More students in Singapore juggle studying and working to support their families, Singapore News
Chan, who graduated in May from Nanyang Polytechnic (NYP) with a diploma in food and beverage business, worked up to five hours a day on weekdays and 12 hours a day on weekends — all while studying full-time.
While there is no official data on the number of students who have to study and work to support their families, social service agency Allkin Singapore said that it has seen a more than threefold increase in the number of post-secondary students aged 17 and above who have to work while studying, from five in 2024 to 17 in 2025.
This is according to data gathered from applications for its Allkin ElevatED! study grant.
Natalie Lim, deputy director of the family and community support division at Allkin Singapore, said that this increase 'suggests a growing trend of students having to assume financial responsibilities while pursuing their education'.
Two other social service organisations The Straits Times reached out to did not have this data.
The Ministry of Education (MOE) said that in academic year 2023, over 70 per cent of Singaporeans studying at the Institute of Technical Education (ITE) and around 50 per cent of Singaporeans studying in polytechnics received the Higher Education Community Bursary and the Higher Education Bursary. The figures have remained stable over the past five years, MOE added.
These are government bursaries for post-secondary students from lower- to middle-income group households that help them to offset tuition fees. Families eligible for the Higher Education Community Bursary take home $4,400 or less monthly, while families eligible for the Higher Education bursary take home $10,000 or less monthly. Sharing their families' burden
For some students, working part-time is a choice they make to help supplement their family's income.
Second-year Temasek Polytechnic (TP) business student Lucas Lim works part-time as a retail assistant at Fairprice to alleviate the financial burden on his 63-year-old bus captain father, who is the sole breadwinner of the family, which includes his 56-year-old homemaker mother and two older brothers, aged 25 and 29.
The 18-year-old said of his father, who is looking to retirement soon: "I've seen him working tirelessly for his entire life. I want to be able to carry some of the burden for him."
When Singapore Polytechnic (SP) civil engineering student Yap Jie Er started working at Takagi Ramen as a kitchen crew member in October 2021, she did it for her own extra pocket money.
Two months later, it became a necessity for her to own her own keep after her father died from cancer.
"I stopped taking an allowance from my mum. Since I was earning my own money, I wanted my mum to be able to give more allowance to my three younger siblings," said Yap, 20, whose younger siblings are aged 18, 11 and seven years old respectively.
Jennifer Lau, a third-year immersive media student at Ngee Ann Polytechnic (NP), works once a week as a retail assistant at a Lego store.
She would like to work more, but she cannot do so because she has to juggle studies as well as visiting her father in a nursing home.
Her father was admitted to a nursing home to receive full-time care in November 2023, after being diagnosed with Parkinson's disease, a neurodegenerative disease that leads to difficulty with walking, balance, coordination and even speech.
Lau, 23, earns about $400 a month during the school term. Most of her salary is spent on personal expenses like food and transport costs, as well as food for her father when she visits him two to three times a week.
For now, her household bills and her father's nursing home costs are covered by her father's savings and her school fees are covered by financial assistance programmes.
"The biggest challenge of working and studying at the same time is that I can't work enough. I want to be able to work more," said Lau, who has no siblings. How they balance school and work
Many students who work part-time focus on academics during the weekdays and go to their jobs on weekends.
Yap would work up to two shifts at Takagi Ramen every weekend. Each shift lasted from 10am to 10pm.
Her job involved preparing drinks, serving customers and assisting the ramen chef. Yap recalls that she had to be on her feet throughout her shifts except during a one-hour break each shift.
She said: "Standing all day can be tiring, especially during the evening peak hours when it's extremely busy. We (also) have to stay a 100 per cent focused on our work without making any mistakes."
Despite working only twice per week, Yap's part-time job took a toll on her studies.
She said: "I would be too tired (from work) to study on weekends, so I would often stay up past midnight to catch up on studies during weekdays."
"Sometimes, when I am sleeping, I would even have dreams about working (at my job). It definitely affected my concentration in class and there's been an obvious drop in my grades," said Yap, whose grade point average has dropped from 3.4 to 3.2.
She stopped working in July 2024 in order to focus on her studies as she is in her final year. Financial aid programmes, such as the bond-free HSBC Centenary Scholarship she won in 2023 and 2024, have helped with her financial situation.
She said: "It's allowed me to work less and have more time to focus on studies and socialising." 'I wish I could spend the money I earn on myself'
For Mr Lim, working part-time means having to sacrifice time that could be spent on co-curricular activities or socialising.
