
What's Dr Copper's warning about India's economic health?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Trump's disruptive copper play
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
How will Trump's copper tariff impact India?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Copper is often called "Doctor Copper" in the world of economics because of its uncanny ability to act as a predictor of global economic trends. The term plays on the idea that copper holds a "PhD in economics", metaphorically speaking, due to its close relationship with industrial and economic activity.Copper is a highly versatile metal used in construction, electronics, manufacturing and energy infrastructure. Because it is so integral to core sectors of the economy, fluctuations in copper demand often reflect broader economic conditions. When the economy is expanding, demand for copper rises as industries ramp up production and construction projects increase. Conversely, when the economy slows down, copper demand tends to fall, and prices often decline as a result. This strong connection between copper prices and economic cycles has made the metal a reliable leading indicator.While copper isn't infallible and its price can be influenced by factors like speculation, supply disruptions or geopolitical tensions, it remains a widely watched barometer of global economic activity.US President Donald Trump has recently announced a 50% tariff on all copper imports into the United States, citing national security and the need to rebuild America's industrial base. "Copper is necessary for Semiconductors, Aircraft, Ships, Ammunition, Data Centers, Lithium-ion Batteries, Radar Systems, Missile Defense Systems, and even Hypersonic Weapons, of which we are building many," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. The move sent immediate shockwaves through financial markets and global trade networks.Copper futures in the US surged by as much as 17% in a single day, closing at their highest level in decades. Anticipating the tariff, importers rushed to stockpile copper, overwhelming US ports with tens of thousands of tonnes of incoming shipments. While it reflects a push toward economic self-sufficiency, the policy comes with significant short-term costs and uncertainty. In the long run, the US may expand domestic mining and smelting capacity, but such progress will take years.The tariffs are said to include all refined metal, Bloomberg has reported, citing people familiar with the matter. They would also include semi-finished products such as those used for power grids, the military and data centers.Major copper-exporting countries like Chile, Peru, Mexico and Canada could see declining demand from one of their largest markets. At the same time, global copper prices are likely to face downward pressure as surplus supply is redirected elsewhere. Arbitrage opportunities may also arise as the price of copper in the US decouples from international markets.Trump's administration has justified the tariff on the grounds of national security, claiming copper is vital for defense and critical infrastructure. However, critics argue that the move is a protectionist gesture unlikely to meaningfully boost domestic output in the short term. Instead, it may exacerbate supply chain disruptions and spark retaliation from trade partners.An industry official told PTI that Trump's proposed 50 per cent import tariff on copper will not have any impact on Indian companies as the country is copper-deficient.International Copper Association India Managing Director Mayur Karmarkar said, "India is a copper-deficient country, and its export, as such, is not significant. Again, of the total exports, the shipments to the US are just around 10,000 tonnes." The proposed duty, as a result, will not have any impact on the Indian firms, particularly as the domestic demand is extremely buoyant, given India's thrust on renewable energy, EVs, and a host of other copper-intensive sectors, Karmarkar said.Union Coal and Mines Minister G Kishan Reddy has said that the government is assessing the impact of Trump's tariffs on copper. According to sector watchers, Trump's tariffs raise the risk of cross dumping copper from other markets, driving down prices and threatening profitability of domestic producers. India annually consumes about 1.7 million tonnes of copper. Exports to the US stood at 13,003 tonnes in the calendar year 2024, and 3,554 in the first six months of 2025, Karmakar said. Another domestic industry representative told ET that less than $ 300 million worth of copper is exported to the US from India.However, certain critical sectors of India's economy might suffer from the steep 50% tariff on copper imports into the US. The tariff has triggered an alarm across global supply chains, raising concerns in India's electronics and semiconductor industries.ET has reported that the measure is primarily aimed at boosting domestic copper production in the US, but Indian executives said the ripple effects could to some extent disturb India's chip and electronics manufacturing efforts under its semiconductor mission.As per the ET report, Industry leaders say India's reliance on imported high-purity copper materials could become a serious bottleneck as global trade barriers proliferate and disrupt the supply chain. They urge the Indian government to move swiftly — not just by streamlining import procedures and BIS certifications but also by investing in the domestic production of high-grade copper alloys and materials essential to the electronics and chip value chain.Copper is a critical raw material in electronic manufacturing, widely used in printed circuit boards (PCBs), capacitors, resistors, connectors, relays, and wiring for semiconductor packaging and assembly. Domestic suppliers like Hindustan Copper, Sterlite, and Hindalco do not currently produce the semiconductor-grade copper needed at scale, said Ashok Chandak, president of SEMI India and the India Electronics and Semiconductor Association (IESA) as cited in the ET report. Global supply issues and costlier components will increase the manufacturing cost and slow down cost-sensitive semiconductor projects, he said. 