logo
From tikanga to ‘protocol': Luxon's war on the Māorification of Aotearoa

From tikanga to ‘protocol': Luxon's war on the Māorification of Aotearoa

The Spinoff20-05-2025
The prime minister insists his government is clamping down on the spread of Māori language and culture in the public sector. But beneath the tough talk, what's really changing – and who is he trying to win over?
Our government is halting the Māorification of Aotearoa. This isn't an opinion, but rather a proud declaration made by Christopher Luxon in his usual Monday morning interview with Newstalk ZB broadcaster Mike Hosking earlier this week.
'How do senior bureaucrats not understand that they're working for a government that have spoken very clearly on the Māorification of this county?' asked Hosking. 'Where we see it, we call it out,' Luxon gloated in response.
The duo were talking about a job advertised in March by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Mfat), searching for a tikanga lead. At around the same time, the minister of foreign affairs and trade (Winston Peters) was trumpeting his party's bill to remove diversity, equity, and inclusion targets from the public sector – with the backing of Luxon. The tikanga lead role quickly became the example, sort of.
The fix for Peters' concerns was seemingly simple – replace any mention of 'tikanga' with 'protocol'. 'The minister's opposition to the politically loaded and inaccurate use of the term 'tikanga' is well known. However, protocol has always been important,' a New Zealand First party spokesperson said following the change in terminology.
Following the furore, several requests were made under the Official Information Act in an attempt to unveil what was happening within the ministry during the kerfuffle. Evidently, it appeared top officials within Mfat were caught off guard by Peters' criticism of the role. Understandably, the likes of Hosking were dumbfounded as to how the country's top bureaucrats could have missed the agenda clearly set out by this government.
Nevertheless, Luxon is quick to point out that his government is laser-focused on stopping the 'Māorification' of the country. His most recent example? The removal of traffic control stop-go signs in te reo Māori in Te Matau a Māui. 'We need the stop-go signs to be very unambiguous,' Luxon said. Hosking went on to say that the production of Māori road signs is 'taking the piss', drawing a chuckle from Luxon as he reiterated his coalition government's intent on 'running things differently'.
'We want everybody in the public service focused on delivery, focused on results, and not lots of resources tied up in things that isn't core business,' Luxon said. 'Where it comes out and they get it wrong, we're very quick to clamp down on it.'
This is strong, authoritative language from Luxon. It shows a switch in his political demeanour from a centrist to a more explicitly right wing politician, at least on this issue. The shift towards 'a tough guy approach', as Willie Jackson called it during the Labour caucus run on Tuesday morning, appears to be an attempt to pull voters from its more right wing coalition partners, draining them of their overall influence on the make up of government. It's the dog trying to take back control of its tail – but this approach also has its risks.
The thing with the authoritative approach from Luxon is that you must walk your talk if you want to appear authentic in your belief – lest those you are trying to win over see through the charade. With the case of the Mfat job, it appears that all that was changed was the use of the word 'tikanga' in the job title. Everything else stayed the same and presumably, someone was still hired for the role and is currently employed at the ministry, providing expert advice and support to ensure Māori cultural 'protocols' are understood, upheld, and appropriately applied across the ministry's work and foreign policy priorities. So what was really achieved and is it enough to convince the voters you are trying to win over?
Similarly, te reo Māori road signs aren't really an important issue to everyday New Zealanders. Most people would understand that green means go and red means stop. 'This isn't about rules – it's about racism,' said Ngāti Kahungungu chair Bayden Barber. The language being used on a road sign is likely not something that shifts a swing voter. But seeing your prime minister getting giddy about Fonterra's ambient cream being sold in Korea, yet livid about the inclusion of te reo Māori in roadworks signage? That might be a deterrent for someone sitting in the middle.
The more you take the hard line approach, the more you risk alienating the always-important centre bloc voters who may feel uncomfortable with such an attitude on diversity, equity, inclusion and race relations. Luxon risks sending National further to the right and competing for a share of the same culture war voter base that New Zealand First and Act already tussle over while leaving voters abandoned in the middle.
I won't venture into how te reo Māori is an official language of this country, or how the likes of Wales and Ireland have effortlessly adopted dual-language signage across their roading networks, aiding the revitalisation of their indigenous languages. However, what's clear from all of this is that if it isn't a part of the government's 'core business' of turning a profit, then it's not a priority.
The issue around the use of te reo Māori is like the latest haka debacle – Māori culture is great, but only on certain terms and when it suits the wider agenda. We love to parade the culture overseas as being our point of difference, our unique selling-point. Why? Because it helps turn a profit. That is the government's core business. But when it comes to the normalisation of te ao Māori in its rightful home, we are quick to condemn. Not right. Not core business. Not helping us make money.
The window dressing and pandering to casual racists will only get National so far. With a turn right coming at a time of already fragile race relations in Aotearoa, the coalition government appears to be throwing caution to the wind. Luxon will be keeping an eye on how his latest gamble plays out with voters. If it goes well, we may be in for a fight for the right in 2026, with Labour left alone in the centre.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cost of polytech changes revealed
Cost of polytech changes revealed