He said: "I don't have much of a chance to rest, so I'm usually too exhausted from work to participate in sports."
"CCAs I'm interested in, like dragonboat and archery, train only on the weekends, so I'm unable to commit due to my work."
Not only does he miss socialising with his friends due to his work commitments on the weekends, he also feels like his life is about "constantly running from task to task".
"I have no time to unwind," he said.
Lau said her sacrifice is in terms of the things she wants but does not need.
"I wish that I could spend some of the money I earn on things I want to buy. Sometimes I'll see things like games or (video game) consoles and tell myself that I'm going to buy it next month, but that next month never comes around," she said.
When she first began working, she often found herself comparing her situation with those of her classmates. "Why do I have to work while they don't? Why can they have things that I can't?" she would think.
"But as I've gotten older, I've gotten more used to it and I've realised that everyone has different journeys any way."
Lau said that despite the challenges, she has benefited from her time working and studying at the same time. She said: "It's helped me improve my confidence and built important skills I'll need for working in the real world, like public speaking."
Senior clinical and counselling psychologist at Allkin Singapore Tan Ying Yin said that working at a young age can benefit students: "It provides early opportunities to develop essential life skills. Through work, youth can learn valuable skills such as time management and financial responsibility."
Mr Lim agrees. "Working has given me a new perspective. It's developed my time management skills, and it's taught me to be disciplined and resolved," he said.
"Even though I may be exhausted now, I think it'll benefit me in the long run. I want to take these skills to give my dad peace of mind when he retires, and contribute to a better future for my family." What are the impacts of studying and working to support the household simultaneously?
Allkin Singapore's Ms Lim said students who have to study and work to support their households face "significant challenges", including difficulty focusing on academics due to the demands of multiple roles and persistent worries about having enough financial resources to meet both personal and family needs.
There are also psychological impacts on students. Tan Ying Yin, senior clinical and counselling psychologist at Allkin Singapore, said: "Youth seek acceptance and a sense of belonging through their peer relationships.
"Taking on work and family responsibilities may cause them to miss out on key relational milestones, as they have less time for social and recreational activities with their peers. The challenge of balancing both work and school can heighten feelings of stress and anxiety." What help is available for students who work and study at the same time?
An MOE spokesperson said that there is a "wide range of financial assistance schemes available to support Singaporean citizen students from low to middle-income families".
These include government bursaries, such as the Higher Education Community Bursary and Higher Education Bursary, and loans for diploma and undergraduate students, as well as individual aid schemes from institutes of higher learning.
Additionally, there are other forms of financial assistance offered by foundations, community groups, self-help groups, as well as private and professional organisations.
Family service centres, such as Allkin, also offer financial assistance programmes for students in difficult financial situations. Some of these programmes, such as the Allkin Family Support Fund, provide financial assistance to students beyond just school-related materials, and help students and their families afford basic needs and significant family expenses.
However, despite the availability of financial assistance, some students still feel the need to work to support their families. Ms Lim said that in these instances, students may continue to work because: They need to contribute to household income, especially when family members are unable to work due to their medical condition(s).
Eligibility criteria of current financial assistance options that may exclude certain students from receiving aid.
The rising cost of living, which outpaces the financial assistance received.
Cultural values that may discourage young people from relying on their parents who are facing financial challenges.
Limitations of financial aid — while some forms of aid cover school fees, they may not fully address other essential expenses such as educational resources (for example, books, laptops) or daily living costs (for example, transport, meals). As a result, students may still need to work to meet these needs.
