Social justice groups sue to block Trump executive order restricting care for transgender children
On January 28, Trump signed an executive order called 'Protecting Children from Chemical and Surgical Mutilation,' which instructed federal agencies to take immediate steps to deny federal funding to any institution that provided gender-affirming medical care for people under the age of 19.
Gender-affirming care is considered medically necessary, evidence-based care that uses a multidisciplinary approach to help a person transition from their assigned gender – the one the person was designated at birth – to their affirmed gender – the gender by which one wants to be known.
For children, the American Academy of Pediatrics advises doctors to provide developmentally appropriate, nonjudgmental treatment in a safe clinical space. The care is individualized and based on peer-reviewed scientific studies that show what is effective. Providers and counselors will often work with the child, and may also work with their family, their school and the community.
More than two dozen states have passed laws restricting access to such care, but nearly every major medical association considers gender-affirming care to be gold-standard treatment.
After Trump's executive order, many children's hospitals told CNN that they were trying to determine the effects on patients and care and that their current approach to clinical care remained the same. The organization that represents these hospitals, the Children's Hospital Association, said it was also trying to determine what the legal impact would be on care.
One organization, Transhealth in Massachusetts, said on its website that it will continue providing care: 'We are not going anywhere, and we will not stop fighting for you and our communities.'
However, PFLAG, an organization that advocates for LGBTQ+ people and their families and one of the plaintiffs in the new lawsuit, said it has received calls from parents across the country whose children's appointments are being canceled.
'Those families and countless other families are being harmed right now by this executive order, whether because they had an appointment for scheduled care canceled or their health care providers have been coerced through threat of federal funding loss to preemptively shut down gender-affirming care services,' Brian Bond, PFLAG's chief executive officer, said Tuesday.
Children's National Hospital in Washington, DC, and Children's Hospital of Richmond at VCU in Richmond, Virginia, said that while they would continue to support patients with mental health counseling and other care, they would immediately pause the part of gender-affirming care that offered medication to some patients, including puberty blockers and hormone therapy. Children's Hospital Los Angeles also told CNN that it was 'pausing the initiation of hormonal therapies for all gender affirming care patients under the age of 19' as it evaluated the order and continued to provide mental health and social support services.
Some people receiving gender-affirming care choose to use puberty blockers, medications that can delay puberty, a developmental phase that can be distressing for someone who is transgender. Studies show that transgender adolescents who used puberty blockers were less likely to have suicidal thoughts than those who wanted the treatment but did not get it.
The medications are the same that are used when someone goes through precocious puberty, which is when a child's body changes into that of an adult too soon. Pubertal suppression is reversible.
Surgery can be another approach included in gender-affirming care for adults, but few surgeries are performed on children in the US. VCU Children's said it was suspending surgical procedures for people under the age of 19, and Children's National said it never offered a surgical option for children.
The new legal challenge was filed by groups including the ACLU, Lambda Legal and GLMA on behalf of two young transgender adults, five transgender adolescents and their families whose health care has been disrupted by the executive order. Many of the plaintiffs are not named.
One parent who is identified, Kristen Chapman, says she moved to Richmond so her child Willow could have access to a gender-affirming care program that accepted the family's Medicaid insurance. The family had lived in Tennessee, which passed a law that banned gender-affirming medical care for minors starting in 2023. The US Supreme Court is considering whether that law is constitutional.
Chapman said she tried to get her 17-year-old an appointment at VCU Children's for months and was finally able to get a spot for January 29. It was the day after Trump signed the executive order.
On the day of the appointment, VCU Children's told the family that it would no longer be able to provide care for Willow.
'I thought Virginia would be a safe place for me and my daughter. Instead, I am heartbroken, tired and scared,' Chapman said at a news conference Tuesday. 'I've had to leave the only home my children ever knew to build a new one entirely from scratch and even separate my family just to get the health care my daughter needs.'
Alex Sheldon, executive director of GLMA, which represents LGBTQ+ health care professionals, said his group has spoken with dozens of members trying to navigate the 'chaos' that the executive order has caused. One nurse, Sheldon said, said they had to cancel a patient's appointment, and the child's mother said it would be the nurse's fault if the child were to die by suicide.
'They called me in tears, realizing that their career had been dedicated to caring for people and they were no longer able to do so because of the fear that this instilled in their institution,' Sheldon said.
'Providers are scrambling to handle hundreds of calls from terrified families,' Sheldon added. 'They are under immense unwarranted scrutiny. They worry for their futures and the futures of their patients.'
The lawsuit was filed in federal District Court in Maryland and will be followed by a request for an immediate restraining order against the enforcement of the executive order.
On Monday, New York state Attorney General Letitia James sent a letter to health care providers and other organizations warning that despite the executive order, they needed to follow state laws that protect against discrimination based on several categories, including sexual orientation or gender identity.
