Trump says he'll send new weapons to Ukraine
'We're going to send some more weapons. We have to – they have to be able to defend themselves,' Trump said ahead of a dinner with his Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu.
'They're getting hit very hard. We're going to have to send more weapons,' Trump added. 'Defensive weapons, primarily, but they're getting hit very, very hard.'
The president's latest remarks come after a senior White House official told CNN last week the Trump administration was pausing some weapons shipments to Ukraine, including air defense missiles. The decision came after a review of military spending and American support to foreign countries that was signed off by Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly said at the time that the decision was made 'to put America's interests first.'
Some US officials insinuated the review of aid to Ukraine was related in part to the Pentagon's push to focus on China and be prepared for potential future conflict in the Pacific – an issue prioritized by the Pentagon's policy chief, Elbridge Colby.
'The Department of Defense continues to provide the President with robust options to continue military aid to Ukraine, consistent with his goal of bringing this tragic war to an end. At the same time, the Department is rigorously examining and adapting its approach to achieving this objective while also preserving US forces' readiness for Administration defense priorities,' Colby said in a statement at the time of the pause.
Russia welcomed the halt in certain shipments to Ukraine, claiming – without providing any evidence – it was made because the US did not have enough weapons.
The US has been the biggest single donor of military aid to Ukraine since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, supplying Ukraine with air defense systems, drones, rocket launchers, radars, tanks and anti-armor weapons, leading to concerns over dwindling US stockpiles.
Trump previously halted all shipments of military aid to Ukraine in March following a heated Oval Office argument with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Trump resumed aid flows to Ukraine about a week later.
The decision to send additional weapons also comes after Trump spoke separately last week with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Zelensky. He said afterward his talk with Putin was disappointing and there was 'no progress' towards a ceasefire.
Meanwhile, Zelensky in recent weeks has been pleading with Western allies to bolster his nation's aerial defenses after intensifying Russian airborne attacks. Russia launched a record number of drones at Ukraine overnight on Friday, just hours after the Trump-Putin phone call.
Trump later Friday said the US was considering Ukraine's request for more Patriot defense systems after a 'very good' phone call with Zelensky. The Ukrainian president said on Saturday that latest conversation with Trump was the best and 'most productive' he has had.
Trump on Monday reaffirmed his displeasure with the Russian leader, saying: 'I'm not happy with President Putin at all.'
CNN's Kaanita Iyer contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
34 minutes ago
- Washington Post
On Ukraine, Hegseth embarrasses Trump and undermines the U.S.
For the third time in less than six months, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has moved to suspend munitions shipments to Ukraine, and President Donald Trump has reversed the decision. Trump announced on Monday night that the United States will resume weapons shipments that the Pentagon paused last week. This previously happened in February and May. In all three cases, the Pentagon's weapons freeze surprised Trump allies and Congress, and Russia pounded civilian targets in Kyiv before the president changed the administration's course.