[[nid:719617]]
This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
CPF at 70: A success story built on self-reliance and constant adaptation
The following is an edited abridged version of a speech by Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong at the launch of the Central Provident Fund's 70th anniversary commemorative book on July 5. The CPF story is, at its heart, the Singapore story – one of self-reliance, ingenuity, and constant adaptation. The Central Provident Fund is older than independent Singapore itself. It was born in 1955, in a very different Singapore. We were much poorer then. Most workers lived from payday to payday. Retirement was a distant luxury, yet an eventual reality that needed to be provided for. The colonial government had a simple and practical idea: If workers could save just a small share of their wages every month, matched by their employers, then over time, they could build up significant savings for when they eventually stopped working. Thus, the CPF was created. It started off as a simple retirement savings scheme. Along the way, we enhanced and developed it to achieve other related objectives. In particular: To enable home ownership. To help Singaporeans cover some of their medical expenses. And from time to time, when economic circumstances demanded, as an instrument to trim business costs and restore our cost competitiveness. Retirement adequacy remained the key aim. But even purely from the retirement adequacy point of view, specific CPF policies needed constant adjustment. As the economy grew, incomes rose dramatically. Equally significantly, so did life expectancies. That meant that we had to continually adjust the CPF rules and schemes − sometimes drastically − to ensure retirement adequacy for Singaporeans. This called for some very tough choices. I once met the late Lord Paul Myners, a British financial expert and UK city minister. He had done a comprehensive review of the institutional investments made by UK insurance companies and pension funds. He explained to me bluntly that with people living longer, there were basically only three ways for them to still have enough for retirement: one, save more while working; two, spend less every month, to make their retirement savings last longer; or three, work longer and retire later. There is no other painless way out. All countries are confronted with this trilemma. Neither can Singapore escape these choices. But that does not mean there is no way forward. It is still possible to make balanced, practical and politically workable arrangements in these three dimensions, to ensure Singaporeans' retirement adequacy. But we have to design and implement the right schemes and evolve them as circumstances change. And we must bring the public along − get them to understand how these schemes work in their best interests and win their support. That has been the essence of the CPF journey over the past 70 years. I have been involved in much of this journey, ever since I entered politics, which is more than half of these 70 years. Today, let me share a little on each of these three aspects. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Eligible S'poreans to get up to $850 in GSTV cash, up to $450 in MediSave top-ups in August Singapore Four golf courses to close by 2035, leaving Singapore with 12 courses Singapore Singapore's second mufti Sheikh Syed Isa Semait dies at age 87 Singapore Fewer marriages in Singapore in 2024; greater marital stability for recent unions Singapore Competition watchdog gives SIA, Malaysia Airlines conditional approval to continue cooperation Singapore About 20 delivery riders meet Pritam Singh to discuss platform worker issues Business OCBC sets loan target of $5b and covers more territories in boost for serial entrepreneurs Singapore Reform Party to leave opposition group People's Alliance for Reform; two parties remain CPF contribution rates First, how to save more while working? How much is enough? The contribution rates have to be high enough to enable workers to meet their housing, medical and retirement needs. But at the same time, firms, workers and the economy must be able to afford paying these rates. Firms must still break even, families must still live and put food on the table, and the country must still remain competitive. So how do we balance that? When the CPF scheme first started in 1955, the total contribution rate was only 10 per cent − 5 per cent each from employees and employers. That was all we could afford. From the late 1960s, as Singapore's economy took off and incomes rose rapidly year after year, the Government seized the opportunity to progressively raise contributions rates for both employers and employees. So that Singaporeans could set aside more for their housing and retirement needs, and later on for their medical needs. But it was not a straight-line process. Sometimes we went too far, and we had to cut back the contribution rates when we had overshot or the economic conditions changed drastically. The first time this happened was in 1985. By then, we had raised the total CPF contribution rate to 50 per cent – 25 per cent from employees; 25 per cent from employers. This proved too high to sustain. The economy suddenly dived into a severe recession. After resisting the decision for many months, we finally concluded that we had to cut the CPF employer's contribution rates, and we decided to do it sharply − 15 percentage points cut from employers. Their contribution rates went from 25 per cent to 10 per cent. I can tell you it was a very painful decision. Effectively, it was a 15 per cent pay cut for workers. It was the only quick way to restore our cost competitiveness and revive our economy. Fortunately, the unions and workers supported the move. The rate cuts worked, and the economy recovered strongly. In the ensuing years, we gradually and carefully