logo
Elizabeth Warren pushes back on plan to get private equity into 401(k)s

Elizabeth Warren pushes back on plan to get private equity into 401(k)s

CNNa day ago
A typical 401(k) plan only offers stock and bond funds that invest in publicly traded companies. But private companies — traditionally the domain of institutional and high-net-worth investors — have become a significant part of the overall investing market. Do they belong as an option in workplace retirement plans, given that they are often more expensive and less transparent than publicly traded securities?
It's a question that's been getting a lot of attention as the private investment industry and others seek to 'democratize' access to such investments. And it's an issue receiving pushback from some lawmakers and consumer advocates, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Banking Committee.
Most recently, Warren sent a letter and a series of questions to Empower, one of the largest workplace retirement plan recordkeepers, probing its recently announced decision to offer plan sponsors the choice of including private equity as an investment option for their employees.
In its response to Warren earlier this week, Empower — which serves roughly 90,000 corporate, government and nonprofit employers — likened the desire to give people access to private markets to the creation of 401(k)s decades ago. 'The 401(k) democratized access to the public markets in unprecedented fashion and without it, many people would have no access to investing,' Empower CEO Ed Murphy wrote. 'Today, we are facing a similar moment.'
Murphy, noting that there are far fewer publicly traded companies today than 30 years ago, cited the growth in capital going towards private companies and the estimated $13 trillion in assets in the global private equity market. 'This structural shift means fewer opportunities for everyday investors saving in defined contribution plans — especially those seeking exposure to innovative or fast-growing companies.'
He also stressed that the new investment option it would offer would have guardrails. 'Private markets investing is not for everyone and Empower is not suggesting that it is. Empower is not advocating for unregulated or unmanaged access to complex asset classes. … It's a carefully monitored gateway.'
Among the guardrails Murphy said would be in place: '(T)he investment manager advising to these investments in accordance with the participant's financial goals and risk tolerance, are selected by the plan sponsor and must be subject to ERISA's high standards and adhere to those standards.'
More specifically, Empower told CNN in an email that only participants with managed accounts will have access. (A managed account is run by an investment professional who will, among other things, manage your investments within your workplace plan in keeping with your goals, risk tolerance and time horizon.)
And, the company added, the private investments would only be a portion of a larger collective investment trust that a person could select. The other portions of the CIT would be in public securities.
'We believe that professionally managed solutions are the best way to offer private assets, as they offer an additional layer of analysis and fiduciary protection,' the company said.
In her reply to Murphy's letter, released Saturday, Warren said she shares his stated goal of helping everyone, regardless of income or net worth, to ''build lasting financial security through well-designed, responsibly managed investment opportunities.''
But, she wrote, 'Your response did not meaningfully address how you would shield plan participants, and our financial system, from the structural risks inherent in private markets. Ultimately, you did not explain why providing retirees with the option to invest their hard-earned life-savings in risky, expensive private markets benefits anyone other than private funds.'
Nor, Warren said, did the company offer 'details about your partnerships with private firms, your fees, and your incentive structures.'
Warren ended her letter by asking Empower to address her specific questions by Friday, July 25, 2025.
So … to be continued.
In the meantime, the Office of the Investor Advocate at the Securities and Exchange Commission said that in fiscal year 2026 it plans to explore issues 'surrounding the inclusion of alternative investments, such as private equity and private credit, in retirement savings plans and their implications for retail investors.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Humphrey Yang Reveals How He Would Invest $1,000 If He Had To Start All Over
Humphrey Yang Reveals How He Would Invest $1,000 If He Had To Start All Over

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Humphrey Yang Reveals How He Would Invest $1,000 If He Had To Start All Over

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Financial guru Humphrey Yang has been answering people's personal finance questions for several years, and he recently entertained what he would do if he had to start all over again with $1,000. Yang's insights aren't specific to him. They can help people who aren't sure how to get started with investing and give them ideas of how they can use their money. "You want individual companies that will still be around in 40 years," Yang mentioned in the video. He elaborated on how he would divvy up the $1,000 and offered valuable lessons along the way. Don't Miss: Warren Buffett once said, "If you don't find a way to make money while you sleep, you will work until you die." Here's , starting today. $100k+ in investable assets? – no cost, no obligation. Yang starts by saying that he would put $400 into an S&P 500 ETF. That comes to 40% of his $1,000. He specifically mentions the Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (NYSE:VOO) and the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSE:SPY), but any fund that tracks the S&P 500 will produce nearly identical results. It's typically the largest holding in any of Yang's starter portfolios, and it's roughly doubled over the past five years. The S&P 500 contains the 500 largest publicly traded U.S. corporations, and it places a strong emphasis on the Magnificent Seven stocks. Each stock in the fund must be profitable, and the index regularly cycles out of bad stocks and replaces them with better ones. S&P 500 ETFs are also known for their low expense ratios since they don't require active management. For instance, VOO has a 0.03% expense ratio and SPY has a 0.09% expense ratio. Low expense ratios let you keep almost all of the profits you generate from your shares. Trending: The secret weapon in billionaire investor portfolios that you almost certainly don't own yet. Yang then suggests putting $200 into the Invesco QQQ Trust (NASDAQ:QQQ), which tracks growth stocks that are primarily in the tech sector. You can also get the Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (NASDAQ:QQQM), which is the same exact fund, but with a lower expense ratio. The fund has more than doubled over the past five years. It has a stronger concentration in tech stocks and the Magnificent Seven stocks than the S&P 500. QQQ regularly outperforms VOO and SPY during bullish market cycles, but it is more vulnerable to corrections. Younger investors who have lengthy time horizons can benefit more from growth and tech ETFs like QQQ. However, if you are just getting started, you may want less volatility in your portfolio. That may be why Yang suggests putting more money into VOO or SPY than you have those two ETFs, Yang suggests finding three individual stocks and putting $100 into each pick. These stocks give you the opportunity to outperform a benchmark like the S&P 500 or the Nasdaq Composite. Yang suggests narrowing the search to companies that will likely be around 40 years later. It's better to make some money than to make a high-risk investment that falls to zero. If you're just getting started, it is easier to make that type of mistake with an asset that you don't know very well. That accounts for $900 of the $1,000. Yang suggests putting the remaining $100 into a high-yield savings account. That way, your money will collect risk-free interest. It offers a safety net as your stocks and ETFs compound in the background. Read Next: Over the last five years, the price of gold has increased by approximately 83% — Investors like Bill O'Reilly and Rudy Giuliani are . This article Humphrey Yang Reveals How He Would Invest $1,000 If He Had To Start All Over originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump claims Democrats ‘wanted to vote' for ‘big, beautiful bill'
Trump claims Democrats ‘wanted to vote' for ‘big, beautiful bill'