'India must not just incentivise fabs but also build upstream resilience — through domestic refining, free trade agreements, and even strategic reserves.'Semiconductors aren't directly hit by tariffs, Kunal Chaudhary, partner and co-leader of the Inbound Investment Group at EY India told ET. 'But disruptions in copper, critical for chip wiring, are pushing up costs and shifting policy focus. This is slowing India's chip momentum and making things more expensive for global supply chains."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
39 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Education Department layoffs: Here's who could face the heat of Supreme Court order
Back in March, the Trump administration laid off 1,378 Education Department employees, following $1.5 billion in grant cuts, including $600 million for teacher training and $900 million for research. US District Judge Myong Joun blocked these layoffs in May, citing an illegal attempt to dismantle the department without congressional approval. However, the Supreme Court on Monday overturned the Boston court's injunction, enabling Education Secretary Linda McMahon to proceed with workforce reductions. Education Secretary Linda McMahon speaks during a Senate Appropriations hearing(AP) ABC News, in March, cited senior officials to report that the impacted staff will be placed on administrative leave starting March 21. They will receive full pay and benefits through June 9. Read More: Education Department layoffs: Why Supreme Court's decision is 'willfully blind' and 'naive', judges explain Who could be laid off at the Education Department? K-12 Dive cited an organizational chart of the Education Department to detail the offices that were to be impacted by the March 11 layoffs. The report further listed about 970 union employees out of 1,300 employees who were let go. According to the report, the closure of seven of 12 Office for Civil Rights (OCR) regional offices (Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, New York, Philadelphia, San Francisco) jeopardizes over 30 million K-12 students across 60,000 schools. Teachers: $600 million in training grants (eg, Supporting Effective Educator Development) were cut, with a $65 million restoration overturned. College students: Federal Student Aid (FSA) layoffs threaten FAFSA delays for 17 million families, including 800,000 Californians receiving $3.5 billion in Pell Grants. Civil rights advocates: 243 OCR staff, including attorneys, were cut, stalling investigations. Lawsuits by the NAACP and parents claim violations of Fifth Amendment rights. Employees: 1,378 workers, including 970 unionized staff, face termination, with 600 taking $25,000 buyouts. The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) was reduced to under 10 staff, as per the report.


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
"Grok For Government": Pentagon Signs Deal With Musk's xAI
Washington: Elon Musk's xAI, which features a large language model that has spewed Hitler-supporting rhetoric and antisemitic tropes, said Monday it has signed a deal to provide its services to the US Department of Defense. Launched at the end of 2023, Grok has rarely been out of the headlines for its offensive gaffes, and will now offer its services as "Grok for Government." In addition to the Pentagon contract, "every federal government department, agency, or office (can now) purchase xAI products" thanks to its inclusion on an official supplier list, xAI added. After an update on July 7, the chatbot praised Adolf Hitler in some responses, denounced on X "anti-white hate", and described Jewish representation in Hollywood as "disproportionate." xAI apologized on Saturday for extremist and offensive messages, and said it had corrected the instructions that led to the incidents. The new version of the chatbot, Grok 4, presented on Wednesday, consulted Musk's positions on some questions it was asked before responding, an AFP correspondent saw. The contract between xAI and the Department of Defense comes even as Musk and President Donald Trump are locked in a bitter feud. The two men became close during Trump's latest run for the presidency and, following the inauguration, the Republican billionaire entrusted Musk with managing the new agency known as DOGE to slash the government by firing tens of thousands of civil servants. After ending his assignment in May, the South African-born entrepreneur publicly criticized Trump's major budget bill for increasing government debt. The president and the businessman engaged in heated exchanges on social media and in public statements before Musk apologized for some of his more combative messages. The government and the defense sector are considered a potential growth driver for AI giants. Meta has partnered with the start-up Anduril to develop virtual reality headsets for soldiers and law enforcement, while in June OpenAI secured a contract to provide AI services to the US military.