raised the CPF contribution rates. But we had to repeat this process twice more, and cut rates twice more. Once during the Asian financial crisis in 1997/1998, and again in the early 2000s after the 9/11 terrorist attacks. It took us until 2015, just 10 years ago, before we finally reached our desired total contribution rate of 37 per cent (now 20 per cent from employees, 17 per cent from employers), which we think is about the right level for the long term. But this is provided we get the other two strategic decisions in retirement planning right too. Withdrawal arrangements This leads to the second key question: How to manage the disbursement of CPF savings during retirement? This is a delicate matter − because people view their CPF savings as their own hard-earned money. They will always prefer more flexibility on what they can spend it on, and when they can get hold of it. At first, members could withdraw all their CPF savings in one lump sum, once they reached 55. This was not unreasonable for an era when life expectancy was only around 60. But as life expectancies lengthened, members who withdrew all their CPF savings at 55 could expect to live for another 20 years or more, into their 70s or 80s. Those who did not carefully husband this lump sum could easily exhaust their CPF savings early, when they still had many more years to live. Withdrawing everything at 55 no longer made sense. Something had to be done. In 1984, Mr Howe Yoon Chong, who was then the Minister for Health, delved into the matter, and published a report which proposed to raise the CPF withdrawal age from 55 to 60. This triggered an intense public reaction. The Government decided it should take this negative reaction into account, and did not implement the proposal. But the problem did not go away, and we had to continue to look for solutions to the problem. Eventually, Professor S. Jayakumar, who was then Minister for Labour, proposed the concept of a CPF 'Minimum Sum', which was introduced eventually three years later. When members reached 55, they would keep a 'Minimum Sum' in their CPF, to be spread out in monthly payouts over a period of years. The excess, if any, they could withdraw but the Minimum Sum they have to keep. And then it would be paid out progressively... so much per month, for as long as it lasted. The balance of their savings after putting aside the Minimum Sum and MediSave, they could immediately withdraw at the age of 55. This was a major change, but it was essential to ensure retirement adequacy for CPF members. We continued to tinker with the arrangements for retirement payouts over the years. The Minimum Sum became the Retirement Sum. Now there are three Retirement Sums – the Basic, Full and Enhanced. We raised the Retirement Sum regularly to keep pace with rising incomes and cost of living. We also pushed the withdrawals later, to better reflect longer working lives and higher retirement needs. But we still allowed a small part of the CPF savings to be taken out at 55 and also at 65. In 2009, we took another radical step – we introduced CPF Life, which is Lifelong Income For the Elderly, that converted members' CPF savings into annuities. CPF Life uses risk-pooling to provide members with retirement payouts for life – however long they may live. This was another major improvement to the scheme. In 10 years' time, we expect almost all CPF members turning 65 then to be automatically enrolled on CPF Life. Retirement and re-employment ages But after dealing with the retirement disbursements, there was a third piece we had to deal with: How to get people to work longer? This is a vexed subject in many countries, especially those with state-funded pension schemes. Because there, retirement payouts usually start at the national retirement age. You work, you pay social security. It goes into the pot where other people benefit − the older ones. The moment you retire, you stop paying, you start receiving. So you want to retire early, and receive early. When the government has to push that back – retire later and start receiving later – there is an enormous pushback, huge resistance, sometimes demonstrations, occasionally riots. We encountered similar pushback when we were pushing for people to work longer and simultaneously delaying the bulk of their CPF payouts. Because to retire at 55, in effect, was too early. And at 55, to withdraw was too early. We had to push both back. It is your own money, but you still wanted it sooner rather than later. Delaying the payouts did not short-change you − the money is there, it is safe, it is earning good CPF interest, but you want to touch it. And so we had a lot of resistance. But with a lot of hard political work, we did get it accepted. We passed the legislation, we created a national statutory retirement age. At that time, retiring at 55 was not by law; it was just by practice. But we made a statutory retirement age by law, which was 60, and then later on, we raised that to 62. And when we raised it to 62, we also introduced a statutory re-employment age of 65. So in effect, many people now work until they are 65 years old. And in parallel, we shifted the bulk of CPF payouts to start from 65, to align with the re-employment age. But as we raised the retirement and re-employment ages beyond 65, we decided not to correspondingly delay CPF payments further. Because by now, we had in place the Retirement Sum Schemes − the Basic, Full and Enhanced Retirement Sums − and we also had the CPF Life scheme. This ensured a baseline of retirement adequacy for everyone. We could afford to give Singaporeans more choice and control over their retirement arrangements. This delinking of the CPF withdrawal arrangement from the retirement age has made it much easier for us to raise our retirement and re-employment ages further, and to encourage workers to work longer. Today, the national