logo
US rural communities bearing the brunt of bitcoin mining – DW – 06/30/2025

US rural communities bearing the brunt of bitcoin mining – DW – 06/30/2025

DW13 hours ago

As US President Donald Trump loosens cryptocurrency rules, one community tells how noise and pollution from a local Bitcoin mining operation has become "relentless."
In the quiet village of Dresden on the western shore of Seneca Lake in thestate of New York, the fire whistle blows like clockwork at noon every day. Residents don't mind; it's a familiar sound that blends into the rhythm of their small-town life.
But there's one noise some of the 300 villagers cannot stand: the constant, mechanical droning of Greenidge Generation. This former coal-fired facility is now a natural gas "peaking plant" that supplies electricity to New York during high demand. Since 2019, it has also powered an energy-gulping Bitcoin mine.
Locals say that on some days, the sound it emits is like a refrigerator humming in the background, but when the wind shifts just right, it becomes more of a roar.
Winton Buddington, who owns a home in Dresden, said "it was a nice and peaceful community," until 2017. "Then, Atlas Holdings purchased the property."
Retired nurse Beth Cain says research shows that constant noise "does affect people. It creates stress for your system," she said, adding that it's like "having tinnitus."
But the unwanted soundscape is not the only concern locals share about the plant, which also discharges hot water into the lake and emits carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
Many in the community, including Yvonne Taylor, vice president of Seneca Lake Guardian, a grassroots environmental advocacy group in upstate New York, fear that Greenidge poses a threat to the broader region, whose wineries and Mennonite farms are big visitor attractions.
"[The wine and tourism industry] is our driving economic engine, and all of those jobs rely heavily on clean air and clean water for survival," Taylor said.
Large-scale crypto-mining operations such as the one in Dresden consume massive amounts of energy. They thousands of computer servers to compete in solving mathematical problems that validate blockchain transactions. By 2021, the Greenidge facility was generating about 44 megawatts to mine Bitcoin, which is enough to power up to 40,000 homes — depending on their consumption levels.
"Each one of those machines has to solve a puzzle. Each machine can solve that puzzle about 100 trillion times every second," said Colin Read, author of The Bitcoin Dilemma: Weighing the Economic and Environmental Costs and Benefits.And that requires a lot of energy, which generates a lot of emissions.
Citing Greenidge's own data, the environmental law group Earthjustice said the facility emitted almost 800,000 tons of carbon dioxide and CO2 equivalents in 2023 — on a par with the tailpipe emissions of over 170,000 cars.According to the US Energy Information Administration, 137 cryptomining facilities were already operating in the country at the start of 2024. The current government has not yet released new figures, but Troy Cross, philosophy professor at Reed College in the US city of Portland and senior fellow at the nonpartisan Bitcoin Policy Institute expects that under self-proclaimed "crypto president" Donald Trump, Bitcoin companies will face fewer barriers when scouting for new mining locations.
"Trump will make it easier for the large Bitcoin mining companies in the US, and especially in West Texas," he said, in reference to the state being a leading producer of coal and natural gas. It's also among the top states in solar and wind energy generation.Since coming to office, the president has already formed a working group to draft pro-crypto regulations and has announced a national reserve to stockpile digital assets. In a sharp reversal of his earlier stance that Bitcoin was "not money" and a "scam," he has even launched his own meme coin.
Taylor says Bitcoin mines are "spreading across the country like a cancer," adding that "slick crypto corporations" are popping up in rural underserved communities with promises of job creation and earnings.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
But pointing to the fact that the Greenidge Bitcoin mine employed 48 people full-time in 2022 — about as many as in a typical McDonald's — she said experience shows that such claims "fall short."
Margot Paez, of the Bitcoin Policy Council, who studies cryptocurrency mining in New York State, says Greenidge's decision to co-locate its Bitcoin mine with a natural gas plant is a "terrible" idea. But she adds that the site is just "one bad apple," suggesting that Bitcoin miners should tap into renewables or support grid balancing.
In a draft environmental impact assessment of the 11 known crypto facilities within its borders, the state said the energy use from such operations "may contribute to challenges meeting New York's renewable energy transition goals."
Residents and environmentalists are also concerned about the Greenidge plant's water use. Keeping the crypto mining computers running without overheating requires massive amounts of water. The facility is permitted to draw up to 139 million gallons (525 million liters) from Seneca Lake every day and dump back as many as 134 million gallons.
Having been used for cooling, however, the water returned to the lake is much warmer than when it was taken out. Temperatures range between 86 degrees Fahrenheit (30 degrees Celsius) in the winter and 108 F (42 C) in the summer — which some locals say makes the lake too warm for kayakers and swimmers to enjoy.
Residents also worry the warm water could affect aquatic life and trigger more harmful algae blooms in the lake. In 2024, the state environment authorities recorded 377 algal blooms — up from 50 in 2023. Exposure to blooms can cause rashes, coughing, sore throat, stomach pain, and vomiting.Locals have been involved in legal action that has so far failed to halt the facility's operations. They are also part of a network of experts and activists from affected communities across 17 states that has reached out to Trump's crypto working group to explain the impacts of cryptocurrency policies on rural areas. They have not yet received a response.
In Dresden, where some residents rent out their properties to visitors who come for the lake, there are fears that proximity to Greenidge will hurt the local rental market.
Even 10 miles (16 kilometers) away in the city of Geneva, residents are concerned about the potential impact of the Bitcoin mining facility. Vinny Aliperti, owner of Billsboro Winery, said the plant hasn't affected his business yet, but he's confident it will.
"Clean lakes are a big part of agrotourism. They're the reason people visit the area and the wineries," he said.
Greenidge, which describes itself on its website as an "environmental leader in power generation and Bitcoin mining," had not responded to a request for comment by the time of publication.
The Torrey Town Board, which governs Dresden, said the plant has complied with all its codes, including an independent noise study.
"The Greenidge power plant has been an important part of the Town of Torrey since the 1930s, remaining so today as a valuable employer and community partner," it said.
The crypto mine has contributed to the community by donating to Dresden's volunteer fire department and the village playground and supporting businesses in the region during theCOVID-19 pandemic.
"They've done those things, but that's not something that we consider to be worth the trade-off of the pollution and the impact they're having on the environment," Buddington said.To play this audio please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 audio

