UK Government-subsidised restaurant to be launched in Dundee
They are one of six newly announced projects that will receive £8.5 million in UK Government funding to tackle food inequality, including a mapping tool to direct a mobile greengrocer to visit areas of Liverpool where social housing residents have limited access to fresh fruit and vegetables.
Under the Liverpool initiative, expected to begin in spring of next year, research will direct the 'Queen of Greens' bus, which has delivered fresh fruit and vegetables to communities across Liverpool and Knowsley since 2022, to residents in social housing who may find it harder to access healthier options in their neighbourhoods, Kyle said.
READ MORE: Wes Streeting calls John Swinney an 'analogue politician' amid NHS row
In some areas, residents will receive vouchers to buy fruit and vegetables from the bus.
Researchers will measure how the diet and health of recipients change as a result of the initiative in order to predict the effect of it being rolled out across the country.
It follows the launch of the Government's 10-Year Health Plan, which last week included the announcement that supermarkets could be fined if they do not sell healthier food.
Other projects will assess the role of community food markets in areas of Glasgow with limited access to grocery stores, known as 'food deserts', surveying food pantry users to find out about other activities and support they would like to see on offer, such as cooking sessions or recipe boxes, and improving the nutritional content and take-up of free school meals.
Kyle said: 'No one in this country should be left unable to access the healthy food they need – which is why interventions like the Queen of Greens are so important – and measuring their impact is so vital.
'These projects will draw on the power of research to actively explore the best ways to get healthy food into the mouths of those who need it, potentially having a transformational effect on people's lives, and fulfilling the missions set in our Plan for Change.'
(Image: Andy Buchanan/ PA Wire)
Lucy Antal, director of Alchemic Kitchen CIC (Community Interest Company), who runs the Queen of Greens, said: 'We are very much looking forward to working on this new research project with all the team assembled by the University of Liverpool.
'It will be a great opportunity to trial an expansion into supporting social housing tenants to access fresh produce, and to have the health and social impact of this intervention measured and assessed. The Queen of Greens is for everyone, and the data produced will help support our future activity.'
Professor Alison Park, deputy executive chairwoman of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), said: 'Everyone should have access to healthy, nutritious food but we know the number of food insecure households across the UK is increasing.
'These innovative projects from across the UK – from Wales to Dundee, Nottingham to the Isle of Wight – will go a long way in helping us understand how to tackle food inequalities and what interventions really make a difference.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Government suing PPE Medpro because of ‘buyer's remorse', court told
The Government is suing PPE Medpro over 25 million surgical gowns because of 'buyer's remorse', the High Court has heard. It began legal action after it said the company, linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone, breached a contract made during the coronavirus pandemic by failing to follow a validated sterilisation process. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million. PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards. Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.' He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.' PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract. Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'. Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told. Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'. Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added. Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records. He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment. In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.' He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.' The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination. These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said. Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'. He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.' Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Lampard: Poor Essex mental health care cited in NHS 10-year plan
Mental health services where more than 2,000 in-patients died between 2000 and the end of 2023 have been cited in the government's 10-Year Health Plan as an example of poor practice, a lawyer told a Lampard Inquiry into the care of patients saw counsel Nicolas Griffin reference the government's comments, acknowledging systemic and avoidable harm in mental health services, including in health plan cites issues like toxic culture, incompetent leadership, rampant blame and a lack of fourth public Lampard hearing will focus on evidence from bereaved families over the next two weeks. The majority of mental health services in Essex are now run by Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (EPUT). Independent lawyer for the inquiry, Mr Griffin, told the hearing that personal testimonies would guide its investigations into any systemic failings."The Inquiry is aware that many families and friends have through their experiences sadly become experts in various different areas of mental ill-health, care and treatment," said Mr Griffin."It values that knowledge and intends to liaise with families engaging with the Inquiry and their representatives in relation to the investigation of systemic issues where relevant in each case."He said key themes found in relatives' statements included accounts of inadequate care, poor communication, unsafe environments, and a lack of accountability. Mr Griffin said the inquiry had also been monitoring recent deaths and inquests, including the 2021 death of Elise Sebastian under EPUT inquest jury at Essex Coroner's Court concluded that "poorly administered observations" contributed to the 16-year-old's - which runs the unit - and chief executive Paul Scott apologised to Elise's Griffin said further deaths in mental health settings in 2024 and April 2025 "may point to serious and ongoing issues in Essex". He said coroners had - or were expected to - issue Prevention of Future Deaths Reports, highlighting ongoing systemic issues. Mr Griffin told the hearing in London that the inquiry remained committed to establishing accountability - with staff names including those of junior staff generally could apply for their names to be withheld in line with relevant law and the inquiry's protocol on restriction orders, said Mr Griffin. The independent statutory Lampard Inquiry previous hearings were held in September and November 2024 and May 2025. In response to the government's criticisms of its health plan, Mr Scott said: "As the Inquiry progresses there will be many accounts of people who were much loved and missed over the past 24 years and I want to say how sorry I am for their loss."All of us across healthcare have a responsibility to work together to improve care and treatment for all and to build on the improvements that have already been made over the last 24 years." Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Government suing PPE Medpro because of ‘buyer's remorse', court told
It began legal action after it said the company, linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone, breached a contract made during the coronavirus pandemic by failing to follow a validated sterilisation process. The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) wants more than £121 million back from PPE Medpro, plus storage costs of over £8 million. PPE Medpro is also accused of supplying the gowns without CE markings, which shows if a product meets certain medical standards. Following a month-long trial at the High Court in London, lawyers for PPE Medpro said in closing that the Government had ordered 10 years' worth of excess gowns by December 2020. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said in written submissions: 'That simple fact explains why, once the PPEM gowns landed in the UK, they were no longer needed or wanted.' He described the Government's assessment at the time as 'wildly and hopelessly wrong', adding: 'DHSC's obvious buyer's remorse was channelled into looking for ways to escape from a contract it wished it had never made.' PPE Medpro has issued a counterclaim saying DHSC owed a duty of care to the company to advise it on compliance with the contract. Mr Samek said DHSC approved the gowns without seeing a valid CE mark because they did not need one, adding that it is 'obvious' that PPE Medpro 'did not have and did not pretend to have a valid CE mark'. Testing of 140 gowns after delivery showed that 103 failed to meet the sterilisation standard, the court was previously told. Mr Samek said that after delivery to the UK, the gowns were kept in shipping containers for 'at least three months'. Contamination therefore likely happened 'subsequent to delivery, most probably during the subsequent transportation, storage and handling of the tested gowns', he added. Paul Stanley KC, for DHSC, said PPE Medpro did not follow a validated sterilisation process and did not keep sufficient records. He said the bioburden, or level of microbial contamination prior to sterilisation, was not properly assessed and that PPE Medpro has been unable to show evidence of this assessment. In written submissions, he said: 'The absence of such documentation is compelling evidence that the assessment of bioburden did not take place.' He continued: 'DHSC invites the court to find as a matter of fact that this fundamental step in a validated process for sterilisation was not done.' The barrister also referenced photographs that he said showed how the gowns were not manufactured in a way that would reduce microbial contamination. These included workers wearing short sleeves, gowns trailing on the floor and personnel wearing street shoes and working without hair protection, he said. Mr Stanley denied that DHSC owed a duty of care to PPE Medpro and said DHSC 'is entitled to repayment of the price, and to recover damages for storage costs'. He added: 'The gowns were not sterilised using a properly validated process and were not, as a result, compliant with the contractual standard or (in the true commercial sense) 'sterile' gowns at all.' Closing submissions are expected to conclude on Thursday with a written judgment given at a later date.
