Who was the murderer whose skin binds a book?
William Corder was convicted of killing a woman in 1827, which shocked Georgian Britain and became known as the Red Barn Murder.
Curators at Moyse's Hall Museum in Bury St Edmunds realised the book, which was on a bookshelf in an office, had been overlooked but it has now gone on display.
It had been donated decades ago by a family with close connections to the surgeon who anatomised Corder's body.
So what do we know of William Corder and the murder, which fascinates to this day?
William was from a middle-class family of tenant farmers in the village of Polstead, between Ipswich and Sudbury, at the turn of the 19th Century.
At the age of 22, when he and Maria Marten became lovers, he was the head of the Corder family and had a reputation as a ladies' man. Maria, who was 24 and lived at home with her mole-catcher father, a stepmother, sister, and her young son, may have seen young William as a means of escape.
In 1827, William came up with a plan to elope, telling Maria to meet him at the Red Barn on the Corder's farm, then run off to Ipswich to get the banns for their wedding.
Maria was not seen again and William disappeared.
William eventually left Suffolk and wrote to the Marten family to say he had eloped with Maria to the Isle of Wight.
In reality, he was holed up just outside London and Maria was buried at the lovers' rendezvous, having been shot in the neck.
Almost a year later, legend states, Ann Marten had a dream her stepdaughter was dead and at the Red Barn. Maria's father dug with his "mole spud" spade and found his daughter's remains.
As a manhunt ensued, a newspaper editor flagged that he knew of a William Corder.
"He is effectively on the run, and the theory is he is lonely, and puts an advert in the newspaper asking for a new wife," says Dan Clarke, a heritage officer at Moyse's Hall Museum. It holds many Red Barn Murder artefacts, including two books covered in Corder's skin.
The authorities traced Corder, who denied any knowledge of Maria, but had a letter from Polstead telling him her body had been found.
Corder was brought to Bury St Edmunds on 10 counts of murder, each based on a different theory about Maria's demise and to strengthen the chance of a conviction.
In his defence he claimed Maria had killed herself, thereby accusing the dead woman of a capital crime. He was found guilty after a two-day trial, and in a final confession said he had accidentally shot Maria during an argument.
It is estimated 7,000 to 10,000 people came to see him hanged outside the prison at the stroke of noon on 11 August 1828. Later that day, people queued to file past his body at the town's Shire Hall.
"There were so many people, the story goes they couldn't get him outside the prison, so they had to hit a hole in the side of the building and create a temporary scaffold," said Mr Clarke.
"There would have been singing and dancing, you would have been able to buy a section of the rope afterwards."
Polstead became a tourist attraction, the Red Barn and even Maria's gravestone chipped away by souvenir-hunters.
Public intrigue in the Red Barn Murder sparked books, plays and music, and it permeates the true crime culture to this day.
At a distance of two centuries, it has become a ripping yarn, the true story clouded in legend.
It is probably fuelled, in part, by being able to stand face-to-face with Corder's image, his eyes shut and his nostrils flared. His death mask is held at Moyse Hall and Norwich Castle.
For many years, until it eventually began to fall apart, his skeleton was used to teach medical students at West Suffolk Hospital.
Disturbingly, two books were covered in his skin and part of the man's scalp, with ear included, was kept as a gruesome ornament. All are at Moyse Hall.
Terry Deary, who created Horrible Histories, believes Corder has been "maligned" with Maria incorrectly portrayed as an innocent young maiden.
Moyse's Hall said it would redress the focus on Corder with a future exhibition which will shine a light on woman victims in Suffolk history, including Maria.
Heritage assistant Abbie Smith said 80% of its visitors were "desperate" to know about the Red Barn Murder.
"How it ended is a big factor, it was such a spectacle and people are going to be drawn to it.
"It's a gory, grotty one, so people seem to like that - rather worryingly."
The first book of the two books is about the trial. It was written by the journalist Jay Curtis and the title on the spine is "Trial of W Corder".
There is an annotation inside written by the surgeon who performed William Corder's dissection, George Creed, which states that it was the surgeon himself who tanned the skin and bound the book in the year 1838.
The second book is thought to be the same edition, but the spine reads "Polstead – William Corder".
This book was donated to the museum by a family which has close ties to George Creed, who he left a number of his possessions to.
Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Book bound in human skin found in museum office
The Suffolk books bound in human skin

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


San Francisco Chronicle
04-07-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
GoFundMe launched for missing father after California fireworks warehouse explosion
As the charred ruins of a fireworks warehouse in Yolo County continue to smolder, families are clinging to hope for the safe return of seven people still missing after a massive explosion Tuesday night. Among the unaccounted is Joel 'Jr' Melendez, a young father and the sole provider for his pregnant wife and their 11-month-old son. A verified GoFundMe page launched by family members describes the anguish of Melendez's wife, Maria, as she awaits news. 'This tragic accident has taken so much from so many, and for Maria, it's shattered her entire world,' the fundraiser states. 'What should be a joyful and hopeful time has instead become filled with fear, uncertainty, and heartbreak.' The explosion, which sent flames and a plume of smoke tens of thousands of feet into the air above the town of Esparto, also left two people injured and forced evacuations within a one-mile radius. The warehouse, operated by Devastating Pyrotechnics, stored commercial-grade fireworks and was being used to supply regional Fourth of July displays, authorities said. According to CBS Sacramento, three brothers from the Bay Area were working at the site when the blast occurred. One of them, Jesus Maneces Ramos, 18, was on his first day. His girlfriend, Syanna Ruiz, said she hasn't heard from him since. She identified his brothers, also missing, as Johnny Ramos, 22, and Junior Melendez, 28. 'They were, all three, incredible men who had so much coming for them, that had so much coming their way,' Ruiz told The Sacramento Bee. 'I'm just praying to God that some way, somehow, they're okay.' Local officials have not confirmed the identities of the missing but say the investigation remains dangerous. Explosions continued Wednesday as firefighters worked to cool the site. Investigators must wait for the area to stabilize before entering. Cal Fire's Jason Clay said in a media briefing Thursday that the facility's owner held valid state and federal licenses for storing explosives. 'Part of our investigation will be to go through and determine the materials that were in there,' he said. Devastating Pyrotechnics released a brief statement on Wednesday night. 'Our hearts and thoughts are with those we lost, their families, and everyone impacted in our community,' it said. 'We are grateful for the swift response of law enforcement and emergency personnel. Our focus will remain on those directly impacted by this tragedy, and we will cooperate fully with the proper authorities in their investigation.'
Yahoo
25-06-2025
- Yahoo
Love Island USA Fans Call Out Yulissa Escobar for Using the N-Word
We're only one episode into Love Island USA Season 7, and there's already a contestant on the verge of cancellation. Love Island fans have called out a new Islander named Yulissa Escobar for casually dropping the N-word. To be clear, this didn't happen on the show. Peacock hasn't gotten that out of control. However, her comments happened during two separate podcast appearances. The clips are circulating online, and the situation has Love Island fans livid. Season 7 of Love Island USA premiered on Tuesday, June 3. In the days leading up to the premiere, fans had somehow resurfaced clips of Yulissa on a podcast using the N-word a total of three times. The clips show her using the racial slur when talking about some boyfriend drama. Yulissa's Instagram comments started getting flooded with angry fans. If you didn't believe us, just take a peek at her cast announcement from the show's Instagram account. There are hundreds of comments from fans promising to use the Love Island USA app to vote this woman out of the Villa. 'America this is your chance to finally getting the voting right,' wrote one fan. Another added, 'Get her out of my villa.' As reported by TMZ, Yulissa has been getting dragged on her personal Instagram as well. She's too busy looking for love in the Villa to know, but one of her friends is on Instagram defending Yulissa's use of the slur. 'lol… y'all act like you never said the N word before, stop being so f*cking sensitive,' commented Yulissa's friend, Maria. Unfortunately, Yulissa isn't the first Islander to get busted using anti-Black language. Season 6's Hannah Smith got arrested outside of a Gracie Abrams concert after throwing a racially-charged tantrum and threatening to kill a police officer. Maybe Hannah and Yulissa should start a podcast. Love Island USA continues tonight at 9/8c on Peacock. TELL US – WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THE LATEST LOVE ISLAND CONTROVERSY? SHOULD THE PRODUCERS REMOVE YULISSA FROM THE VILLA? The post Love Island USA Fans Call Out Yulissa Escobar for Using the N-Word appeared first on Reality Tea.


