
‘To whom should I go for justice now?': Pain, anger among Mumbai train blasts victims' families
Nineteen years later, with the High Court on Monday acquitting all 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train bomb blasts, Pitale says, 'This one day is more unjust than the 19 years of suffering we have gone through. My only expectation now is that if these were not the perpetrators, then find the real culprits. I am convinced that the investigation fell short.'
The court also set aside a special court verdict that had awarded the death sentence to five convicts, and refused the Maharashtra government's plea seeking confirmation of their sentences.
On July 11, 2006, a series of bombs had ripped through seven local trains in Mumbai, killing 187 people and injuring 824.
Following Monday's verdict by a special High Court bench of Justices Anil S Kilor and Shyam C Chandak, the victims of the blast and their families expressed their disappointment.
Ramesh Naik, who lost his 27-year-old daughter Nandini when a bomb went off on a train at Borivali, says, 'We waited for 19 long years for justice, but was it delivered? After 19 years, we are being told that the accused are not guilty. To whom should I go for justice now? Who should I hold responsible – the judiciary or the government? Nandini had just graduated from college and was about to start her career.'
Months before the blast, Naik had lost his younger daughter Rachana to an illness. The two consecutive tragedies left the family shattered.
Anuj Kilawala, who worked as a development officer with a private firm, was among the dead. His wife Chandika Kilawala says, 'The government always fails to provide speedy justice to the victims. If it had not been for my daughter, who took over the family business, we would have struggled.'
In another part of the city, Chirag Chauhan calls the verdict a 'failure of the judiciary'. In 2006, Chirag, then a CA student, was returning from his articleship when a blast went off on a train near Jogeshwari. While Chauhan survived the blast, an injury to his spinal cord left him paralysed waist down.
'The judgment is shocking. This is not just about me; there are hundreds of others who were victims of this attack. I am yet to go through the whole judgment but I don't understand why this has happened. We are hoping to appeal the verdict in the higher court,' he says.
Hansraj Kanojia, 55, walks on crutches since he injured his legs in the blast. That day, he was returning from his workplace to his home in Goregaon, when the bomb went off on the train. 'The incident may have happened 19 years ago but the wounds are still fresh. I remember the blasts vividly – everyday. The incident altered my life and I think about it every moment I walk. Like me, all the victims would have hoped to get some sense of justice from the administration. But today's judgment today is a complete failure of the administration. How is it that they haven't been able to find those responsible for these attacks?'
Usha Sharad Bobhate's husband Sharad Bobhate, a manager at the Punjab National Bank in Sion, was on a train in Matunga when the blasts hit. Usha says that on July 11, 2006, she didn't get the usual evening call from Sharad. 'He would always call me while leaving office to ask if he needed to pick anything from the market. However, that day, I got no calls from him and I kept getting restless. How was I to know that he would never come back home that day?' she says. 'I simply cannot believe that the court let the accused get away. Isn't the court meant to deliver justice?'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
27 minutes ago
- India Today
Did High Court apply its mind? Supreme Court raps bail to actor Darshan in murder case
The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved its order in the Renukaswamy murder case, after pulling up the Karnataka High Court for the manner in which it granted bail to Kannada actor Darshan and others accused.A bench led by Justice BR Gavai came down heavily on the High Court, questioning whether judicial discretion had been applied judiciously. 'We are sorry to say, but does the High Court dictate the same kind of orders in all bail applications?' the court troubling us is the approach of the High Court. Look at the manner in which it has been done. Is that the understanding of a High Court judge? We could understand if it were a sessions judge. But a High Court judge committing such a mistake?' Calling it a 'perverse exercise of discretion', the Supreme Court said it was examining whether the High Court had 'applied its mind judiciously' before granting bail in such a serious case. 'We will not make the same mistake the High Court did,' the bench said. 'We are a little serious because it is a case of murder and conspiracy.'The court was hearing a petition filed by the State of Karnataka challenging the High Court's December 13, 2024 order granting bail to actor Darshan and others in the murder of 33-year-old bench also made pointed remarks during the hearing. Addressing the lawyer for co-accused Pavitra Gowda, the bench said, 'All this happened because of you. If you had not been there, A2 would not have been interested. If A2 was not interested, others would not have been interested. So, you are the root cause of the problem.'The lawyer argued that she had received objectionable messages and had no direct call record links to the accused involved in the kidnapping or murder. But the court made it clear it was not examining 'meticulous arguments.' 