WIRED
34 minutes ago
- WIRED
Volodymyr Zelensky's Clothing Has Sparked a Polymarket Rebellion
By Joel Khalili and Kate Knibbs Jul 8, 2025 4:18 PM Crypto gamblers are crying foul as they stand to lose millions of dollars in a bet over whether Ukraine's president would wear a suit. Did Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky wear a suit? It should be a simple question, but a dispute over the answer has torn apart bettors on the gambling site Polymarket. With a collective $210 million on the line, some claim to have been denied their rightful winnings. Polymarket is a platform that allows users to gamble cryptocurrency on the outcome of a particular event, ranging from sports games to election outcomes to niche wagers on movie box office results. Each individual prediction market is framed as a binary question. In this case: 'Will Zelensky wear a suit before July?' After Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, Zelensky pledged to wear only military-style fatigues in solidarity with frontline soldiers. The Ukrainian leader's sartorial choices have since become a media preoccupation, criticized in some quarters as disrespectful, particularly after a heated encounter with US president Donald Trump in March. On June 25, Zelensky was pictured at a pre-NATO summit dinner wearing a black jacket, shirt, and trouser combination with military-style detailing that multiple news outlets—including the BBC and the New York Post—described as a suit. Posts to a Polymarket-affiliated X account and the national Ukraine Instagram page even referred to it as a suit. Yet the Polymarket bet is poised to be resolved to the contrary, leading to an outcry among those who stand to lose their stake. The discrepancy comes down partly to a dispute over the definition of a suit. 'It meets the technical definition,' menswear expert Derek Guy tells WIRED. 'I would also recognize that most people would not think of that as a suit.' But more than that, the bet has become a test case for the efficacy and reliability of Polymarket's model for crowdsourcing truth. In the event of a dispute, the platform lets holders of a certain crypto token cast votes on the answer. That may work for bets with binary outcomes—a team wins a game or it doesn't—but invites chaos when many millions of dollars are on the line over more subjective topics, like what constitutes a suit. ('That's a very weird system,' Guy says.) Before a prediction market is resolved, Polymarket gives users a two-hour window in which they can lodge a dispute by posting a $750 bond. If a dispute is registered, it falls to Polymarket's 'oracle,' a decentralized financial contracts platform called Universal Market Access (UMA), to vote on a resolution. UMA, which was founded in 2018 and operates independently from Polymarket, resolves these disputes by allowing people or organizations that hold its tokens to vote on what the truth is. In this case, UMA voters are saying by a seemingly insurmountable margin that Zelensky did not wear a suit. The problem with such a system, critics claim, is that it's vulnerable to abuse by so-called whales—holders of large amounts of tokens with an outsized influence over decisions. To avoid having to wade into every Polymarket dispute or otherwise incur a financial penalty for missing a vote, smaller UMA holders frequently loan their tokens to delegates who vote on their behalf, further concentrating the supply. According to data platform Sentora, 95 percent of UMA tokens are controlled by whales. 'It's not decentralized—nowhere near decentralized,' says an independent crypto trader who goes by the username defipolice, who stands to lose roughly $30,000 on his Zelensky bet. Polymarket did not respond to a request for comment. Launched in 2020, Polymarket rose to prominence last year as a way for people to bet on the outcome of the US presidential election. During the election cycle, Polymarket and its advocates pitched prediction markets as a superior method for predicting outcomes than traditional polling—as a more efficient 'source of truth.' But that proposition has been challenged by the Zelensky suit debacle. 'Everybody knows the answer … but the system is currently broken,' claims defipolice. 'It's a fucked up situation.' Polymarket does reserve the right to overturn a UMA outcome. Last year, the company overruled UMA voting on a wager over whether Barron Trump was involved in a Trump-themed cryptocurrency project. At the time, Polymarket refunded bettors and explicitly described UMA's conclusion as 'wrong.' The company hasn't stepped in every time, though. In March, a $7 million bet over whether Ukraine and the United States would reach a deal on mineral access was prematurely resolved with the wrong result. At the time, in a Discord message addressed to affected users, a Polymarket employee called it an 'unprecedented situation' but said that it would not refund bettors. Polymarket users aggrieved by the likely outcome of the Zelensky prediction market are gathering on messaging platform Discord to coordinate a response, potentially including pursuing a lawsuit against Polymarket and UMA, they claim. 'I do intend to join the lawsuit,' says a Polymarket bettor by the username Adversary, who at one stage stood to win $300,000 on their bet, before they pulled out some funds in response to the confusion. 'I have experienced moral damages over this debacle and the added context has caused me a great amount of stress.' People in UMA's Discord channel are similarly riled by the controversy, with community members accusing each other of 'backchannel deals' and scams. Some view it as an unflattering referendum on the entire project. 'This isn't just a vote on a suit—it's the vote on the future of UMA,' one member wrote. The final resolution is expected by the evening of July 8. The cofounder of UMA, Hart Lumbur, says the organization is planning to make adjustments to the dispute resolution process in light of the Zelensky suit controversy, but rejects the allegation that the vote has been manipulated in any way. 'There is no evidence of manipulation of UMA. I really don't like those meritless accusations,' Lambur tells WIRED. 'After the dust settles on this suit-or-not market, I'm looking forward to having a productive conversation about improvements and design tradeoffs.' Others see this kind of disagreement as a natural part of the process: 'For me this was a jacket that looked like a suit but wasn't a suit,' says Lancelot Chardonnet, who voted as a delegate on behalf of the token pool, which controls around 0.1 percent of the total supply. 'This controversy simply reflects that the truth is complex and differs from one person to another.' All of this heat arrives at a critical moment for Polymarket, which is in the middle of an aggressive fundraising round led by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund; according to Reuters, the prediction market will be valued at $1 billion. It's not an ideal time to alienate some of its most active users, or for the integrity of its markets to come into question. "The silence from Polymarket has been deafening,' defipolice says.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Netanyahu stresses Hamas's military capabilities must be destroyed ahead of US visit
PM: Israel committed to remaining vigilant, preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons • 'Opportunity to expand circle of peace' We are determined to bring all hostages home, but are firm in eliminating Hamas's military capabilities, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said while preparing to board Israel's state plane, Wing of Zion, to travel to Washington on Sunday. "We are still focused on the Gaza arena. We have also achieved great successes there, but there are still tasks to complete. To date, we have freed 205 out of 255 hostages, including 148 alive. There are 20 hostages still alive and 30 deceased. I am determined, and we are determined, to bring them all back," Netanyahu stated. "We are also determined to ensure that Gaza will no longer pose a threat to Israel. This means we will not allow a situation where there are more kidnappings, more killings, more beheadings, or more invasions. This means one thing: the destruction of Hamas's military and governmental capabilities. Hamas will not be there," he continued. "I am committed to these three tasks: freeing and bringing all our hostages, both the living and the fallen, eliminating Hamas's capabilities – removing them from Gaza, and ensuring that Gaza will no longer pose a threat to Israel," he added. "We are working to secure the deal under the terms we agreed to. I sent a team for negotiations with clear instructions, and the conversation with US President Donald Trump can certainly advance the outcome we all hope for," Netanyahu said. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu talks to press before boarding Wings of Zion to travel to Washington, July 6, 2025. (credit: VIA AMICHAI STEIN) "In my conversation with President Trump, I will first thank him for his strong commitment to Israel. We have never had a friend like this in the White House. Our joint efforts led to a tremendous victory over our common enemy – Iran," Netanyahu added. "Iran has made the destruction of Israel its goal. For years we were concerned – what will we do about Iran? Can we handle Iran? And now, our heroic pilots have flown over Iran's skies, and the IDF excelled, as did the Mossad and all our security branches. Not only there, but also against Hezbollah in Lebanon. For years we were concerned – what will Hezbollah do and how can we stop them? We could stop them. And we also struck Hamas," he continued. "This creates a great commitment and also great opportunities. The commitment is, first and foremost, to preserve the achievement, to remain vigilant against Iran's efforts to renew its pursuit of nuclear weapons aimed at our destruction," he stated. "This is one commitment, but there is also a great opportunity. The opportunity is to expand the circle of peace, far beyond what we could have imagined before. We have already dramatically changed the face of the Middle East, and we now have the opportunity and ability to change it even more and bring a great future for the State of Israel, the Jewish people, and the entire Middle East," he continued. "This is my third visit with the president since he was elected a little over six months ago. I will also meet with senior administration officials, key members of Congress from both parties, and many other figures," Netanyahu noted. US Ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, also boarded Wing of Zion. During the boarding process, The Jerusalem Post asked Huckabee his feelings towards the delegation's visit. Mike Huckabee speaks to The Jerusalem Post while boarding Wings of Zion plane, joining delegation to Washington, July 6, 2025. (credit: AMICHAI STEIN) "Looking forward to it, it's going to be a great trip," Huckabee responded. "Do you expect any announcements to be made?" the Post asked. Huckabee smiled and stated, "I don't want to make any predictions."