The Hill

time5 hours ago

  • The Hill

Trump claims Democrats ‘wanted to vote' for ‘big, beautiful bill'

President Trump claimed during an interview on Saturday that some Democrats in Congress 'wanted to vote' for his ' big, beautiful bill, ' which was signed into law last week. 'And remember this, the Democrats wanted to vote for it, most of them, many of them, because it's all good stuff,' the president said during his appearance on Fox News's 'My View with Lara Trump.' Democrats in both chambers were critical of the reconciliation package, constantly pointing to cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs. The massive package also includes funds to hire more border patrol agents and customs officers, funding for border wall construction, extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and will supercharge fossil fuel production. No Democrat voted for the spending package in either chamber. The House eventually passed the bill in a 218-214 vote, with two GOP members, Reps. Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), voting against it. 'We didn't have one democrat vote because they said, 'don't vote.' And the one thing they do well is they stay together. You're reading stories now, but a lot of them wanted to vote for it, but they couldn't. They couldn't do it,' Trump told host Lara Trump, who is his daughter-in-law. She is married to Trump's son Eric Trump. Later in the interview, the president added of Democrats, 'It's pretty incredible. And they stick together. I admire that.' Trump hammered Democrats for not supporting the 'big, beautiful bill' during his rally in Des Moines, Iowa, last week. 'But all of the things that we've given, and they wouldn't vote. Only because they hate Trump. But I hate them, too. You know that? I really do, I hate them. I cannot stand them, because I really believe they hate our country, you want to know the truth,' Trump told the crowd.

Kraft Heinz explores grocery business spinoff worth up to $20 billion, source says
Kraft Heinz explores grocery business spinoff worth up to $20 billion, source says

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kraft Heinz explores grocery business spinoff worth up to $20 billion, source says

(Reuters) -Kraft Heinz is studying a potential spin off of a large chunk of its grocery business, including many Kraft products, into a new entity that could be valued at as much as $20 billion on its own, a source familiar with the matter said on Friday. However, the structure of the deal could change and there is no guarantee Kraft Heinz would move forward with any such deal, the source said. News of the potential move is the second effort this week by a storied U.S. company looking to shore up shareholder value as shoppers ditch their pricey products in an uncertain economy. Earlier this week, cereal maker WK Kellogg agreed to a $3.1 billion buyout deal from Italy's Ferrero. The Wall Street Journal first reported the development earlier in the day. According to the report, a split, which would leave the company with products such as its namesake Heinz ketchup and Dijon mustard brand Grey Poupon, could be finalized in the coming weeks. "As announced in May, Kraft Heinz has been evaluating potential strategic transactions to unlock shareholder value," a company spokesperson said. Its shares closed up 2.5%. The company currently has a market value of $31.33 billion. Kraft Heinz was formed in 2015 after Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway and Brazilian private equity firm 3G Capital combined the former Kraft Foods with H.J. Heinz, which they bought in 2013. But it has been a challenging investment for Berkshire. Inflationary pressures and a shift in focus toward fresher, less processed food have hurt demand for Kraft Heinz's lunch combos and other products. It lowered annual forecasts and reported a dour quarter in April, hurt by muted consumer spending. Kraft Heinz also said last month it would stop the launch of new products with artificial colors in the U.S. after Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. outlined plans to remove synthetic food dyes from the U.S. food supply to address chronic diseases and conditions. "KHC spinning off its grocery business echoes the 2023 Kellogg spinoff in which the company spun off its cereal business, which had been in volumetric decline for some time," said Connor Rattigan, analyst at Consumer Edge. "As CPGs (consumer packaged goods makers) contend with both changing consumer preferences and a challenging consumer environment, other CPGs may look to M&A and or similar corporate actions to improve their category exposures and improve their top-line trajectory," Rattigan said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store