Conservative MPs rally behind trucker convoy leaders as sentencing looms, saying, ‘They're heroes, not criminals!'
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Popular in International
1.
Who is Luciano Frattolin? The grieving father at the heart of the Melina Frattolin tragedy
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Crown 's decision to prosecute two prominent organisers of the "Freedom Convoy" protests has drawn criticism from a number of Conservative MPs, with the party's deputy leader referring to it as an act of "political vengeance."Due to their involvement in planning the protest, which blockaded the streets surrounding Parliament Hill for over three weeks in early 2022, Tamara Lich and Chris Barber were found guilty of mischief in April.Also read: Poilievre says Canada needs more people leaving than arriving to ease housing, job strain Additionally, Barber was found guilty of advising people to defy a court order.A number of accusations, including encouraging others to do mischief, were dropped.Barber and Lich will appear in Ottawa on Wednesday, July 23, for a sentencing hearing.The Crown wants to sentence Barber to eight years and Lich to seven years, according to social media posts.She shared a screenshot of a portion of the Crown's argument to the judge, in which they referred to their acts as "the worst case of mischief" and contended that the right to free speech has never been unrestricted. The screenshot has not been independently confirmed by The Canadian Press. Poilievre criticises prosecutors for seeking "political retribution"Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party, questioned the Crown's strategy in a Monday post on X.He said, "Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges & antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares & block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants 7 years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich & Barber.""How is this justice?", he added.Also read: Canada just can't win in trade war with Trump "Equal application of the law would be a good start if the Crown suddenly wants to apply the law," wrote Melissa Lantsman, the deputy Conservative leader, in a social media post. "But this is political vengeance not actual justice and that's why trust in our institutions is dwindling."The recommended punishment range was described as "excessive and vindictive" by Ontario Conservative MP Andrew Lawton.For Chris's three-week nonviolent protest over three and a half years ago, the Crown is requesting a seven-year sentence [eight years]. "All the while, violent criminals are slapped on the wrist," Lawton stated."[seven to eight] years for holding the line and causing Justin Trudeau a political emergency," according to Saskatchewan MP Jeremy Patzer, is the suggested sentence, he likened it to an instance when a man attempted to purchase sex from a person he thought was 15 years old and was granted a conditional release.The Liberals' priorities are rather obvious. The only people who are suggesting changing our laws to put the genuine criminals in jail are conservatives, Patzer stated.Also read: Poilievre criticizes Canada's trade deadline with US as he seeks political comeback MPs "are raising concerns because the sentencing sought by the Crown in this particular case appears completely disproportionate, particularly when compared to violent criminals who have gotten away with a mere slap on the wrist," according to a statement from Poilievre's office.In the April election, the Conservatives ran on a platform of toughness against crime. Poilievre committed to enact life sentences for some drug and human trafficking offences and guaranteed "jail not bail" for repeat offenders, promises that constitutional experts said would almost probably be overturned by the courts.The social media tweets on Monday, July 21, followed criticism of Poilievre and his MPs by several well-known right-wing social media personalities and influencers for their purported lack of support for Lich and Barber.At every court appearance, vociferous supporters have greeted Lich and Barber, and on Monday, Lich's post received hundreds of likes and comments.Defence attorney Michael Spratt , who practices in Ottawa, referred to the MPs' choice to comment on the suggested sentence as "craven politics.""Politicians' involvement in court-related matters is extremely risky," he stated.According to Spratt, it has long been customary for politicians to refrain from forcing their opinions on Canada's legal system.Politicians, however, occasionally cross that boundary. The granting of bail to a suspect in a homicide case involving the death of a Toronto police officer was described as "beyond comprehension" by Ontario Premier Doug Ford in 2021.The accused was found not guilty in 2024. Spratt claimed that when the case's facts were revealed, lawmakers who had previously criticised the legal system looked dumb.According to Spratt, politicians who decide to use well-known cases to "promote a political narrative" ultimately devalue the judiciary's job.MPs are using their right to "raise concerns about disproportionate sentencing in the justice system," a spokesman for Poilievre's office, said.The spokesperson stated that it is the responsibility of the opposition to bring up issues of proportionality and consistency in the criminal justice system, including sentencing laws and policies, as demonstrated by particular cases.Although the allegation is "mischief," Spratt contended that this isn't an example of a child misbehaving, and that the Conservative criticism undervalues the seriousness of the charges.Also read: Canada rescinds tax hitting US tech firms: Government According to him, the case concerns two demonstrators who caused "real harm" to thousands of people living in downtown Ottawa and inflicted millions of dollars' worth of damage.Justice Heather Perkins-McVey of the Ontario Court , who handed down the guilty judgements, stated on the criminal mischief trial of Tamara Lich and Chris Barber in her verdict on April 3, 2025, that despite being aware of the impact the protest was having on downtown residents and businesses, Lich and Barber frequently urged others to attend or stayIn early 2022, thousands of demonstrators, cars, and large rig trucks gathered in downtown Ottawa to protest COVID-19 pandemic limits, vaccination requirements, and the administration of then-prime minister Justin Trudeau.Many of the protesters continued to honk their truck horns throughout the day despite a court order to cease, refusing to leave the downtown area.Locals claimed the stench of diesel fumes was overpowering and