmer is doing wrong, we will win.' His advice comes after Reform's rise in the polls, with the party making a significant impact in the May local elections. Meanwhile, some Tory MPs have been calling for the former prime minister to make a dramatic return to the Commons, hoping he can evive the ailing Conservative Party. The former prime minister, who led the Tories when the Brexit Party, now known as Reform, was polling at 'zero per cent,' believes that attacking them head-on is a waste of energy Meanwhile, some Tory MPs have been calling for the former prime minister to make a dramatic return to the Commons, hoping he can evive the ailing Conservative Party Reform gained control of seven local authorities and became the largest party in three more, a stunning sweep that left Conservative strongholds in tatters. His remarks come amid growing concern in Conservative ranks about the threat from Reform, which has seen increasing support, particularly since the last general election. While the Tories lost a staggering 252 seats and only managed a 23.2 per cent vote share, Reform surged to secure five seats with 14.3 per cent of the vote. In recent months, both Sir Keir Starmer and Tory leader Kemi Badenoch have come under fire for spending too much time attacking Reform. Mrs. Badenoch, in a March interview with The Telegraph, dismissed Nigel Farage as a 'reality TV star,' suggesting that government should not be about drama. But Farage fired back, saying it was a good thing people knew who he was, comparing his TV background to Donald Trump's unconventional political rise. In May, the Prime Minister escalated his rhetoric, attacking Reform directly and calling them his main political rival. Yet, his attempt to discredit the party has only backfired. Last month, he echoed Reform's tough stance on immigration, warning that Britain could become an 'island of strangers.' His words sparked outrage among Labour MPs, and he was forced to walk back the comment, admitting regret. In May this year, Mr Johnson's allies were reportedly trying to convince him to make a bombshell return. Mrs Badenoch attempted to play down the prospect of a political return by Mr Johnson in a TV interview this morning, telling GB News: 'So, I love Boris. 'He sends me lots of messages, gives me lots of advice, like Iain Duncan Smith, like David Cameron. 'I have great people who have been in this situation before, who dealt with difficult times. So it's up to him what he wants to do. 'I have to focus on my job, which is making sure that Keir Starmer does not do more than the damage he's doing right now. 'We have to get him out in four years time, otherwise there's not going to be a country left I'm afraid.'

Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes
Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes

Leader Live

timean hour ago

  • Leader Live

Reeves says welfare fallout ‘damaging' and declines to rule out tax hikes

The Chancellor warned there would be 'costs to what happened', as she faced questions about how she would cover a shortfall left by the Downing Street climbdown on planned cuts to disability benefits. The Government saw off the threat of a major Commons defeat over the legislation on Tuesday, after shelving plans to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) in the face of a backbench revolt. The original welfare proposals had been part of a package that ministers expected would save up to £5 billion a year, with economists warning that tax rises are now likely to plug a gap left by the concessions to rebels. The fallout threatens to cause lasting damage to morale in Labour ranks, with some MPs calling for a reset in relations between the parliamentary party and the leadership before fractures widen. Images of the Chancellor crying in the Commons on Wednesday also spooked the financial markets and led to questions about her future, though a Treasury spokesman said the tears were the result of a personal matter and Downing Street said she would remain in post. In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Ms Reeves said she had never considered resigning, adding: 'I didn't work that hard to then quit.' She said she had gone to Prime Minister's Questions because she 'thought that was the right thing to do' but that 'in retrospect, I probably wished I hadn't gone in… (on) a tough day in the office'. Ms Reeves added: 'It's been damaging. 'I'm not going to deny that, but I think where we are now, with a review led by (disability minister) Stephen Timms, who is obviously incredibly respected and has a huge amount of experience, that's the route we're taking now.' Asked whether she would rule out tax rises now, she said to do so would be 'irresponsible' but warned 'there are costs to what happened' with the welfare Reeves is said to have already told ministers that the decision to water down the welfare package means taxes will rise in the autumn. The Times reported she had warned Cabinet on Tuesday that the increases in her first budget, which included a £24 billion hike to employer national insurance, were 'painful' but 'the low-hanging fruit'. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the Government is still committed to welfare reform, but ministers will now wait for the conclusions of the Timms review before implementing changes to Pip.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store