Meta updates safety features for teens. More than 600,000 accounts linked to predatory behavior
Teens will now see more information about who they're chatting with, like when the Instagram account was created and other safety tips, to spot potential scammers. Teens will also be able to block and report accounts in a single action.
"In June alone, they blocked accounts 1 million times and reported another 1 million after seeing a Safety Notice," the company said in a release.
This policy is part of a broader push by Meta to protect teens and children on its platforms, following mounting scrutiny from policymakers who accused the company of failing to shield young users from sexual exploitation.
Meta said it removed nearly 135,000 Instagram accounts earlier this year that were sexualizing children on the platform. The removed accounts were found to be leaving sexualized comments or requesting sexual images from adult-managed accounts featuring children.
The takedown also included 500,000 Instagram and Facebook accounts that were linked to the original profiles.
Meta is now automatically placing teen and child-representing accounts into the strictest message and comment settings, which filter out offensive messages and limit contact from unknown accounts.
Users have to be at least 13 to use Instagram, but adults can run accounts representing children who are younger as long as the account bio is clear that the adult manages the account.
The platform was recently accused by several state attorneys general of implementing addictive features across its family of apps that have detrimental effects on children's mental health.
Meta announced last week it removed about 10 million profiles for impersonating large content producers through the first half of 2025 as part of an effort by the company to combat "spammy content."
Congress has renewed efforts to regulate social media platforms to focus on child safety. The Kids Online Safety Act was reintroduced to Congress in May after stalling in 2024.
The measure would require social media platforms to have a "duty of care" to prevent their products from harming children.
Snapchat was sued by New Mexico in September, alleging the app was creating an environment where "predators can easily target children through sextortion schemes."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump 'In Denial' About Job Figures, Economy—Nate Silver
Based on factual reporting, incorporates the expertise of the journalist and may offer interpretations and conclusions. Pollster Nate Silver on Sunday called out President Donald Trump's reaction to the latest data about jobs, accusing him of "denialism" and warning that it won't help him fix the nation's slowing economy. "Firing the BLS commissioner won't prevent the effects of tariffs. But it will reduce American economic leadership and increase uncertainty for businesses, workers and investors," Silver wrote in his newsletter, referring to Trump's decision to fire Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), after the agency published a weaker-than-expected jobs report for July. Silver stressed that U.S. economic data remains reliable, as it is meticulously documented and regularly revised "because measuring something as complex as the modern American economy is an incredibly challenging task." "I'm not sure exactly where firing the BLS commissioner ranks on the list of Trump-related outrages," Silver wrote. "Even if Congress does its job and McEntarfer replaced with another competent successor, this could have a chilling effect on BLS and other government agencies to operate independently." Newsweek has reached out to the White House by email on Sunday outside of normal business hours for comment. Why It Matters Trump's decision to fire McEntarfer has sent shockwaves throughout the country, with economists and Democratic lawmakers criticizing the move. Some have accused Trump of trying to "kill the messenger" over heavy revisions to May and June's job numbers, which removed 258,000 jobs previously announced in those months. This followed the July jobs report, which reported 73,000 jobs added, which is well short of the projected 100,000 jobs. The unemployment rate also rose to 4.2 percent. The firing of a high-level labor statistician after the release of adverse economic data raised alarms about the politicization of nonpartisan agencies and reliability of official U.S. economic statistics. Experts and lawmakers stressed that the integrity of the BLS is central to public trust and informed economic decision-making. What To Know Silver, the founder of 538 and one of the most prominent polling experts in last year's presidential election, wrote in his newsletter that July's jobs report has suggested a slowing economy and "Trump is in denial about it." "Each monthly payrolls figure is actually revised three times: once in each of the first two months after initial publication (so July's 73,000 figure will be re-reported in August and then again in September) and then again each January as part of the BLS's annual benchmark revisions," Silver wrote. He argued that the jobs report often only receives attention at the initial announcement, with politicians and news media treating the figure as a simple "beat" or "bust" factor relative to the initial estimate, and that not enough attention is given to the regular cycle of "large revisions and the difficulties in estimation." "All of this feels a little too familiar: it's the same thing that happens when news organizations breathlessly report polling data without considering the margin of error and other challenges for surveys," Silver wrote. He noted that revisions during every month of Trumps' second administration have seen negative revisions, which he wrote is "actually common enough" and that it's more important to look at the trend of revision from month-to-month. Those trends help experts and analysts understand if they're seeing sampling errors or statistical biases in the numbers, which can occur also in the event of an economy facing "some sort of trauma or disruption." Silver also wrote that any attempt to undermine Trump would be better executed by reporting the lower estimates instead of revising them down later, since "revisions don't usually get as much media attention as the headline figures," and that "the May and June revisions are relatively pedestrian." "The largest change ever to an initial jobs figure ever after two months came in March 2020 as the pandemic hit American shores; initially reported as a job loss of 700,000, it was later revised to nearly 1.4 million instead," he wrote. President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on August 1 in Washington, D.C. President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to Bedminster, New Jersey, on August 1 in Washington, D.C. Andrew Thomas/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images What People Are Saying President Donald Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on Sunday: "Head of the Bureau of of Labor Statistics did the same thing just before the Presidential Election, when she lifted the numbers for jobs to an all time high. I then won the Election, anyway, and she readjusted the numbers downward, calling it a mistake, of almost one million jobs. A SCAM! She did it again, with another massive 'correction,' and got FIRED! She had the biggest miscalculations in over 50 years." Trump also wrote on Truth Social on Friday: "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months. Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative. The Economy is BOOMING under 'TRUMP' despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting 'Kamala' elected – How did that work out? Jerome 'Too Late' Powell should also be put "out to pasture." Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Ernie Tedeschi, the former head of Yale University's Budget Lab, wrote on X on Friday about McEntarfer's firing: "I've worked closely with Erika. I know of no economist who is more data-focused & devoted to truth in statistics. She never shied from speaking truth to power when the data were disappointing. Nothing would be worse for US credibility than political meddling in our economic data."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
SC senator announces run for Ralph Norman's 5th District seat in Congress
Republican state Sen. Wes Climer is running for Congress, seeking to succeed U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, who is running for South Carolina governor. Climer announced his run at Southern Charm Events in Rock Hill Thursday evening, promising to be an ally to President Donald Trump in Congress and push an 'America First' agenda. 'I've had enough and I think you have too,' Climer said Thursday. 'Enough of the career politicians. Enough of unelected bureaucrats running our lives. Enough of special interests calling the shots.' South Carolina's 5th Congressional district includes all of York, Lee, Lancaster, Union, Cherokee, Chester, Fairfield and Kershaw counties, as well as portions of Sumter and Spartanburg counties. The district heavily favors Republicans, and Climer is the biggest name in the race so far. Climer joins two Democrats already in the 2026 race, Alex Harper and Andrew Clough. Climer endorsed Norman's run for governor at the Thursday event, encouraging York County Republicans in attendance to vote for him. Who is Wes Climer? Climer is in his third term in the state Senate, representing District 15 in York County since 2016. He is the chairman of the S.C. Senate's agriculture and natural resources committee. He formerly served as the chairman of the York County Republican Party. In July, Climer filed a lawsuit over the General Assembly-approved pay increase for lawmakers, The State reported. He called the increase of $1,500 a month 'unconstitutional.' Climer also advocated this year for candy and soda to be excluded from SNAP benefits, and voted against the confirmation of Myra Reece as director of the Department of Environmental Services. Climer said at the time he did not want the state to make rules based on 'thoroughly unproven theories,' citing climate change as an example. Climer described himself Thursday as a Christian, a small business owner and 'a lifelong conservative who is sick and tired of watching this county get hollowed out by people who either don't know what they're doing or don't care.' What are Climer's campaign priorities? Climer said his campaign priorities include cutting the federal budget, sealing the Southern border, fighting against Critical Race Theory in schools and overhauling the Department of Justice. He said in South Carolina he will push for better coordination between federal, local and state governments to manage the state's growth. Climer emphasized his record in the state senate fighting for constitutional carry, tax cuts, school choice and anti-Critical Race Theory measures. 'We don't need more noise in Washington,' Climer said. 'We need results,' What is Climer's experience? Climer has served in the state Senate for nearly nine years and ranks 23rd out of 46 senators in seniority. When asked why he would give up the seniority he has gained in the smaller chamber to be one of 435 U.S. representatives, Climer said he believes Congress is where he can make the biggest impact. 'The real fight for the future of this country is happening in Washington,' he said. 'The stakes are incredibly high. I have learned a lot serving in the State House about how to accomplish conservative objectives, not just talking about it, not just doing a press release or a tweet, but moving it from an idea into a law. I think we need more of that in Washington, people who not only can make the argument, but people who can close the deal.' His experience makes him a good candidate for Congress, said Alex Stroman, a former SC GOP executive director. Climer has worked on Capitol Hill and is a popular senator throughout the state, Stroman said. 'He will be able to go in with an understanding that I think a lot of freshmen members of Congress don't have,' Stroman said. 'He knows how it works, and he knows how to get things done. He knows what to avoid, and I think that the legislative experience that he's had and the leadership experience he's had in the South Carolina Senate really will make him an even better congressman. It's kind of a no-brainer.' Is Climer aligned with President Donald Trump? Climer is aligned with the president's agenda, Stroman said. Though he deals more with state-specific issues as a senator, he has maintained a strong Republican stance, he said. 'Those Republican values that he's had for years being a county party chairman, working in the Senate, focusing on constituent service issues, really taking some really tough stances at times in the South Carolina Senate that I think are more aligned with… the president's agenda.' Climer said he would be an ally to the president in Congress. Climer told The Charlotte Observer on Thursday he doesn't disagree with any Trump policy. What advantages does Climer have? Stroman said some of Climer's biggest strengths include his personality, strong stances in the senate and his ability to raise money. 'Climer is someone who can disagree without being disagreeable. He's somebody who has really taken tough stances at times in the South Carolina legislature and led on issues,' he said. 'I think that he has so many built-in advantages that will prove him well in a Republican primary and a general election.' Climer told the Observer his record in the state senate is his biggest advantage. 'Most people, when they run for office, they have to run from their record in a conservative primary,' he said. 'I'm running on my record as a principled conservative who delivers results.'
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
On GPS: Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes on how to make markets work for all Americans
Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes talks to Fareed about his new book, "Marketcrafters," and how policymakers can intervene in the market in targeted, strategic ways.
