Unlisted sealed records of ex-President Yoon spark dispute
According to the Presidential Archives under the Ministry of the Interior and Safety, this accounts for 1.6 percent of the Yoon administration's state-designated records. Such protected records cannot be accessed for up to 15 years due to a potential threat to national security or economic stability.
Sealing the presidential records is justified under the Act on Management of Presidential Archives, but the lack of listing has been subject to criticism. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea on Thursday accused Yoon of failing to carry out a proper transition to his successor.
The sealed presidential records could be revealed under consent from two-thirds of the National Assembly, or with a warrant issued by the head of a high court. But without a list, it would be difficult to pinpoint which records should be revealed.
Not having the list of sealed records could hinder the ongoing investigations and trials connected with Yoon. The former president, then-Defense Minister Kim Yong-hyun and other high-ranking military and police officials are on trial for their part in the alleged insurrection and abuse of power related to the Dec. 3 declaration of martial law, which led to Yoon's impeachment and eventual expulsion in April.
Another potential issue is the probe related to the military's 2023 investigation into the death of a Marine, which Yoon has been accused of interfering with.
Revealing the list of presidential state-designated records is a legally grey issue as it is not specified in the law. But Article 8 of the Official Information Disclosure Act says public institutions shall prepare and keep a list of information they possess and manage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Special counsel imposes fresh travel ban on ex-first lady: sources
A special counsel team has imposed a fresh travel ban on former first lady Kim Keon Hee as part of its probe into corruption allegations surrounding her, judicial sources said Wednesday. The investigation team, led by special prosecutor Min Joong-ki, made the move after it received the case last month from the prosecution, which had already prohibited Kim from leaving the country, according to the sources. The investigation into the former first lady, the wife of former President Yoon Suk Yeol, centers on 16 allegations, including her alleged involvement in a stock price manipulation scheme, acceptance of a luxury bag and suspected interference in election nominations. Min's team launched an official probe into the case Wednesday, holding a signboard-unveiling ceremony at its office in central Seoul. It plans to take over case records on the alleged influence-peddling case related to election nominations at the main opposition People Power Party from the police Thursday. Earlier in the day, another special counsel, led by special prosecutor Lee Myeong-hyeon, opened an official investigation into suspicions the then government, including Yoon, tried to cover up the truth behind the death of a Marine during a search for torrential rain victims in July 2023. By law, the special counsel probe into Kim can last up to 110 days, including 20 days of preparation that have already lapsed, and be extended twice by 30 days each time. The investigation into the Marine's death can last up to 80 days, including 20 days of preparation, and be extended to up to 140 days. "We will conduct all investigations in a manner that isn't excessive or biased," Min said at the ceremony at his office. "We will do our best to provide proper answers to various suspicions by combining our strengths and pooling our wisdom." "We will do our best to thoroughly determine the actual truth," Lee said at the ceremony at his office. Together with another special counsel team led by Cho Eun-suk, which has already begun its investigation into Yoon's failed martial law bid, the three teams were appointed by President Lee Jae Myung following his inauguration last month. (Yonhap)\
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Yoon may have ordered drone incursion into North: local reports
Special counsel set to summon South's drone operations chief over alleged provocation plot to justify Yoon's martial law South Korea's special prosecutor investigating former President Yoon Suk Yeol's imposition of martial law is looking into the possibility that Yoon may have ordered a covert drone incursion into North Korea to provoke a military response, multiple local media outlets reported Wednesday, citing unnamed sources. According to the reports, the investigation team has obtained an audio recording that may be related to the suspected drone operation. While the contents are not considered direct evidence of Yoon's involvement, they are said to contain remarks suggesting that a mission was carried out at the instructions of someone referred to as 'V' — a designation often used within the military to signify the president. In the recording -- or recordings, as the number remains unclear -- an unidentified active-duty officer is heard saying that Lt. Gen. Kim Yong-dae, commander of the military's Drone Operations Command, had described the mission as 'an order from V' and was preparing to report to 'Yongsan' on a separate drone incursion plan. Yongsan houses the presidential office, along with key military institutions including the Defense Ministry and the Office of National Security. In October last year, North Korea accused the South of sending a drone into Pyongyang and released photographs as evidence. South Korean authorities at the time denied any involvement. The drone incident has gained renewed focus and scrutiny amid the backlash following Yoon's short-lived martial rule in December, with opposition politicians suggesting he may have tried to engineer an armed clash with the North to justify the emergency measure. Yoon was impeached by the opposition-controlled National Assembly that same month and formally removed from office by the Constitutional Court on April 4. Other comments allegedly captured in audio and reported by local media on Wednesday include remarks that the operation 'had to be carried out without the knowledge of the Defense Ministry or the Joint Chiefs of Staff,' and that 'leaflets had to be dropped' and the drone needed to be exposed on purpose to heighten North Korea's sense of insecurity. They also purportedly include, 'The VIP and the minister applauded with joy' after the mission, and remarks that the unit was subsequently instructed to repeat the operation and a second drone incursion took place in November. The special prosecutor is expected to summon Lt. Gen. Kim for questioning. His unit is also under investigation for allegedly establishing internal protocols to destroy documents and delete drone-related data after the martial law declaration.
Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
[Editorial] Stablecoins, unstable ground
Korea must weigh the risks and rewards of stablecoins amid intensifying dispute In Seoul's financial circles, a new image is emerging: a digital coin emblazoned with the South Korean flag, suspended somewhere between statecraft and speculation. Once a fringe idea among cryptocurrency enthusiasts, the notion of a won-backed stablecoin has moved to the center of the country's monetary policy debate. What appears to be a pragmatic embrace of innovation conceals deeper tensions about the architecture of money, institutional trust and the evolving role of central banks in a digitized economy. At the core of the issue lies a contradiction. President Lee Jae Myung's administration has pledged to foster a stablecoin ecosystem to keep pace with global developments and safeguard monetary sovereignty. The ruling Democratic Party of Korea is advancing legislation to allow private companies — with as little as 10 billion won ($7.4 million) in capital — to issue coins fully backed by the Korean won. Major banks are already registering trademarks and forming blockchain partnerships. Related equities are climbing on speculative enthusiasm. Yet as momentum builds, the Bank of Korea is applying the brakes. Its own pilot project for a central bank digital currency, once touted as a state-led alternative to private stablecoins, has lost traction after years of investment. The central bank, once positioned to shape the digital finance agenda, now finds itself increasingly marginalized. Officials warn that if the market is flooded with privately issued pseudo-money, the bank's ability to manage interest rates, control liquidity and maintain financial stability could be severely compromised. These concerns are not theoretical. The global stablecoin market is overwhelmingly dominated by dollar-based tokens such as USDT and USDC, which account for over 99 percent of transaction volume. Proponents of a Korean alternative argue that without a domestic option, the country risks capital flight and diminished control over trade settlement. But these arguments remain speculative. The BOK, echoing the Bank for International Settlements, has repeatedly cautioned that stablecoins issued by private firms — even when pegged to fiat currencies — pose systemic risks. These include liquidity mismatches, opaque reserves and the danger of a 'coin run' in which investor panic depletes backing assets and triggers broader financial contagion. The collapse of Terra-Luna in 2022 still casts a long shadow over the debate. Procedurally, the rush toward legislation raises additional concerns. Multiple competing bills are circulating in the National Assembly. Oversight is fragmented among the BOK, the Financial Services Commission and the Ministry of Economy and Finance, with no unified strategy in place. The absence of robust consumer protections, capital requirements and clear supervisory authority underscores the lack of regulatory preparedness. Reports that the Presidential Commission on Policy Planning has urged the BOK to 'show flexibility' and devise alternatives reflect mounting political pressure on the central bank to step aside. This disjointed approach points to a deeper dilemma. South Korea seeks to lead in digital finance but remains uncertain about how monetary authority should be shared — or defended — in an era of decentralization. The CBDC's limited progress reflects institutional inertia in the face of rapid technological disruption. Meanwhile, private sector players are advancing with greater speed, louder voices and fewer constraints. The implications extend beyond implementation. A poorly regulated stablecoin framework could distort trade data, fuel asset bubbles and erode trust in the won. Yet delaying reform risks entrenching dollar dependence and leaving South Korea behind in emerging payment systems. The task is to permit innovation while preserving accountability and credibility. South Korea is not wrong to explore stablecoins. But it is wrong to move without a cohesive plan. True stability is not found in code or collateral alone, but in the strength of the institutions that stand behind them.
