
Neither Pak nor India to be blamed, our fault is we were born: Hindu refugees in Majnu Ka Tila
'Bhai, notice aagaya hai… ab hum kahan jaayenge,' said a camp resident while referring to the public notice issued on July 14.
'How can they evict us without giving us any alternate living space… Some imaginary lines were drawn by foreigners to divide India and Pakistan. They didn't care about the toll it would take on us… We hoped at least the government of India would care about us,' he added, refusing to share his name.
The refugee camp is located on the Yamuna floodplains, which, according to the Delhi Master Plan, fall in Zone 'O', where construction and housing are prohibited due to environmental concerns.
The DDA notice issued on July 14 has stated: '…the Hon'ble High Court has given judgment in favour of DDA… In compliance… it is proposed to conduct demolition drive against encroachment in Yamuna River flood plain DDA land south of Gurdwara in Majnoo ka Tila on 15/07/2025 and 16/07/2025.'
Requesting that the residents vacate the area by July 14, it added that if not done, 'they (residents) will be responsible for any damage caused due to demolition drive against encroachment' on July 15, 16, and thereafter.
The eviction, however, is yet to begin, said residents.
On May 30, the HC had dismissed a petition filed by one Ravi Ranjan Singh seeking the court's direction to the DDA not to demolish the camp, till some alternative piece of land is allotted to the residents under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA).
Pointing out the need to secure the fundamental human right to a clean and healthy environment for the residents and future generations of Delhi, Justice Dharmesh Sharma had said in his May order: 'Given the critical condition of Yamuna river, this court unhesitatingly finds that no interference with the ongoing restoration and rejuvenation efforts of the river can be countenanced at the petitioner's instance.'
Dharamvir Solanki, who has been living in the camp since 2013, said, 'Around 1,000 people live in this camp…700 of them don't have Indian citizenship. None of them has a ration card. Some have come after the CAA cut-off date of December 2014… Why even have a cut-off date like this?' While the walls of houses in the camp are made of bamboo slats, corrugated metal sheets, or even mud bricks, the roofs are an amalgamation of tarpaulin and straw. Some houses bear the marks of recent destruction or ongoing construction, and the ceilings are a rustic lattice of wooden beams and bamboo.
'It is neither the fault of India, nor of Pakistan… our fault is we were born,' said Maina (25), who has been living in the camp for the last 12 years. 'They called us 'Hindustani' there, and they call us 'Pakistani' here,' said Shruti (40), who has recently shifted to the camp.
As her child asks for Rs 10 to purchase finger chips being made by a group of women inside the camp, Maina said, 'It breaks my heart when he asks for money… I earn just Rs 100 a day. I spend more than I earn. Earlier, we would sell mobile phone covers… but a single flood in the camp takes us 10 years back. Our savings, our inventory… everything gets destroyed.'
'We didn't even have power for the last 10 years. This used to be a cemetery… finding corpses in the ground was common a decade ago,' said Mohini, another resident. 'A snake is spotted here every single day… I am scared for my children,' she added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
TRF Declared Foreign Terror Outfit by US Terror Exposed on The Right Stand
TRF Declared Foreign Terror Outfit by US | Big Win At FATF | Terror Exposed on The Right Stand Bharat scores a major diplomatic victory!In a significant move, the United States has designated The Resistance Front (TRF)—a Pakistan-backed terror proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). This is a direct acknowledgment of Pakistan's deep-rooted support to terror groups, especially those operating in Jammu & development gives India a stronger footing at the FATF, as it continues to push for Pakistan's accountability as a state sponsor of terrorism. The TRF, a shadow outfit of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba, has been responsible for several attacks on Indian soil. Mobile App -


The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
It is shocking that people are still being kept out of temples because of their caste, says Madras High Court
It is shocking that even after more than 75 years of independence people are still being kept out of temples because of their caste, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has observed in a recent order. Justice B. Pugalendhi observed that the Constitution did not allow discrimination. God did not discriminate. Only human beings did, the court said, while hearing the petitions filed by Vanniyakulachathiriyar Nala Arakattalai (Trust), represented by its president Murugan, and Marimuthu, who alleged that Scheduled Caste devotees were being denied entry into the temple. The court observed that the petitions raised serious constitutional and administrative issues concerning Mariamman Temple at Chinna Dharapuram in Karur district. The Trust sought removal of the 2018 prohibitory order and