More adults likely to experience domestic abuse than previously thought
The estimates have been produced by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) and are the first to use an improved method for measuring the prevalence of domestic abuse among the population.
A new set of questions has been added to the ONS's long-running Crime Survey for England and Wales in order to better capture a wider range of abuse types and behaviours.
They include questions about health abuse and forced marriage – areas not previously covered by the survey – as well as reflecting recent changes in the law regarding coercive and controlling behaviour.
More detail on economic abuse, which can take the form of someone deliberately getting a person into debt or preventing them from getting a job, has also been included.
The ONS now estimates that in the year to March 2024, 26.1% of adults – around one in four – had experienced domestic abuse since the age of 16, the equivalent of 12.6 million people.
Under the old method, which is not directly comparable with the new survey, the ONS estimated that one in five (20.5%) questioned in the 12 months to March 2024 had experienced abuse since 16.
The new estimates suggest 30.3% of women and 21.7% of men surveyed in this period had experienced domestic abuse at some point since the age of 16, equivalent to 7.4 million and 5.1 million people respectively.
Meghan Elkin, ONS head of crime statistics, said: 'The way domestic abuse manifests is constantly changing and is difficult to measure.
'In developing these questions, we have listened to victims and survivors of domestic abuse alongside a range of users from charities to academics and other government departments.
'These new questions are a positive step in better understanding domestic abuse and providing vital information to all those working to improve outcomes and support for victims.
'The new approach has resulted in a higher prevalence rate as we have introduced questions to ask about types of abuse not previously covered by the crime survey, such as health abuse and forced marriage.'
Health abuse includes anything from depriving a person of daily essentials, such as food and sleep, to forcing someone to terminate pregnancy or denying someone medical assistance.
Marital status-related abuse includes forced marriage and the prevention of marrying someone of your choice.
The new figures also suggest that an estimated 8.0% of people aged 16 and over (3.9 million people) surveyed in the year to March 2024 were likely to have experienced some kind of domestic abuse in the previous 12 months, with a higher figure for women (9.5% or 2.3 million) than men (6.5% or 1.5 million).
Responding to the findings, Dame Nicole Jacobs, domestic abuse commissioner for England and Wales, said: 'Domestic abuse has a devastating impact on the millions of lives it touches but for too long the scale of the problem – and its pervasiveness – has remained hidden.
'Developing new ways to further our understanding of this terrible crime so we can put in place measures to tackle it and ensure survivors receive the support they need is absolutely vital.
'I welcome the ongoing focus on domestic abuse by the ONS, as only through knowing the full picture will we be able to rid society of it for good.'
Sarika Seshadri, head of research and evaluation at Women's Aid, said: 'The new questions will provide insight into victim-survivors' experiences of domestic abuse since the age of 16, including detailed profiles of which victim-survivors are experiencing the highest impact and highest harm forms of abuse
'By understanding not only prevalence but impact, and how this is affecting different groups of the population, we will be able to identify to what extent policies and practice are either reducing or exacerbating experiences of domestic abuse, and in particular for whom, so that we can develop targeted and meaningful interventions.'
In developing the new questions, the ONS worked with a consortium led by the Centre for Gender and Violence Research at the University of Bristol, that also involved the College of Policing, the Women's Aid Federation of England, Men's Advice Line, Imkaan and Welsh Women's Aid.
While the updated questions are better aligned with the offence of coercive and controlling behaviour, it is not possible to separate out an estimate for victims of this offence, the ONS said.
