
Army recruiting is up, but data show trend began before the election, current and former Army officials say
"You had some number of young men and women who didn't want to join the army over the last four years under Joe Biden and Christine Wormuth, the former secretary of the Army, when they thought it was more focused on Wokeness and DEI and climate change," Cotton told Fox's America's Newsroom. "That's not why young men and women join our military. They do it because they love the country."
The uptick in recruiting started months before the election on November 5.
"No, it did not all start in December," former Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, who served until Jan. 20, said in an interview with Fox News.
"Army's recruiting started getting better much earlier. We really started seeing the numbers, the monthly numbers, go up in February of 2024. We were seeing sort of in the high 5000 contracts per month, and that accelerated, you know, into the spring all the way into August, when the Army really hit a peak."
Starting in Oct. 2023, the Army put 1,200 more recruiters in the field. By Sept. 2024, before the election, the Army announced it had exceeded its recruiting goals.
The groundwork was laid that October when Wormuth and Gen Randy George, the Army chief, began a sweeping initiative to help those who did not meet academic standards or fitness requirements. The six-week pre-boot camp, called the Future Soldier Prep Course, helps lower-performing recruits meet enlistment standards. They also moved away from just recruiting in high schools to posting on job message boards. Recruiters got trained by Amazon, Wells Fargo and other industry leaders in talent acquisition. And the Army brought back the "Be All That You Can Be" branding campaign from the 1980s.
"We've been selecting soldiers who have personalities that are more suited to recruiting. We improved our marketing very dramatically in terms of being very data driven and very targeted. And then, of course, the future Soldier Prep course, which the Army established some time ago, has been a big success and has accounted last year for about 25% of the new recruits that came in," Wormuth said. "If you look at our Army ads, we show young people, you know, jumping out of helicopters. We show kids doing, you know, night patrols in the jungle."
Army data shows the Army has struggled with recruiting numbers since COVID, including a shortfall of 15,000 recruits in 2022.
It reported record-breaking recruitment in Dec. 2024, with nearly 350 recruits enlisting daily and the total number of active duty soldiers reaching 5877 recruits that month. Secretary Hegseth praised the recruiting numbers in a post on X:
"@USArmy: @USAREC had their most productive December in 15 years by enlisting 346 Soldiers daily into the World's greatest #USArmy!
"Our Recruiters have one of the toughest jobs - inspiring the next generation of #Soldiers to serve.
"Congratulations and keep up the great work!"
But August of last year, three months prior to the election, saw a higher number of recruits than in December – 7,415 recruits compared to the 5,877 in December. And January 2025 still has not surpassed August 2024 for the highest monthly count of the past year.
In other words, the positive recruiting trend began before the election.
The increased recruiting numbers resulted from more women joining. Women made up 19% of the recruits last year, the highest rate to date.
"For example, right now, 16% of the overall Army is women. And so, having a year where almost 20% of the new recruits are women is a notable increase," Wormuth said. "In 2024, we also had the highest ever recruiting year for Hispanics."
There is a lag of about 10–12 weeks from the time a recruit enters a recruiting office and actually signs up due to medical exams and other paperwork.
"The biggest reasons young people are hesitant to join the Army is because of fear of death or injury, fear of leaving their families, a sense that maybe somehow, you know, joining the Army will put their lives on hold for a period of time," Wormuth said. "Concerns about so-called wokeness are very low on the list of obstacles for most young people. And the last time the Army ran that survey, we didn't really see a change. That remains to be a small concern."
During its recruiting crisis, the Army had seen a drop in the number of families who typically send their children to serve, families whose members have served for generations. Many of those families tended to be white and from one of the 10 states that make up nearly half of the recruits: Texas (13.3%), California (10.5%), Florida (9.7%), Georgia (5.1%), North Carolina (4.6%), New York (4.3%), Virginia (2.9%), Ohio (2.8%), Illinois (2.6%) and Pennsylvania (2.4%).
There is no data suggesting a surge in white males joining the Army last year. In FY2024, 40% of the Army recruits were Caucasian, 25% were Black and 26% were Hispanic.
"From the data we saw, there was no discernible change in young white men joining the Army compared to the spring of 2024. The Army had about 7400 recruits in August, and in December it was about 5800," Wormuth said.
The Army is also set to expand its basic training capacity in the spring.
"U.S. Army Recruiting Command is on track to exceed the fiscal year 2025 recruitment goal of 61,000 new Soldiers and an additional 10,000 in the Delayed Entry Program," Madison Bonzo, U.S. Army Recruiting Command spokeswoman, said in a statement. "As of today, USAREC has contracted 59% of the current FY25 goal. Our success couldn't be possible without the hard work of our Recruiters, continued transformation of the recruiting enterprise and modernization initiatives to attract qualified talent into America's most lethal fighting force."
Wormuth said: "I would say we saw in the Army recruiting numbers, we started seeing us really get traction in February of 2024."
