Welsh Tory leadership change now 'completely nuts'
Mims Davies said she was the leader, but worked with Senedd group leader Darren Millar as "a team".
An internal party report recommended the Welsh Conservatives be led by the Senedd group leader.
Currently the group is led by three people: the Senedd group leader, the shadow Welsh secretary and the party's chairman.
Millar and the former secretary of state for Wales, David TC Davies, have been asked to comment.
Tory leader defends missing vote for Trump trip
Who is Darren Millar, new Senedd Tory leader?
Badenoch appoints new shadow Welsh secretary
Mims Davies, who is MP for East Grinstead and Uckfield but studied at Swansea University, was asked on BBC Politics Wales whether now was the time to reconsider the leadership question, considering there were now no Welsh MPs in the House of Commons.
"If you're asking me ahead of the biggest set of elections [2026 Senedd elections], where the Labour Party has put £120m into more politicians in the Senedd, that we should be going down a procedure and process about our own party, that would be completely nuts," she replied.
"Ultimately, I am the leader, working with Darren and David TC Davies, and working with our MSs [but] it's not like that, it's a team working together.
"Darren is setting a very clear agenda about fixing Wales in the Senedd alongside our shadow cabinet members there. We want to fix Wales and offer a very strong Conservative offer."
A report in November, accepted by the Welsh Conservatives board, recommended having one leader to represent the Welsh wing of the Tory party, as is the case in Scotland.
It followed calls from Conservative Senedd members for the leader in the Senedd to be the official figurehead of the party.
Although approved by the board in Wales, the final decision is in the hands of the UK Tory leader Kemi Badenoch.
Mims Davies said: "Where things have fallen down before is where you haven't really felt you've known what the team looks like.
"It's Darren [Millar] in the Senedd of course, with the MSs and his cabinet around him. Kemi [Badenoch] and I in Westminster, and Lord Byron Davies and Olivia Bloomfield in the Lords.
"The structure and the processes don't matter. We work together."
Conservatives rejected sexual harassment training
Gareth Lewis: Welsh Conservatives unite behind new leader
'I'm Christian - get over it', says Welsh Tory leader
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Funeral to be held for ‘icon in British politics' Norman Tebbit
Mourners will gather for the funeral of Tory former Cabinet minister Lord Norman Tebbit at the cathedral in the town where he lived. The Conservative grandee, who was one of Margaret Thatcher's closest political allies, died on July 7 aged 94. His life will be remembered during a service at St Edmundsbury Cathedral in the Suffolk town of Bury St Edmunds on Thursday. Lord Tebbit was injured in an IRA bombing during the Conservative Party conference in Brighton in 1984, which left his wife, Margaret, paralysed from the neck down. He served as employment secretary, taking on the trade unions, and as chairman of the Conservative Party from 1985 to 1987 he helped Mrs Thatcher secure her third general election victory. He also served as trade secretary and had a reputation as a political bruiser. After the 1987 election success he left his post as Tory chairman to help care for Margaret, who died in 2020. He left the Commons in 1992 and became a member of the House of Lords. His son William said his father died 'peacefully at home'. Former leader of the Conservative Party Iain Duncan Smith is due to give a reading at Thursday's funeral service, with the eulogy to be delivered by Tory peer and author Lord Michael Dobbs. Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch said Lord Tebbit was an 'icon in British politics', adding that his death would cause 'sadness across the political spectrum'. Former prime minister Boris Johnson described him as 'a hero of modern Conservatism' and 'great patriot' whose values were needed 'today more than ever'. Lord Tebbit's family have asked that any donations go to St Nicholas Hospice and the East Anglian Air Ambulance charity.
