
State lawmakers, officials seek input into how auto insurance rates are set
Curbing the cost of auto insurance has been the subject of several legislative proposals in the last couple of years, but those measures have yet to go anywhere.
The Illinois secretary of state's office, which has unsuccessfully promoted a measure that would eliminate factors such as credit scores and advanced age from being used as metrics to set car insurance rates, is set to launch a campaign to highlight why it thinks employing those factors is unfair to consumers.
'This, to me, is an economic justice issue. People are struggling to pay their bills. People are required to have car insurance, and it's becoming unaffordable for folks to have it,' Giannoulias said. 'So if the purpose of auto insurance is to protect the eight and a half million Illinois motorists, it only makes sense that their driving records … serve as the primary factor for setting their rates.'
Car insurance rates have climbed across the country. According to the finance website Bankrate.com, the rates have increased at a slower pace compared to past years but from 2023 to 2024, full coverage auto insurance jumped by an average of 14% and by 12% from 2024 to 2025.
The website, citing an official from the Insurance Information Institute, attributed the rising rates to some of the worst underwriting losses in decades. Bankrate.com also suggested President Donald Trump's administration's tariffs on vehicles and auto parts could affect car insurance costs.
Democratic state Rep. Will Guzzardi of Chicago, who has worked on legislation aimed at regulating car insurance rates, said he is optimistic there's enough will in the legislature to take on high costs of auto insurance, but acknowledged the need to do so without harming the insurers doing business in Illinois.
'We want to maintain a vibrant, competitive insurance market in Illinois, where companies are competing for your business, and that drives prices down,' Guzzardi said. 'Premiums are rising and Illinois consumers are bearing the brunt of it, and government needs to step in and protect us from those kinds of abuses.'
A bill Guzzardi introduced in January would bar insurers from refusing to issue or renew a policy of auto insurance based in whole or in part on 'specified prohibited underwriting or rating factors.' The bill would require auto insurers to show that their handling of claims and algorithm models do not unfairly impact any group of customers based on factors including race, gender, religion or sexual orientation.
The bill has been stalled in the House, and Guzzardi acknowledged the difficulty in getting such legislation passed given the insurance lobby's power in Illinois, which is home to both State Farm and Allstate.
'If it's a reasonable increase and (insurers) can justify it, then it's fine. But if they're just raising their rates to protect their profits and pad their CEO pay, then the state has the ability to veto or reduce those premium increases,' Guzzardi said. 'And it (seems) really unfair to base someone's car insurance premium on factors that are out of your control and have nothing to do with whether or not they're a good driver.'
In a statement, the Illinois Insurance Association, along with the American Property Casualty Insurance Association and the National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies, said that 'Insurers are not permitted to use and do not use factors like race, income, religion, and/or ethnicity in setting rates. This is true in Illinois and in every state.'
But the organizations defended the criteria that are used to set rates.
'Allowing insurers to continue using a wide set of objective criteria to determine risk and set rates will ensure this market can continue to flourish,' the statement read. 'We oppose efforts to limit the actuarial process that has driven companies out of other large states and led to increased premiums for the majority of policyholders.'
Another bill that has languished in the legislature, which would affect homeowners as well as auto insurance, would require insurance companies to open their books so that state officials can assess whether the rate increases are too burdensome. Insurers would need to provide information on their rates to the state's Department of Insurance '60 days in advance of a proposed aggregate rate change of 5% or more.'
This legislation has the backing of the Pritzker administration and could be the subject of debate during the two-week veto session in October since lawmakers and the insurance industry were busy during the spring session haggling over the bill's details.
According to the secretary of state's office, Illinois is one of only two states, the other being Wyoming, that doesn't require a rate review process to protect auto insurance customers from excessive rates.
The influence a person's economic status has on their insurance rates has long been a point of contention.
Two years ago, the Consumer Federation of America issued a 25-page report showing the impact of car insurance rates when consumer credit information for good drivers who have decent or bad credit scores are factored in by insurers.
The 2023 report showed that Illinoisans who were safe drivers with excellent credit paid an average annual premium of $424 for auto insurance, while consumers with a comparable driving record and fair credit paid around $607. At the same time, the report notes, safe drivers with poor credit paid an annual average of $915. These findings were echoed nationally, according to the report.