More detailed findings from the new survey will be published later in the year.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK heatwaves could cause more than 5,000 deaths this summer as temperatures soar
The Centre for Ageing Better says it is extremely concerned about the significant heat health risk to older people this summer and the increasingly hotter summers of the future. This summer could see more than 5,000 deaths due to excess heat as temperatures look likely to exceed one of the deadliest heatwave years on record, experts are warning. The Office for National Statistics estimates that the hot weather of 2022 was a factor in more than 4,500 heat-related deaths. Predictions suggest that this summer could be even warmer. The UK Health Security Agency issued three heat health alerts in June this year compared to just one alert, issued to a smaller area of the country, in June 2022. So far, this summer has also seen higher average temperatures than in the same period in 2022. READ MORE: Why heatwaves are now hotter, more frequent and just a taste of what's to come Data from the Met Office shows that the average maximum daily temperature in England in June 2025 was 21.9C, compared to 20C in June 2022. The average maximum daily temperatures for May 2025 were also 1.2C higher than in May 2022. And the number of extremely hot days this year is also higher with 12 days exceeding 28C in England in 2025 to the end of June, compared to just six days exceeding 28C by the end of June in 2022. This is significant because research has shown that death rates increase more rapidly as temperatures rise above 27 degrees. The Centre for Ageing Better says it is extremely concerned about the significant heat health risk to older people and warns that the poor-quality of the nation's homes is a significant factor in this heightened risk – for this summer and the increasingly hotter summers of the future. Deputy director of the organisation, Millie Brown said: 'The heatwave we have just experienced is unfortunately just a taste of what could become the norm in the not-too-distant future, as the State of the UK Climate report makes clear this week. Unfortunately, this country is not built for such temperatures, and especially not our poor-quality housing stock. 'Current estimates indicate that the average number of heat-related deaths in this country could triple to 7,000 every year by the 2050s. This is an appalling scenario, and one that we should be doing all we can to avoid.' People aged 65 and above could likely constitute around four in five of heat-related excess deaths based on recent studies. Britain has the poorest insulated housing stock in Europe, which not only means homes lose heat quicker in winter but they are also very poor at keeping the heat out in summer. In 30C heat, the temperature within a UK home will rise by five degrees within three hours - double the rate of heat gain in other parts of Europe. Data shows that an ageing population living in ageing housing stock are at heightened risk from increasingly hot summers. Around three million people aged 65 and above in the UK are among the greatest at risk of becoming ill because they are living in properties between 45 and 80 years old. Millie Brown added: "This is an appalling scenario, and one that we should be doing all we can to avoid. 'Too many people are living in poor-quality homes that put their health, and lives, at risk in extreme temperatures, whether that be in the height of summer or the depths of winter. When building new homes or retrofitting existing homes, we need to consider how to keep homes cool in summer, as well as warm in winter. People also need access to information and advice if there are issues with overheating in their homes. 'This change in our nation's climate is already set in motion. But we can mitigate some of the worst of its impact by building better quality homes that offer people shelter from extreme weather while also giving people better support to improving the state of their homes. The government should be including how to tackle both these challenges in its forthcoming housing strategy."
Daily Mail
11 hours ago
- Daily Mail
More than a fifth of patients in parts of England fed up with 'poor' GP services - how does YOUR area fare?
More than a fifth of patients in some parts of England are suffering 'poor' experiences at their GP, official data revealed today. Figures show nationally just 10 per cent of people were dissatisfied with the care they experienced between May and June this year. But in Nottinghamshire, the figure is 22.5 per cent, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). By comparison, just 4.3 per cent of patients were dissatisfied in Coventry and Warwickshire. It comes as the latest GP patient survey last week—jointly carried out by NHS England and Ipsos—discovered patient satisfaction with GP services has improved on the previous year. Ministers have been under renewed pressure to fix the crisis in general practice and banish the hated 8am scramble for appointments millions face every morning. Disgruntled patients have even previously complained of having to visit A&E instead, heaping extra pressure on swamped casualty units. In the NHS 10 year plan, unveiled earlier this month by the Government however, Downing Street pledged to tackle the crisis head on and 'bring back the family doctor'. The ONS survey, carried out between May 27 to June 18, asked over 75,000 participants about their experiences of contacting and attending GP surgeries. According to the report, patients in Derby and Derbyshire followed Nottinghamshire, with 18.7 per cent reporting a 'poor' experience with GP services. Kent and Medway, meanwhile, logged a figure of 17.5 per cent. Patients in Bristol, North Somerset, South Gloucestershire and Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin, both reported a 16 per cent dissatisfaction rate. The report, however, also found the proportion of people who had a 'poor' experience nationally fell to 10.9 per cent, down from the 15 per cent reported in July and August 2024. Equally, the percentage of people who found it 'difficult' to contact their GP practice decreased from 18.7 per cent in July to 15 August 2024to 10.6 per cent in May and June 2025. The GP crisis has been bubbling away for years, despite multiple ministerial promises to fix it. In total, there are now just over 28,000 fully-qualified full-time GPs in England. Numbers have dwindled over the past decade despite attempts to recruit thousands more. Many are retiring in their 50s, moving abroad or leaving to work in the private sector because of soaring demand, paperwork and aggressive media coverage in the NHS. At the same time, the population has also grown, exacerbating the problem. It means millions of patients are rushed through, in scenes compared as 'goods on a factory conveyor belt'. Some have described it as being impossible to see a GP, with a Glastonbury-esque to get an appointment. But in the 10 Year Plan for Health, unveiled earlier this month, the Government revealed community outreach, which sees clinicians going door to door, would reduce pressure on GPs and A&E. The plans also outlined training for thousands more GPs, to end the '8am scramble' to get an appointment. GPs will be encouraged to use artificial intelligence to take notes, while technology will be used to speed up the answering of calls to surgeries. Sir Keir said: 'The NHS should be there for everyone, whenever they need it. 'It's reform or die. Our 10-year health plan will fundamentally rewire and future-proof our NHS so that it puts care on people's doorsteps, harnesses game-changing tech and prevents illness in the first place. 'That means giving everyone access to GPs, nurses and wider support all under one roof in their neighbourhood—rebalancing our health system so that it fits around patients' lives, not the other way round.' It comes as the latest GP patient satisfaction survey last week found 75 per cent of 702,000 respondents had a good experience at their practice, up slightly from 74 per cent in 2024. Some 70 per cent also said their overall experience of contacting their family doctor was good, up year-on-year from 67 per cent. At the time, Louise Ansari, chief executive at Healthwatch England, said: 'It's promising that this year's findings show modest increases in people's overall experiences of GP, including an increase in the number of people given a choice of time, day or location for their most recent appointment. 'We know from previous years' results that this directly links to improvements in overall experience.