Otago Daily Times

timean hour ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Cost of polytech changes revealed

By John Gerritsen of RNZ A Cabinet paper reveals re-establishing independent polytechnics will cost more than 500 courses and about 1000 jobs. The March paper from Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds said polytechnics had started to act on financial improvement plans that would ensure they were viable when they were cut free from super-institute Te Pūkenga. "Polytechnics have begun implementing their financial improvement plans, which as of late 2024 indicated reductions of approximately 550 programmes, up to 900 FTE and approximately 30 delivery sites," it said. "The final model for work-based learning will also change the spread of training provision between polytechnics, wānanga and private providers. It would be premature to commit to long-term plans to support important provision when there is potential for delivery to look very different once these processes are completed." The paper said the government would set aside $20 million to ensure the retention of strategically important, but potentially unviable courses. "I intend to review support for strategically important provision in the second half of 2026, including long-term options to support the organisations that provide it and how to incentivise delivery of the provision that regions need, through either polytechnics, Wānanga, or private providers who may be able to fill gaps," the paper said. It also said using $6.5m from a special funding category aimed at supporting Māori and Pacific students to boost government subsidies for polytech courses generally could have a negative effect. "Tertiary education organisations may see the removal of the Māori and Pacific learner criteria from the Learner Component as a signal that programmes tailored to support these learners are no longer needed and can be substituted with more generic student support programmes. This may negatively impact on Māori and Pacific learner outcomes." Tertiary Education Union national secretary Sandra Grey told RNZ's Nine to Noon programme today it was the first time the full scale of the cuts had been revealed. "This is the first time we've seen it in black and white. We've been feeling it every week as each institution tries to right-size so that it can cope with the minister's vision for them. "To see 500 jobs going in black and white is really hard for the sector." Grey said the changes would remove vocational education and training from some communities altogether. The government recently announced nine of the 16 polytechnics that joined Te Pūkenga would emerge as stand-alone institutes next year. Three of the remaining institutes would join a federation, with the fate of four others yet to be decided. Simmonds said in a statement: "The Cabinet paper confirms the scale of change required to re-establish a financially viable and regionally responsive vocational education network. The paper you are referring to is an early piece of advice and there were several updates made." The government had asked the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) work with Te Pūkenga to assist all polytechnics to review their operations, "an exercise that should have happened five years ago when Te Pūkenga was set up, to ensure the viability of the polytechnic sector", she said. "As the minister, I am not privy to information regarding the operational decisions that polytechnics might contemplate. However, I would suggest that it is important for all polytechnics to be taking appropriate actions to ensure their overall viability and maintain their relationships. "We are absolutely committed to maintaining and improving access to vocational education across the regions. $20m has been secured from TEC to support provision in strategic regions and strategic delivery. "Our goal is to give each polytechnic the autonomy to tailor provision to the needs of their region - something the old centralised model simply didn't allow."