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump ends Syria sanctions, orders terror designation review – DW – 07/01/2025
Trump ends Syria sanctions, orders terror designation review – DW – 07/01/2025

DW

time2 hours ago

  • DW

Trump ends Syria sanctions, orders terror designation review – DW – 07/01/2025

President Donald Trump formally lifted US sanctions against Syria. Damascus said it expects the move will "lift the obstacle" to economic recovery. US President Donald Trump on Monday signed an executive order to dismantle the US sanctions program on Syria, ending the Middle Eastern country's isolation from the international financial system. The sanctions program, which has been in place since 2004, imposed far-reaching sanctions on Syria that affected most state institutions, including the central bank. "This is in an effort to promote and support the country's path to stability and peace," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters, Leavitt added that the move will enable the US to maintain sanctions on Syria's former president, Bashar Assad, and his associates, as well as on human rights abusers, drug traffickers, individuals involved in chemical weapons activities, the Islamic State, ISIS affiliates, and Iranian proxies. Trump's order also instructs the US State Department to review the designation of the Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) as a foreign terrorist organization. The Syrian transitional government has largely emerged from this group. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is also to review Syria's designation as a state sponsor of terrorism, as well as that of Syrian transitional President Ahmed al-Sharaa as a terrorist. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Syrian Foreign Minister Assaad al-Shibani said the US move marked a "major turning point," according to a post by the minister on social media platform X. "With the lifting of this major obstacle to economic recovery, the long-awaited doors are opening for reconstruction and development" as are the conditions "for the dignified return of displaced Syrians to their homeland," he wrote on X. Trump had already exempted Syria from most of the sanctions in May in response to appeals from Saudi Arabia and Turkey. In December, Assad was ousted in a swift offensive led by Islamist rebels under the command of al-Sharaa. Since then, Syria has taken steps to rebuild its international ties.

Trump Begs 'Boss of AT&T' to Save His Conference Call After Experiencing Technical Issues
Trump Begs 'Boss of AT&T' to Save His Conference Call After Experiencing Technical Issues

Int'l Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Trump Begs 'Boss of AT&T' to Save His Conference Call After Experiencing Technical Issues

President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to plead with the "boss of AT&T" to fix his conference call after technical difficulties disrupted a planned virtual meeting with unnamed faith leaders. "I'm doing a major Conference Call with Faith Leaders from all over the Country, and AT&T is totally unable to make their equipment work properly," Trump wrote in a post shared Monday afternoon. "This is the second time it's happened," he continued before directly addressing the "boss" at the multinational telecommunications corporation. "If the Boss of AT&T, whoever that may be, could get involved — It would be good. There are tens of thousands of people on the line!" Four minutes later, the president followed up with another post, once again urging the company to take action. "I apologize for the long wait on the Faith Leaders Conference Call," Trump wrote. "AT&T ought to get its act together. Please pass along the word to the tens of thousands of people who are there," he continued, before announcing he "may have to reschedule the call, but we'll use another carrier the next time." "AT&T obviously doesn't know what they're doing!" It is unclear whether AT&T or its CEO and president since 2020, John Stankey, directly addressed the issue with the president. Earlier this month, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump launched Trump Mobile, a U.S.-based mobile service selling $499 smartphones. The company initially claimed the devices were entirely made in America, a statement industry experts quickly challenged, noting that nearly all facilities capable of manufacturing such phones are based in China. The company has since updated its website to reflect that the phone was made by "American hands," without offering additional details. Originally published on Latin Times

