logo
Breakdown in Trade Talks Between U.S. and Canada, Explained

Breakdown in Trade Talks Between U.S. and Canada, Explained

Time​ Magazine6 hours ago

Negotiations between the U.S. and Canada have broken down, with President Donald Trump announcing that he is 'terminating' all trade discussions with his northern neighbor.
'We are hereby terminating ALL discussions on trade with Canada, effective immediately,' Trump said on Friday. 'We will let Canada know the tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven-day period.'
Trump's retreat from negotiations follows a long-standing back-and-forth between the two countries on trade, which kickstarted when Trump implemented the application of an additional 25% tariff on imports from Canada in February. ( Energy resources from Canada received a lower 10% tariff.)
With tensions now reaching a high, spurred on by Trump threatening more tariffs on Canada, parties in both countries have voiced concern over where things currently stand.
What led to the breakdown in negotiations of trade between the U.S. and Canada?
Trump called Canada 'a very difficult country to trade with,' blaming the breakdown in progress on Canada's Digital Services Tax [DST], a levy on tech revenues generated from Canadian users, which is set to go into effect on Monday, June 30. Trump called the 3% digital services tax 'a direct and blatant attack' on the U.S.
The Trump Administration has urged Canada to pause or eliminate the tax, which applies to any tech company making more than $15 million from Canadian internet users. In his social media post, Trump said the U.S. had 'just been informed' of the tax. The plan has, in fact, been in place since last year, but the first payments are only due to begin on June 30. The bill works retroactively, so large tech companies such as Apple, Google, and Meta stand to be hit with large payments.
'Here's the irony. To me, this looks like a power play from Canada, because they're making it retroactive… so Trump came along and said, 'No, no more deals—watch and learn,'' argues James Mohs, an associate professor of accounting, finance, and taxation at the University of New Haven. He likens the situation to two 'bullies' fighting each other on the block to see 'who's the biggest.'
A June 11 letter from Republican members of the U.S. Congress urged Trump to pressure Canada into pausing the tax.
'If Canada decides to move forward with this unprecedented, retroactive tax, it will set a terrible precedent that will have long-lasting impacts on global tax and trade practices,' said the 21 members of Congress, further arguing that 90% of what Canada would collect under its Digital Services Tax Act would be from U.S. companies.
Trump's announcement of stalled talks came a week after Canada's Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne said that they would not delay implementation of the tax, despite mounting pressure.
"This was voted by parliament so we're going ahead with the DST," Champagne told reporters on June 19. "[The Digital Services Tax] is not unique to Canada, by the way. Let's put that into context."
In the Oval Office on Friday, Trump told reporters that the U.S. has "all the cards' in its relationship with Canada. "Economically, we have such power over Canada. I'd rather not use it," he seemingly warned.
Speaking to Fox News' Maria Bartiromo on Friday, for an interview of which the first part aired on Sunday morning, Trump delved into his decision to stop negotiations with Canada, saying the country is 'very nasty to deal with.' He stated that the negotiations would be paused 'until such time as they drop certain taxes,' seemingly referring to the DST.
Trump also once again repeated his belief that 'Canada should be the 51st state.'
Read More: Does Trump Still Plan to Annex Canada and Make It the 51st State?
Meanwhile, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Friday that though the Trump Administration knew of the Digital Service Tax, they had hoped that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney's new Administration would, 'as a sign of good will,' pause it.
'We think it's badly unfair to do it retroactively,' Bessent said, stating that U.S. Trade Ambassador Jamieson Greer is likely going to open a 301 investigation on the tax, which would allow the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) to investigate any potential harm on U.S. businesses.
Colin Robertson, a former Canadian diplomat and current fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, says that Trump has 'thrown a grenade into the negotiations," but hope for a deal is far from lost.
'I look at this as part of the negotiating process. Trump is unpredictable, but my guess is that there are those in the U.S. who would like to see an agreement with Canada,' he says. 'I think that the interests on both sides are such that an agreement is possible and desirable—certainly [from] the Canadian side, but for the American side, also. I think they want to be able to show the rest of the world you can make a deal with your closest neighbor and ally. And if you can't do it with Canada, who can you do it with?'
This is not dissimilar to how Trump does business, as he prioritizes gaining 'as much leverage as he can' before making a deal, Robertson argues.
Mohs agrees, stating that this is all 'a negotiation tool, nothing more, nothing less.'
How has Canada responded?
In a brief exchange with reporters on Friday, Carney addressed questions about the breakdown in talks.
'We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," he said, firmly.
The Canadian government also retaliated later on Friday, placing a steel quota on some imports, with a hefty 50% tariff on products that exceed that quota. The measure went into effect immediately, and is set to be reviewed in 30 days.
'This temporary trade measure will help stabilize the Canadian steel market by addressing the risk that steel originally destined for the United States is redirected to Canada,' stated the government's press release on the measure. 'The combination of tariffs imposed by the U.S. on all steel imports and global overcapacity, caused by non-market practices, has led many exporters to seek new markets.'
Robertson sees this move as 'consistent' with what Canada has promised in the past.
'I think that all fits into [how] we had promised we would take action when Trump doubled the tariff from 25% to 50%,' he says, arguing that Canada, as 'the biggest steel exporter to the U.S.,' will likely lift these measures if they can get back to a trade agreement.
At the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada on June 16, Carney had said that he and Trump were working towards finding a trade deal within 30 days, something Trump had agreed was 'achievable.' But the subsequent blow to their relations puts any deal on shaky ground.
Goldy Hyder, CEO of Business Council of Canada, said that this back-and-forth has only escalated the uncertainty that businesses are struggling with. While change is happening on the geopolitical and economic scale, Hyder pointed out, geography never will change, and these neighboring countries need to find a way out of these stalled negotiations.
'[Canadian] businesses are intertwined not just with the U.S., but also with Mexico. We have smart people, we have a lot of natural resources,' Hyder told Canada's CTV News. 'We've grown an economy that's working and can continue to grow, but it's challenging because business, of course, likes predictability and certainty, and it doesn't have a nationality that it's attached to.'
Sharing a message to the governments of both the U.S. and Canada, Hyder urged: "Let's not get in our own way here."
But some experts remain divided on whether or not Canada should pause the tax in order to appease Trump. Julian Karaguesian, a former adviser to Canada's Ministry of Finance, told CTV that Canada's Prime Minister and Finance Minister had 'different means' to 'delay the implementation' of the tax.
'It leads me to think that this was a tactic by Prime Minister Carney—putting a card on the table because, as President Trump said, [the U.S.] has more cards than we do, but we have some,' Karaguesian argued, pointing to Canada as a major energy producer with reserves of oil and gas.
Karaguesian said Canada, as a 'natural resource superpower,' could, if backed into a corner, utilize this, and also build out other existing trade relationships with India, China, and beyond.
'It's not much at all,' Karaguesian said of the amount of money Canada might gain from the tax, emphasizing that the charge is not a tariff. 'The tax is part of our domestic policy, and every sovereign nation has a right to pursue domestic policies.'
There's mounting tension on both sides, says Mohs, but "when it comes to business, a trade war is not going to work well for either Canada or the U.S.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republicans and Democrats to duke it out for North Carolina Senate seat
Republicans and Democrats to duke it out for North Carolina Senate seat