Scotsman
2 days ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: It's a tragedy take-up of measles vaccine has fallen
The measles vaccine is a triumph of medical science and should be taken up by all parents, says reader Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... As a virologist I apologise for not being more effective in persuading all parents to get their children vaccinated against measles as a matter of course. In terms of lives saved and safety it is not possible to better the vaccine as a triumph of medical science. Unfortunately, however, a link with deprivation still exists, not with mortality – in the olden days measles killed 9.2 per cent of children living in single room flats compared to1.5 per cent in those in houses with four or more rooms – but with vaccine uptake, which a century later still shows a similar difference between the most and least deprived areas. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad My concern about the recent decline in vaccine uptake is not only fuelled by anger that a superbly effective preventative measure is not being used to the full, but by the personal experience of attending a post-mortem on a teenager who had died from subacute sclerosing panencephalitis, a horrible complication of measles. Fortunately rare, occurring in 1 in 10,000 infections, the sufferer always dies after developing personality changes, seizures, and a terminal paralytic state. Vaccination gives 100 per cent protection against it. A one year-old receives the MMR vaccine as cases rise (Picture:) Hugh Pennington, Aberdeen A wife's wisdom Donald Trump not that long ago said to Volodymyr Zelensky that Vladimir Putin would sign an agreement with him and would keep to it 'because I know him'. It takes Melania Trump's words to basically tell the US President, don't believe what Putin is saying as he won't keep his word, which, if you remember the great 'show me respect' meeting they had in the Oval office, is exactly what Zelensky told him all those months ago – Putin can't be trusted to keep his word on any agreement. J Moore, Glasgow Inflation pain Double-digit inflation may be over but, largely driven by food prices, annual inflation is up again to 3.6 per cent according to the ONS. Life continues to feel tough for many households. Any hope on the horizon? Not according to the Resolution Foundation. Its new report, 'Living Standards Outlook for 2025', does not make for happy reading. The report finds the mild recovery in real incomes in 2024-25 fails to compensate for a 'lost half-decade'. It also confirms the cost-of-living crisis is still very much with us. Food insecurity was twice as high at the start of 2025 as in 2021. Looking ahead, the real income of a 'typical non-pensioner' is expected to rise by just 1 per cent by 2030, giving 'zero growth' over the entire decade! 'Lower-income' households are projected to be 1 per cent worse off and those on 'very low incomes' 8 per cent worse off (that's poorer by £1,000). By contrast, the real income of a' typical pensioner' is expected to rise by 5 per cent, and that of an 'outright homeowner' by 4 per cent. A 'typical mortgage holder', however, is projected to be 1 per cent worse off. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These pressures, if realised, do nothing to alleviate the embarrassment of the UK being ranked ninth most unequal among 38 OECD countries in terms of income. Trade union discontent can be expected to intensify, especially in the public sector, with the Government seemingly powerless to instil stability (taxpayers will surely pick up the tab). Simultaneously, AI adoption is reducing job opportunities in the private sector, especially for new graduates. Dynamic growth would ease tensions. But the Chancellor knows, that's still like looking for smoke on some distant horizon – on an increasingly windy day! Ewen Peters, Newton Mearns, East Renfrewshire Realism needed I would suggest that in his article 'Why major changes to the ISAs regime are long overdue' (14 July), Adrian Murphy has the diagnosis spot on but the prescription could be better. Part of the reason people keep money in Cash ISAs and avoid stocks and shares investments is the need to gain access at short notice with the assurance they will not lose money; while possibly not keeping up with inflation they are a better option than keeping cash 'under the mattress'. Many, many people must have relatively small amounts to invest and cannot afford to lose it or wait months for favourable conditions to prevail should they need to withdraw it. Sadly, the volatility of stocks and shares is precisely what discourages them from the greater returns possible, with the cash ISA being the least worst alternative. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad One only has to see the massive downward effect that events such as Trump tariff announcements, Truss financial statement announcements or Covid had on stock markets and subsequent lengthy recovery periods to see why people will avoid those. There is another factor, which is the cost burden of investing in those products – these are multi layered so that often the only people making money, or at least too much of it, are the advisers and fund managers, to the detriment of the investor whom the products are supposed to help. I agree with Mr Murphy that the ISA regime needs to change – not by reducing the amount one can put into a Cash ISA each year but by limiting the total amount held there. If mis‑selling of Lifetime ISAs is happening then that needs to be sorted for sure. On the fees, there needs to be simplification and proper regulation with limitation on fees charged so that a better proportion of returns goes to the investor, not the institutions. Neil Robertson, Edinburgh Useless cabal Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He who shouts loudest is not necessarily correct. In reply to Brian Bannatyne-Scott (Letters, 16 July), the app on the NHS England service has been running for years – fact. Scotland's is going to be rolled out over two areas serving 70,000 people to see if it works – fact. This morning, visiting Gloucester Royal, the out-of-hours GP said that if I had my prescription with me there was information on it that would have allowed my request for medication much easier. Far from anti-SNP propaganda and based on a false premise, my point was that the NHS should not be devolved in the first place. My reasoning for this is that the SNP are utterly useless, inept and couldn't organise a chimps' tea party – there's your anti-SNP rhetoric! – and fully justified this view is after 18 years of complete incompetence, certainly not a false premise! Could Mr Bannatyne-Scott fill me in on the successes of the cabal at Holyrood? And please do not omit the great strides made while in cahoots for votes with the ultra left-wing, royal family-hating Greens? I am fairly confident it shouldn't take up too much time. D Millar, Lauder, Scottish Borders Tram trials Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It's hard to understand how Edinburgh trams have posted a loss of £10 million in 2024, despite a rise in passenger numbers (your report, 16 July). I wonder who's footing the bill. Presumably, taxpayers are still paying off the exorbitant bill incurred for their installation. The trams have been a totally unnecessary luxury, whose construction has caused severe damage, not least to businesses en route. Simply put, it was a vanity project for the council of the time. The trams, even in their extended route, do little more than replicate what is already covered by our excellent bus system. If further modes of transport were needed, which is questionable, the resurrection of the intra-city rail routes would have been money well spent, taking the burden off our already overcrowded roads. This works perfectly well in Glasgow. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Call for change M Blair (Letters, 16 July) takes the National Trust for Scotland to task for their telephone response (or lack of it). Sadly, their experience is true of almost every organisation. How often must we wait in a telephone queue being told 'due to a high level of calls...' as we wait and wait and wait to speak to a human? If our call really 'was important', as the messages say, these businesses and public bodies would look at their call volume trends and ensure the service was sufficiently staffed to give the public a decent call answer time, combined with the aim of resolving queries first time. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The bad situation is being exacerbated by the increasing use of chatbots, who seem determined to do everything to avoid the customer being passed to a real human being. AI has a long, long way to go in helping to deliver excellent customer service, but it definitely does have a role. In some ways, we are all in part to blame for constantly seeking more for less, but at least we have a choice and can go elsewhere. With public bodies, we have no choice and our job is to allow our pockets to be picked more and more deeply simply to 'feed the beast'. There are exceptions – many financial services companies (such as Standard Life and Chase Bank) do strive to provide excellent service – but I must declare a bias having worked for one and as a customer of the other. My plea is that every single Executive or Director of a private or public body calls their own organisation at least once a week to experience the service provided to the public. Perhaps then, and only then, will things improve. And no 'special service' lines for MPs, MSPs etc. Let them experience what us mere mortals do. Brian Barbour, Prestonpans, East Lothian Praise be! I note Energy Secretary Ed Miliband is considering providing money for solar panels to be installed on religious buildings. No doubt the dwindling congregations in what's left of our churches will celebrate by singing 'Nearer My Grid To Thee'. Robert Menzies, Falkirk Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