'These credit disparities are connected to systemic biases against Black, Latino, and Indigenous communities and long-standing structural hurdles to achieving financial stability for communities of color,' the report said. 'When credit information is used to construct credit-based insurance scores for underwriting and rating auto insurance, the result is higher auto insurance premiums for drivers of color.'
'Insurance companies use these rating factors, these non-rating factors, significantly, to set rates, and that can lead to both discriminatory and absurd outcomes,' said Abe Scarr, director of the Illinois Public Interest Research Group, which posted the report on its website. 'Also, it's, I think, somewhat less pronounced and maybe less investigated as well, but they're doing this with homeowners insurance as well.'
Under a bill pushed by Giannoulias' office during the spring legislative session, the secretary of state, in partnership with the Office of Risk Management and Insurance Research at the University of Illinois, would look into 'the use of ZIP codes, credit scores, and age in ratemaking and whether the specific factor results in inequitable rates being assessed to certain populations.'
The bill had 16 Democratic House sponsors and 17 Democratic Senate sponsors. It passed through the Democratic-controlled House in April on a 70-39 vote. But it never made it through the Senate.
State Rep. Jeff Keicher, a Republican from Sycamore who sits on the House Insurance Committee and opposed the bill, said Illinois has one of the lowest rate environments 'given the factors that we are currently using.' The competitive market helps consumers because if the rates are too high with one carrier, they can easily move to another.
He said eliminating factors such as where a customer lives and their credit score could increase the rates for suburban drivers.
'So you'd have a rate in Chicago the same as a rate in the middle of a cornfield in Illinois,' said Keicher, a 30-year insurance agent who said he was not speaking on behalf of the industry.
'The industry has proven time and again that that credit-based score is effective and accurate, and there have been no other challenges once regulators have looked at the direct correlation in accident propensity with the factors that insurance companies are currently using,' Keicher said.
Kevin Martin, executive director of the Illinois Insurance Association, said there have been a number of studies over the years purported to show credit scores are an appropriate metric, including one that concluded 'better credit scores correlate with lower insurance risk.'
As for Giannoulias' bill from the spring, Martin's group had concerns over whether the secretary of state's office's involvement in the study would've led to a 'very, very biased result,' noting the office has come out 'very much opposed to allowing us to use these factors.'
'We have no objections to having a study,' Martin said. 'We were opposed to any reference and any language that would have put (the) secretary of state's office in a position to conduct, lead and write the report.'
Lou Sandoval, president and CEO of the Illinois Chamber of Commerce, which advocates for businesses in the state, echoed Martin's criticism of the bill.
'We're not against transparency of trying to say, 'Hey, listen, what should we get done?'' he said. 'What was problematic is the bill sought to do a study that basically abided with the (confirmation) bias of the bill itself.'
'It was like, 'we're going to do a study to confirm the fact that there's racist policies in place, not to identify what the policies are and whether they're racist or not.' It's like 'we have a thesis. The thesis is, this is racism, and that's the direction we're going,'' Sandoval continued. 'And you know, writ large, we have a problem with government basically stepping in and whacking industries that are major employers in the state.'
The statewide advocacy campaign being launched by the secretary of state's office, dubbed 'Driving Change,' will ask state residents 'to share their stories about unfair and discriminatory ratemaking practices employed by auto insurance companies,' according to a news release from Giannoulias' office.
There will be town halls on the issue over the next several weeks throughout the state, and the secretary of state's office would be conducting a study using feedback from residents to determine whether factors such as credit score, ZIP code and advanced age unfairly raise insurance premiums for residents.
From there, the feedback could be used to aid in crafting new legislation over what factors to include when setting car insurance rates, the secretary of state's office said. Locations and times of the town halls would be posted on www.ilsos.gov/drivingchange.
