American attitudes about AI today mirror poll answers about the rise of the internet in the '90s
Despite rising acceptance, the future ubiquity of artificial intelligence tools like those put out by OpenAI and Google remains an open question. Polling data suggests that current adoption rates of AI chat tools look similar to internet adoption rates at the turn of the century. But the trajectory of AI's growth and the challenges it faces are unique.
When an October 1998 Newsweek poll asked respondents how often they were using the internet, 38% said once a week or more.
By June 2000, an NBC News/Wall Street Journal Poll found that 71% adults had internet access and that among that group, three-quarters were using it for at least an hour a week.
Internet use has, of course, only continued to rise since 2000. Daily internet use is now a more relevant metric than weekly use, and much of the public debate centers on what limits to internet access are necessary.
The NBC News Decision Desk Poll identifies how public reservations shape opinions about AI adoption.
In the recent survey, 47% said they believe a school that prohibits using AI would better prepare students for the future. That sentiment extends even to the most frequent AI chat tool users — one-fifth of those who say they use AI tools 'often' say prohibiting them in the classroom would better prepare students.
Society's concerns about internet ubiquity may mean we're in new territory regarding technological caution. Yet, it's important to remember that public sentiment toward new technologies doesn't always prioritize adoption.
When CBS News asked in 1999 whether the ability to use the internet was important for school-age children, 48% said it wasn't all that important.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
I downloaded Tea, the new man-shaming app. Here's what I learnt
An app that allows women to anonymously review the men they date became the most popular download in the US iPhone app store on Thursday. Tea, founded in 2023 by the Silicon Valley developer Sean Cook, went viral on Wednesday after more than one million women signed up in the past week. The app uses AI to verify users' selfies and ensure that they are women. Once verified, users can post photos of men — mainly scraped from dating profiles — and demand 'the tea', or gossip, about them from other female users. The concept is the same as the viral Facebook group 'Are we dating the same guy?', in which women appeal for dirt on the men they date. But Tea takes the idea to a whole new level, using reverse image search to find other online photos of the men and exposing potentially slanderous details about them — fake names, double lives, you name it. The AI tool that dredges up these smears is called 'Catfish Finder AI'. The app can also expose phone numbers, perform background checks, and dig up criminal histories and public records. But it is the Tea Party Group Chat that is causing the most concern from disgruntled male daters. While the app uses a moderation tool called 'SafeSip' to remove harmful content, men on X are complaining that they're being 'doxxed' — a form of cyberbullying where private information is posted without the person's consent. One man laments that it's 'a place where hurt women can … tell a one-sided story about men and damage their name without any context or proof'; another worries about a future destroyed by 'surveillance by our peers'. Free to download and exclusive to the US, Tea is not easy to access. I had to submit a selfie (to verify that I am a woman) before being added to a waiting list behind 13,000 other potential users. Even though I was able to move to the front of the line by recommending the app to a friend — a feature intended to boost usership — it takes hours to be accepted. And having scoured men's rights boards on Reddit, I begin to doubt the efficacy of the sex-verification tool at all: one man boasted that he gained access to the app after he 'asked ChatGPT' to transform his picture into that of a woman. You don't have to get inside the Tea app to feel its toxicity. Screenshots from the app on Reddit reveal some shocking claims from female users. 'Avoid this man!!' says one. 'His name is [redacted]. He has mouth herpes and STDs. He lies to get what he wants then will ghost you after.' Another man is described as 'abusive, pathological liar, manic and victim mentality. Loves drama.' Another user calls a guy a 'meth addict. Will emotionally and physically abuse women. Secret life with gay older men.' In other examples, women post pictures of their partners while they are sleeping to find out if other women recognise him. Users are even able to set alerts for a particular man's name. This Tea is bitter indeed. When I downloaded the app, it gave me a series of promises: 'everything is anonymous', 'screenshots are impossible', 'you can search all posts in the country by a man's name'. Reassuring, certainly — as long as you're a woman using it, and not a man who could be torn apart by gossip. And yet Tea claims to be doing good. To reinforce this altruistic 'purpose', it declares that 10 per cent of its proceeds are donated to the National Domestic Violence Hotline. Here's the truth: Tea pours fuel on an already fraught dating scene for my generation. It may be well intentioned, but it will inevitability chill any sense of romantic risk or hope for authenticity among my peers. Worse, the app hides behind the idea of transparency: nothing to hide, nothing to fear. But this is simply vigilante justice, entirely reliant on the scruples of anonymous women. With Tea on the scene, what man would ever dare date a woman again?
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
MTG again lashes out at Trump this time over his AI plan: ‘An absolute threat to federalism'
Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch ally of the MAGA movement, broke from President Donald Trump on Thursday to oppose his executive order on artificial intelligence, raising concerns about its impact on the environment and states' rights. Hoping to accelerate the United States's development of AI, Trump signed a series of executive orders on Wednesday, making it easier to build data centers on federal lands and incentivizing states to impose fewer regulations by threatening to withhold federal funding to AI projects. But Greene raised a red flag, saying she was concerned with the impact of massive data centers on the people and environment around, while providing little to no regulations. 'My deep concerns are that the EO demands rapid AI expansion with little to no guardrails and breaks. It also contains the threat of withholding federal funds from states who regulate AI, which is an absolute threat to federalism and why I strongly opposed the AI state moratorium originally in the BBB,' Greene wrote on X. Trump has pushed for more AI development in the U.S., hoping for companies such as Meta, Google, OpenAI, and Microsoft to develop and expand their AI technology beyond what the Chinese-based company DeepSeek has already done. But the Georgia congresswoman said the 'rushed AI expansion' should include a plan to address human and environmental impact – with particular concerns around using nearby water supplies that cross state lines. 'Competing with China does not mean become like China by threatening state rights, replacing human jobs on mass scale creating mass poverty, and creating potentially devastating effects on our environment and critical water supply,' Greene wrote. 'This needs a careful and wise approach. The AI EO takes the opposite.' Greene's statement is the latest in a string of opposing stances that she has taken against Trump, whom she has typically expressed unwavering loyalty to. Recently, Greene has also criticized the administration for not releasing the Epstein Files, a recent Trump-backed crypto bill, and the president's decision to intervene in the Iran–Israel conflict by bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. Her additional opposition also comes at a moment of contention between the president and his MAGA base. Trump's dismissal of the Epstein Files, of which conspiracy theories have floated in the MAGA world for years, appears to have caused a fracture in his base's trust. It's unclear how many may feel about the AI bill, but Greene's opposition provides some insight. 'I represent the base and when I'm frustrated and upset over the direction of things, you better be clear, the base is not happy,' Greene said on X back in May.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Ike Barinholtz cast as Elon Musk in OpenAI film from Luca Guadagnino
The Studio's Ike Barinholtz is set to play Elon Musk in Artificial, the Luca Guadagnino-directed film about Sam Altman and OpenAI. Barinholtz was nominated for an Emmy for his role as production executive Sal Saperstein in the acclaimed comedy series co-created by, among others, Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg, as well as acting as one of the co-creators of Kate Hudson sports-comedy series Running Point. Musk was one of the co-founders of OpenAI in 2015, along with Altman and a string of others; however, he left the company in 2018 and started a rival firm called xAI in 2023. Musk and OpenAI have been at loggerheads since, with a string of legal claims on both sides. Musk has accused OpenAI of abandoning its original charitable mission by establishing a for-profit subsidiary, and in August 2024 launched legal action against the company claiming he was manipulated into co-founding it, saying: 'The perfidy and deceit is of Shakespearean proportions.' Musk subsequently attempted a takeover of the company in 2025; his $97.4bn bid for OpenAI was rebuffed, with Altman posting on social media: 'no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.' In April, OpenAI countersued Musk for what it claimed were his 'malicious campaigns' and 'harassing legal claims'. Although plot details have not been confirmed, Guadagnino's film is said to concentrate on the brief period of behind-the-scenes drama when Altman was fired and re-hired as OpenAI CEO within a matter of days in November 2024. The board had claimed Altman was not 'consistently candid in his communications', but Altman was reinstated after many of the company's employees threatened to quit. Andrew Garfield, Monica Barbaro and Anora's Yura Borisov have reportedly been cast in the film, though their roles have not been clarified. The writer has been confirmed as novelist Simon Rich, a former contributor to the Observer and writer of Rogen comedy An American Pickle. Guadagnino has just completed thriller After the Hunt, starring Julia Roberts, Ayo Edebiri and Garfield, which is due to receive its world premiere at the Venice film festival.
