Election fever will not grip Mattannur municipality in 2025 also
This is because the five-year term of the Mattannur municipal council does not coincide with that of the other 1,199 panchayats, municipalities, and corporations in Kerala. The council has two more years left in its term before it faces elections.
The State Election Commission, which prepares the electoral rolls and conducts elections to local bodies, noted on Saturday that the term of the Mattannur council would expire only on September 10, 2027. In the case of the other local bodies, new councils have to take over by December 21 this year.
One of the 87 municipalities in Kerala, Mattannur's loner status dates back to the 1990s and a political controversy over its elevation to a municipality.
The curious case of Mattannur is once again back in the spotlight with the State Election Commission kicking off the process for the 2025 local body elections. The commission is set to publish the draft voters' lists on July 23 ahead of its revision for the polls.
The State Delimitation Commission had covered Mattannur also in the Phase 1 of the delimitation exercise which saw the reorganisation of wards in grama panchayats, municipalities, and corporations. The number of wards in the municipality has increased from 35 to 36.
However, the draft rolls for the municipality to be published on July 23 will be based on the old ward structure and not on the basis of the delimited wards, State Election Commissioner A. Shajahan said.
Elections were last held to the municipality in 2022, whereas all the other local bodies elected new councils in 2020. Although the Left Democratic Front (LDF) retained its traditional grip in Mattannur, it won fewer seats (21) in the 2022 elections, while the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) doubled its tally to 14.
The commission said on Saturday that the 2025 elections would be held to 941 grama panchayats, 86 municipalities, six corporations, 152 block panchayats and 14 district panchayats.
The E.K. Nayanar-led Left Democratic Front government had elevated Mattannur panchayat to a municipality in 1990. But the United Democratic Front government which came to power in 1991 cancelled this decision. The LDF moved court, and Mattannur remained in limbo for a number of years.
When the LDF returned to power in 1996, it upgraded Mattannur to a municipality. Mattannur saw municipal elections for the first time in 1997. The LDF had won all the elections since then.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
House disruptions seem to be suiting treasury benches, says Priyanka Gandhi
New Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra stated on Thursday that during the last session of the Lok Sabha, disruptions originated from the treasury benches, which ultimately resulted in the adjournment of the House, suggesting that the repeated adjournments do not concern the Centre. This comes as the Lok Sabha was adjourned till 2 p.m. as the Opposition continued to create ruckus for the fourth straight day of the Monsoon Session of Parliament over the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. Speaking to the reporters, Priyanka Gandhi said, "In the last session, I was surprised, as a new MP, to see that the disruption was actually starting from the treasury benches. I was taken aback that they would deliberately raise a topic to provoke a reaction, leading to chaos and eventually an adjournment of the House." "It seems to be suiting them just fine," she added. Speaker Om Birla's repeated appeals for decorum went unheeded among members of the Opposition, prompting an early adjournment till 2 p.m. This marks the fourth consecutive day of disruptions in Parliament's Monsoon Session, with opposition parties intensifying their demand for a debate on the Bihar voter verification drive, the Pahalgam terror attack, and Operation Sindoor. Earlier in the day, Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra joined the protest at Makar Dwar, with Priyanka holding a placard reading "Democracy in Danger". The Election Commission's SIR initiative has sparked controversy after reports revealed that over 52 lakh voter names may be deleted due to duplication, deaths, or relocation. Opposition leaders allege the exercise disproportionately affects marginalised communities and migrants, accusing the government of "institutional voter cleansing". The Election Commission of India's ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has ignited a fierce political standoff in Bihar. The opposition alliance, INDIA bloc, has accused the revision process of being skewed to favour the incumbent NDA government -- an allegation the EC has firmly refuted, asserting that the exercise is routine and impartial.