that they were harassed.Throughout the march, Poilievre backed the demonstrators. In a February 2022 video recorded outside Parliament, he labelled some of the truckers 'honest, hard-working, decent people' and offered them coffee and doughnuts.A few demonstration participants declared their desire to topple the government. At the time, Poilievre stated that the opinions of a select few should not be used to discredit the truckers as a group.After the Trudeau administration used the Emergencies Act for the first time in the nation's history, a large-scale police operation ultimately dispersed the demonstration.The use of the law, which granted the government, police, and financial institutions extensive powers to put an end to the protest, was the subject of a federal public inquiry. A year after the demonstrations, the commission published a report stating that the federal government had good reason to use the statute.Outside remarks, according to Spratt, are unlikely to influence the judge's decision about Lich and Barber's potential sentencing.Also read: From economy to immigration: Something is rotten in Canada Because Pierre Poilievre chose to take to social media to voice his thoughts, he stated that this judge in particular would not make a ruling.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 days ago
- Time of India
Researchers train AI model to respond to online political posts, find quality of discourse improved
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Researchers who trained a large language model to respond to online political posts of people in the US and UK, found that the quality of discourse by artificial intelligence (AI), a large language model (LLM) is trained on vast amounts of text data and therefore, can respond to human requests in the natural evidence-based counterarguments by the AI system -- trained prior to performing experiments -- were found to nearly double the chances of a high quality online conversation and "substantially increase (one's) openness to alternative viewpoints", according to findings published in the journal Science open to perspectives did not, however, translate into a change in one's political ideology, the researchers language models could provide "light-touch suggestions", such as alerting a social media user to the disrespectful tone of their post, author Gregory Eady, an associate professor of political science and data science at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark, told PTI."To promote this concretely, it is easy to imagine large language models operating in the background to alert us to when we slip into bad practices in online discussions, or to use these AI systems as part of school curricula to teach young people best practices when discussing contentious topics," Eady Kapoor, research author at the department of psychology, Monk Prayogshala in Mumbai, an independent not-for-profit academic research institute, told PTI, "(The study) provides a proof-of-concept for using LLMs in this manner, with well-specified prompts, that can generate mutually exclusive stimuli in an experiment that compares two or more groups."Nearly 3,000 participants -- who identified as Republicans or Democrats in the US and Conservative or Labour supporters in the UK -- were asked to write a text describing and justifying their stance on a political issue important to them, as they would for a social media was countered by ChatGPT -- a "fictitious social media user" for the participants -- which tailored its argument "on the fly" according to the text's position and reasoning. The participants then responded as if replying to a social media comment."An evidence-based counterargument (relative to an emotion-based response) increases the probability of eliciting a high-quality response by six percentage points, indicating willingness to compromise by five percentage points, and being respectful by nine percentage points," the authors wrote in the said, "Essentially, what you give in a political discussion is what you get: that if you show your willingness to compromise, others will do the same; that when you engage in reason-based arguments, others will do the same; etc."AI-powered models have been critiqued and scrutinised for varied reasons, including an inherent bias -- political, and even racial at times -- and for being a 'black box', whereby internal processes used to arrive at a result cannot be who is not involved with the study, said that whilst appearing promising, a complete reliance on AI systems for regulating online discourse may not be advisable study itself involved humans to rate responses as well, she context, culture, and timing would need to be considered for such regulation, she too is apprehensive about "using LLMs to regulate online political discussions in more heavy-handed ways."Further, the study authors acknowledged that because the US and UK are effectively two-party systems, addressing the 'partisan' nature of texts and responses was added, "The ability for LLMs to moderate discussion might also vary substantially across cultures and languages, such as in India.""Personally, therefore, I am in favour of providing tools and information that enable people to engage in better conversations, but nevertheless, for all its (LLMs') flaws, allowing nearly as open a political forum as possible," the author said, "In the Indian context, this strategy may require some trial-and-error, particularly because of the numerous political affiliations in the nation. Therefore, there may be multiple variables and different issues (including food politics) that will need to be contextualised for study here."Another study, recently published in the 'Humanities and Social Sciences Communications' journal, found that dark personality traits -- such as psychopathy and narcissism -- a fear of missing out (FoMO) and cognitive ability can shape online political of researchers from Singapore's Nanyang Technological University suggest that "those with both high psychopathy (manipulative, self-serving behaviour) and low cognitive ability are the most actively involved in online political engagement." Data from the US and seven Asian countries, including China, Indonesia and Malaysia, were the study "interesting", Kapoor pointed out that a lot more work needs to be done in India for understanding factors that drive online political participation, ranging from personality to attitudes, beliefs and aspects such as voting team, which has developed a scale to measure one's political ideology in India (published in a pre-print paper), found that dark personality traits were associated with a disregard for norms and hierarchies.