'We have to see if the prosecution's case inspires confidence or not,' the bench court also questioned how the High Court dismissed the eyewitness accounts of Kiran and Puneet, who were working as guards. 'Why does the High Court say they are not reliable witnesses?' the bench asked. 'Our last question: how has the High Court dealt with these two statements while exercising discretion?'Appearing for the State, senior advocate Sidharth Luthra said that call data records, location pins, DNA on clothes and the vehicle, and other material support the statements. 'All of this has been corroborated,' he bench further questioned the nature of the evidence retrieved from one of the accused. 'You recovered a mobile phone from accused number 10. Why would someone click pictures of the assault?' the court told that the pictures were forwarded to A2 and that the deceased was seen pleading in one photo, the bench was shocked. 'Unbelievable, Mr Luthra. These people are posing for photographs? There is an assault going on and they're posing? I've understood this cult now that worships actors.'Luthra replied that the accused were all part of Darshan's fan club. 'People do anything for him just to have access,' he bench concluded the hearing by stating it will examine the matter and deliver its order. 'We will not pronounce a verdict of acquittal or conviction. But we will look into the conduct of the High Court and take a call.'- Ends


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
US sanctions warnings unheeded: Indian firm exports explosive compound to Russia; HMX widely used in missile & torpedo warheads
Indian company Ideal Detonators Private Limited dispatched two HMX consignments in December. (AI image) Amidst ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, an Indian firm exported explosives to Russia despite warnings of sanctions from the US. According to a Reuters report, an Indian enterprise exported HMX, an explosive compound with military applications, with an export value of $1.4 million to Russia in December. The Reuters report quoted Indian customs records reviewed by it. According to documentation from the Pentagon's Defense Technical Information Center and associated defence research initiatives, HMX is a crucial component in various military applications, including missile warheads, torpedo systems, rocket propulsion units and sophisticated military explosive devices. The US has designated HMX as important to Russia's military operations and has cautioned financial institutions against enabling any Moscow-bound transactions of this substance. This particular HMX transaction with Russian entities remained undisclosed until now, the report said. According to Reuters' investigation, Indian company Ideal Detonators Private Limited dispatched two HMX consignments in December, which arrived in St. Petersburg. This information was verified by Indian customs records and confirmed by a government official with direct knowledge. The customs data reveals that High Technology Initiation Systems, a Russian firm, acquired one shipment valued at $405,200. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search ads Search Now Undo Promsintez purchased the other consignment, worth over $1 million. Both purchasing companies are located in Samara Oblast, near Kazakhstan's border in southern Russia. Also Read | '10% is the new zero tariff': Trump seals trade deals with many countries - what do they mean for India? India's Strong Ties With Russia India maintains its historical military and economic partnerships with Moscow whilst strengthening its alliance with the United States to balance China's increasing regional dominance. Despite Western sanctions aimed at weakening Russia's wartime economy, India's commercial relations with Russia remain strong, particularly concerning petroleum imports. Promsintez, a Russian explosives manufacturer identified as one of the recipients of the explosives, maintains connections with the Russian military, according to a Ukrainian SBU security service official. The same official confirmed that Ukraine conducted a drone strike on a Promsintez facility in April. Russian defence production facilities have maintained continuous operations in recent years to support President Vladimir Putin's military campaign in Ukraine, which escalated in 2022. In July, President Donald Trump warned of imposing a complete tariff on nations continuing to buy Russian oil. According to three sanctions lawyers, the US Treasury has authority to penalise entities selling HMX and similar materials to Russia. HMX is classified as a "high explosive" designed for maximum impact with rapid detonation properties. The HMX deliveries appear consistent with Indian governmental policies. An Indian official familiar with these transactions noted that besides its primary military applications, the compound has some civilian uses. Also Read | Russia oil squeeze: Trump's 100% tariff threat - should India panic? The Indian foreign ministry issued a statement emphasising that the country conducts exports