Hans India
25 minutes ago
- Hans India
Jagdeep Dhankhar's Vice Presidential Resignation Stemmed From Long-Standing Disputes With Government
The dramatic resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar from the Vice President's office has revealed a complex web of tensions that had been escalating between him and the central government for months before reaching a breaking point over an Opposition-backed impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma. Sources indicate that Dhankhar's conflicts with the government extended far beyond the immediate controversy surrounding the judicial impeachment motion. The former Vice President had reportedly been making various protocol-related demands that created friction with the administration, including requests for his photograph to be displayed alongside those of the Prime Minister and President in ministerial offices, and persistent pressure to upgrade his entire vehicle fleet to Mercedes-Benz cars. The final confrontation emerged when Dhankhar maintained contact with a senior Congress leader regarding the motion to impeach Justice Varma, who had been embroiled in controversy after a significant cash recovery from his residence earlier this year. Despite the government's awareness of these communications, Dhankhar proceeded to formally accept the Opposition's signatures for the impeachment motion. The administration made three separate attempts to dissuade the Vice President from unilaterally accepting the Opposition proposal. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, Law Minister Arjun Meghwal, and Rajya Sabha Leader JP Nadda all urged Dhankhar to delay his decision, explaining that efforts were underway to build consensus for a joint impeachment motion that would include both ruling party and Opposition members. Government officials had informed Dhankhar well in advance that they intended to pursue an impeachment motion against Justice Varma in both houses of Parliament. Rijiju had communicated this intention to the Vice President four to five days before the Monsoon Session began, and reiterated the message again just one day before the session started, by which time the government had already secured signatures from both ruling party and Opposition members in the Lok Sabha. However, after meeting with Opposition leaders over the weekend, Dhankhar made it clear he would proceed independently. On Monday morning, it became apparent that he had committed to formally announcing the Opposition's motion in the House, prompting the government's repeated interventions. The attempts to change his mind proved futile. In the first meeting, both Nadda and Rijiju approached the Vice President together. The second intervention involved Rijiju and Meghwal, while the final attempt saw only Meghwal meeting with Dhankhar to emphasize the importance of maintaining government confidence and including ruling party signatures. Earlier tensions had also surfaced around protocol issues during high-profile diplomatic visits. When US Vice President JD Vance was scheduled to visit India, Dhankhar reportedly insisted on conducting the primary high-level meeting himself, arguing that as fellow Vice Presidents, he was Vance's natural counterpart. A senior Cabinet minister had to clarify that while Vance held the Vice Presidential title, he was actually carrying a message from the US President specifically for Prime Minister Modi. These accumulated grievances created an atmosphere of mistrust that culminated in Dhankhar's defiant announcement of the Opposition motion despite government objections. Recognizing that his position had become untenable, he proceeded directly to Rashtrapati Bhavan without prior notice, waited approximately 25 minutes, and submitted his resignation to the President. Following his resignation submission, Dhankhar reportedly hoped until the next morning that the government might attempt to persuade him to reconsider or that his resignation might be rejected. However, no such outreach materialized, as the administration had already concluded that his departure was necessary. The Vice President's unexpected decision to side with the Opposition prompted Prime Minister Modi to convene urgent consultations with senior aides, including the Home Minister. Sources suggest that Modi expressed profound disappointment with Dhankhar's conduct, particularly given that he had been the NDA's chosen candidate for the Vice Presidential position in 2022.
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India-UK trade deal to be signed today: Navigating protectionism, political turmoil, and shadow of Trump's tariffs
India and the UK are poised to sign the long-awaited Free Trade Agreement (FTA) today — a pact that was years in the making, driven by mutual concerns over China, and finalised amidst a rapidly evolving US trade policy that has compelled nations worldwide to secure access to new markets. The India-UK deal is significant as it would be the most comprehensive free trade agreements for India to have entered into so far and is going to be closely watched as a template for other upcoming major trade deals such as the agreement with the European Union. The India-UK deal will also mark the beginning of integration between the advanced services sector in the UK and that of India along with opening doors for high-end British cars and whisky into India, albeit in a phased manner. India and the UK (then part of the EU) began exploring the possibility of a trade deal back in 2007. However, Europe's demands for access to India's key job-generating sectors, such as automobiles and agriculture, were too steep for the government to build a consensus within the country, leading to the talks' failure. After deciding to withdraw from negotiations for the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) — a mega trade deal involving China, the ASEAN region, Australia, and New Zealand — over concerns of a surge in Chinese imports in 2019, India began looking to the lucrative West for deeper economic integration. Post-2019, when India adopted a decisive approach towards a free trade agreement with the UK, a political crisis in London played spoilsport, beginning with Brexit in 2016. While negotiations continued under three different British Prime Ministers from 2022 to 2025, several deadlines were missed, including the Diwali deadline set by former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. The deal only materialised after the Keir Starmer-led Labour Party won a landslide victory in May 2025. Another political push towards global deals was the election of US President Donald Trump. It incentivised countries to swiftly secure new markets, bringing the UK and India even closer to find certainty in a world that seems to be moving towards trade turmoil. The India-UK deal will help integration of the advanced services sector between the two nations. It will also enable access for high-end British cars and whisky into India in a phased manner. The India–UK FTA is expected to ensure comprehensive market access for goods across all sectors, covering all of India's export interests. India will benefit from tariff elimination on approximately 99 per cent of tariff lines, covering nearly 100 per cent of trade value — offering opportunities to boost bilateral trade between India and the UK, according to the Commerce and Industry Ministry. The pact includes chapters on goods, services, innovation, government procurement, and intellectual property rights. The two countries have also concluded negotiations on the Double Contribution Convention Agreement, or social security pact, which would help avoid double contributions to social security funds by Indian professionals working for a limited period in Britain. However, talks on the Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) are still ongoing. Government officials have pointed out that the India–UK trade deal is also significant as it is one of the most comprehensive free trade agreements that India has entered into so far and could serve as a template for future engagements, including the multiple trade deals currently under negotiation — such as the complex agreement with the European Union. The Ministry stated that the UK FTA will ease mobility for professionals, including contractual service suppliers; business visitors; investors; intra-corporate transferees; partners and dependent children of intra-corporate transferees with the right to work; and independent professionals such as yoga instructors, musicians, and chefs. India's exports to the UK rose by 12.6 per cent to $14.5 billion, while imports grew by 2.3 per cent to $8.6 billion in 2024–25. Bilateral trade between India and the UK increased to $21.34 billion in 2023–24 from $20.36 billion in 2022–23. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