"And we continued to build those numbers up to about, you know, high 5,000, 6,000 a month in August. And the Army has continued that momentum going into the end of the year. And I think the winds are at the Army's back for coming into 2025," she continued.
Former Army officials warn that it is dangerous to link Army recruiting successes to the election cycle, since the military is supposed to be apolitical. Soldiers sign up not to serve a president or a party but to serve the Constitution.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
Andrew Cuomo's independent run: Letters to the Editor — July 16, 2025
The Issue: Ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo's decision to stay in the New York City mayoral race as an independent. It is incomprehensible that former Gov. Andrew Cuomo would even think about running for political office again at any level ('Cuo: Hell no, I won't go,' July 15). Does he think people forgot about the decisions he made during COVID that resulted in the horrible deaths of countless elderly people? His involvement in the bail-reform laws have also contributed mightily to the deaths of innocent people and diminished the quality of life in New York City. This is a man with no conscience or self-awareness who is utterly obsessed with power. He just needs to fade into obscurity so we can forget he was ever in the public eye. Robert DiNardo Farmingdale If voters don't want Zohran Mamdani, they should rally around a more competent, although flawed, Cuomo. Mayor Adams is a proven failure. Otherwise, don't complain if Mamdani wins. Robert Berk Manhattan Neither Mamdani nor Cuomo are deserving of the mayorship. However, Adams and Curtis Sliwa need to drop out of the race for mayor and support Cuomo if they truly have the best interests for New Yorkers. Edwin Young The Bronx Why don't Adams and Cuomo swallow their pride and do the right thing for New York City? They should flip a coin or cut cards and whoever loses should support the other candidate. If they truly want to prevent Zohran Mamdani — who is supported by the dumbest of our city — from becoming mayor and completely destroying our city, they will do this for New York. Joseph Napoleone Richmond Hill Cuomo and Adams just don't know when it's time to quit. Cuomo got caught up in a scandal, and Adams got caught up in corruption. They both should go off into the sunset. Sadly, they are not smart enough to do that. Gene O'Brien Whitestone Looks like NYC is going to have a socialist mayor. The once-greatest city in the world will be no more — no thanks to Andrew Cuomo, who is a disgrace. Under his watch, 15,000 nursing-home patients died from COVID and many of his staffers claim they were sexually harassed. He's also known for saying America 'was never that great.' J.R. Cummings Manhattan It's typical of Cuomo and his ego to think he's still relevant to voters. The Cuomo name was ultimately dishonored with his lack of sexual control. I am not a fan of Adams, but unfortunately New York City is so mired in Democratic politics that the chances for Sliwa are slim. Kevin Judge Naples, Fla. The Issue: A fired pediatrician's apology for saying Texas flood victims got 'what they voted for.' The Texas pediatrician, Christina Propst — who heartlessly commented that the flood victims got what they deserved for voting for President Trump — is now trying to take back her shameless remark ('Oh doc, Cry me a river,' July 11). She is saying she didn't know there were any victims when she posted these remarks. Sorry, but that won't fly. Did she expect that there would be no casualties after all that flooding? Warren Goldfein Mount Arlington, NJ This doesn't surprise me; Trump Derangement Syndrome knows no bounds. Propst's apology is weak and transparent. Even if she didn't know about so many dying, it is still absolutely horrible to wish terrible things on people who don't agree with you politically. I am sure glad she was never my kid's pediatrician. Chris Plate Waterloo Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.

Business Insider
30 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Why the US military wants troops to be able to fix their own stuff
Troops often find themselves surrounded by gear they cannot legally fix. A bipartisan push is trying to allow troops to turn to their own wrenches to repair military equipment rather than relying on civilian contractors. Service members are allowed to fix a lot of military equipment on their own, with many troops specializing in mechanical repair for guns, aircraft, and even weapons optics. But some equipment contracts come with strict provisions that stipulate that repairs can only be performed by contractors and limit the technical data and intellectual property that can be shared with troops for repairs. Some lawmakers say these stipulations are problematic for troops in need of urgent repairs and take advantage of DoD funding. "When you're deployed in the field and you have a mission to complete and you have people's lives to protect, it just doesn't make sense to be constrained by some commercial agreement that you have with the manufacturers," said Greg Williams, the director of the Center for Defense Information at the Project on Government Oversight. Now, a bipartisan push from senators Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Tim Sheehy, a Montana Republican, is calling for a change amid new movement on the National Defense Authorization Act. These lawmakers highlight instances of the Navy ferrying contractors to sea for simple fixes, Marines in Japan forced to send engines to the US for repair instead of repair on site, and one contractor that "charged $900 a page for upgrades to its maintenance manuals for an Air Force aircraft." These moves mark the latest in a string of actions to overcome right-to-repair barriers. A 2023 California bill, for example, spurred Apple to endorse the ability for consumers to repair and modify their own devices. Medical device manufacturers came under fire during the pandemic for troublesome restrictions on ventilator repair. And US farmers have criticized farming equipment manufacturer John Deere, now embroiled in a federal lawsuit, for what they see as prohibitively restrictive controls on repair part access and burdensome diagnostics tech tools. President Donald Trump's tariffs could strengthen the right-to-repair movement throughout the nation, as some consumers grow increasingly reluctant to toss out high-priced goods that are damaged and seek to repair them instead. Top Pentagon brass have pushed for comprehensive changes to repair policies since January. Amid major transformation initiatives within the Army, Secretary of the Army Daniel Driscoll and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have each called for the inclusion of right-to-repair provisions in all new and existing Army contracts. Navy Secretary John Phelan told lawmakers in June that when visiting the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, he discovered six of the ship's eight ovens, essential tools required to feed thousands of sailors, were out for repair, adding that crewmembers aboard the vessel were legally prohibited from performing repairs. "It is crazy. We should be able to fix this," he said. Such high-level advocacy comes as other military leaders have observed that future warfare will require more innovative fixes from troops on the front lines. "The force of the future will fix on the spot," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said during a congressional hearing on military spending last month. The Iraq and Afghanistan wars saw robust base build-ups for troops, where equipment could be sent for intensive maintenance needs with the near-assurance of US air supremacy. Such guarantees are almost certainly a thing of the past, experts say, at least for high-end fights. Right now, "it all comes down to the particulars of the contract involved," Williams explained. "Different contractors have arrived at different arrangements with the Defense Department about when they have a chokehold on repairs and when they don't." "And so it needs to be negotiated on a contract-by-contract basis," he said. Williams pointed to a near-miss naval incident and subsequent relief of USS John McCain's captain as a clear example of what can happen when repairs go unaddressed. The destroyer nearly collided with another vessel during a refueling operation when the ship's lingering steering problems arose unexpectedly. It's unclear whether the right to repair would have prevented that outcome, but the argument for it is that it eliminates the unnecessary tension that exists today. As things stand now, Williams said, "it comes down to a push and pull between the manufacturer and the consumer."


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Brett Cooper warns Democrats evoked a Gen Z rebellion after the party angered young voters
Former President Barack Obama is urging Democrats to stop complaining and get involved, telling party members dissatisfied with its direction to 'just toughen up.' But one conservative podcaster says she doubts the younger generation will respond to that advice. Advertisement 'These new young Democrats coming in, they said actually something very similar to what Obama said,' Fox News contributor and political commentator Brett Cooper told 'America's Newsroom' on Tuesday. 'They said it's time to start actually having solutions and to stop whining about what Republicans are doing and actually try to compete with them.' Cooper noted a rising sense of frustration among Gen Z progressives who feel the Democratic Party isn't doing enough to contend with Republicans. It's a similar sentiment shared by former President Barack Obama during a fundraiser with Democratic donors last week. Advertisement 'I think it's going to require a little bit less navel-gazing and a little less whining and being in fetal positions. And it's going to require Democrats to just toughen up,' said Obama, according to excerpts obtained by CNN. Conservative podcaster and influencer Brett Cooper appeared on Fox News' 'America's Newsroom' claiming that Gen Z voters will unlikely take the advice of former President Barack Obama despite having a similar approach. Fox News 'Don't tell me you're a Democrat, but you're kind of disappointed right now, so you're not doing anything. No, now is exactly the time that you get in there and do something.' Many younger Democrats have launched primary campaigns nationwide, looking to dethrone establishment Democrats. Advertisement 'One of the things that they've [Democrats] accidentally done right is infuriating young people,' argued Cooper, who said upsetting Gen Z voters may have energized the base more. 'Because Gen Z, as we know, they are very emotional, especially on the left. They want to be involved.' There are a slew of young Democratic hopefuls looking to unseat older lawmakers. Advertisement 25-year-old social media influencer and progressive activist Deja Foxx is among those young candidates with a chance at claiming a House seat. Cooper said, 'These new young Democrats coming in, they said actually something very similar to what Obama said,' which is to stop complaining about what Republicans are doing and instead compete against them. LP Media In an upset victory, she was able to win the Democratic Party's congressional primary for an Arizona House seat. The spot had been left empty following the death of Rep. Raul Grijalva in March. 'I think by pissing them off, really, and screwing up the last election for the Democrats, that they've gotten a lot of younger people engaged,' explained Cooper, who added that their increased participation stems from a desire to shift the party's direction. Cooper also said more young people are getting involved because of social media, something she believes Republicans have done a better job utilizing so far. 'They saw what really worked with Trump. They saw what worked with JD Vance, of having authentic leaders who are speaking directly to the people, who are big on social media but actually feel like they're speaking directly to the public rather than just having a [communications team] run everything,' she said. It's that online authenticity, Cooper said, that could lead younger Democrats to pose a larger threat in elections moving forward.