logo
Wimbledon desperately needs to expand to catch up with sprawling Australian Open

Wimbledon desperately needs to expand to catch up with sprawling Australian Open

Yahoo27-01-2025
The blue planet that is Melbourne Park has never teemed with so much life as it has this year. Total attendance at the Australian Open reached 1.1 million, including qualifying week, and the 99-acre grounds were full of fresh experiments such as the child-friendly Topcourt area near the Yarra River.
This is the most ambitious and far-sighted of the four slams, perhaps because it has the ingrained inferiority complex that comes with being the youngest of four siblings. Nevertheless, over 20 years as tournament director, Craig Tiley has transformed the Australian Open beyond recognition.
Now Tiley's grand designs are heaping extra pressure on the All England Club, as they strive to add another 73 extra acres to their bijou 42-acre site. The planned expansion into neighbouring Wimbledon Park Golf Course has been inching along for seven years, but despite a positive planning verdict in September from London's City Hall, it remains stuck in development hell.
To the AELTC's dismay, the well-organised 'Save Wimbledon Park' campaign is now challenging the verdict via a judicial review, while a separate debate is considering whether the land might be protected by a statutory trust. Legal experts suggest that we are still a couple of years from resolution, and even then, it would still take five or six years for the new grass courts to bed down. In the best-case scenario, the expanded site is unlikely to be ready before 2033.
Every additional delay is a dagger to the heart of the AELTC committee. As they fly around the world for their grand-slam board meetings, chair Debbie Jevans and chief executive Sally Bolton see the other majors expanding into three-week operations.
Sports fans are increasingly clocking on to the attractions of qualifying – a three-round mini-tournament that whittles 256 men and women down to 32 – as well as the appeal of open practice sets contested by high-profile names.
These preliminary weeks drew 116,000 people at this Australian Open and 219,000 at September's US Open. I don't have a figure for the French Open, but since the recent stylish redevelopment of Roland Garros, attendance in Paris is also on the up.
It's profoundly frustrating that the Wimbledon equivalent cannot be staged on-site because of the need to keep the grass courts pristine until the first ball is hit on the opening Monday. For the moment, qualifying is held three miles away at what used to be the Bank of England Sports Ground (now renamed as the Wimbledon Qualifying and Community Sports Centre Roehampton). But there are many disadvantages here.
For one thing, the site has a maximum capacity of 5,000 spectators. For another, the land is only leased from the Bank of England, so its use cannot be guaranteed beyond 2035.
While one understands the local residents' strength of feeling about the golf-course expansion, there is one part of their argument which simply doesn't stack up.
The campaigners say that, as tennis's oldest tournament and the only grass-court major, Wimbledon's future is assured without the need for expansion. But that's because they don't work in tennis.
It's easy to forget that sports rise and fall, and so do individual events. Think of the decline of athletics as a whole, or the way golf's Open Championship now plays second fiddle to the Masters. Anyone who spends time at these tournaments can see how quickly the All England Club is being left behind. As one high-ranking administrator put it last week, 'When does traditional become old-fashioned?'
The AELTC would love to seek out younger audiences with a Kids' Day – as happens at all the other majors during qualifying week – and a buggy park like the one that Tiley has instituted in Melbourne. On a corporate level, it would like to provide better facilities for sponsors. But none of this is possible while the club is handcuffed by its own spatial limitations.
It's not as if Wimbledon will ever take on the same vibe as the Australian Open – an event which, like Tommy Steele, sees itself as an all-round entertainer. As a parent, you could quite happily take your family to Melbourne Park and spend the day on the climbing walls and the ping-pong tables without even worrying about going on court.
The All England Club is much more focused on the sport itself, casting Wimbledon as a temple of tennis, and creating a sense of aspirational exclusivity. The tournament's image is predicated on quality rather than quantity, which is another reason why it wouldn't try to compete with Melbourne's crowd numbers. Wimbledon's capacity is set at 42,000 for the moment, and the best guess is that it might rise by another 10,000 when the new facilities are completed.
On second thoughts, we should say 'if' the new facilities are completed. Despite the recent green light from the Greater London Authority, SWP campaigners remain confident that they can nix the whole project through their latest legal challenges.
Such an outcome would condemn Wimbledon to a slow decline towards heritage status. If development becomes impossible, the less constrained majors – especially in Melbourne and New York – will gradually eclipse their old-world counterparts, largely on the grounds of space.
As with so many sports, the British codified tennis, only to see it adopted with great enthusiasm by other nations. After Madison Keys's thrilling victory on Saturday, the Americans have won 352 majors, the Australians 166, and Great Britain 98. At this rate, a similar pecking order will soon apply to the grand-slam events themselves.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We'll never see the likes of Tiger Woods and Babe Ruth again? Well, here come Scottie Scheffler and Shohei Ohtani.
We'll never see the likes of Tiger Woods and Babe Ruth again? Well, here come Scottie Scheffler and Shohei Ohtani.

