Finance experts suggest ways to teach children good money habits over the summer
Introducing children and young people to good money habits from a young age can help to build financial confidence and set them up for life, they added.
They made the suggestions ahead of My Money Week (June 9-13), a campaign and activity week which aims to encourage children and young people to learn about money matters.
Chris Henderson, save and pay director at Tesco Bank, said: 'It's so important to teach children about money, and how to manage it, from a young age.
'The skills and knowledge that are gained, which we carry with us into adulthood, can really impact how we live our lives and our financial wellbeing.'
He suggested making everyday spending a 'fun challenge,' adding that the summer holidays 'can be the perfect time to talk about budgeting and spending'.
Mr Henderson added: 'It might be a quick trip to the shops to pick up dinner or something bigger, like a day out. Let your children take charge of the budget and see how they would spend the money – you could even set them a challenge, like planning a day out.'
With many transactions taking place digitally rather than with physical cash, Mr Henderson also suggested showing young people 'what it looks like when you get paid, the money landing in your bank account, and then the things that you have to pay for – like water, electricity or housing costs.
'For older children, you can start introducing them to things like national insurance and your pension.'
He also suggested introducing the idea of savings with a 'wishlist' of items children want, inviting them to consider how much money they would need to save and how they might reach their savings goals faster.
Mr Henderson added: 'Not only will this help them save, they'll also value their purchases more and only spend on items they really need, rather than the first thing that catches their attention.'
Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at financial app Moneybox, suggested that some parents could consider opening a junior Isa.
He said: 'By the time your child turns 18, a junior Isa is automatically transferred into an adult Isa, allowing them to decide on how they wish to spend, or invest their hard-earned savings.'
Mr Byrnes added that if parents are concerned about how their children will spend the Isa money once they reach adulthood: 'You could put a small amount into a junior Isa and the rest of your savings into a different account earmarked for your children's future.'
As with adult Isas, junior Isas have tax advantages and the money held in them is ringfenced from the taxman for as long as it remains in its Isa 'wrapper'.
Mr Byrnes also suggested talking openly about money with children, adding: 'Talking about any money you have put aside for your children with them is a fantastic way to include them in your plans and educate them on savings and investing.'
Susan Hope, a retirement expert at Scottish Widows, highlighted recent research it had commissioned which indicated that more than two-fifths (44%) of adults doubt they will ever achieve financial independence, 'with confidence in making everyday financial decisions a driver of this'.
She suggested that going through payslips with young people could help them to understand concepts such as tax and national insurance (NI).
Ms Hope added: 'Let your children see how you budget, compare prices, or plan for your weekly spending. Involving them in decisions, like choosing between two activities based on cost, teaches practical skills they'll use for life and should instil money confidence.'
As children get older, she suggested talking to them about 'important topics like saving into a pension and what this means. A pension is something they will likely encounter for the first time when they start full-time work and we know that engaging early gives people the best opportunity to build a healthy pot for later on in life.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Council agree to sell former TK Maxx building in Peterborough
A council said it hoped a former TK Maxx building could be turned into a mixed residential and commercial City Council's cabinet members agreed to sell the Bridge Street building at a meeting on 15 July, as it was "no longer economically viable".It was bought by the local authority for £4.1m in 2020 with the aim of using it for a £15m community hub project known as The Vine.A feasibility commissioned by Tetra Tech in July 2022 said the cost of the necessary works was about £10.8m, making the project no longer viable. A marketing exercise to sell the vacant four-storey building will conclude in the Thulbourn, the council's cabinet member for growth and regeneration, told the meeting on 15 July, "62-68 Bridge Street is a prominent city centre site with development potential currently underutilised". Open to offers Adrian Chapman, the executive director of place and economy at the authority, said: "We should be proud of this site. At the moment it is difficult to be because the building is a slug of a building."I imagine it with something on there which is iconic in style and nature and is a real gateway into our city centre."He added: "This is a really significant site in our city centre and a site that deserves a building upon it which is of some significance, of quality and offers real value to the High Street."It's seen as part of our wider regeneration programme for the city centre."The building will go on the open market and the authority is open to all offers including development Local Democracy Reporting Service said before going out for informal tender the local authority had to pay for marketing fees (£15,000), a development brief (£10,000), surveys (£10,000) and legal fees (£5,000).Following the marketing of the building other costs would include, agent disposal fees (highest of 1.5% of sale price or £40,000), legal fees (highest of 1% of purchase price or £35,000) and a section 123 best consideration valuation – RICS Registered Valuer (£10,000).The council said it would achieve value for money by appointing professional advisers through a national local authority framework. Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘It's soul-destroying': takeover crisis leaves Morecambe FC on the brink