retirement age is 63, but many choose to continue working, perhaps in a lighter job, well beyond that. And we are on track to raise the retirement age to 65, and the re-employment age to 70, by 2030. Key points about CPF system So, this is how we have, in many complex ways, managed to get Singaporeans to save more while working; managed to re-arrange and pace out their retirement finances in a measured and prudent way; and managed to get people to stay employed longer, achieving both social and economic objectives. Several key points on this journey are worth highlighting. First , the CPF's central philosophy of self-reliance remains as pertinent as ever. What you take out depends on what you put in yourself − each person. So in Singapore, each generation funds its own retirement needs. We avoid burdening younger generations with the retirement needs of older generations. The ethos of fairness and personal responsibility fosters the right attitudes towards work, retirement and active ageing. This is in sharp contrast to countries which have adopted tax-based 'Pay-As-You-Go' pension systems. Because in these systems, retirement benefits are entitlements, paid for not by themselves, but by the next generation of taxpayers. While self-reliance works for the majority of the population, we recognise its limits for lower-income workers and for those who have not been in the workforce, such as housewives. Hence the Government complements members' own savings with targeted state support for those who need it more. We have built this into structural components of our social safety nets, such as the Workfare Income Supplement scheme, Silver Support Scheme, and tax incentives to encourage voluntary CPF contributions from family members. The Government also provides additional support − discretionary, but substantial − through generous packages for the Pioneer, Merdeka and Majulah generations, and through periodic CPF top-ups in the annual Budgets whenever the economy does well. But the basic principle remains: You must try your best to provide for your own future needs. If that is still not enough, the Government will be there to help you. But you must try your best. Second , each decision and change to the CPF system must be carefully thought through, because it affects the lives and plans of millions of people. The Government must take care to design good schemes that will work for Singaporeans. It must patiently and clearly explain these to Singaporeans, to win their support. In the end, for the whole CPF system to function and to endure, Singaporeans must have faith that the system is sound, and that the rules ultimately serve their best interests. I am glad that today, public trust in the CPF is very high. People faithfully make their contributions month after month. Many members also voluntarily top up their own and their family members' CPF accounts with cash. Last year, members made 875,000 such tops-ups,totalling nearly $5 billion. Even when members reach 65, a significant minority do not make any withdrawals. They just leave their money in the CPF's good hands. In fact, sometimes people ask, 'Can I add more money into the CPF?', treating it like a savings bank. It took us a long time to build this trust; we must never take it for granted. Last lesson learnt: T here is no perfect CPF system. We are in a generally good state now. But as circumstances change – as society's needs and working patterns change, and life expectancies lengthen further − we will have to revisit the topic again and again, to adapt and update the CPF scheme to keep it fit-for-purpose for new generations. This will be a perpetual process of innovation and adaptation. But that is the nature of many public policy issues. The CPF story is one such government policy. But the same can be said of so many others − housing, healthcare, education, security, and many more. Collectively, these tell the Singapore story too – one of self-reliance, ingenuity, and constant adaptation.
Independent Singapore
12 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
S$500 in Child LifeSG Credits, Edusave, and PSEA top-ups to be disbursed from today; some Singaporeans already received credits
Photo: Depositphotos/ imtmphoto (for illustration purposes only) SINGAPORE: Over 450,000 Singapore Citizen (SC) children aged up to 12 will receive a one-off S$500 Child LifeSG Credit, while about 300,000 aged 13 to 20 will get a S$500 one-off top-up to their Edusave Account or Post-Secondary Education Account (PSEA) starting today, Monday (Jul 7), the Ministry of Education (MOE) and the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) said in a joint press release on Thursday (Jul 3). These are part of the household support measures announced by Prime Minister Lawrence Wong at Budget 2025 to help families with child-raising and education-related costs. This is in addition to the annual Edusave contributions provided by the government. Each year, eligible SC students receive Edusave contributions for educational purposes. Earlier this year, primary school students received S$230, while secondary school students received S$290 in their Edusave accounts. Child LifeSG Credit The Child LifeSG Credit will be disbursed from this week to SC children born between 2013 and 2024. Children born in 2025 will receive it in April 2026. The Child Development Account (CDA) trustee of each eligible child will receive the CLC automatically and can access it through the digital wallet in the LifeSG application. No application is required. CLC recipients will be notified via SMS once it has been credited to their digital wallet in the LifeSG app. The credits can be used at physical and online merchants that accept payment through PayNow UEN QR and/or NETS QR to help households with daily expenses such as groceries, pharmacy items, transport, and utilities. Edusave Account, PSEA top-ups