These are the most, least stressed cities in the US: Study
The study determined its rankings through five different dimensions — work, financial, family, and health/safety stress. A higher number denotes a lower level of stress.
'Some stress is out of our control, due to issues with family, friends or employers,' Chip Lupo, an analyst with WalletHub, said in a statement. 'However, where you live can play a big role in how stressed you are. Cities with high crime rates, weak economies, less effective public health and congested transportation systems naturally lead to elevated stress levels for residents.'
When it comes to finances alone, 73 percent of Americans polled in an April 2025 survey by CNBC/SurveyMonkey admitted to feeling financially stressed.
'One of the biggest financial stressors in 2025 is rising grocery prices and incomes that are not keeping pace,' Marist University Professor of Management Joanne Gavin said in a statement.
'According to the Economic Research Service division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. food prices rose 23.6 percent between 2020 and 2024,' Gavin added. 'This significant increase has made providing the basics very difficult for many families.'
Data for the study came from the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, INRIX, TransUnion, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and more. See the full list on the WalletHub website, and the interactive map below.
Stress — and our varying levels of success in dealing with it — is increasingly part of the national conversation.
A year ago, former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy warned parents and caregivers of the toll stress can play on them and their families.
'The stresses parents and caregivers have today are being passed to children in direct and indirect ways, impacting families and communities across America,' Murthy said. 'The work of raising a child is work, no less valuable than the work performed in a paid job and of an extraordinary value when it comes to the impact on the future of society.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
3 hours ago
- Politico
The megabill's Medicaid cuts shocked hospitals, but they may never happen
And 2028 is not only an election year, but a presidential one. 'Are they really going to want to cut rural hospitals in an election?' asked Chris Mitchell, head of the Iowa Hospital Association. 'We're going to talk to our delegation early and often about the impact of these cuts and how looming cuts down the road impact how hospitals run in the interim.' Heartening for hospital executives is a now-long history of Congress delaying or repealing the painful parts of major legislation. Congress, for example, never allowed a tax on high-end 'Cadillac' insurance plans in 2010's Affordable Care Act to take effect, and rescinded a tax on medical devices. 'We saw it with the Affordable Care Act, and we will certainly see it with this bill,' predicted Ben Klein, a former Democratic Senate aide and founding partner of Red+Blue Strategies, a lobbying firm that counts major hospital groups and systems among its clients. Congress' habit of revisiting painful cuts also guarantees a multiyear windfall for K Street, the Washington corridor where many lobbyists have their shops. Lobbyists with ties to Trump or Republicans in Congress have already seen a surge in revenue this year. Several state-based hospital associations say they will ramp up meetings with lawmakers to stress the need for an off-ramp before the 2028 elections. Even before the megabill's enactment, some Republicans in competitive districts were suggesting Congress may need to tweak a provision restricting states' ability to extract more money from the Treasury if it causes problems for hospitals. 'If it looks like we have issues and we're not comfortable, we can change it,' Rep. Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.) said before the House voted to pass the bill last week. 'Things are subject to change. We're going to have different members of Congress. We're going to have a new president. Things are going to be different.' If the lobbyists are successful in undoing the cuts — which mostly target Medicaid, the state-federal insurance program for low-income people — it'll mean the One Big Beautiful Bill Act will be even more expensive than the Congressional Budget Office expects: $3.4 trillion in deficit spending over a decade. That will have ramifications across the U.S. economy, exposing Americans to higher interest rates and slower economic growth, budget experts warn. 'If they are successful in getting these reductions delayed, modified, scaled back, … it will be a tax on future generations,' said Bill Hoagland, senior vice president at the Bipartisan Policy Center and longtime GOP Senate budget aide. But that's a deal hospital executives — who have predicted the cuts could threaten some facilities' survival — are willing to take. Delays and cuts States use two tools to get higher Medicaid payments from the federal government. The first is a tax on hospitals and other providers. States use the tax revenue to pay their share of Medicaid, which offers insurance to more than 70 million low-income Americans. Hospitals don't mind because states cover the tax with bigger Medicaid payments. Conservative advocates of reining in the practice say it amounts to 'money laundering' because states with bigger Medicaid budgets qualify for larger federal contributions. That