'To me, it doesn't matter whether you live on the South or West side of Chicago or in rural southern Illinois,' said Giannoulias, whose name has been floated as a potential Chicago mayoral contender in 2027. 'Our point is, base it on driving record.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump removes official overseeing jobs data after dismal employment report
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Friday removed the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures after a report showed hiring slowed in July and was much weaker in May and June than previously reported. Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, should be fired. He provided no evidence for the charge. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Trump later posted: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' The charge that the data was faked is an explosive one that threatens to undercut the political legitimacy of the U.S. government's economic data, which has long been seen as the 'gold standard' of economic measurement globally. Economists and Wall Street investors have long accepted the data as free from political bias. Trump's move to fire McEntarfer represented another extraordinary assertion of presidential power. He has wielded the authority of the White House to try to control the world's international trade system, media companies, America's top universities and Congress' constitutional power of the purse, among other institutions. 'Firing the Commissioner … when the BLS revises jobs numbers down (as it routinely does) threatens to destroy trust in core American institutions, and all government statistics,' Arin Dube, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, said on X. 'I can't stress how damaging this is.' After Trump's initial post, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director. 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS,' Chavez-DeRemer said. Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated. The report suggested that the economy has sharply weakened during Trump's tenure, a pattern consistent with a slowdown in economic growth during the first half of the year and an increase in inflation during June that appeared to reflect the price pressures created by the president's tariffs. 'What does a bad leader do when they get bad news? Shoot the messenger,' Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said in a Friday speech. McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants. The Senate confirmed McEntarfer to her post 86-8, with now Vice President JD Vance among the yea votes. Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from a previously revised 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% from 4.1%. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Trump wrote. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Trump has not always been so suspicious of the monthly jobs report and responded enthusiastically after the initial May figures came out on June 6 when it was initially reported that the economy added 139,000 jobs. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG!' Trump posted at the time. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most-recent revision down to just 19,000. The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent U.S. market indexes about 1.5% lower Friday. The revisions to the May and June numbers were quite large and surprising to many economists. At the same time, every monthly jobs report includes revisions to the prior two months' figures. Those revisions occur as the government receives more responses to its survey, which help provide a more complete picture of employment trends each month. In the past decade, companies have taken longer to respond, which may have contributed to larger monthly revisions. The monthly jobs report has long been closely guarded within the BLS, with early copies held in safes under lock and key to prevent any leaks or early dissemination.

an hour ago
Democrats blast GOP-proposed Texas congressional maps in redistricting showdown
Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett said Friday that GOP-proposed congressional maps in Texas would draw her out of the district where she lives, part of a redistricting effort Democrats say is aimed at at picking up five seats to keep Republican control of the U.S. House of Representatives. During public testimony at a hearing on the plan in the state capitol, Crockett said she had been asked to confirm her home address by the legislature, she said, ahead of the previous field hearings. "In addition to the fact that I know that this legislature did ask us as members of Congress to confirm our addresses, I don't know how many of us actually still reside in the districts that we represent. I do not currently reside in my district based upon the plan that has been drawn, which is another red flag," she said. She alleged that some other members had also been drawn out of their seats. More broadly, Crockett attacked the proposed maps as discriminatory and the map "does nothing but divide, distract and depress," she said. Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who currently represents Texas' 37th Congressional District but would be in the same district as fellow Democratic Rep. Greg Casar if the new maps go through, told the hearing that he is an "unusual opponent of this plan" because more than half of the people in the district he represents, which he said he's filed for reelection in, are still there. "This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map. It was not requested by any Republican or any Democrat in Texas. It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas legislature," Doggett said. Republican state Rep. Todd Hunter, who filed the bill containing the new maps and chaired the 2021 redistricting committee in the legislature, told the hearing that "political performance" was part of the considerations when drawing the maps. Hunter also said later that the "newly drawn districts now trend Republican in political performance. Doesn't guarantee electoral success. Does not guarantee; that's up to the candidates, but it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts." Redistricting in both red and blue states has often been alleged to be partisan; the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that federal courts cannot police partisan gerrymandering. Outside of the hearing, protesters gathered in the capitol's rotunda to slam the maps, according to photos shared by state Rep. Gene Wu and former U.S. Rep. Colin Allred. Some Republicans have defended the proposed new maps and redistricting effort. Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn, responding on Thursday to the proposed new congressional maps in his home state, said, "Texas has changed, like many other states, and there are a lot more Republican voters, and they're underrepresented in the current maps. And so this is a chance to align the population changes and the voting changes in Texas with those maps, so that everybody gets fair representation."


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Democrats decry firing Bureau of Labour Statistics director
Senate Democrats are quickly jumping on the dismissal of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, warning that it shows Trump is acting like a dictator. In a Senate floor speech, Democratic leader Sen. Chuck Schumer said, 'Donald Trump sometimes admires dictators, he admires them. Well, he sometimes acts just like them. It's classic Donald Trump. When he gets the news he doesn't like, he shoots the messenger.' Other Senate Democrats said it showed Trump was not facing up to the realities of the economy. 'This is the act of somebody who is soft, weak and afraid to own up to the reality of the damage his chaos is inflicting on our economy,' said Sen. Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee.