logo
Housebuilders and steelmakers sound alarm over £1bn landfill tax raid

Housebuilders and steelmakers sound alarm over £1bn landfill tax raid

Times5 days ago
A shake-up of landfill tax that could amount to a corporate tax raid of more than £1 billion has sparked outcry from industry leaders.
The Treasury is consulting on proposals to scrap exemptions and reduced rates for the tax, which is collected on the government's behalf by landfill operators.
The move was one of several quietly pushed out by the Treasury in April. City sources said that some officials in Downing Street were taken by surprise as industry leaders sounded the alarm.
A government source insisted that the proposals had been 'cleared by No 10 on publication in the normal way'. They added that tax policy is not cleared by government departments before publication.
Landfill tax was introduced in 1996 to encourage companies to reduce waste and promote recycling. The tax rose in April and the standard levy is £126.15 a tonne, while a lower rate of £4.05 a tonne applies to less polluting materials. Certain sectors have exemptions and discounts.
Of the 19.1 million tonnes of waste put into landfill in the 2024-25 fiscal year, 4.7 million tonnes were charged the standard rate, according to HM Revenue & Customs. Some 6.9 million tonnes were levied at the lower rate and 7.5 million tonnes were deemed exempt.
One example of how scrapping the lower rate could affect business is the housebuilding industry. At present housebuilders pay the lower rate to dispose of topsoil. If this was scrapped it would mean that companies would face a 30-fold increase in landfill tax. If all the lower rate landfill was taxed at the higher level, this alone would add £840 million to the amount collected by the Treasury. Adding in even a fraction of the tonnage that is at present exempt would take the figure beyond £1 billion. One large housebuilder estimated that its bill could rise from single-digit millions to more than £100 million.
This is 'potentially catastrophic' for housebuilders, according to senior industry sources who point out that they are helping Labour deliver on its target to build 1.5 million homes in England during this parliament.
Steelmakers are also aggrieved. The proposal would mean that iron slag, a heavy non-recyclable residue, would be subject to landfill tax.
Likewise, the phasing out of water discounts — where a dispensation is granted for heavy industry that mixes dust and other harmful particles with water for safer transportation — would create problems.
The change would impinge especially on British Steel. The company is owned by the Chinese firm Jingye but controlled by the UK government after ministers stepped in this year to prevent the closure of the remaining blast furnaces.
Bosses from the trade body UK Steel warned the Treasury that the changes 'overlook the technical and regulatory realities of steel production'.
'Increasing the cost burden on these essential and responsibly managed wastes will further damage the competitiveness of UK steelmaking, risk offshoring production, and undermine efforts to decarbonise and regenerate industrial regions, without delivering a proportionate environmental benefit,' UK Steel said.
It added: 'These proposals run counter to the forthcoming steel strategy which aims to provide a competitive, streamlined business environment for the UK steel industry. The outlined changes simply come across as a straightforward revenue-raising measure with little heed paid to the impact … this will have on our industry and other key sectors of the economy.'
The timing of the proposal is particularly bad because, despite hopes of a trade deal with the US, British steelmakers could face a 50 per cent tariff imposed by Donald Trump on exports to America.
The Treasury said: 'The consultation on landfill tax reform is still open, no decisions have been made. We are committed to working with businesses to understand the impacts of the proposals.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MPs condemn water regulators — as utility chief gets double pay boost
MPs condemn water regulators — as utility chief gets double pay boost

Times

time22 minutes ago

  • Times

MPs condemn water regulators — as utility chief gets double pay boost

MPs have accused Ofwat and the Environment Agency of being 'missing in action' while water bills rise, as the boss of Southern Water saw his pay package almost double to £1.4 million. In a highly critical report on water regulation, the public accounts committee said the sector was 'failing', in a 'farcical state' and being 'left to flounder' by the government. At the same time, environmental campaigners representing millions of people called on ministers to 'end the sewage scandal' by systemically transforming the industry. The interventions come just three days before the recommendations of a government-ordered independent review of water regulation, billed as the biggest shake-up since privatisation in 1989. The committee said that with water bills rising at their fastest rate in real terms since 2005 and customer trust in water firms at its lowest since 2011, a 'complete overhaul' of the sector was needed. Water bills are expected to rise by an average of £31 per household each year until 2030, with the true figure even higher after inflation. 'The monumental scale of work required to reverse the fortunes of failing water companies is rivalled only in difficulty by the efforts needed to repair customers' faith in the sector,' said Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the committee and Conservative MP for North Cotswolds. The environmental performance of water companies is 'woeful', the MPs said. They noted that the Environment Agency found breaches in more than a quarter of 4,600 inspections at sewage treatment works last year, including 92 serious ones. Sewage spills into rivers and seas last year rose to a record duration of 3.61 million hours — equivalent to more than 400 years. The committee said companies were not doing enough to explain to bill payers what £104 billion of investment over the next five years will achieve. It said Ofwat must issue guidance, before the end of the year, to make firms outline what improvements the price rises are paying for. • Wild swimmers' health should be 'legal objective' for water companies The MPs said Ofwat had also failed to ensure the financial resilience of water companies, allowing them to build up too much debt and pay out too much in dividends. Ten companies did not earn enough income in the 2023-24 financial year to cover their debt interest payments. Thames Water, which is struggling under £16.8 billion of debt, this week warned it would collapse into emergency nationalisation if the government did not waive billions of pounds of fines. Southern Water, which is also facing financial challenges, awarded its chief executive, Lawrence Gosden, £691,200 under a two-year incentive plan and £687,100 in fixed pay for the utility's last financial year. Gosden was among leaders at six water firms that recently had their bonuses banned by government for poor performance. His would have been worth £396,475, company filings this week revealed. Helena Dollimore, the Labour MP for Hastings and Rye, said: 'There is no justification for Southern Water hiking up their CEO's pay cheque after the Labour government banned his bonus.' However, Southern Water said that the award to Gosden was not a bonus but from a 'long-term incentive plan' set up in 2023. It was also for before the period covered by the government ban. The company was rescued from financial collapse and a potential temporary renationalisation during the pandemic. This month Macquarie, the Australian investor, and co-investors agreed to inject up to a further £1.2 billion to help Southern Water through its present five-year spending cycle. The public accounts committee found that the Environment Agency and Ofwat had made water firms pay out £430 million in penalties for wrongdoing over the last five years. However, the agency reported it was facing a 'justice gap' where some cases were not pursued because there were so many suspected violations and prosecution was too expensive. The MPs also found a water restoration fund created last year, designed to spend water company fines to pay for improvements of waterways, had still not distributed its £11 million pot. They said it should be disbursed by the end of the year. Separately, charities including Surfers Against Sewage, Greenpeace and River Action have written to Steve Reed, the environment secretary, asking him to put 'environmental good' before 'private profit'. 'Coastal economies and communities are being hammered. Rivers declared ecologically dead. Pollution poisoning our wildlife. Thousands of people are falling ill after swimming in raw sewage,' they said in an open letter. • The Times view: A new water regulator is needed 'Yet water bills will keep rising — to service debt, to fund dividends — and so it is the public who will continue to pay the price,' said the green groups, which also includes Wildlife and Countryside Link, an alliance including the National Trust and RSPB. The signatories said that together they represent 8.9 million British people. The Times's Clean it Up campaign has been calling for stronger regulation to help Britain's rivers and seas. An Ofwat spokesman said: 'We are clear that change is needed, and the independent water commission is a key opportunity to help rebuild public trust.' A Water UK spokesman said: 'We agree that fundamental change to regulation is needed.' The government and the Environment Agency were contacted for comment.

Risk of 'voter fraud' over Labour plans to allow bank cards as identity at polling stations - as party to let 16-year-olds vote
Risk of 'voter fraud' over Labour plans to allow bank cards as identity at polling stations - as party to let 16-year-olds vote

Daily Mail​

time22 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Risk of 'voter fraud' over Labour plans to allow bank cards as identity at polling stations - as party to let 16-year-olds vote

The elections watchdog warned of a risk of voter fraud last night over Labour plans to allow the public to use bank cards to prove their identity at polling stations. Angela Rayner yesterday unveiled a 'seismic' shake-up of Britain's voting system which will give 16-year-olds the vote at the next election and make it easier for people to pass identity checks designed to combat fraud. Existing laws require people to show photographic ID such as a passport or driving licence at the polling station before they can vote. But Labour's plan would make the system more 'accessible' by allowing people to use a bank card as proof of identity, even though it would not allow polling station staff to confirm a voter's likeness against a photograph. The Electoral Commission, which oversees Britain's voting system, last night said using bank cards 'has risks for security and voter trust'. Tory spokesman Paul Holmes also warned switching to non-photographic ID could 'undermine the security of the ballot box'. Prominent Reform politician Darren Grimes said that voting in an election could become 'less robust than collecting a parcel from the Post Office'. During angry exchanges in the Commons yesterday, Reform's deputy leader Richard Tice said the risk of election fraud was already too great. Mr Tice said there were 'grave concerns' about the risk of voter impersonation and told MPs he had witnessed people 'carrying bag loads of postal votes to a polling station on election day'. The row came as Ms Rayner confirmed controversial plans to lower the voting age to 16, despite widespread public opposition. A YouGov poll last night found the public oppose the move by a margin of 57 to 32 per cent. The Deputy Prime Minister brushed aside allegations of 'gerrymandering' and said the move would be introduced in time for the next election. Children will be able to register from the age of 14 and will get the vote at 16, although they will not be permitted to stand for election until the age of 18. Government sources said changes could be made to the national curriculum to deliver 'relevant democratic education in schools'. But critics warned the changes could lead to children as young as 14 being targeted by political parties. Ms Rayner said the change would give young people a 'stake in the future' but the Conservatives said the plan was 'hopelessly confused'. Mr Holmes added: 'Why do they think a 16-year-old should be able vote, but not be allowed to buy a lottery ticket or an alcoholic drink, marry, go to war or even stand in the elections they are voting in?' Former Tory Cabinet minister Sir James Cleverly accused ministers of rushing forward the plans because of panic about Labour's collapse in the polls. But Ms Rayner denied the claim, saying: 'This is about democracy and giving young people an opportunity to have a say.' Pollsters suggested lowering the voting age could give Labour less of a boost than it is expecting. Elections expert Robert Hayward said: 'There is a real risk it will backfire on Labour. Historically, young people have been perceived as Labour supporters but there are clear polling indications young people do not vote for the two traditional parties.' Nigel Farage, who has a large following of young people on TikTok, accused Labour of an 'attempt to rig the political system', but added: 'We intend to give them a nasty surprise.'

Retail growth ‘fizzled out' last month, analysts find
Retail growth ‘fizzled out' last month, analysts find

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Retail growth ‘fizzled out' last month, analysts find

Three months of growth in the Scottish retail sector 'fizzled out' in June, analysts have found. Total sales in Scotland decreased by 0.4% compared to June 2024, where they had also decreased by 3.4%, according to the Scottish Retail Sales Monitor. The Scottish Retail Consortium-KPMG analysis found the figure was well below the three-month average increase of 1.2%, and below the 12-month average rise of 0.1%. Adjusted for inflation, there was a year-on-year decrease of 0.8%. Food sales fell by 2.3% last month compared to the same time last year, when they had also decreased by 1.7%. Total non-food sales rose by 1.1% compared to June last year, when they decreased 4.8%. Adjusted for the effect of online sales, non-food sales rose by 2.1% in June. David Lonsdale, director of the SRC, said: 'Three consecutive months of growth in Scottish retail sales unfortunately fizzled out in June. 'Retail sales contracted by 0.4% during the month when compared with the same trading period the year before. 'This was perhaps less than surprising after the slump in shopper footfall in June, and with households continuing to prioritise experiences, such as holidays and concert-going rather than purchases of products.' Mr Lonsdale said the sale of gaming consoles and electric fans performed well amid new releases and sunny weather, while grocery sales declined and the sale of outdoor furniture and DIY equipment slowed, after a strong month in May. He added: ' Households are having to contend with a multitude of pressures which is seeing them spend selectively. 'Council tax and water bills have soared, inflation is increasing, and shop prices have started to rise. 'All this is putting a dampener on disposable spending. 'Hopefully this downturn in sales will prove temporary as retailers themselves grapple with a hotchpotch of cost pressures of their own, ranging from higher statutory costs for employing people to higher business rates and new levies on packaging.' Linda Ellett, UK head of consumer, retail and leisure at KPMG, said: 'Non-food purchases saw modest growth in Scotland in June as consumers took advantage of summer promotions to buy home appliances and homeware goods, while the weather aided clothing sales. 'But a fall in food and drink spending saw monthly Scottish retail sales slightly down overall. 'Retailers will be hoping that the summer buying is not yet complete and that the pace picks up further in July and August as suitcases get packed and the sun hopefully keeps shining.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store