can also free up money in state budgets to pay for other things, like coverage for undocumented immigrants. But states and hospitals say the tax is vital because Medicaid reimbursements don't cover the true costs of care. The megabill incrementally lowers the rate states can levy from 6 percent of patient revenue to 3.5 percent. In 2028, the cuts start to phase in at 0.5 percent and continue for several years until reaching 3.5 percent. The new law permits the 10 red states that have chosen not to take advantage of a provision in Obamacare encouraging them to expand Medicaid to cover more low-income people to keep their taxes but not increase them. Restricting the provider taxes will hit hospitals that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients hard, their advocates say. Second, the bill targets a wonky financial tool states use to boost hospitals' Medicaid revenue called state-directed payments. The tool enables states to boost the rates privately run managed care plans, which contract with states to cover Medicaid patients, reimburse providers. States have ordered higher rates for chronically underfunded hospitals and facilities. In some cases, states have required the plans to pay providers at commercial rates, which are much higher than those paid by Medicaid and Medicare, the federal health insurance program for elderly people. Overall the bill will cut more than $1 trillion in health spending over the next decade, with the majority coming from Medicaid. This includes not just the state cuts but also the effects of other provisions, such as new rules requiring some Medicaid recipients to work, volunteer or attend school. Hospitals are trying to figure out how to make up funding gaps that could reach billions of dollars — and warning their representatives and senators of what's ahead. States could raise income taxes or find ways to shed Medicaid enrollment to help contain costs, hospital executives said. In West Virginia, facilities may delay construction projects or cut services, said Jim Kaufman, president and CEO of the West Virginia Hospital Association. Some areas that could be targeted are obstetrics or pediatric care, which are already in short supply in rural areas. 'One out of every two births is covered by Medicaid,' he said. Getting grandfathered Lawmakers are likely to hear more in the coming months about the impacts on their local hospitals. The industry has always been a powerful one in Washington since hospitals care for lawmakers' constituents and also employ many of them. The Iowa Hospital Association's Mitchell said lawmakers may think twice once they see the consequences of the cuts. 'We won't be talking theoretically,' he said. 'Unless there's intervention, we know how things will shake out.' Republicans did include a $50 billion relief fund for rural hospitals to stretch out over five years. Details on how that money will be distributed remain scant as states await guidance from the Trump administration. But it is unlikely to fully offset the losses, several hospital groups said. That's because rural hospitals serve mostly Medicare and Medicaid patients and the rates the government pays are usually far less than what private insurers do. In Virginia, large hospital systems in urban areas might get a sixth of their revenue from state-directed payments. For rural facilities, it is closer to a third, said Julian Walker, vice president of communications for the Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association. Advocates for rural hospitals, as well as urban ones that serve large numbers of Medicaid patients, are highlighting their vulnerability. Larry Bucshon, a Republican lobbyist and former heart and lung surgeon who served seven terms representing an Indiana House district, said he expects Congress will have to do more to help them. 'There is going to have to be some work done to say, 'Well, we need to have more grandfathering,'' he said. Still, lobbyists for hospitals said they aren't taking that for granted. They point out that the Paragon Health Institute, a Trump-aligned think tank, made the case for changes to provider taxes and state-directed payments and that many Republicans believe strongly that Medicaid costs have grown too rapidly and that some states provide benefits to people who don't need them. That threatens the program's stability, Republicans said during the megabill debate. 'They may not be as from the Paragon Institute work inside the White House and have been pushing for these changes that have now become enshrined in law,' a lobbyist for multiple hospitals, granted anonymity to speak freely on the situation, said. At the same time, any changes going forward will likely need bipartisan support and Democrats might not be eager to help Republicans out of a jam if the GOP finds itself trying to stop unpopular provisions from taking effect in an election year. 'I don't want to hear Jeff Van Drew, or any Republican from New Jersey, or any Republican in this House telling me that they're going to correct bad things that they did today,' said Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) after the final megabill House vote last week. Still, Pallone, the top Democrat on the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he wants to reverse the Medicaid cuts. 'I'm determined to ultimately reverse all the terrible things they've done to Medicaid, to the ACA, to make health care less affordable, more costly,' Pallone said.
