Andhra CM launches Annadata Sukhibhava scheme
Each eligible farmer received Rs 7,000 in the first phase, comprising Rs 5,000 from the State (Rs 2,343 crore) and Rs 2,000 from the Centre (Rs 832 crore), as part of the Rs 20,000 annual aid package.
Naidu presented cheques for Rs 186 crore to Prakasam district, including Rs 29 crore for Darsi Assembly constituency, Rs 7.36 crore for 10,972 farmers in Darsi mandal, and Rs 31 lakh for 476 farmers in Veerayapalem.
Speaking amid lush fields, Naidu described the launch as a historic step to empower farmers, contrasting it with the previous YSRCP regime's mismanagement. 'The joy in farmers' eyes is my greatest reward,' he said, praising their resilience during crises like Covid-19.
The Super Six initiative by the TDP-BJP-Jana Sena combine promises Rs 20,000 per annum in three instalments. Naidu urged farmers to use the Sukhibhava portal or helpline (155251) for payment issues, and announced technology-driven crop advisories.
The Polam Pilustondi programme, resolving issues in 15,424 villages, and a drip irrigation scheme with up to 90% subsidy were highlighted as key initiatives to boost agricultural yield.
The Super Six promises include Rs 32,134 crore for 64 lakh pensioners, a Rs 4,000 pension hike, free gas cylinders under Deepam (Rs 2,700 crore), and free bus travel for 2.6 crore women under Stree Shakti from August 15.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Centre counters Mamata's 'man-made flood' charge, says water release was scientifically regulated
New Delhi, Jal Shakti Minister C R Paatil on Tuesday rejected West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee's allegations of "deliberate flooding" in the state by the Damodar Valley Corporation , asserting that water releases from the Maithon and Panchet reservoirs were carried out scientifically and in coordination with all stakeholders. Centre counters Mamata's 'man-made flood' charge, says water release was scientifically regulated Responding to Banerjee's claim that the DVC was "anti-Bengal" and responsible for a "man-made catastrophe," Paatil said, "The decision to release water is taken by the Damodar Valley Reservoir Regulation Committee , chaired by the Central Water Commission , with representatives from the DVC and the state governments of West Bengal and Jharkhand." He noted that the Damodar basin received 815 mm of rainfall between May and July 2025, a significant surge compared to the previous years. "This resulted in water inflows into the reservoirs during June-July 2025 being 16 times higher than in 2024 and 43 times higher than in 2023," the minister said in a post on X. "Despite such pressure, DVRRC regulated water release scientifically, limiting peak discharges to 70,000 cusecs to reduce downstream flood risk," Paatil said. Banerjee had alleged "flood mismanagement" and a "systematic attempt to trigger more and more flood-like situations" in south Bengal. "The centrally administered agency has failed Bengal to an unprecedented degree," she alleged in a post on X, accusing the Centre of "engineering a crisis" through the DVC. She highlighted a sharp spike in water outflows from 4,535 lakh cubic metres in June-July 2024 to 50,287 lakh cubic meters in the same period in 2025, and said the sudden release had devastated districts, damaged roads, breached embankments, and forced mass evacuations. Calling it "deeply disturbing," Banerjee claimed the "30 times higher" discharge compared to 2023 pointed to a conspiracy. "This is not a natural disaster. The data speaks for itself," she said, demanding an immediate halt to such discharges. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Delhi CM tables CAG audit report on welfare of construction workers in assembly
NEW DELHI: Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta presented a CAG audit report in the Assembly on Monday, highlighting irregularities in the registration of construction workers and indicating low expenditure on their welfare, despite the state government having a substantial fund of over Rs 3,500 crore available from 2019 to 2023. The report of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) of India on 'Welfare of Building and Other Construction Workers' (BOCW) covered the four years up to March 2023 under the rule of the previous Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) government in Delhi. The Delhi government did not have any reliable data relating to the number of BOCWs in Delhi, it said. The Welfare Board for the BOCWs could provide a complete database of only 1.98 lakh out of 6.96 lakh workers stated to be registered with it. "Out of 1.98 lakh beneficiaries of various welfare schemes, for whom images were made available to Audit, 1.19 lakh beneficiaries were linked with 2.38 lakh images - more than one image for individual beneficiary," it said, suspecting "ghost" worker registrations. Also, the availability of duplicate images, images with no faces, and multiple registrations of the same face indicated several "loopholes" in the registration process, the CAG report stated. In terms of renewals of registrations of the BOCW, Delhi was way behind the all-India performance of 74 per cent. Delhi recorded a renewal of just 7.3 per cent of workers as per the report. As of March 2023, the Welfare Board for the BOCWs had accumulated funds of Rs 3,579.05 crore, it added. "There was a huge difference in the figures of cess amount collected as per records of cess collectors, district records and the Board. The difference in figures of the cess as per District records and as per the Board for four years amounted to Rs 204.95 crore. The differences were not found reconciled," it noted. The registered companies pay one per cent of the construction cost as cess to the Board for undertaking various schemes for the welfare of the BOCWs. Also, the Delhi government did not maintain a reconciled database of cess assessed, collected and remitted. It thus lacked a system to ascertain the quantum of cess due and its timely collection, the report found. "Cases of incorrect assessment, short/deposit/realisation of cess were observed," it noted. Expenditure on welfare schemes ranged between 9.53 and 11.33 per cent only of the total receipts, except in 2021-22, when ex gratia payments were made to the BOCW to tide over the Covid pandemic period, it added.
Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
With federal funds gone, US states turn to trusts to sustain early education and child care systems
US states turn to trusts to sustain early education and child care systems The COVID-19 pandemic exposed just how essential child care is to the functioning of families, communities, and economies. During the crisis, US states relied heavily on federal funding through the American Rescue Plan (ARP) to keep early childhood systems running. These temporary funds were used to lower costs for families, support providers, and stabilize a system that had long been under pressure. Now, with that federal funding gone, states are facing a familiar challenge: how to sustain and scale early education and child care programs without relying on inconsistent, short-term budgets. A growing number of states are responding with a new approach—permanent trust funds dedicated to early care and education. These funds are designed to provide reliable, long-term support for children, families, and educators across the country. The shift toward permanent funding structures Federal relief during the pandemic enabled states to make meaningful improvements in early care—from boosting wages for workers to expanding access for low-income families. But these improvements were largely temporary. As federal funding expired, states needed a way to preserve and expand these gains. Rather than relying on unpredictable annual appropriations, some states are building trust funds—dedicated financial reserves that generate stable funding year after year. These funds help insulate child care systems from economic downturns and political shifts, offering a more sustainable alternative to emergency aid or short-term grants. New Mexico: A model for other states New Mexico became one of the first states to embed early childhood education into its long-term financial planning. In 2022, it redirected a portion of its oil and gas revenues—traditionally set aside in a state land fund—toward early education. The trust has since enabled the state to make child care free for nearly all families, increase compensation for early educators, and create thousands of new child care slots. In 2025, lawmakers took the additional step of expanding the fund's minimum annual contribution, further securing its long-term impact. Connecticut: Using surplus revenue for children Connecticut established an early childhood trust fund in 2023 and began funding it in 2025 using unspent surplus revenues. The state's strict spending caps often leave funds unallocated at the end of the fiscal year. Instead of letting this money sit idle, lawmakers directed it into a dedicated trust. With an initial allocation of ₹300 million and potential for annual contributions of the same amount, the fund is expected to reach ₹1 billion by 2028. The goal is to eliminate child care costs for middle-income families and limit expenses for others, while also expanding the availability of early education services. Montana: A conservative state, a bold move In a significant move for a conservative-leaning state, Montana launched the 'Growth and Opportunity Trust' in 2025. The fund is broad in scope, with allocations for infrastructure, tax credits, and child care. Child care received an initial investment and a share of future interest generated by the fund. While the amount is modest compared to the overall fund, it marks a foundational shift in how the state views early care—not just as social support, but as core infrastructure. Other states and strategies Several other states have also created or expanded trust funds for early education. Louisiana, for instance, matches local investments in child care through a state-level fund. Kentucky used tobacco settlement money and private funding to establish a similar trust in 2022. Meanwhile, states like Washington and Massachusetts have implemented dedicated taxes to support early learning systems. Each model varies, but the underlying principle remains the same: stable, long-term funding is essential for a healthy child care system. Limitations and future outlook While trust funds offer stability, they are not a complete solution. The cost of building a truly universal early childhood system—including access to care from birth to age five and fair compensation for providers—is significantly higher than what most trust funds currently generate. Additionally, the continued health of these funds often depends on surplus revenues or investment returns, which may fluctuate. If state budgets tighten, future contributions to the funds could shrink or stop altogether. There is also a risk that lawmakers treat these trust funds as replacements for broader systemic investment, rather than complementary supports. Building long-term resilience in child care As federal support recedes, US states are increasingly taking child care funding into their own hands. Trust funds represent a forward-thinking approach that moves beyond short-term relief and toward permanent investment in children, families, and educators. By embedding early childhood care into their financial infrastructure, states like New Mexico, Connecticut, and Montana are not just reacting to a crisis—they are laying the foundation for long-term resilience in a system that families rely on every day. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
