
Uddhav, Raj Thackeray share stage after 20 years at anti-Hindi rally
Raj Thackeray
came together after 20 years to celebrate the 'victory' rally after the state government withdrew Hindi as the state's third language.
This has led to speculations that the two cousins-who had turned bitter rival-could join hands for the upcoming civic polls.
Raj Thackeray had quit the
Shiv Sena
in 2005, upset over
Uddhav Thackeray
's style of functioning , and formed his own
Maharashtra Navnirman Sena
in 2006.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
The Top 25 Most Beautiful Women In The World
Articles Vally
On Saturday, at the Worli Dome-where several Marathi writers, activists and opposition party leaders like Supriya Sule and communist party leaders were present-both Raj and Uddhav slammed chief minister
Devendra Fadnavis
for trying to 'impose' Hindi in the state.
"In the last twenty years what Balasaheb (Thackeray) and others could not do, Devendra Fadnavis has done, by bringing me and Uddhav together," Raj Thackeray said. "I don't know why this Hindi thing was suddenly sprung up on us. There was no demand from any educationists or parents but the state government did it, because they thought they are in power (and) they can do it. You (Fadnavis) have the power only in the state assembly but on the streets, we have the power," he warned.
Live Events
The MNS leader questioned the three-language policy under which the government was planning to introduce Hindi to primary students. He asked what the third language would be for states like Bihar and Madhya Pradesh where Hindi is the first language.
The MNS leader claimed that there was a conspiracy to separate Mumbai from Maharashtra and that the government was running a "trial" to check people's reaction by first making Hindi compulsory. On recent incidents of violence against non-Marathi speakers in the state, Raj Thackeray said if "anyone does mischief, then you need to beat them up."
"We will listen to anything but will not compromise on Marathi and Maharashtra...Try to touch Maharashtra and see what happens," he said. Uddhav Thackeray in his speech said he and Raj have "come together and would stay together."
"If for working for
Marathi pride
and for justice you are calling us goondas then, yes, we are goondas," he said, referring to Fadnavis's statement saying that the state would not tolerate 'goondaism' over the language issue.
Congress Plays Down reunion of Thackeray cousins
Meanwhile, the Congress appeared sceptical of a potential political alliance between the two cousins.
"It's fine if Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray claim credit for the withdrawal of the GRs. If they come together politically, our best wishes," said Chavan.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
What becomes of Republicans who cross King Donald?
DONALD TRUMP'S One Big Beautiful Bill act (BBB) is a Frankenstein's monster of hand-outs, carve-outs, tax cuts and ideological splurges and purges. Independent analysis suggests it will increase America's deficit , stunt the economy and hit the poorest hardest. A recent poll by YouGov and The Economist found that just over one in three Americans support the bill. Elon Musk, a big Republican donor and a former 'first buddy' of Mr Trump, is so unhappy that he is proposing to create a new political party. Even so, only five Republican members of Congress voted against it—fewer than any budget of Mr Trump's first term. Since becoming president for the first time in 2017, Mr Trump has reshaped the Republican Party in his image. Loyalty comes before all else in the Trump Party: Republicans who cross him could find themselves on the receiving end of a social-media rant or, worse, facing a Trump-endorsed primary challenger. After Thom Tillis (pictured) voted against the BBB , Mr Trump took to Truth Social, his social-media platform, to condemn the senator from North Carolina, calling for a loyalist to run against him. Mr Tillis chose to withdraw from his re-election campaign altogether. His exit is a boon for Democrats who hope to win his seat next year. After combing through 52,792 of the president's social-media posts, The Economist has identified 30 Republican members of Congress whom Mr Trump has publicly scorned or sought to displace since his first inauguration (see chart 1). Of those 30, ten went on to resign or decide not to run for re-election, including Mr Tillis. Nine faced a Trump-endorsed primary opponent. Five are standing for re-election in 2026. The data is reminiscent of the famous epigram 'divorced, beheaded, died; divorced, beheaded, survived'. Of course, the parallel to Henry VIII is unfair. Unlike the murderous English monarch, Mr Trump shows clemency. He publicly reconciled with seven of the 30 (although the feud resumed in four cases). The president's ire has been directed at one in 20 Republicans who have served in the past eight years. That this number is not greater can be credited to the fear instilled by six occasions when a candidate endorsed by Mr Trump defeated a Republican incumbent. By this method, he dispatched four of the ten House Republicans who voted to impeach him in 2021, along with Representatives Mark Sanford, an early critic, and Bob Good, a hard-right conservative caught on tape implying that Mr Trump was not a 'true conservative'. His endorsement is so valuable that one Republican congressman from Kentucky took to airing ads in south Florida, aimed to reach Mr Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort. The president's ability to dislodge unfriendly colleagues is not absolute. Three Republicans have survived a Trump-endorsed challenge. Nancy Mace, a congresswoman from South Carolina, survived by embracing Mr Trump, recanting her previous, mild criticisms. Two of the remaining Republicans who supported Mr Trump's second impeachment—Senator Lisa Murkowski and Representative Dan Newhouse—defeated primary opponents under voting systems which allow voters to cross party lines. Ranked-choice voting in Alaska and the two-round system in Washington state meant they could draw on support from sympathetic or tactical Democrats and independents. Mr Trump appears to understand the limits of his powers. He has notably avoided feuding with Representative David Valadao of California, and despite calling her 'absolutely atrocious' in 2022 he has been relatively muted about Senator Susan Collins of Maine. Although both of them voted for his impeachment, they also represented constituencies that leaned towards the Democrats (Mr Valadao now represents a more Republican-leaning district). Maine uses ranked-choice voting and California uses a two-round system. Mr Trump's strategic restraint could be to preserve his record. 