Hamilton Spectator
10 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Carney government is silent on prospect of pharmacare deals for provinces like Ontario
OTTAWA–Prime Minister Mark Carney's silence on Ottawa's outstanding pharmacare deals with provinces and territories — including Ontario — have health experts questioning why the issue no longer appears to be a priority for a Liberal government that campaigned on protecting the policy. At a news conference in Fredericton last week, when asked how much of a priority it was for Ottawa to strike a deal with New Brunswick, federal Health Minister Marjorie Michel told reporters Canada has 'a new government' and that the country is 'in a new context.' Michel's office has said that the federal government will be moving forward with implementing the four deals it has already signed with British Columbia, Prince Edward Island Yukon, and Manitoba. But the minister was noncommittal on the fate of deals with the remaining provinces and territories that have said they are open to reaching agreements. 'Universal, accessible and publicly funded health care is a point of pride for Canadians and it underpins our economic strength. Our new government is discussing with our provincial and territorial partners how we can support them for better health outcomes for Canadians,' said a statement from Michel's office. 'This is the time for the government to move forward. I mean, let's remember pharmacare and dental care and other health care measures were central to the Liberal (election) campaign,' said Steven Staples, the national director of policy for the Canadian Health Coalition. 'It's why Canadians voted for them, because they were unsure if the Conservatives would continue to expand the program.' Premier Doug Ford's government says Ontario has not received any details about Ottawa's plans for a deal since Justin Trudeau's Liberals passed legislation last fall promising to cover diabetes and birth control drugs and devices for Canadians, before laying out a plan for wider government-paid drug coverage later. 'We remain prepared to work collaboratively with the federal government to reach a deal that benefits Ontario families,' a spokesperson for Ontario Health Minister Sylvia Jones wrote. Federal departments are currently reviewing which programs could be on the chopping block as Carney looks to find billions of dollars in savings. The Trudeau government introduced its pharmacare bill in early 2024 after months of negotiations with its governing partner, the federal New Democrats. While the bill was primarily aimed at covering two classes of drugs through agreements with provinces, it also sought to lay out a framework for a more universal, single-payer system that would eventually replace Canada's patchwork of private and public coverage plans. In the lead-up to the federal campaign, then-health minister Mark Holland raced to ink deals, but had only struck preliminary agreements with three provinces and one territory when the election was called. During the campaign, the Liberals promised to 'protect dental care and pharmacare,' noting that the programs were 'key parts of a strong public health care system that (Conservative Leader) Pierre Poilievre would cut.' Carney did not say whether he would commit to expanding pharmacare into the universal system it was initially envisioned to be, while Poilievre suggested he would not completely abandon the program but did not explain how he would maintain it. NDP interim leader Don Davies, who worked with the Liberals to shape the legislation, told the Star Wednesday that the Carney government's failure to commit to swiftly drafting the rest of the deals suggests that the prime minister has 'deceived' Canadians. Davies also said the government's silence on the issue does little to bolster Ottawa's intergovernmental relations because it already set aside $1.5 billion over five years to support the creation of a nationwide pharmacare plan in tandem with provinces. 'Now you've got some provinces that, through just sheer timing, manage to get agreements with the feds and other provinces don't,' Davies said. Staples said that provinces like Ontario are now frozen out of the same types of coverage others in the country will be receiving. Currently, eligible Ontarians receive degrees of drug coverage through the Ontario Drug Benefit, OHIP+, and the Trillium Drug Program. But Dr. Danyaal Raza, a Toronto-based family physician and former chair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare, said there are gaps in the province's plans, which a federal deal would take steps toward closing. 'If we're even unwilling to take this marginal, incremental step forward, then I think … it's an indictment of how low a priority governments are putting on this issue,' said Raza, who said Ottawa's current lack of enthusiasm is 'confusing and disappointing.'
Hamilton Spectator
13 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Many voters cast ballot in last federal election without being fully informed: poll
TORONTO - A new survey suggests more than half of Canadians believe they didn't have enough information or needed more to cast their ballot in the last federal election. The Ipsos poll says 57 per cent of respondents either believed they didn't have enough local news or could have used more to assess candidates back in April. Many respondents pointed to social media as among their most influential news sources, with 14 per cent specifically citing Facebook even though the social media site banned news content in Canada. The online survey of 1,000 Canadian residents was conducted July 11 to 21 and is part of a study by the Public Policy Forum on access to local news. The think tank concludes that a steady erosion of local news outlets leaves many Canadians 'wading through the toxic waters of social media.' Report authors include former Toronto Star columnist Tim Harper and former Maclean's editor-in-chief Alison Uncles, who suggest a permanent non-partisan election fund could help media outlets better cover political races. 'There was scant coverage at the local level, with candidates using their own social media channels rather than have their information filtered through local reporters,' says the report, also co-authored by Sara-Christine Gemson, executive director of the Public Policy Forum Academy and a past Radio-Canada journalist. 'It is no hyperbole to argue that given the collapse of local news and the Facebook ban on news on its site, the federal election of 2025 was most likely the most poorly covered election in modern Canadian history.' Meta stopped Canadian access to news on Facebook and Instagram in 2023 after the federal government required the social media giant to pay Canadian news outlets for posting their journalism. Sean Simpson, senior VP at Ipsos, says the poll suggests 'people are craving more information' about their local candidates and local issues. The poll found 70 per cent of respondents said greater availability of local news would have made them better informed voters. There was some overlap when respondents were asked which sources of information had the biggest impact on their ballot, with national media most often cited at 46 per cent, followed by word-of-mouth at 35 per cent. While 14 per cent pointed to Facebook, 15 per cent cited other social media, such as TikTok, Reddit and Instagram. Simpson notes that national concerns dominated the campaign as concerns over the economic policies of U.S. President Donald Trump shaped a two-party race between Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre and winning Liberal leader Mark Carney. 'It was very much an election fought on national leaders,' says Simpson, reached in Kitchener, Ont. 'It was: who's best to deal with Trump?' 'Uncovered: How to build back election coverage for a better democracy' is set for release Thursday. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