'Electing to refuse services to a class of individuals based on their protected status, such as withholding the availability of services from transgender individuals based on their gender identity or their diagnosis of gender dysphoria, while offering such services to cisgender individuals, is discrimination under New York law,' the letter said.
CNN's Elizabeth Wolfe contributed to this report.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
3 Medical Stocks to Consider as Markets Take a Breather
The broader indexes have cooled off in the last few trading sessions after what was another pleasant month for the stock market in July. While the market has been able to shrug off trade war concerns on the way to a historic rebound, President Trump has officially signed an executive order to hit most of the United States' trading partners with tariff hikes, which ignited a pullback on Friday as July's Jobs Report came in weaker than expected. Considering the benchmark S&P 500 and the tech-centric Nasdaq looked due for a breather after spiking more than +10% in the last three months, investors may be scoping out some defensive positions. That said, these medical sector stocks may continue to provide this defensive safety, as there will always be a constant need for health care. CVS Health Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) CVS Health's CVS transformation into an innovative pharmacy company with integrated offerings across the entire spectrum of pharmacy care is paying off. Thanks to strong earnings, raised guidance, and renewed investor confidence, CVS stock has surged over +30% this year but still trades at just 10X forward earnings and offers a very generous 4.28% annual dividend yield. In addition to sporting a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy), CVS stock currently checks an overall 'A' VGM Zacks Style Scores grade for the combination of Value, Growth, and Momentum. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Johnson & Johnson Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) Pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson JNJ checks the value box, with a reasonable 15.1X forward earnings multiple and a 3.16% annual dividend yield. Furthermore, investors seemed to have flocked to Johnson & Johnson stock earlier in the year during heightened market volatility, and JNJ is still up +15% in 2025 to top the S&P 500 and Nasdaq's returns of roughly +7%. Although Johnson & Johnson's growth has slowed, steady top and bottom line expansion is still in the forecast, and the medical leader has one of the most diversified business models. Having more than 275 subsidiaries, Johnson & Johnson's pipeline of drugs/treatments covers neuroscience and mental health, oncology, immunology, pulmonary hypertension, cardiovascular, rare, and infectious diseases. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Tenet Healthcare Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) We'll round out the list with Tenet Healthcare THC, an investor-owned health care services company that owns and operates general hospitals and health care facilities for urban and rural communities in numerous states. Boasting a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), THC stock is benefiting from a very pleasant trend of positive earnings estimate revisions. With Tenet Healthcare's annual earnings now expected to leap 25% in fiscal 2025 to $14.92 per share, it's noteworthy that these EPS revisions have climbed 17% in the last 60 days from estimates of $12.69 two months ago. Plus, THC is up +25% YTD and trades at 10X forward earnings. Strongly suggesting Tenet Healthcare's impressive stock performance should continue, FY26 EPS is projected to expand another 4% to $15.48, and estimates have spiked 14% in the last 60 days. On top of being a 'feel-good' investment in regard to Tenet Healthcare reaching underserved communities, THC checks the fundamental trading boxes with an 'A' VGM Zacks Style Scores grade. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Bottom Line Hopefully, the excitement for AI-driven growth will continue to push the broader market higher, but these top medical stocks can provide the defensive safety that investors may need with volatility starting to resurface amid President Trump's tariff hikes and last month's unfavorable jobs report. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) : Free Stock Analysis Report Tenet Healthcare Corporation (THC) : Free Stock Analysis Report CVS Health Corporation (CVS) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
The Manhattan shooter had a previous arrest and 2 psychiatric holds, sources say. How was he able to own a gun?