'I am 42-0 over the last two cycles and never even tried to run up the score,' he said of his endorsements in 2022. For their part, Democrats are happy to enjoy the red-on-red scraps. In 2022, Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the House, made the controversial decision to use Democratic campaign funds to boost pro-Trump Republicans. Though arguably corrosive for democracy, in a narrow sense the gamble paid off. In three of the six races where Mr Trump unseated his critics, the Republican replacements went on to lose the general election. Be careful what you wish for Republicans in competitive districts have to weigh the risks of crossing Mr Trump against the risks of being too closely associated with him as voters' dissatisfaction rises. Mr Trump's loyal base, who vote in Republican primaries, are pitted against moderate general-election voters. This dynamic is a gift for the Democrats, who have a narrow path to regaining the Senate in next year's midterm elections (see chart 2). In North Carolina, Mr Tillis will probably be replaced by a less popular Republican nominee. In Texas, the state's scandal-plagued hard-right attorney-general leads primary polls by double digits, taking advantage of the president's attacks on the incumbent senator, 'hopeless' John Cornyn (to use Mr Trump's epithet). The fracas substantially improves Democrats' chances of winning the two states, which are key to their Senate prospects. Mr Trump has made himself inextricable from the Republican Party. This gives him a lot of power. But from a tactical point of view, he can still be a liability for his party. What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald- What-becomes-of-Republicans-who-cross-King-Donald-


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Mumbai woman alleges MNS leader's drunk son rammed into her car, abused on camera
A woman in Mumbai has alleged that her vehicle was hit by the son of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) leader Javed Shaikh in Andheri area late on Sunday night. According to her, the man – identified as Rahil Javed Shaikh – was driving under the influence. Rahil, the son of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena leader Javed Shaikh and Rajshree More. Rajshree More, who was reportedly once a close friend of actor Rakhi Sawant, posted a video of the incident on social media platform Instagram in which Rahil appears to be in a semi-naked state, and purportedly heard using abusive language. Rahil reportedly can be heard saying, 'Bh**od paishe the." He also says, 'My father is the state vice president of MNS." The video also shows the accused getting into an altercation with the cops, and charging at Rajshree, daring her to lodge a police complaint. "Go and tell the cops I am Javed Shaikh's son, then you'll see what happens," he is heard saying in Marathi. Rajshree also shared an image of the FIR that was lodged against the accused later. She also claimed that MNS workers and supporters were targeting her because of her recent comments on the local Marathi population and the Marathi language imposition row. Rajshree also demanded strict action against Rahil and claimed that she felt threatened during the incident. What police said "A video is viral on social media where a shirtless youth is seen abusing a woman, named Rajshree More, after her car was hit by the youth's car. He has been identified as Rahil Shaikh, claiming to be the son of MNS state vice President Javed Shaikh. The incident took place at Vira Desai road in Andheri West. FIR was registered at Amboli police station, and the youth was detained for medical examination, his car was also taken into custody for further investigation by Mumbai police," news agency ANI quoted police as saying. Rajshree recently sparked a row after posting a video on social media in which she made controversial remarks about the local Maharashtrian community. In the video clip, Rajshree questioned the demand to impose the Marathi language on residents of the state. She added that instead, local Marathi people should be encouraged to work harder. MNS workers from Versova later filed a complaint against Rajshree at the Oshiwara police station, News18 reported. Following the FIR, Rajshree issued a public apology and took down the video.


Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Tunnel vs transit: Bengaluru's infrastructure debate on social media heats up amid traffic woes
Bengaluru's social media fraternity is debating two massive infrastructure projects amid continuing traffic congestions: the proposed underground tunnel network for private vehicles and the expanding Namma Metro system aimed at mass transit. Social media users debated which Bengaluru needs more, the Namma Metro or the proposed underground tunnel network system, to ease its ongoing traffic woes.(X) READ | 'Unworkable': Experts on tunnel highway network proposed in Bengaluru to ease traffic congestion The tunnel road project — estimated to cost ₹19,000 crore — envisions an underground network between Hebbal and Silk Board, intended to ease surface traffic by creating a high-speed corridor exclusively for private vehicles, mostly cars. In contrast, the Namma Metro, along with the long-anticipated suburban rail project, is being pitched by many urban planners and citizens as a more inclusive, sustainable solution to the city's transportation crisis. READ | 'Bound to fail': Tejasvi Surya slams ₹18,000 crore Congress-backed tunnel project in Bengaluru Social media took the wheel in looking at the future of mobility in Bengaluru, arguing that the city's focus should be on enhancing public transport instead of creating infrastructure that encourages more private vehicle use. A resident's post on the issue took the internet by storm, raising the question of both the metro and the tunnel road being built on the same corridor. 'Know this Bengaluru. City can neither afford nor does it makes sense to build both metro and Tunnel Rd on same corridor. Metro serves all. Tunnel Rd? Cars only. Great cities have great metros and aren't car dependent. Stop the Tunnel Road. Complete metro & suburban rail first,' the post read. READ | ₹19,000 crore loan for tunnel? Bengaluru MP PC Mohan lists 13 better ways to spend the money The post amassed 17,000 views and over 300 likes. Several users agreed, with one writing, 'Lived in Bengaluru for years. The traffic is already a nightmare. We need mass transit that serves everyone, not just those who can afford cars.' 'We need suburban Rail immediately,' another posted. On the other hand, some disagreed, with a user replying, 'Have metro above tunnel. Think hybrid design concept.'