logo
Why do so many British Pakistanis marry their cousins? Why is it a political issue now?

Why do so many British Pakistanis marry their cousins? Why is it a political issue now?

First Posta day ago
A ban on cousin marriages has divided the United Kingdom. It is not illegal to marry your first cousin in the country. Between 40 and 60 per cent of the British Pakistani community are estimated to be in consanguineous relationships. But why are there calls to outlaw the practice now? read more
A debate on banning marriages between cousins has gripped the United Kingdom, where it is not illegal to marry your first cousin. However, the cultural practice has come under scrutiny in recent months.
In December last year, Conservative MP Richard Holden introduced legislation in the UK Parliament, arguing 'the practice is not really conducive to modern British society.' He called for outlawing consanguineous marriages, pointing to 'serious concerns' about the health risks of children of couples who are biological relatives.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A large majority of Britons oppose such unions, a survey found in May. But many are against banning cousin marriages. But why?
Let's take a closer look.
Cousin marriages in the UK
Marriage between cousins has been legal in the UK since the 16th century. Queen Victoria and Charles Darwin are among the prominent Britons who married their cousins.
However, the practice later faded and became taboo as families became smaller and the awareness about genetic risks to babies born out of such unions grew. Despite this, cousin marriages are normal in some communities in the UK.
Today, between 40 and 60 per cent of the British Pakistani community are in consanguineous marriages, Patrick Nash, an expert on religious law and director of the Pharos Foundation social science research group, said, according to The Week.
Cousin marriages are also acceptable in certain parts of the world, including South Asia, West Asia and North Africa.
An estimated 10 to 15 per cent of newborns have parents who are biological relatives, reported Deutsche Welle.
The cultural practice is about securing wealth and property and keeping the family together. There is an 'optimistic assumption' that such unions would reduce the risk of rifts between in-laws, as per The Economist.
3/4th Britons want cousin marriages outlawed
About 77 per cent of Britons believe first cousin marriage should be illegal, according to a YouGov poll in May.
It also found that 47 per cent of British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis wanted the practice to be banned, while 39 per cent said it should be legal.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some 77 per cent of white and Indian Britons supported prohibiting cousin marriages, compared to 82 per cent of black Britons.
Eight per cent of white Britons do not oppose consanguineous marriages. Six per cent of black Britons and nine per cent of Indian Britons said marrying your cousin should be legal.
A political hot topic
Cousin marriages were thrown into the limelight last December when Tory MP Richard Holden proposed a bill to ban first-cousin marriage in the UK. The legislation has been supported by Robert Jenrick, the runner-up in last year's Conservative leadership election.
'The British Pakistani community and, to a lesser degree, the Irish traveller community are removing themselves from wider society and closing themselves off,' Holden claimed.
The second reading of the bill in the House of Commons is likely this month.
Holden told DailyMail after YouGov's poll in May, 'The overwhelming majority of Brits, including those of Pakistan i heritage, want to see first cousin marriage banned.
'The fact Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party are standing in the way of ending an outdated practice rooted in misogynistic cultural practices shows that he's more interested in promoting cultural relativism than in ending practices that have no place in our country and isolate both individuals and communities from each other.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'If Starmer really believed in British values he'd back my bill, just like every community in Britain does.'
Among the different reasons for those wanting a ban on cousin marriages, one is the health risks to kids born to parents who are related.
As per a briefing on childhood deaths in Bradford, Birmingham and the London borough of Redbridge, '20-40 per cent' of them may be 'due to genetic disorders associated with consanguinity and chromosomal conditions", reported The Week.
The Born in Bradford study found that a child with a first cousin is six per cent more likely to have a congenital health problem, compared to three per cent in the broader population.
Kids born to parents who are biologically related may have health risks. Representational Image/Pixabay
Joyce Harper, a professor in reproductive science at University College London, told BBC that the children born out of a consanguineous relationship could have genetic disease if both parents have faulty genes.
'The issue with cousins marrying is what we call recessive diseases, so things like cystic fibrosis and thalassaemia where both of the couple have to have an error in that same gene.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'So genetics is the main worry, but there are other risks, but it's still very low and I just don't think it's our right to dictate. I think it's our right to educate those communities.'
As per a 2021 study, 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins. However, the practice has been on the decline.
The Born in Bradford project, which studied 13,500 families between 2007 and 2011, found that 60 per cent of couples with Pakistani roots were either first cousins, second cousins or other blood relatives.
But this figure plunged from 60 to 40 per cent in a follow-up study between 2016 and 2020. The rates of consanguineous marriage were around 30 per cent for couples of Pakistani heritage who were both born in the UK.
Norway has banned cousin marriages, while Sweden and Denmark also plan a similar move. As this demand surfaces in the UK, many have warned that outlawing cousin marriages would stigmatise those who are already in such unions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed said earlier that such a ban would be ineffective and called for a 'more positive approach', such as advanced genetic tests for prospective married cousins. He also suggested education programmes to raise awareness of the health risks.
Professor Dominic Wilkinson, an NHS neonatologist and ethics expert at the University of Oxford, has also opposed a ban on consanguineous marriages, calling it 'unethical'. Instead, he proposed offering special screening on the NHS to help such couples decide if they should consider having children.
Nazir Afzal, a former chief prosecutor for north-west England, said last year that cousin marriage should remain legal, highlighting the falling rates. Politicising the issue would mean Muslims 'will be reluctant to talk about it and educate others if they think it's just a hammer which the far right would use to attack their communities', he said at a public debate.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

2023 Parliament security breach: Delhi HC grants bail to two accused
2023 Parliament security breach: Delhi HC grants bail to two accused

