What are the Jeffrey Epstein files and will they be released?
While campaigning, Trump said he would release the so-called 'Epstein files', the documents about criminal investigations into his former friend, who died in jail by hanging in 2019. But since taking office, Trump has appeared to have broken that promise, rankling ardent Maga allies who have spent years calling for the documents' release.
Epstein knew powerful people of all political persuasions and counted them as friends. Releasing the documents has become a rallying cry to reveal more details about Epstein, including how he made his money, and the extent of involvement by those who supported him in his criminal activity, especially those with wealth and political sway.
Earlier in July, the US justice department said it would not be releasing more documents, saying it could harm victims and insisting there was not a 'client list'. Democrats have seized on the schism on the right, calling for Congress to compel the release of the documents and calling out Trump's hypocrisy.
Congress may intervene to obtain the documents. This week, a Democratic-led effort to subpoena the justice department for Epstein-related materials was passed by the House oversight subcommittee, but the leaders of the House Republican party have also blocked other efforts to release the documents.
What are the 'files'? What kinds of documents?
The federal government has a 'truckload' of documents from and about Epstein related to his criminal cases, according to reported comments of Pam Bondi, the US attorney general. This includes his flight logs for private planes and contacts, which is sometimes referred to as his 'black book' – which has already been publicly posted online.
A memo released by the justice department in July said the agency searched through its databases, hard drives and physical areas to find Epstein-related information, locating 'more than 300 gigabytes of data and physical evidence'.
Within those files were images and videos of Epstein and his victims, some of whom are minors, and more than 10,000 downloaded videos and images of 'illegal child sex abuse material and other pornography'.
Some documents related to Epstein are under court-ordered seals. For instance, a federal judge this week denied a request from the justice department to unseal grand jury transcripts in a south Florida criminal investigation. Some of those that were once sealed have been unsealed, including some unsealed in early 2024 that identified names of people included in depositions and motions who previously were listed as John Does.
'Much of the material is subject to court-ordered sealing,' the justice department memo said. 'Only a fraction of this material would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial, as the seal served only to protect victims and did not expose any additional third parties to allegations of illegal wrongdoing.'
There are also serious concerns about identifying victims if some documents are released. The department said Epstein had harmed more than 1,000 victims, some minors, all of whom 'suffered unique trauma'.
'Sensitive information relating to these victims is intertwined throughout the materials. This includes specific details such as victim names and likenesses, physical descriptions, places of birth, associates, and employment history,' the memo said.
Is there a 'client list'?
In its memo, the department says there was no 'client list', despite it being a longtime claim and rallying call for those embedded in the Epstein case, especially on the right.
'There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions,' the memo says. 'We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.'
Julie K Brown, an investigative journalist with the Miami Herald who has been uncovering the Epstein case for years, said earlier this year that there was 'no Jeffrey Epstein client list. Period. It's a figment of the internet's imagination – and a means to just slander people.'
In an interview with the Atlantic, Brown said the list idea was a 'red herring' that seems to have been born out of a phone directory Epstein's girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, compiled, often referred to as the 'black book'. People such as Trump and other celebrities were in the directory, but so were Epstein's gardeners, barbers and others, Brown said.
What has Trump said about the files?
After Epstein's death by suicide, Trump shared a tweet that claimed the Clintons were involved in his death. He also told reporters at the time that he had questions about whether Bill Clinton went to Epstein's infamous island.
While campaigning for the 2024 election, Trump said, when asked, that he would declassify the Epstein files, though he prioritized them below files about September 11 and the John F Kennedy assassination. 'You don't want to affect people's lives if there's phoney stuff in there, because there's a lot of phoney stuff with that whole world,' he said then.
Bondi said earlier this year that the justice department would be releasing a list of Epstein's clients, telling Fox News that it was 'sitting on my desk right now to review' – though she later said she was talking about case files and not a client list. The department released some information, dubbed a 'first phase of files', to rightwing influencers, though those files did not contain much new information.
Trump has grown increasingly angry at those calling for the files to be released, and dismissed the entire controversy as 'boring' and a 'hoax', something that 'nobody cares about'.
'I have had more success in 6 months than perhaps any President in our Country's history, and all these people want to talk about, with strong prodding by the Fake News and the success starved Dems, is the Jeffrey Epstein Hoax,' he wrote on Truth Social on 16 July.
Is Trump named in the files?
Recent reporting by the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal said that the justice department briefed Trump that his name and the name of other well-known people were found as the department searched through the files. The Journal said Trump's name 'appeared multiple times'.
Trump is known to be a one-time friend of Epstein's. His name's inclusion in the documents does not mean he was a party to any of Epstein's criminal activity. Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew are expected to be named among the documents, as both were known to be in Epstein's circles to some degree.
Elon Musk, the world's richest man who was a Trump cheerleader until the two fell out, tweeted in early June amid a fight over the Trump tax bill that Trump 'is in the Epstein files' and 'that is why they have not been made public'. He has since deleted the tweet.
What questions could these files help answer?
There are many legitimate questions that the files could shed light on about Epstein and his circle.
How Epstein made his money is still of much interest, as is how he financed his extensive sex-trafficking operation. Often referred to as a financier, he had vast wealth, owning expensive real-estate including two private islands, and a private jet.