of dual-use items whilst adhering to international non-proliferation obligations, supported by a comprehensive legal and regulatory framework that evaluates relevant criteria for such exports. When approached about the specific consignments identified by Reuters, the US State Department refrained from commenting. However, they noted that they had consistently warned India about potential sanctions risks for companies engaged in military-related commerce. A spokesperson from the US State Department highlighted India's position as a strategic ally, with whom they maintain open discussions, including matters concerning India's ties with Russia. They reiterated their consistent message to all partners, including India, about the risk of US sanctions for any international company or financial institution conducting business with Russia's military industrial sector. "India is a strategic partner with whom we engage in full and frank dialogue, including on India's relationship with Russia," a spokesperson said. "We have repeatedly made clear to all our partners, including India, that any foreign company or financial institution that does business with Russia's military industrial base are at risk of US sanctions." Also Read | Russia oil trouble hits: Shipowners and oil traders avoiding Russia-backed Nayara Energy in India; impact after EU sanctions "While India has not traditionally been amongst the main regions utilised for bypassing sanctions, we acknowledge the possibility of individual instances," Ukrainian presidential adviser Vladyslav Vlasiuk informed Reuters. "We can confirm that the Russian company Promsintez has appeared on our radar in the past, including in connection with cooperation involving Indian counterparts," added Vlasiuk, who serves as President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's principal sanctions official. US Reluctance To Sanction India During Joe Biden's presidency, whilst some Indian organisations faced sanctions for supporting Russia's military activities, the administration applied these measures cautiously, considering diplomatic implications, according to two former US sanctions officials. The Trump administration has significantly reduced Russia-related sanctions activity, and there is uncertainty regarding potential US actions against Indian firms engaged with Russia's defence sector. The United States continues to pursue stronger ties with India, aiming to reduce the South Asian nation's alignment with China. Eric Prince from the London-based law firm Akin noted that the US administration typically prefers addressing concerns with allies through private diplomatic channels, using punitive measures only when necessary. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Remains from AI crash belongs to strangers: UK families
London: British families grieving after the Air India disaster have discovered that the remains of their loved ones have been wrongly identified before repatriation, according to an aviation lawyer representing them. Relatives of one victim had to abandon funeral plans after being informed that their coffin contained the body of an unknown passenger. In another case, the 'commingled' remains of more than one person killed in the crash were mistakenly placed in the same casket and had to be separated before the interment could go ahead, the Daily Mail reported. The news came before the start of a two-day state visit to London by India's prime minister on Wednesday. Narendra Modi will meet his British counterpart, Keir Starmer, to sign a landmark free trade agreement between India and the UK. The mistakes emerged when the senior coroner for London Inner West, Dr Fiona Wilcox, sought to verify the repatriated Britons' identities by matching their DNA with samples provided by the families, the Mail reported. A London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport on 12 June, killing 241 people onboard, of whom 52 were returning Britons. Another 19 people died on the ground and 67 were seriously injured. A preliminary report found the plane's fuel switches had been moved to cut-off, deepening the mystery of what happened and leaving families distressed and seeking answers. The report from India's aircraft accident investigation bureau, published on 10 July, said both of the plane's fuel switches moved to the cut-off position immediately after takeoff, stopping fuel supply to the engines. While some of the dead were cremated or buried in India, the remains of at least 12 victims had been repatriated, said James Healy-Pratt, an aviation lawyer representing many of the British families. He said he was expecting Starmer to raise these issues with Modi this week at their meeting in London. 'The families deserve urgent answers and assurances about the whereabouts of their loved ones,' said Healy-Pratt, who told the Mail he was looking into what had happened during the identification process. 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back. But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. It has been going on for a couple of weeks [and] I think these families deserve an explanation.' He said while the family who received the 'commingled' remains had been able to have them separated to hold a funeral service, the second family had been left 'in limbo'.