Politico

time22 minutes ago

  • Politico

Republicans and Democrats to duke it out for North Carolina Senate seat

Democrats just scored a massive new pickup opportunity in North Carolina. Republicans are determined not to let them have it. GOP Sen. Thom Tillis' abrupt retirement announcement Sunday has blown the door open for potential juggernaut candidates on both sides of the aisle. Democratic former Gov. Roy Cooper plans to make a decision this summer on whether he'll mount a bid, according to a person close to him and granted anonymity to disclose private conversations. Democrats widely believe the popular former governor would give the party its best chance of winning the competitive seat. Meanwhile, former Rep. Wiley Nickel is already running. The GOP side could become a family affair for Donald Trump after he called for Tillis' ouster for voting against the megabill. Lara Trump, the president's daughter-in-law and past co-chair of the Republican National Committee, is 'taking a strong look' at the race and will have the family's support if she chooses to run, according to a person close to the Trumps and granted anonymity to speak candidly about their internal discussions. Another person said Trump was still likely to meet with all the GOP candidates. The White House also considers RNC Chair Michael Whatley, a former North Carolina GOP chair, a strong candidate, per a Republican operative granted anonymity to describe internal thinking. And some in Trump's orbit are promoting Rep. Pat Harrigan, according to a person close to his political operation. Asked if he would back a successor, Tillis sidestepped the question on Sunday night. 'Dependent upon whether or not President Trump endorses somebody it could be an open primary,' Tillis said. 'He could close it out and the party could get behind it, I suspect that's what they do. I just really hope he has some discernment because obviously Mark Robinson was a bad pick.' North Carolina, a perennial battleground since Barack Obama turned it blue in 2008, has largely eluded Democrats ever since. Making the state even more tantalizing, Democrats have generally won governorships. Cooper is considered particularly formidable, winning the governorship in 2016 and 2020 — when Trump also won the state. Similarly, Democratic Gov. Josh Stein last year beat scandal-ridden GOP Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson to succeed Cooper even as Kamala Harris lost the state. But Democrats haven't won a Senate seat here in nearly two decades — and Tillis ousted that Democrat, Kay Hagan, to take it back in 2014. Among the more moderate Republicans in the Senate and an increasingly rare example of a GOP lawmaker willing to break with Trump, Tillis was one of the party's most vulnerable incumbents. Now his retirement is giving Democrats an even riper target. 'An open seat is a totally different ball game than a Thom Tillis seat in terms of flippability,' said a senior Democratic aide granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'That will be a blue seat come 2026.' North Carolina could become a rare bright spot for Democrats on what is otherwise a very difficult Senate map. They're defending a trio of competitive open seats, and their only offensive opportunities going into the cycle ran headlong into formidable incumbents like Tillis and Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. 'It just shows you that the Republicans' majority is at risk because their Big, Ugly Bill is so unpopular, not just in North Carolina but throughout the country,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement. All eyes are now on Cooper. The person close to the former governor said Tillis' announcement 'doesn't really change anything' about Cooper's own calculations, arguing that whoever emerges from the Republican primary will have either voted or voiced support for the Medicaid cuts that Tillis has criticized. 'This has always been a personal decision [for Cooper],' the person said. 'He's always believed that he could win and that he gave Democrats the best chance to win. None of that has changed this afternoon.' Tillis' decision to head for the exit is the latest sign that the GOP faces a difficult midterm battle on multiple fronts. The move comes less than 48 hours after reports emerged that centrist Rep. Don Bacon intends to announce his retirement Monday, opening up a swing seat in Nebraska in one of only three GOP-held districts Kamala Harris won in the 2024 presidential election. And Republicans are already poised to spend heavily in a bitter Senate primary in Texas between Sen. John Cornyn and state Attorney General Ken Paxton, potentially forcing the party to divert resources from more competitive races elsewhere. Still, the path back to Senate control — gaining four seats — remains narrow for Democrats. Even if the party flips North Carolina's Senate seat, they would have to wrest back control of redder territory like Iowa or Ohio and unseat Collins in Maine to have any chance at a majority. And they still face expensive, competitive races to defend Senate seats in Michigan and Georgia, states Trump won in 2024, while protecting open seats in Minnesota and New Hampshire, too. That has led Democrats to look further afield for a path to a majority, with some in the party staking their hopes on winning Texas' Senate seat if Paxton, a controversial MAGA darling, becomes Republicans' nominee. But Democrats haven't held a Senate seat in the Lone Star State in over three decades. Tillis spent the week issuing increasingly dire warnings to his Republican colleagues that the party could lose seats — including his own — if it continued to pursue controversial changes to Medicaid, likening the public health care program to the political albatross the Affordable Care Act was for Democrats in 2014. Those concerns drove him to take a procedural vote against the megabill Saturday evening. Trump responded by threatening to find someone to primary Tillis, exposing the increasingly strained relationship between the senator, the White House and Senate GOP leadership as Tillis pushed back against the bill. 'With Donald Trump in the White House voting against his agenda, seems like either a decision to retire or suicidal,' said Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). The president on Sunday took a victory lap after the senator said he wouldn't run again: 'Great News! 'Senator' Thom Tillis will not be seeking reelection,' he posted on Truth Social. Before the post Tillis said he texted Trump, 'He probably needed to start looking for a replacement.' 'I told him I want to help him. I hope that we get a good candidate, that I can help, and we can have a successful 2026,' Tillis recounted Sunday night. One GOP strategist, granted anonymity to describe private conversations, said Republicans were breathing a 'sigh of relief' that Tillis was retiring, believing that a fresh candidate would better appeal to the voters as the incumbent butted heads with the president and showed a sagging favorability rating in polls. Democrats argue Republicans' support for Medicaid cuts give Cooper in particular an opening. 'He was obviously instrumental in getting Medicaid expansion here in the state and this bill will threaten it,' said Doug Wilson, a Democratic strategist who was an adviser on Kamala Harris' campaign in North Carolina. 'This gives him a lane to run on. Not only did he help implement it, it was something he has pushed for since his first term.' Nickel is the most prominent of the Democrats to announce a campaign so far. He's hinted at a Senate bid ever since being redistricted out of his House seat last cycle and has expressed confidence in his chances against whichever Republican candidate emerges. 'No matter which MAGA loyalist Donald Trump hand-picks to run in North Carolina, I'm the Democrat who's ready to take them on and win. I've flipped a tough seat before and we're going to do it again,' he said in a statement to POLITICO. Still, flipping North Carolina isn't a done deal for Democrats either. 'People forget that North Carolina Senate races are always close,' North Carolina-based Republican strategist Doug Heye said. 'There hasn't been a double-digit Senate win since 1974.' Rachael Bade, Jordain Carney, Meredith Lee Hill, Calen Razor and Andrew Howard contributed to this report.