Ron Wyden, the Democratic senator from Oregon who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate finance committee, told the New York Times that four major banks had 'flagged more than $1.5bn in transactions – including thousands of wire transfers for the purchase and sale of artwork for rich friends, fees paid to Mr Epstein by wealthy individuals, and payments to numerous women'.
Questions still swirl over potential ties to the intelligence community. Bondi told reporters: 'To him being an agent, I have no knowledge about that. We can get back to you on that.' The former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett denied Epstein was an Israeli agent, a frequent claim made without evidence. 'The accusation that Jeffrey Epstein somehow worked for Israel or the Mossad running a blackmail ring is categorically and totally false,' Bennett said.
And suspicion over the manner of Epstein's death is still in the mix. The justice department released an 11-hour video of jail footage in the hours before and after his death, though there seems to be almost three minutes of footage missing, leading to further scrutiny. Bondi has said that missing footage is because the Bureau of Prisons was resetting video.
There is also much to be discovered on how Epstein was able to evade justice for so long. Brown, the Miami Herald reporter, told the Atlantic her 'one nagging question' goes back to 2008, when the justice department decided not to fully go after Epstein after local and state authorities first were looking into his crimes.
'Who were the people behind that in the beginning?' Brown said. 'Because if they had done their jobs, of all these people in 2006, 2007, and 2008 – if all those people working for us, the American public, had done their jobs, we wouldn't be sitting here right now. A lot of those victims would've never been victimized.'
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The ‘White Dudes for Harris' founder told Jesse Watters that Fox's own polling showed Trump losing popularity.
A Democrat took aim at Republicans and Fox News in an interview with Fox host Jesse Watters, arguing that his network's own polling numbers showed that people are unhappy with Trump's presidency. In a Monday evening appearance on Fox News' Jesse Watters Primetime, 'White Dudes for Harris' founder Mike Nellis was asked if he still supported former Vice President Kamala Harris. Nellis replied, 'Listen, I prefer Kamala Harris for president right now, and honestly, I think a lot of Americans agree with me.'


CNN
26 minutes ago
- CNN
Funeral home owner who sent families fake ashes pleads guilty to fraud
FacebookTweetLink A Colorado funeral home owner accused of stashing nearly 200 decomposing bodies in a room-temperature building admitted in federal court Monday that she cheated customers and defrauded the federal government out of nearly $900,000. Carie Hallford, who ran Return to Nature Funeral Home with her husband Jon Hallford, pleaded guilty in federal court to conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Carie Hallford faces a maximum of 20 years in prison, though federal prosecutors agreed to ask for 15 years at a December sentencing hearing. Hallford already pleaded guilty once in federal court, but a judge last year rejected the agreement with prosecutors and still has to approve this one. Crystina Page's son David died in 2019, and his body was left in an inoperable refrigerator for four years. Standing outside the federal courthouse Monday, Page said she's disappointed about the possibility that neither Hallford goes on trial, something she hoped would have brought answers about what happened to her son and others entrusted to their care. 'We still don't know the truth of what they've done to us,' she said. The federal case brought against both Hallfords focused on two schemes: falsifying documents to siphon nearly $900,000 in COVID-19 pandemic-era financial aid from the U.S. Small Business Administration and deceiving customers by taking payments for cremations the Hallfords never did. Instead of cremating the nearly 200 bodies between 2019 and 2023, the Hallfords allegedly stored the bodies in a decrepit building and sent some customers dry concrete instead of ashes. The Hallfords pocketed around $130,000 of their customers' payments meant for cremations or burial services and spent it, along with the federal funds, on luxury products — a GMC Yukon, laser body sculpting, vacations, jewelry and cryptocurrency. In a separate case in state court, both Hallfords have been charged with 191 counts of corpse abuse, including for twice burying the wrong body and leaving others to decompose. Jon Hallford has already pleaded guilty to those 191 counts, as well as a fraud charge in the federal case for which he was sentenced to 20 years in prison. The building packed with bodies was discovered in 2023 in Penrose, Colorado, about a two-hour drive south of Denver. It shook already grieving families. Many learned that their loved ones' remains weren't in the ashes they spread or held tight but were instead decaying in a building. Investigators found bodies stacked atop each other, swarms of bugs and maggots, and so much liquid on the ground it had to be pumped out.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Woman arrested after driving erratically with child inside along Highway 101, CHP says
PETALUMA, Calif. - A woman was arrested Monday afternoon in Petaluma after she was seen driving erratically with a toddler inside, according to the California Highway Patrol. CHP said it received several 911 calls about a woman driving recklessly along southbound Highway 101 in Petaluma. Child was not in car seat What we know When an officer attempted to stop the driver, the woman failed to pull over and continued driving— from Petaluma to San Rafael, then making a U-turn and heading north toward Santa Rosa, before turning around again. Officers said the child could be seen moving around inside the vehicle and was not in a safety seat, prompting them to maintain a safe distance from the woman's Escalade. CHP said the SUV was equipped with OnStar, and the system was able to take control of the accelerator and gradually slow the vehicle down in 5 to 10 mph increments. The Escalade came to a stop on the Petaluma River Bridge along Highway 101. Woman exited SUV clinging onto child Dig deeper The woman exited the vehicle while holding the child. Officers were able to get a hold of the child, and the woman was taken into custody. She was booked into Sonoma County Jail. Authorities said it is unclear why the woman was driving erratically. The Source The California Highway Patrol