In the century since it was founded, only a world war has stopped play at Morecambe football club. But the 105-year-old institution is days away from collapse amid the 'unfolding disaster' of a takeover deal. The Shrimps, as they are affectionately known, are the latest victims of lax football governance rules, after similar crises at clubs including Wigan Athletic, Bolton Wanderers, Sheffield Wednesday and Bury FC, one of the oldest in the world. 'It's soul-destroying,' said David Freer, 62, a lifelong fan who has commentated on Morecambe games for 12 years for the Football League. As recently as 2021, the club were holding their own in the third tier of English football – their highest-ever ranking. Morecambe were relegated for the first time in their history in 2023 and then again last season. Now there is a real possibility the club will be banned from playing their first game in the National League, which kicks off in three weeks, and players will be allowed to leave the club for nothing if they are not paid by Friday. 'It is two minutes to midnight and it's just terrifying,' said Freer. The club's playing staff were only paid a third of their wages in June, and school proms, weddings and wakes due to be held at Morecambe's 6,400-capacity Mazuma Stadium were abruptly cancelled. The local food bank and Citizens Advice branch have offered help to employees, while an Indian restaurant fed them all for nothing earlier this month. A whip-round by fans raised £361 for the players, who politely declined the donation, which will instead go to the supporters' group the Shrimps Trust. Joanna Young, the chief executive of Citizens Advice North Lancashire, said: 'We've had contact from people who have been affected by what's happening at the football club, who find themselves in a very difficult financial position. 'Most people budget for what they're expecting to receive. Receiving a third of your wages – that just pitches people into financial crisis.' Lizzi Collinge, the Labour MP for Morecambe and Lunesdale, said she had wept and barely slept over the 'unfolding disaster' at the club. There was a 'very real risk' that the club would cease to exist in a matter of days, she added. Morecambe's takeover drama began in 2023 when the owner, Jason Whittingham's Bond Group Investments, announced it was selling to the London-based investment firm Panjab Warriors, which then loaned £6m to the Shrimps. Two years of financial turmoil followed, with unpaid bills, sackings and resignations. It came to a head last week when Whittingham announced he was selling the club to a mystery third party and not to Panjab Warriors. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion In the Commons last week, Collinge used parliamentary privilege to raise a suspicion that Whittingham is using Morecambe to leverage his own finances. 'I suspect that Jason Whittingham has built a house of cards, and it is now falling down around his ears,' she said. 'Morecambe FC is being held hostage, and it breaks my heart … The likes of Jason Whittingham should never have been allowed to buy a football club.' Panjab Warriors said this week it was considering legal action against Bond Group Investments, accusing it of possible 'misrepresentation and bad faith dealing'. Whittingham has not commented on the allegations. Morecambe FC was approached by the Guardian for comment. Tarnia Elsworth, the chair of the Shrimps Trust, said the end of the club would devastate Morecambe, a seaside resort that relies on the thousands of football fans who visit the Mazuma Stadium every year. Football was a 'common thread' that held the town together, she said. 'It's the one place where 3,000 people meet regularly to share experience. I've got members who've been doing that for 60 years. For some people it's the only contact they have with other people.' Outside the stadium, lifelong fan Mike Gibson, 58, said he had been watching his beloved Shrimps for 43 years. 'All that time could just disappear and could all be ripped away from you,' he said. 'It just feels like losing a family member. It's a deep part of your life.'
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Reeves's trickle-down economics: deregulation dressed as economic renewal
Rachel Reeves's Mansion House speech mattered less for what it changed than what it confirmed: she's staying – and backing the City. After spooking markets with tears in the Commons, appearing with the Bank of England governor was damage control. The 'Leeds reforms' were billed as bold, but the real message was a return to business as usual. Delivered to a City audience, the speech confirmed a deregulatory tilt that is striking not for its boldness but for its familiarity. Her 'reform' of the ringfencing regime for banks is code for loosening constraints under pressure from the finance lobby. Streamlining the regime brought in after the 2008 crash to hold bank leaders personally responsible for regulatory breaches will weaken post‑crisis accountability standards. One of the City's regulators, the financial ombudsman, will be reined in after industry gripes that its consumer-friendly stance over complaints has exposed banks to compensation claims worth billions of pounds. Mortgage borrowing caps are being eased, allowing lower-income buyers to stretch their finances further. And most revealingly, the Treasury will launch a national campaign next spring to promote stock market investing – because, in 2025, betting on stocks is public policy. It's a curious prescription for an economy whose GDP per head has grown more slowly than any other major high-income country since 2008. A new government promising change might have offered a broader rethink. Instead, it has given us rightwing tropes about red tape being the 'boot on the neck' of business. Today's financial sector is less a source of productive capital than a machine for asset inflation, property speculation and leveraged buyouts. Encouraging households to put their savings into equities, or to take on larger mortgages, will not fix Britain's broken growth model. It will simply shift more risk on to households already burdened by wage stagnation and unaffordable housing. Pushing stock ownership as financial inclusion shows just how Labour has internalised the logic of private enterprise. The state won't raise living standards directly, so individuals are nudged to become their own portfolio managers. This will do little to address the technological and organisational drift of the economy. But it highlights Ms Reeves's deeper misdiagnosis that Britain's stagnation stems from overregulation, not underinvestment; from hesitant consumers, not cautious governments. The real barriers to growth – weak demand, low public investment, regional imbalance – go unaddressed. So too does the self-imposed fiscal straitjacket that constrains state action. The Leeds reforms may boost asset prices, but undermine balanced regional growth. They will enrich the City, not the nation. Instead of building a resilient, innovation-led economy for all, they revive the ideology of asset-led prosperity for the few. They claim financial markets will backfill decades of underinvestment. History suggests they won't. A world-class financial centre isn't the problem – until its priorities outweigh the public's. Reeves says that her reforms will 'ripple' through the economy. But beneath the City-friendly gloss lies a misplaced faith in trickle-down economics – the very model that drove deindustrialisation, inequality and financial crises. Real wages are rising now, lifted by fiscal stimulus, but that can't undo 15 years of stagnation. The issue isn't too much state action – it's too little. Asking households to fix growth by becoming part‑time speculators isn't a plan. It's a cop-out.