permission to resume festivals and worship. It said no caste discrimination took place in the temple, which they had the right to manage. On the other hand, Mr. Marimuthu alleged that the SC devotees were being denied entry into the temple. The officials had failed to protect their rights to equality and religion. The Karur Collector, in a status report, admitted that the temple had remained closed for public worship and festival-related activities since 2018. Pujas alone were being performed. The reason was apprehension of communal tension and law and order issues, he said. Condemning the report, the court observed that the closure of a public temple for years under the guise of law and order concern was a dereliction of constitutional duty. If there was any real threat, it was the Collector's responsibility to handle it. Equally disturbing was the role of police. 'They seem to think that the only way to keep peace is by denying entry to everyone. This is wrong. Stopping everyone from entering is not the way to maintain peace. It is the job of the police to make sure that rights are protected, and that anyone who breaks the law is dealt with properly,' the court observed. It observed that the Collector admitted that the temple was under the control of the HR&CE Department and was being managed by a Fit Person. Legally, the temple was a public temple under the HR&CE Department, and the Trust had no official right to claim full control. It was the duty of the department and the State to make sure that everyone was allowed to worship. A good example of how such situations could be handled was the Kandadevi Temple festival in Sivaganga district. The temple festival had been stopped for 17 years due to similar caste tensions. But, in 2024, the government took proactive steps and ensured that the festival took place peacefully with participation of all. The government must remember that peace built by denying rights was not real peace, it was surrender, the court observed. The court made it clear that no person or group could block the access to a public temple based on caste. If anyone tried to create trouble or claim superiority based on caste, they would face strict legal consequences, the court said. The court directed the Karur Collector, Superintendent of Police, and HR&CE Department to file a report and posted the matter for hearing after three weeks.


Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
NITI Aayog proposes easing investment curbs on Chinese firms, suggests allowing 24% stake without nod: Report
India's leading policy think tank, NITI Aayog, has suggested relaxing regulations that mandate additional scrutiny for investments by Chinese firms, asserting that these rules have caused delays for some significant deals, news agency Reuters reported, citing government sources. All investments by Chinese companies in India currently require necessary security approvals from both the Home Ministry and the Foreign Ministry. However, NITI Aayog has proposed that Chinese companies may acquire a stake of up to 24% in an Indian company without the need for approval, the news agency said, citing sources who did not wish to be named. The proposal is part of an initiative to increase foreign direct investment in India and is currently under review by the trade ministry's industries department, the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, as well as by Prime Minister Narendra Modi office, the report said. NITI Aayog has also suggested to revamp the board that decides on foreign direct investment proposals, it added. Livemint could not independently verify the report. Notably, the NITI Aayog plays an advisory role and not all proposals suggested by the body are implemented by the government. government. However, the proposal comes at a time when India and China are reportedly trying to improve bilateral relations following the border issues in 2020. The final decision over easing the trade rules will be taken by the political leaders, the report said, citing two sources. The current regulations were introduced following border conflicts in 2020. They apply to land-bordering countries, most impacting Chinese companies. Meanwhile, firms from other countries are generally free to invest in various sectors like manufacturing and pharmaceuticals, although certain sensitive areas such as defence, banking, and media remain restricted. Due to these rules, deals such as China's BYD plan to invest $1 billion in an electric car joint venture in 2023 have been shelved, the report stated. Although global foreign investment has slowed since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the restrictions on Chinese investment in India are seen as a key reason for a significant decline in the country's FDI. Net foreign direct investment in India dropped to a record low of just $353 million in the last financial year, compared to the $43.9 billion recorded in the year ending March 2021. Foreign Minister S Jaishankar made his first visit to China in five years this week. During his trip, he emphasised to his counterpart the importance of resolving border tensions and urged both nations to avoid restrictive trade measures, such as China's limits on rare earth magnet supplies.