Canada ended its digital tax for Trump. Could others follow? – DW – 06/30/2025
Canada ended its digital tax for Trump. Could others follow? – DW – 06/30/2025

DW

time8 hours ago

  • DW

Canada ended its digital tax for Trump. Could others follow? – DW – 06/30/2025

Canada has withdrawn a tax that could have reaped billions in revenue to bring Donald Trump back to the table. It raises the possibility that other taxes targeting big tech could be in the US president's sights next. Canada has cancelled its digital services tax (DST) to entice the United States to return to the negotiating table for a long-awaited trade and defense deal. The tax, which was due to take effect on Monday, would have applied a 3% levy on revenues earned within Canada by companies — from any country — whose services are digitally based and earn more than $20 million CAD (€12.4 million) a year. But the DST was the target on Friday of a now familiar missive from US President Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform. There, he labelled the tax as a "direct and blatant attack" on the US and set the clock ticking on new tariffs for his northern neighbor as he put trade negotiations on ice. While DSTs from Canada and other nations avoid naming specific companies among their targets, there is an inescapable reality that such instruments catch a swathe of American companies in their nets — among them digital behemoths like Meta, Google, Amazon, Airbnb and Uber. Compounding the tax's impact was its retroactive nature, capturing all revenues back to 2022 in a boon that would have yielded more than $2 billion to Canada's finances. Binning the tax on the day it came into effect has potentially avoided Canada feeling the brunt of harsher Trump tariffs and the loss of a trade deal with a major trading partner. At the very least, it's brought the US president back to the negotiating table. Last year Canada bought nearly $350 billion in US products and exported more than $412 billion to the US. "Obviously the revenue from digital services taxes will be much lower than any costs from potential trade conflicts," said Bertin Martens, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based economic think tank Bruegel. "This is the right road to take at this moment for Canada, at least." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Big tech companies make billions in revenue globally and there are few places that haven't been touched by the presence of the dominant US players in e-commerce, digital advertising and social media. But taxation of these businesses largely falls to the country where they are headquartered. For the majors, it's usually in the US, or even low-taxing countries like Ireland or Luxembourg. It's why other countries are turning to DSTs to recoup revenue for operating within their borders. While Canada's DST has been shelved, other countries across the Atlantic have been reaping revenues for years. France, Italy, Spain and the UK have revenue taxes for digital services providers, with criteria requiring a company to meet a minimum level of global revenue, a fraction of which is made within their borders. France, Italy and Spain apply a tax of 3% on those revenues, the UK 2%. France is even looking to increase its rate to 5%. "Big US tech companies that operate in Europe and elsewhere in the world pay very little, if any, taxes in the countries where they operate and collect substantial revenue and profits," Martens told DW. "But nothing of that can be taxed in the country itself, and so, in the absence of an OECD agreement on how to do this, countries have taken this in their own hands." The US has historically taken a dim view towards foreign digital services taxes under the last three administrations — Democrat and Republican — with a view that they amount to import tariffs on services. "It's not just Preisdent Trump, it was President Biden too, it is members of the US Congress in both parties, Republican and Democrat, that agree that DSTs are not appropriate for other countries to adopt," said James Hines, a professor of law and economics at the University of Michigan, US. "A tax that really is designed just to hit hard the American tech companies, which is what DSTs are," Hines said. "I'm sure the Trump administration is very serious about being upset about DSTs, and being willing to retaliate." That leaves open the question of whether other countries will be pressured to drop theirs. "I think the EU could also be persuaded to withdraw these taxes, but the problem is that the EU Commission, as a trade negotiator, has no leverage on member states' taxation policies," said Martens. "It can try to pass the message to member states, but whether they will accept it or not is a different matter." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Biden administration opposed DSTs but worked to broker a global trade deal via the OECD. That agreement was scuttled by Trump upon his return to the White House, leaving the prospect of unilateral DSTs back on the table. Despite American opposition to these agreements, Allison Christians, a tax law professor at McGill University in Canada, said the idea that major tech corporations should only be taxed in their home country is "antiquated." "They're headquartered in the US, yes, but they're capitalized all over the world, and they're collecting data all over the world, and they're making profit all over the world," Christians said. That, she said, makes it harder for local companies to compete with their "highly digitalized" US rivals. Martens agrees that DSTs are a response to the desire for other nations to have a level playing field. "There is this distorted playing field between local companies and foreign — in this case US — companies, in online markets," Martens said. "Local companies obviously pay local taxes in the country where they are established, and US companies can avoid that or circumvent that through preferential tax deals with tax havens like Ireland or Luxembourg, or even through repatriation of lots of their profits to the US. Martens said a global agreement like those brokered by the OECD would be a better way to proceed. But without US support, national-level taxes are likely to remain, at least until they appear again as a trade negotiation tool. "[DSTs] have become tangled up in this Trump administration trade policy debates, and that makes a debate even more complicated," Martens said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store