Indian Express
2 days ago
- Indian Express
‘Same man, same conclusion': Australian state MP found guilty of raping, sexually assaulting 2 men 2 years apart
An Australian state MP has been found guilty of raping a man and sexually assaulting another in separate incidents that happened two years apart. Gareth Ward, 44, the independent MP for Kiama in New South Wales, was convicted by a jury on Friday at the Downing Centre District Court. He was found guilty of three counts of indecent assault against an 18-year-old man in 2013 and one count of sexual intercourse without consent involving a 24-year-old man in 2015. Prosecutors said the two men did not know each other but gave very similar accounts of what happened. 'Similar behaviour, similar setting, same man, same conclusion. This is not a coincidence,' Crown prosecutor Monika Knowles told the jury, The Independent reported. Ward denied all charges. He claimed the 2015 incident did not happen and said the 2013 incident was being misremembered by the complainant. The defence argued the allegations were false. Earlier, the court heard that in 2013, Ward invited the teenager, who had been drinking, to his South Coast home and assaulted him three times despite his efforts to resist. In 2015, Ward raped a staff member who was intoxicated after an event at the NSW Parliament House. Ward has been granted bail and is living at one of his two homes. A court will consider whether to detain him next Wednesday, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported. He first entered the state parliament as a Liberal MP in 2011 and was made a minister after the 2019 election. He left the Liberal Party in 2021 after revealing that he was being investigated by police. He continued as an independent and was re-elected in 2023. Mark Speakman, leader of the opposition in the NSW parliament, said he respected the jury's decision. 'What any victim of sexual abuse endures is appalling and their strength in coming forward can't be overstated,' he said, as quoted by The Independent. 'There is no excuse for the criminal behaviour which the jury has found occurred beyond reasonable doubt — a complete abuse of power which has no place anywhere, let alone by those entrusted by the public to represent them.'
Hans India
2 days ago
- Hans India
Honoured to witness signing of free trade pact between India and UK: Ashish Kumar Chauhan
London: Ashish Kumar Chauhan, MD and CEO of National Stock Exchange (NSE), said on Saturday that it was an honour to witness the signing of Free Trade agreement between India and the UK, in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his counterpart Keir Starmer. 'Honoured and privileged to be a witness to the signing of Free Trade agreement between India and UK on July 24,2025 with Hon'ble PM India and Hon'ble PM Uk at the country residence of UK PM Chequers outside London, UK,' Chauhan said in a post on X social media platform. The landmark India-UK Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is an indication of several such trade pacts in the near future under the leadership of PM Modi, he had said earlier on Friday. Speaking to IANS here, Chauhan said that the talks on the India-UK FTA were ongoing for three-four years. 'When talks first began 4–5 years ago, the UK was under a Conservative government. Since then, there have been regime changes but the way both the Conservative and the Labour parties supported finalising the FTA is commendable,' he emphasised. According to Chauhan, the India-UK FTA will pave the way for several such trade pacts with other nations, like the US, the EU and Japan etc, in the near future. India and the EU are aiming to reach an agreement on a free trade deal by the end of 2025. The coming months will be crucial for India's global trade relations, as the government intensifies negotiations with major partners such as the EU and the ASEAN bloc. Meanwhile, talks with the US are also gaining pace. 'The world has seen the tremendous progress India has achieved in the last 11 years under PM Modi, and the FTA will bring a better future for several industries,' said the NSE CEO.