Forbes
12-06-2025
- Forbes
The Fraudulent Human Trafficking 'Hack' That's Erasing Bad Credit
New credit repair scams are exploiting CFPB lifeline for human trafficking survivors Maria (not her real name) thought she had found the answer to her prayers when she found a TikTok influencer promising to boost her credit score by over 100 points in as little as seven days. She needed a car for work, but her credit score was bad, and she couldn't get financing. What she didn't know was that the influencer was about to embroil her into a fraud scheme by claiming she was a victim of human trafficking. Maria was just one of thousands who have been caught up in a credit repair scam sweeping social media - 'The 7-Day Credit Hack', and just the latest example of how people are unknowingly being lured into sweeping fraud schemes on social media. In 2022, The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, created a new lifeline for survivors of human trafficking. The rule allowed people to submit proof they were victims of human trafficking to credit bureaus, who would then be required to remove the negative items from the victim's credit report within four days. The intention of the rule was noble - help human trafficking survivors rebuild their financial lives after their captors exploited their credit, taking out cards and loans in their name without repaying them. For victims, providing proof was straightforward. They could provide documentation from a court, an NGO, or a human trafficking task force confirming they were a victim, or they could simply offer a "self-attestation letter." It was the letter that scammers honed in on. Virtually anyone could easily create a fake attestation letter and use it as proof of human trafficking. The CFPB even published a template letter that anyone could simply fill out as proof. Self attestation sample letter provided on the CFPB website It didn't take long for credit repair companies and influencers on social media to sniff out the business opportunity with the new CFPB rule. They could charge thousands to help people exploit the system. By April 2024, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook videos were popping up everywhere, advertising the "New 7-Day Credit Sweep". People could merely log in to the credit bureaus, dispute all the negative credit items, and upload a self-attestation letter explaining they were victims of sex trafficking. One influencer says in a popular video, "First, you are going to want to set up an account on "Then, you will want to include all of the accounts acquired when you were 'human trafficked'. She emphasizes the words human trafficked by holding up air quotes with her fingers. "And finally, you will need to upload a victim determination letter. Its that easy.", she concludes. The technique apparently worked. Within 4-7 days, people were reporting that their bad credit had vanished, and their credit scores shot up - sometimes by 100 points or more. And for people that didn't want to do it, experts were more than willing to do the sweep for a price. For a payment between $1,000 to $2,000 they would sweep the credit for them. One person that watched the it emerge and warned people to avoid it - The Credit Plug- reported the scheme on his YouTube Channel and advised people to 'leave it alone'. The "7-Day Credit Hack" was reported by The Credit Plug in June 2024 with a warning not to try it 'As anyone knows these types of situations are 100% being abused right now,' he says, 'where people who may not necessarily have been a victim or survivor are using this loophole to get things wiped off of their credit report.' Social media wasn't the only place lit up with red flags that something was amiss. Signs were also showing up in industry reporting. First, there was CFPB's own reporting that showed a spike in complaints submitted by consumers through their portal - a 285% increase from 2023 to 2024, after the new rule went effect. CFPB consumer complaints submitted through their portal show a 285% increase in the last two years Credit repair companies will often file complaints with the CFPB on behalf of consumers while they perform these credit sweeps. Point Predictive tracked a suspicious spike in "credit washing" during the social media hack last year. Credit washing is the finance industry's term for any activity where borrowers fraudulently remove bad debt through false identity theft or trafficking reports. The analysis showed a 161% increase in applicants for auto loans who appeared to have erased their bad credit through credit washing. Suspicious Credit Washing (where consumers erase bad credit by falsifying reports) appeared in 1 out ... More of every 60 auto loan applications Those credit washers can result in big losses to financial institutions. In 2023, Sentilink found that the losses to the credit card industry alone from credit washing was more than $297 million. It wasn't like the CFPB wasn't warned that the rule would be exploited. The American Bankers Association predicted it would most certainly happen. In a letter to the CFPB dated May 9th, 2022, months before the rule went into place, they wrote that it would encourage criminal activity. "The ease of blocking accurate information by submitting to a governmental entity a form in which the person self-identifies as a victim will allow and encourage people who are not victims of trafficking- including criminals-to block accurate negative information in their consumer reports, introducing the risk of widespread inaccuracies in consumer reports." And they weren't the only ones raising the red flag. Other industry groups including the American Financial Service Association (AFSA) argued people would use attestation as a way to remove accurate information from their credit reports. It's a cruel irony that a rule designed to help society's most vulnerable victims has become a weapon for criminals who want to exploit it. And that hurts survivors more than anyone else. Many will face a "cry wolf" effect as the system becomes more skeptical of all claims, forcing them to prove their claims with even more documentation and proof. Consumers should be wary of credit sweeps on social media and following some practical advice. When someone promises to wipe your credit clean in less than seven days for $1,500 thats not a miracle, its likely just plain old fraud. And while it may seem like an easy and painless process, they could be filing fraudulent documentation or claims in your name that could be tied back to you in the future. Honest credit repair does exist, but it can take weeks and involves careful attention to finding actual errors on your credit report and removing them through a legitimate process. And be cautious of any credit sweep that promises to remove 'all of your bad credit' including legitimate items you are responsible for. Before working with a credit repair company, check their online reviews as well as any complaints that they have with the Better Business Bureau. Legitimate credit repair companies don't guarantee unrealistic results or demand large payments before doing any work. Those are high pressure tactics that should be considered a red flag. They will also not ask you to sign false affidavits claiming you are a victim of identity theft or human trafficking. Remember, those documents are official records that are often retained and can be used against you later if they suspect fraud, which unfortunately is increasingly common now.