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Over 20 states sue Trump over $6.8 billion frozen funds for after-school, summer programmes
More than 20 states have sued US President Donald Trump over the freezing of about $6.8 billion in funding for after-school, summer programmes and other programmes. The states have argued that the Donald Trump administration has violated the US Constitution by not considering Congress's sole authority over spending. (Bloomberg) Attorney generals or governors from 24 states and the District of Columbia sued the Trump administration in federal court in Providence, Rhode Island. They argued that the US department of education and the office of management (OMB) and Budget brought chaos to schools across America by freezing funding for six programmes approved by Congress. North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson told ABC News, "This is plainly against the law." He went on to explain from a legal standpoint that this is "against the Constitution, against the Impoundment Act. This is not a hard case". According to the Impoundment Control Act, 1947, Congress must note and review the executive branch withholdings of budget authority. This requires the President to report any such withholdings to Congress. ALSO READ | 20 US states sue Trump administration over sharing of medical aid data with deportation officials While the Trump administration has been going after Ivy League universities head-on, freezing millions and billions of dollars in funding, the freeze also extended to the money used to support migrant farm workers and their childrens' education, recruitment and training of teachers, English proficiency learning and academic enrichment, besides the after-school and summer programmes. The lawsuit filed against Trump said that his administration was legally required to release the funds to the states by July 1, Reuters reported. Instead, the education department notified them on June 30 that the funds would not be released under those programmes as per the deadline, citing the change in administration as its reason. At the time, an OMB spokesperson reportedly said, "ongoing programmatic review" of education funding and said initial findings showed what he termed as a misuse of grant funds to "subsidize a radical leftwing agenda." The department also raised objections to the grant money being used to support scholarship for immigrant students and LGBTQ-themed lessons. The Democratic-led states said that the freeze has resulted in cancellations of summer school and after-school programmes and the halting of other initiatives, with little time for schools to fill in the gaps in their budget. ALSO READ | Trump administration sues California over transgender athletes in schools The states have argued that the Trump administration has violated the US Constitution by not considering Congress's sole authority over spending and went against the federal administrative law by freezing funds without any logical explanation. They also said that the administration failed to abide by the Impoundment Control Act, which prevents the executive branch from single-handedly refusing to spend funds approved by Congress unless certain procedures are followed. Jackson further told ABC News, "If the courts don't act promptly, the consequences will be dire." He warned that districts face the threat of immediate harm as the school year is nearing. The North Carolina Attorney General said that the massive effect of the pause could also result in the firing of about 1,000 educators in the district. "Everybody knows when it comes to juvenile crime, you want a safe place for teenagers to be able to go, to be able to keep them out of trouble," Jackson said, adding that elimination of after-school programmes across the US has never been considered a "good idea". ALSO READ | 12 states sue Donald Trump administration in trade court to stop tariff policy Alabama State Superintendent of Education Eric Mackey said that this will affect the students with the "greatest need". He told ABC News, "The loss of funding for those rural, poor, high poverty school districts, is just going to be, you know, more fuel for the fire that makes it more difficult to educate children in those communities." Christy Gleason, executive director of Save the Children Action Network, which provides after-school programming for 41 schools in rural areas of Washington and across the South, where the school year is set to begin as soon as August, said, "Time is of the essence." "It's not too late to make a decision, so the kids who really need this still have it," she added.