Crime Gun violence Gun control Mental healthFacebookTweetLink Follow New York City's deadliest shooting in 25 years – in a state with some of the toughest gun laws in the nation – is raising questions about how a gunman with a history of mental health issues was able to obtain multiple firearms and drive undetected across several states to carry out the attack. The gunman who walked into a Midtown Manhattan office building on Monday, M4 assault-style rifle in hand, and sprayed it with gunfire, had a license to carry a concealed weapon in his home state of Nevada, officials said. He also had been placed on psychiatric hold in 2022 and 2024, law enforcement sources told CNN. But that may not have necessarily prohibited him from obtaining his license in 2022 or buying firearms – depending on the circumstances of the holds, according to gun law experts. Shane Devon Tamura, 27, of Las Vegas, killed four people at the 345 Park Avenue office building and injured another before he died by suicide, police said. While public health experts continue to stress that the vast majority of people experiencing mental health challenges are not violent, questions remain about the details of Tamura's psychiatric holds and if they would have shown up in a background check. The case underscores the wide gap in sharing mental health data with the federal government – an issue that can be attributed to inadequate funding to manage or require the data, as well as privacy issues, according to Thomas Chittum, former associate deputy director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Tamura had 'a documented mental health history,' according to New York Police Department Commissioner Jessica Tisch, and a previous run-in with law enforcement. Tamura was arrested and charged with misdemeanor trespassing in 2023 in Clark County, Nevada, after he refused to leave a Las Vegas casino after attempting to cash out about $5,000, according to a police incident report. A court database suggests a district attorney declined to pursue the case, meaning the incident wouldn't have prevented him from obtaining a gun. The case also throws private gun sales under the microscope. The AR-15 style weapon used in the shooting was legally purchased last year by the gunman's supervisor at the Vegas casino where he worked, two law enforcement officials told CNN. The supervisor then assembled it and sold it to Tamura for $1,400, the officials said, citing an interview with the supervisor who is cooperating with authorities. It's not yet clear whether the private sale between Tamura and the supervisor involved a background check. But the supervisor, who has not been named by authorities, could face legal jeopardy if the investigation reveals the firearm transfer took place in Nevada and the private sale didn't follow a state law requiring background checks for private sales, according to Warren Eller, gun violence expert and associate professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. As police work to uncover a motive behind the shooting, investigators are digging into Tamura's history and examining are how he obtained multiple firearms and made his way from Las Vegas to New York City with the assault rifle. A search of the gunman's car turned up a host of items, including additional ammunition, another loaded weapon, headphones potentially used for target practice, two cell phones, the antidepressant Zoloft and cannabis, a law enforcement source told CNN. A note found in the gunman's pocket claimed he had CTE, a disease linked to head trauma, one that's often associated with football players, a source told CNN. New York City's chief medical examiner's office will test Tamura's remains for CTE, an office spokesperson told CNN Tuesday. The only way to diagnose the disease is through an autopsy of the brain. As for the psychiatric holds, it's difficult to say without knowing the details whether they would have shown up in a background check or prevented Tamura from purchasing weapons, experts say. 'If you were on a 48-hour hold, if you were released at the end of that, it would not affect your ability to possess firearms under federal law,' Chittum said. Most states barely touch on the area of mental health when a person applies for a gun license due to concerns over privacy issues and stigmatizing people who have mental health issues, according to Eller. One concern, for example, is soldiers who struggle with post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, might be reluctant to seek help because they fear their treatment history would deprive them of possessing firearms. 'Between the lack of funding to make sure the background check system is effective for those problems and the legal hang ups with advocacy groups who will challenge this, that's a long road ahead,' Eller said. There's a concerted effort by veterans' groups and advocacy organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union to fight against the sharing of mental health records with the National Crime Information Center and local law enforcement, which most states rely on for background checks, according to Eller. 'Groups have been combating that because simply being mentally ill doesn't mean you're mentally incompetent, nor does it mean you're a danger,' he added. However, in cases where a person was declared incompetent by a court, faced a restraining order, involuntarily committed or deemed a danger to themselves or others due to a mental illness, the federal government restricts firearm ownership and states largely follow federal law with some variations, according to Chittum. 'Even when we have someone who has a mental health issue that prohibits them under the law, the next question is whether the background check identifies that. Historically, mental health records have been some of the hardest for FBI to obtain when doing background checks,' Chittum said, adding there have been efforts to improve the availability of those records in some legislation. As New York homicide detectives work to piece together a timeline of events leading up to the deadly Manhattan attack, the way Tamura obtained the high-powered M4 rifle from an associate and whether Nevada's background check laws were violated will likely come under scrutiny. In Nevada, the private sale of a firearm between two parties requires a federal background check before the transfer is complete. Both individuals must go to a federally licensed firearm dealer, which conducts the background check on their behalf. There are limited exceptions, including firearm transfers between immediate family members, which do not require this process. If the private sale between Tamura and the supervisor did abide by the law and the facts can't prove the supervisor had any knowledge of possible disqualifiers in Tamura's history, including intended use of the firearm, then the seller likely won't be prosecuted, according to Eller and Chittum. Federal law doesn't impose any obligation on private gun sellers to identify the buyer, conduct a background check or keep any record of the sale, Chittum said. The Nevada law enforcing background checks for private sales was implemented in January 2020, closing the so-called 'gun show