Newsweek
7 hours ago
- Newsweek
Yogurt Recall Sparks Nationwide Warning to Customers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Danone U.S. is recalling all YoCrunch® products due to fears of potential plastic pieces in the dome topper. Newsweek has reached out to the company via email Monday night for comment. Why It Matters Numerous recalls have been initiated in 2025 due to the potential for damaged products, foodborne illness, contamination and undeclared food allergens. Millions of Americans experience food sensitivities or allergies every year. According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the nine "major" food allergens in the U.S. are eggs, milk, fish, wheat, soybeans, Crustacean shellfish, sesame, tree nuts and peanuts. Contaminants like plastic present health risks including choking, damage to teeth, digestive tract injury and the potential for microplastic absorption leading to systemic exposure. Foreign objects in food products, like small plastic shards, could obstruct airways, especially in vulnerable populations like children and older adults. What To Know The voluntary recall affects all flavors and sizes of YoCrunch® yogurts and is isolated only to the separate topper and does not impact the yogurt itself, the FDA says. The agency's alert has images and product details including lot numbers and expiration dates listed in a chart on its website for customers to reference. The FDA warns if people consume the product and there is plastic in the dome topper, it could "cause a choking response." It was unknown to Newsweek if there had been any injuries or illnesses related to this recall at the time of publication. YoCrunch® yogurt can be seen in a July 14 recall due to the potential presence of plastic in the product's topper. (Photo from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) YoCrunch® yogurt can be seen in a July 14 recall due to the potential presence of plastic in the product's topper. (Photo from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration) What People Are Saying The FDA in the alert, in part: "Consumer complaints have reported the presence of plastic pieces in the toppers, which have the potential to cause choking. The plastic pieces are transparent, may have sharp edges, and could present a risk to consumers because some pieces are between 7 and 25 mm in length." The FDA alert continued: "This voluntary recall was initiated on July 11, 2025, and is being conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The company is working swiftly with retail partners to remove the impacted product from shelves, while it works to address the issue and bring back the YoCrunch® products so many people enjoy." What Happens Next The FDA is expected to continue monitoring the recall, and additional guidance may be issued as more information is gathered regarding the scope of distribution. Consumers who have purchased the recalled YoCrunch® yogurts are advised to check product labels and contact the company's Consumer Care Line at 1-877-344-4886 on weekdays for refund information.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ice cream, other foods getting makeover as part of MAHA
The White House is touting progress in getting artificial colors and harmful chemicals out of the U.S. food supply — including news that ice cream companies that together make more than 90% of the ice cream sold in the U.S. have agreed to stop using certified artificial colors in their products. 'President Donald J. Trump took office promising to confront the chronic health crisis plaguing Americans — and six months later, he is delivering on that promise by removing harmful chemicals from our food supply," per a White House news release Monday. The effort is in line with findings of U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy's 'Make Americans Healthy Again' effort. In a report the department recently issued, chemical exposures and food dyes were called out as harmful. As Deseret News noted, the report on children's health focused on four things: an unhealthy diet — including artificial ingredients and dyes — exposure to environmental chemicals, too little activity and overprescription of medications. The White House list of companies that manufacture food and promise to make it healthier includes: Steak 'n Shake replaced its buttery blend with 100% all natural beef tallow, per QSR Magazine. In-N-Out told Good Morning America that it is making the same transition to 100% beef tallow and said it will remove artificial food dyes and artificial flavors from its menu items. McCormick said it will drop certain food dyes. McCormick CEO Brendan Foley told analysts that 'we are seeing a tick-up in reformulation activity' regarding food dyes and sodium, the latter of which he added they've always been working on, per Fox Business. PepsiCo is going to reformulate some of its products, including Tostitos and Lay's chips by the end of the year to remove artificial ingredients. Ramon Laguarta, company chair and CEO, told Food Business News in April that 60% of the company's portfolio already didn't have artificial colors. Tyson Foods has been 'proactively reformulating' products that contain petroleum-based artificial dyes, per Reuters. The company noted that most of its products don't contain those dyes. Mars Wrigley removed titanium dioxide from Skittles. Fox News reported it's typically used 'to make food look whiter and opaque.' Sam's Club has said it is 96% of the way to the goal of removing artificial ingredients from its private brand, Member's Mark. The warehouse store is calling the effort 'made without,' per a release from Walmart, Sam's Club's parent company. It said that 'the 'Made Without' list includes over 40 distinct ingredients, such as artificial colors, aspartame and high-fructose corn syrup, that were identified based on a combination of member feedback, nutritional guidance and industry trends.' Kraft-Heinz is giving its products a no-artificial-dyes makeover in the U.S., as Deseret News earlier reported. General Mills is taking artificial dyes from its cereals and all foods sold in K-12 schools, as the Associated Press reported. Nestlé USA said most of its portfolio doesn't have synthetic colors, but it's reformulating products that do to eliminate them by the middle of next year. 'Conagra Foods announced it will remove certain color additives from its frozen products, no longer offer products with artificial dyes in K-12 schools and stop using artificial dyes in the manufacturing of its products," per the White House. JM Smucker is getting rid of its synthetic colors from consumer food products, according to FoodDive and Hershey is doing the same, per Bloomberg. The Consumer Brands Association said it is urging its food and beverage companies to stop using the certified Food, Drug and Cosmetic colors from products served in schools by fall 2026.