Singaporean children born between Jan 1, 2009 and Dec 31, 2012 will receive a S$500 top-up to their Edusave Account, while those born from Jan 1, 2005 to Dec 31, 2008 will get the same amount credited to their PSEA. The funds can be used to pay for approved fees and enrichment programmes, the ministries said. These top-ups will also be disbursed this July. Parents of eligible recipients will be notified via SMS. The ministries reminded parents that SMS notifications will only be sent from ' and will only contain information about the status of the top-up or disbursement. Recipients will also not be asked to reply to the message, click on links, or provide any information. Some Singaporeans online have shared that they already received the Child LifeSG Credit for one of their children while still waiting for the others. Others suggested it may be disbursed in batches. /TISG Read also: Over 950,000 eligible Singaporean households to get U-Save, S&CC rebates this July Featured image by Depositphotos (for illustration purposes only) () => { const trigger = if ('IntersectionObserver' in window && trigger) { const observer = new IntersectionObserver((entries, observer) => { => { if ( { lazyLoader(); // You should define lazyLoader() elsewhere or inline here // Run once } }); }, { rootMargin: '800px', threshold: 0.1 }); } else { // Fallback setTimeout(lazyLoader, 3000); } });
Online Citizen
13 hours ago
- Online Citizen
Singapore sees 7% drop in marriages in 2024; more elderly living alone as family dynamics shift
SINGAPORE: The number of marriages registered in Singapore in 2024 fell by 7 per cent compared to the previous year, according to a report released by the Ministry of Social and Family Development (MSF) on 7 July 2025. A total of 26,328 marriages were recorded last year, down from 28,310 in 2023, based on data from the Department of Statistics (SingStat) featured in MSF's latest family trends report. The drop was most notable among civil marriages, which declined across nearly all age groups. The steepest falls were seen among those aged 25 to 34. In 2024, 15,213 brides in this age bracket were married, an 8.9 per cent decline from 16,707 the previous year. Similarly, 13,615 grooms aged 25 to 34 tied the knot, down 9 per cent from 14,956 in 2023. Out of the total marriages, 21,144 were civil unions, compared to 22,914 in 2023. Muslim marriages also dipped slightly, from 5,396 in 2023 to 5,184 in 2024. This decline was attributed to fewer unions involving grooms aged 30 to 34 and 45 and above, and brides aged 30 to 34 and 40 to 44. The overall trend aligns with the increasing median age at first marriage over the past decade. In 2014, the median age for first marriages was 30.2 years for grooms and 28.2 years for brides. By 2024, these figures had risen to 31.1 and 29.6 years respectively. Divorce and annulment cases see a slight rise There was also a modest increase in the number of divorces and annulments. In 2024, 7,382 marriages ended in dissolution, a 3.7 per cent rise from 7,118 in 2023, SingStat reported. The median age at divorce increased to 44.4 years for men and 40.9 years for women, up from 42.6 and 38.4 years respectively in 2014. Marriages ending in divorce lasted a median of 11.1 years in 2024, compared to 10.4 years a decade earlier. Couples married for five to nine years accounted for the highest share of divorces, comprising 29 per cent in 2024. Marriage stability improving among recent cohorts Despite the increase in annual divorces, long-term marriage stability has improved. MSF highlighted that the cumulative proportion of divorces before the 10th wedding anniversary declined from 17 per cent for couples married in 2005 to 14.4 per cent for those married in 2013. 'This signifies greater marriage stability among recent cohorts of married couples,' the ministry stated. The largest improvement was noted in Muslim marriages. Although divorce rates among Muslims remain higher than those of civil unions, the gap has significantly narrowed over the years. Later parenthood and persistently low fertility rate Singaporeans are also delaying parenthood. In 2024, the median age of first-time fathers rose to 33.6 years, up from 32.9 in 2014. For first-time mothers, the median age increased from 30.4 to 31.9 over the same period. Despite these shifts, the country's total fertility rate remained at a historic low of 0.97 in 2024 — its second consecutive year below the replacement rate of 1.0. Growing uptake of paternity leave and infant care facilities The uptake of government-paid paternity leave has risen gradually. In 2023, 56 per cent of eligible fathers took paternity leave, compared to 53 per cent the previous year. Maternity leave uptake has remained high, with 74 per cent of mothers making use of it in both 2022 and 2023. To support working parents, full-day infant care places have nearly tripled over the past decade. According to data from the Early Childhood Development Agency, available spots grew from 5,628 in 2014 to 16,207 in 2024. Enrolment also increased from 3,506 to 11,265. Full-day childcare places similarly expanded from 104,066 in 2014 to 200,847 in 2024. More elderly living alone despite strong family support values Singapore's ageing population continues to grow. The number of residents aged 65 and above living at home increased from 466,300 in 2014 to 767,900 in 2024. While 80 per cent still live with a spouse or children, the number living alone doubled over the past decade — from 42,100 in 2014 to 87,200 in 2024. A 2023 MSF survey showed that more than 80 per cent of respondents considered family the top source of support for elderly relatives. Additionally, 90.4 per cent of respondents agreed on the importance of maintaining close ties between grandparents and grandchildren. 'This shows that family members continue to be the key line of support for elderly,' MSF said.