The Hindu

timean hour ago

  • The Hindu

2023 Parliament security breach: Delhi HC grants bail to two accused

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday (July 2, 2025) granted bail to Neelam Azad and Mahesh Kumawat, two accused in the 2023 Parliament security breach case, but barred them from talking about the incident to the press or on social media. A Bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar granted the reprieve on a personal bond of ₹50,000 each and two sureties. 'They shall not give interviews or make any statement regarding the case before the press or social media. They shall not leave Delhi and appear before the investigating agency every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday,' the court said. The accused had challenged a trial court's order rejecting their bail pleas. The trial court had found sufficient evidence to believe that the allegations were 'prima facie' true. Delhi Police had opposed the bail applications, alleging that the accused intended to bring back 'haunted memories' of the 2001 Parliament attack. The security breach occurred on December 13, 2023, coinciding with the anniversary of the 2001 Parliament terror attack. During the incident, the co-accused, Sagar Sharma and Manoranjan D., allegedly jumped into the Lok Sabha chamber from the public gallery during Zero Hour. They released yellow gas from canisters and sloganeered before being overpowered by some MPs. Around the same time, another accused, Amol Shinde, and Ms. Azad allegedly sprayed coloured gas from canisters outside Parliament premises while shouting 'tanashahi nahi chalegi (dictatorship won't work)'. According to the police, preliminary inquiries revealed that Ms. Azad and Mr. Shinde were associates of Mr. Sharma and Mr. Manoranjan, and together carried out the terror act. Delhi Police had arrested Mr. Kumawat on December 16 on charges of criminal conspiracy and destruction of evidence. Earlier, the court had sought clarification from the police on whether the act of carrying or using a smoke canister within Parliament premises or outside would invoke provisions under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and if such an act would come under the definition of terrorist activities.

Parliament Monsoon Session: Govt plans bill for regulator, RTI purview for sports federations
Parliament Monsoon Session: Govt plans bill for regulator, RTI purview for sports federations

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Parliament Monsoon Session: Govt plans bill for regulator, RTI purview for sports federations

In a bid to rein in sports federation politics, the Centre is likely to introduce a bill in the Monsoon Session of Parliament to establish a sports regulator aimed at ensuring transparency and financial discipline in the administration of sports bodies. The National Sports Governance Bill also proposes bringing all sports federations under the purview of the RTI Act, barring certain matters such as team selection, performance, injury, and medical records of sportspersons. On Tuesday, the Union Cabinet approved the new Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 , which also advocates a regulatory framework, including legislation for the governance of sports federations. Originally mooted by the sports ministry last year, the bill proposes three key mechanisms: Sports Regulatory Body of India Athletes Commission Appellate Sports Tribunal Live Events The SRBI will regulate and recognise national and state-level Olympic, Paralympic, and other sports federations. It will be a five-member body chaired by the Sports Secretary, with one Khel Ratna awardee and one Dronacharya awardee among its members. The body will be empowered to uphold ethical, financial, and governance standards in sports bodies. The bill also proposes the formation of athlete commissions for each discipline, which will have representation within the corresponding sports federations. Another major provision is the establishment of a three-member Appellate Sports Tribunal, headed by a retired Supreme Court judge. This is not the first attempt at regulating sports governance. During UPA-2, then sports minister Ajay Maken had proposed a similar bill mandating fair and transparent elections in federations. However, it faced opposition from within the government and never made it to Parliament.

Delayed opening of Carnac Bridge leads to first united protest by Sena UBT–MNS
Delayed opening of Carnac Bridge leads to first united protest by Sena UBT–MNS

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Delayed opening of Carnac Bridge leads to first united protest by Sena UBT–MNS

The Sena UBT and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), led by the estranged cousins Uddhav Thackeray and Raj Thackeray, respectively, held their first joint protest Wednesday against the prolonged delay in opening the newly reconstructed Carnac Bridge in South Mumbai. Workers from both parties reached the bridge and attempted to open the crucial link in South Mumbai. However, their attempts were thwarted by the Mumbai police, who detained the protestors and took them to the Pydhonie police station. The joint protest came on the heels of Raj Thackeray and Uddhav Thackeray's announcement of a 'victory rally' planned for July 5 after the Maharashtra government scrapped the orders over the three-language policy. Both Uddhav and Raj Thackeray had earlier signalled openness to an alliance between the two parties. Meanwhile, Sena UBT MLA Aaditya Thackeray, in a social media post, said that their attempts to open the bridge were prevented by the police, on orders from the state government. 'The police today, on orders from the state government, prevented our local unit from opening the Carnac Bridge for Mumbaikars today. The bridge is finally ready and has been so for a week. Why does the government not open a fully ready bridge for people?,' wrote Aaditya. Speaking to The Indian Express, Arvind Gawde, MNS vice-president, said, 'While initially there were some pending works such as installation of lights, the structure has been completely ready for past 10- 15 days. However, the structure remained closed, leaving people to wait for hours in traffic as all the load comes on the freeway. Three days ago, we had written a letter to the traffic police, appealing to them to open the bridge.' On Wednesday, the delayed opening was also flagged in the Maharashtra Assembly by Congress MLA from Mumbadevi Amin Patel. Built at Rs 60 crore, the Carnac Bridge runs between Masjid and CSMT stations in South Mumbai, providing a direct link to motorists commuting towards P D'Mello Road. The new structure was constructed after the old Carnac Bridge, a 154-year-old structure, was razed in 2022 after a structural audit deemed the British-era bridge unfit for daily usage. The construction work of the bridge concluded in June. However, the opening remained delayed owing to pending clearances from the Central Railways as the bridge passes above the railway tracks. Responding to questions, senior BMC officials alluded that the bridge is likely to open for vehicular movement over the next few days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store