Time's Running Out To Take A Stand And Shape New Plymouth District's Future
Time's Running Out To Take A Stand And Shape New Plymouth District's Future

Scoop

time2 hours ago

  • Scoop

Time's Running Out To Take A Stand And Shape New Plymouth District's Future

If you want to be around the table to make the big decisions for New Plymouth District, you only have until midday Friday 1 August to get your nomination papers in. There are currently 25 confirmed nominations, compared with six at the same point in the previous election. So far there are: 6 nominations for Mayor 5 nominations for five Councillors at large (across the whole district). 9 nominations for six Councillors in Kaitake/Ngāmotu ward (New Plymouth city to Ōkato) 0 nominations for one Councillor in Kōhanga Moa ward (Inglewood and surrounding area) 1 nomination for one Councillor in North Ward (Waitara up to Waitomo District Council border) 1 nomination for one Councillor in the Te Purutanga Mauri Pūmanawa (Māori ward). Nominations for our five community boards, which each have five members: 0 Inglewood Community Board (Inglewood, Egmont Village, Tarata) 1 nomination for Clifton Community Board (Tikorangi, Urenui, Ōnaero, Tongaporutu) 2 nominations for Waitara Community Board (Waitara, Brixton, Lepperton) 0 nominations Kaitake Community Board (Ōākura, Ōmata, Ōkato) 0 nominations Puketapu-Bell Block Community Board. Find out more, including details on how to stand and nomination papers on our Vote 2025 website ( Fast Facts: Nominations to stand close midday 1 August. Voting papers start being delivered from 9 September Voting closes midday Saturday 11 October. This election, councils with Māori wards, including NPDC, will run a poll to decide if they will have Māori wards for future elections. Results are legally-binding. Progress results are expected in the afternoon of 11 October, 12 October for preliminary results and 17 October for the final results.

World Court's Climate Ruling A Legal Warning Shot For Luxon
World Court's Climate Ruling A Legal Warning Shot For Luxon

Scoop

time3 hours ago

  • Scoop

World Court's Climate Ruling A Legal Warning Shot For Luxon

Greenpeace Aotearoa says the world's highest court has just delivered a wake-up call for Prime Minister Christopher Luxon. In a historic climate ruling, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has confirmed that governments have legal obligations to protect people - both now and in the future - from the worsening impacts of the climate crisis. That includes regulating big polluters like fossil fuel companies and intensive livestock operations. "This is a warning shot to Luxon that his Government's war on nature and the climate comes with consequences," says Greenpeace spokesperson Amanda Larsson. "The Court has made it clear: states must take action to prevent climate harm, no matter where it occurs. They must uphold people's fundamental right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment - for today's communities and future generations." The ICJ ruling goes beyond the Paris Agreement, reinforcing that governments have a duty to regulate climate pollution, cooperate internationally, and prevent environmental harm. It strengthens the legal grounds for climate-impacted communities to hold governments accountable. Since taking office, the Luxon Government has scrapped or weakened numerous key climate policies. It has: Overturned the ban on offshore oil and gas exploration Pledged to fast-track coal mining Shelved agricultural emissions pricing Exempted the country's worst climate polluter - intensive dairying - from meaningful accountability "Luxon is elevating the profits of polluters above people's fundamental human rights," says Larsson. "This ruling puts him - and governments like his - on notice." The dairy industry, led by Fonterra, is New Zealand's largest climate polluter. Yet under pressure from lobby groups, the Government has rolled back environmental safeguards and is now considering weakening methane targets - despite clear advice from the Climate Change Commission that action on methane must be strengthened. Earlier this year, Luxon received a letter authored by dozens of international climate scientists accusing him of ignoring scientific evidence on methane and urging him to follow the Climate Commission's advice to strengthen New Zealand's methane target. The letter was featured on the front page of the Financial Times. "New Zealand is the world's largest dairy exporter and a major player in the global livestock industry," says Larsson. "How New Zealand addresses livestock emissions sets an important precedent for the rest of the world. If Luxon guts the methane target, New Zealand risks breaching the Paris Agreement and, by extension, its trade agreements with partners like the UK and EU." The historic ICJ ruling is a result of action taken in 2019 by 27 law students from The University of the South Pacific. As the Pacific Islands Students Fighting Climate Change, they campaigned for the ICJ to issue an Advisory Opinion on the responsibilities of States in respect to climate change. The resolution, put forward by Vanuatu alongside a global alliance of States, passed the United Nations General Assembly unanimously in March 2023, co-sponsored by over 130 countries. "As this ruling shows, the courts are becoming an increasingly important venue for climate justice - because governments like ours are failing to protect people and the planet. And when that happens, people will step up to defend their future."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store