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

We'll never see the likes of Tiger Woods and Babe Ruth again? Well, here come Scottie Scheffler and Shohei Ohtani.

Yet here comes Shohei Ohtani. Crazy comparisons? Sure used to feel that way. But given the latest exploits of Scheffler, who The beauty of sports strikes again, a reality show so unpredictable that you never really know when the exceptional is going to happen. You just try to enjoy it when it does. Advertisement Start with Scheffler and Woods. A golf season that started with Rory McIlroy's Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The British Open marked Scheffler's 10th consecutive win when holding the 54-hole lead, reminiscent of if not as good as Woods, who did that 37 straight times. But the comparison is growing, particularly in the crazy truth that both men took exactly 1,197 days to go from winning their first major win to their fourth. Advertisement The British Open marked Scottie Scheffler's 10th consecutive win when holding the 54-hole lead. Jon Super/Associated Press 'I don't think we thought the golfing world would see someone as dominant as Tiger come through so soon, and here's Scottie sort of taking that throne of dominance. You can't even say he's on a run. He's just been killing it for over two years now,' 2024 British Open champion Xander Schauffele said. 'He's a tough man to beat, and when you see his name up on the leaderboard, it sucks for us.' Golfers in 2000 knew the feeling. If you were a fan, you no doubt remember what it was like, how utterly impossible it was not to feel Woods's impact. With Sunday red shirts, intimidating fist pumps, ridiculous drives, incredible accuracy, steely nerve, he had it all. Tiger opened 2000 with six consecutive PGA Tour victories, the longest streak since Ben Hogan's six in 1948, including a US Open win that saw him break or tie nine tournament records on the way to a 15-stroke romp. At 24, he became the youngest to earn the career slam, and by the end of the season, had won nine of the 20 Tour events he entered and set a new low scoring average. Then he turned the corner to 2001, and opened by winning the Masters, becoming the first man to win four consecutive majors, though not in the same calendar year. The Tiger Slam was born, and it has yet to be duplicated. Advertisement Tiger Woods won the Masters in 2019 for one of his 15 major championships. David J. Phillip/Associated Press Scheffler is such a different personality than Woods was on the golf course, with such an even keel, never really looking at legacy-defining statistics or achievements. Outwardly, in his prime, Woods displayed his killer instinct, talking openly of chasing and surpassing the likes of Jack Nicklaus, Arnold Palmer, Hogan or Gary Player, barely acknowledging the golfers around him. But Scheffler and Woods are in the exclusive club of four, along with Player and Nicklaus, to win the British Open, Masters, and PGA before turning 30. Scheffler will turn 30 on the Sunday of next year's US Open. 'Having watched Tiger play in his prime — and I think Tiger is the greatest player I've ever seen — I never thought in my lifetime I'd see a player as close to Tiger as this man currently is,' former longtime caddie turned NBC commentator Jim 'Bones' Mackay said on TV. 'Scottie Scheffler just blows my mind every time I watch him play.' Ditto for Ohtani. This week, the Dodgers star joined Ruth as the only players to homer in five straight games while also starting one of those games as a pitcher. Add that to he and Ruth being the only men with 500 strikeouts as a pitcher and 100 home runs as a hitter. As USA Today's Bob Nightengale pointed out after the Dodgers' 100th game, in which Ohtani had two home runs, the National League's reigning MVP became the fifth player in league history to hit at least 34 homes runs in the first 100 games three or more times, joining Ruth and Mark McGwire (five times apiece) and Sammy Sosa and Aaron Judge (three times each). Advertisement Shohei Ohtani joined Babe Ruth as the only players to homer in five straight games while also starting one of those games as a pitcher. Ronald Martinez/Getty Ohtani's pitching numbers may be more restricted than early Ruth, the one year he didn't pitch at all because of an arm injury, he invented the 50/50 home run/stolen base club. He's the closest thing to Ruth we might ever see. Just ask Dave Roberts, the Dodgers manager who last year told interviewer Colin Cowherd, 'Like you, we didn't see Babe Ruth, but I'll take Ohtani all day long.' Eras are different. Dead balls, live balls, equipment changes, racial barriers. We get it. But comparisons are fun nonetheless. Tara Sullivan is a Globe columnist. She can be reached at

Daniil Medvedev won a US Open and made 5 other hard-court Slam finals, so this is his time to shine
Daniil Medvedev won a US Open and made 5 other hard-court Slam finals, so this is his time to shine

San Francisco Chronicle​

time2 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Daniil Medvedev won a US Open and made 5 other hard-court Slam finals, so this is his time to shine

WASHINGTON (AP) — Daniil Medvedev figures this is his time to shine: He loves playing tennis on hard courts like those used at the D.C. Open. And he loves the U.S. Open, which is just a month away, in particular. Doesn't matter what else he's done this season or how things ended for him at the Australian Open, French Open or Wimbledon. He's reached six Grand Slam finals in his career — all on hard courts. 'Usually, this is the most important part of the season for me,' Medvedev said in an interview in Washington, where he was scheduled to play Corentin Moutet in the quarterfinals on Friday. 'And this year, it's really important for me, because I didn't have the best year. I had a lot of time after Wimbledon, so I'm feeling ready and I feel in good shape." After dropping his opening set at the D.C. Open this week against big-serving Reilly Opelka, Medvedev took the next four sets he played at an event where he was the runner-up in 2019. What works so well for the 29-year-old Russian on hard courts? 'A lot of different things. My ball goes through the air the most. My serve goes faster. And this year, the courts seem pretty fast. On the ATP lately, the courts seem to only get slower and slower. But here it's super fast. I like the way it plays,' said Medvedev, who has been ranked No. 1 and is No. 14 this week, his lowest spot in more than six years. 'It's one thing to like the way it plays and it's another thing to win. But I do feel like I can do big things.' He certainly has in the past. Any list would have to start with his championship at the 2021 U.S. Open, where his victory in the final prevented Novak Djokovic from completing the first calendar-year Grand Slam by a man since Rod Laver in 1969. Medvedev was the runner-up to Rafael Nadal in New York in 2019 — who could forget the back-and-forths with spectators that year? — and then to Djokovic in 2023. Medvedev also participated in three finals at the Australian Open, losing to Djokovic in 2021, to Nadal in 2022 and to current No. 1 Jannik Sinner in 2024. He's twice been a semifinalist on Wimbledon's grass, and even made it to the quarterfinals at the French Open on red clay, his least favorite surface. This time around, Medvedev bowed out in the second round of the Australian Open in January, and then the first round of both the French Open in May and Wimbledon in June. He hadn't lost consecutive first-round matches at majors since 2017 — in his first two appearances at those events. Asked whether he tends to dwell on that sort of thing or tries to forget it, Medvedev said he would put himself 'kind of in the middle.' 'It does bother me,' he said, thinking back to his 7-6 (2), 3-6, 7-6 (3), 6-2 setback against 64th-ranked Benjamin Bonzi at the All England Club. 'Like after Wimbledon, I was sitting there, and I actually felt like I didn't play that bad. And you're losing (in the) first round. You know that the guy is probably going to lose in the second or third round — he did lose in the second round. You're like, 'Damn, I didn't play that bad and I'm losing first round of a Grand Slam, second time in a row.'' Medvedev said he got over it, in part, by heading to Ibiza for a couple of days of relaxing on the beach and having fun. And then it was time to get back to work — with a positive mindset. 'I know that when I come back to this level, I can beat anyone. And so that's where the optimism is coming from,' he said. 'Just work hard and try to find back this rhythm, this level, and then results can come and rankings can come.' ___

Daniil Medvedev won a US Open and made 5 other hard-court Slam finals, so this is his time to shine
Daniil Medvedev won a US Open and made 5 other hard-court Slam finals, so this is his time to shine

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Daniil Medvedev won a US Open and made 5 other hard-court Slam finals, so this is his time to shine

WASHINGTON (AP) — Daniil Medvedev figures this is his time to shine: He loves playing tennis on hard courts like those used at the D.C. Open. And he loves the U.S. Open, which is just a month away, in particular. Doesn't matter what else he's done this season or how things ended for him at the Australian Open , French Open or Wimbledon. He's reached six Grand Slam finals in his career — all on hard courts. 'Usually, this is the most important part of the season for me,' Medvedev said in an interview in Washington, where he was scheduled to play Corentin Moutet in the quarterfinals on Friday. 'And this year, it's really important for me, because I didn't have the best year. I had a lot of time after Wimbledon, so I'm feeling ready and I feel in good shape.' After dropping his opening set at the D.C. Open this week against big-serving Reilly Opelka, Medvedev took the next four sets he played at an event where he was the runner-up in 2019. What works so well for the 29-year-old Russian on hard courts? 'A lot of different things. My ball goes through the air the most. My serve goes faster. And this year, the courts seem pretty fast. On the ATP lately, the courts seem to only get slower and slower. But here it's super fast. I like the way it plays,' said Medvedev, who has been ranked No. 1 and is No. 14 this week, his lowest spot in more than six years. 'It's one thing to like the way it plays and it's another thing to win. But I do feel like I can do big things.' He certainly has in the past. Any list would have to start with his championship at the 2021 U.S. Open , where his victory in the final prevented Novak Djokovic from completing the first calendar-year Grand Slam by a man since Rod Laver in 1969. Medvedev was the runner-up to Rafael Nadal in New York in 2019 — who could forget the back-and-forths with spectators that year? — and then to Djokovic in 2023. Medvedev also participated in three finals at the Australian Open, losing to Djokovic in 2021 , to Nadal in 2022 and to current No. 1 Jannik Sinner in 2024. He's twice been a semifinalist on Wimbledon's grass, and even made it to the quarterfinals at the French Open on red clay, his least favorite surface. This time around, Medvedev bowed out in the second round of the Australian Open in January, and then the first round of both the French Open in May and Wimbledon in June. He hadn't lost consecutive first-round matches at majors since 2017 — in his first two appearances at those events. Asked whether he tends to dwell on that sort of thing or tries to forget it, Medvedev said he would put himself 'kind of in the middle.' 'It does bother me,' he said, thinking back to his 7-6 (2), 3-6, 7-6 (3), 6-2 setback against 64th-ranked Benjamin Bonzi at the All England Club. 'Like after Wimbledon, I was sitting there, and I actually felt like I didn't play that bad. And you're losing (in the) first round. You know that the guy is probably going to lose in the second or third round — he did lose in the second round. You're like, 'Damn, I didn't play that bad and I'm losing first round of a Grand Slam, second time in a row.'' Medvedev said he got over it, in part, by heading to Ibiza for a couple of days of relaxing on the beach and having fun. And then it was time to get back to work — with a positive mindset. 'I know that when I come back to this level, I can beat anyone. And so that's where the optimism is coming from,' he said. 'Just work hard and try to find back this rhythm, this level, and then results can come and rankings can come.' ___ AP tennis:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store