loophole' that gun safety advocates have long criticized as a means for bypassing records checks that can flag past criminal history. Most states conduct background checks through federally licensed dealers relying on the FBI's National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), while some states like Nevada have a designated 'point of contact' system that offers access to state criminal history records. Under federal law, an unlicensed person buying a firearm directly from a gun dealer must also undergo a background check, however, those who already have a concealed carry permit – like Tamura had – may be exempt because they would have already undergone a background check to get the permit. Hours after the shooting in Manhattan, Las Vegas Police Crimestoppers received a tip from a licensed firearms dealer saying he remembered Tamura sought to buy an aftermarket trigger assembly for an M4 rifle at a Las Vegas gun show in June, a senior law enforcement official told CNN. Tamura returned the trigger assembly the next day, saying he needed the money back to buy 500 rounds of .223 ammunition – the same kind of ammunition used in the New York shooting, according to the official. The gun dealer told police Tamura came back the next day with additional funds and re-purchased the trigger assembly, the official said. Tamura's case calls attention to the 'gray area' in the federal regulation and enforcement of private sales that exists when people buy firearms for cash in a private sale, according to Eller. Because a concealed carry permit would exempt an individual for five years from a background check when buying a firearm from a licensed dealer, it creates a 'nuanced area' where a person could obtain a license to carry and then subsequently be convicted or have a mental health prohibitor and might still be able to use their card to purchase a firearm and avoid the background check, Chittum said. Some states recognize this issue and routinely run background checks on licensed holders to determine if their license is still valid, Chittum said. Red flag laws, including the one in Nevada, aim to keep guns out of the hands of those who pose a threat to themselves or others. But such laws are only effective if the individual demonstrated warning signs so that others can alert law enforcement and initiate the process of revoking the person's firearm, Chittum said. It's not clear if Tamura demonstrated any warning signs that would trigger the state's red flag law. The style of weapon Tamura used to slaughter four people has commonly been seen in some of the nation's deadliest mass shootings and has prompted renewed calls by progressive lawmakers for increased regulation. 'In the State of New York, you cannot buy one of these,' Gov. Kathy Hochul told CNN on Tuesday, criticizing what she said were 'much looser laws in the State of Nevada than we have here.' Hochul called on federal lawmakers to pass a national assault weapon ban that would limit access to high-powered guns like the AR-15 style rifle used in Monday's massacre and slammed GOP counterparts whom she accused of being 'intimidated by the gun lobby.' 'We need a national awakening here, people need to be talked about this once again and it shouldn't just happen in the wake of a tragedy like this,' said Hochul. CNN's Mark Morales contributed to this report.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
States sue Trump administration over access to care for transgender youths
A coalition of more than a dozen states sued the Trump administration on Friday over health care for transgender young people, claiming the White House has 'relentlessly, cruelly, and unlawfully targeted transgender individuals' since President Donald Trump took office. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Massachusetts, seeks to have part of one executive order issued in January declared unconstitutional. The order targets gender-affirming care provided to people under the age of 19, such as puberty blockers, hormone therapy and surgical procedures, which it refers to as 'mutilation.' The lawsuit also asks the court to declare unlawful the Justice Department's targeting of providers of gender-affirming care. The section of the order that is being challenged directs the Justice Department to use laws such as the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, those against female genital mutilation, and child custody legislation to carry out the administration's aims. 'It is the policy of the United States that it will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another,' Trump's order says, calling the treatments 'a stain on our Nation's history.' The states of Massachusetts, California, New York, Connecticut, Illinois, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island and Wisconsin, as well as the District of Columbia and Josh Shapiro in his capacity as Pennsylvania governor, filed suit. The lawsuit, filed against Trump, the Justice Department and Attorney General Pam Bondi, argues that the executive order conflicts with states' remit to regulate and police medicine and violates the 10th Amendment, which protects states' powers, and is in conflict with many state antidiscrimination laws. Nearly every major medical association endorses the availability of gender-affirming care for transgender young people, citing reductions in depression, substance abuse and suicide attempts. 'Empirical evidence has demonstrated that trans and nonbinary gender identities are normal variations of human identity and expression,' the American Medical Association has said. But the issue, and others related to transgender people, has animated conservatives. Trump has said he wants the 'official policy of the United States' to be that there are only two genders and has referred to being transgender as a 'falsehood.' The administration has moved to ban transgender service members from the military, relocate incarcerated transgender women into men's prisons and bar transgender people from using restrooms that align with their gender identity in federal buildings, among a slew of anti-trans measures, many of which have been challenged in court. After the January order, the lawsuit says, the Justice Department began 'intimidating providers into ceasing care through threats of civil and criminal prosecution.' 'These threats have no basis in law,' the complaint says. 'No federal law prohibits, much less criminalizes, the provision or receipt of gender-affirming care for transgender adolescents.' Puberty blockers temporarily inhibit sex hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone, and other hormone therapies introduce them to the body. Gender-affirming surgeries, such as breast reductions for transgender men, are rarely performed on minors. White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in an email that 'everyday Americans resoundingly support' the administration's actions. 'The President has the lawful authority to protect America's vulnerable children through executive action, and the Administration looks forward to ultimate victory on this issue,' she added. In June, the Supreme Court upheld a ban on gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee.