Nuclear watchdog agency's general director says Iran's capabilities suffered "severe damage"
Nuclear watchdog agency's general director says Iran's capabilities suffered "severe damage"

CBS News

time23 minutes ago

  • CBS News

Nuclear watchdog agency's general director says Iran's capabilities suffered "severe damage"

Iran's nuclear capabilities suffered "severe damage" in last week's U.S. airstrikes but not "total damage," said the man in charge of the world's global nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. "One cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there." "It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage, first of all," IAEA director general Rafael Mariano Grossi said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "And secondly, Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again." The U.S. launched three strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities on June 21, following more than a week of Israeli attacks, which President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities. But Grossi's comments appeared to support an early assessment by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), which suggested the strikes had only set back Iran's nuclear program by months. The Trump administration has slammed the DIA's assessment as "low confidence," and Hegseth and other officials on Thursday went after the media for reporting on a "leaked" report. At a briefing Thursday, reporters questioned Hegseth repeatedly on whether Iran had moved its stocks of enriched uranium before the Israeli and U.S. strikes began. The defense secretary responded that he was "not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be — moved or otherwise." Grossi on Sunday said Iran did not share that they had any plans to move the enriched uranium, but at the same time "there was no physical time" for Iran to share that information. The IAEA director general also conceded that it's "logical to presume that when [Iran] announce[s] that they are going to be taking protective measures" that moving the enriched uranium "could be part of it." But he also emphasized that "this is why it's so important, first of all, for Iran to allow our inspectors to continue their indispensable work as soon as possible." Brennan pushed Grossi that since it's unclear if the uranium had been moved and all the centrifuges cannot be accounted for, there's an open question that Iran could still "sprint towards a bomb…if they wanted to." Grossi said he didn't want to be an "alarmist," but "we need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there, and where is it and what happened." "Iran had a very vast ambitious program, and part of it may still be there, and if not, there is also the self-evident truth that the knowledge is there," Grossi said. "The industrial capacity is there. Iran is a very sophisticated country in terms of nuclear technology, as is obvious. So you cannot disinvent this. You cannot undo the knowledge that you have or the capacities that you have. It's a huge country, isn't it? So I think this should be the incentive that we all must have to understand that military operations or not, you are not going to solve this in a definitive way militarily." Grossi confirmed that his IAEA inspectors were never able to verify Iran's claims that its nuclear program was only for peaceful ends and that it was not trying to develop a weapon. "We didn't see a program that was aiming in that direction, but at the same time, they were not answering very, very important questions that were pending," Grossi said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement Saturday that there were calls in Iran for the arrest and execution of Grossi. When asked about alleged threats against nuclear inspectors, Iran's ambassador to the UN, Amir Saeid Iravani, said in a separate appearance on "Face the Nation" that Iran is not threatening nuclear inspectors, including Grossi. Nuclear inspectors "are in Iran," Iravani said. He said they are in a "safe condition," but "they cannot have access to our site." Iravani also said that since Iran is a member of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), nuclear "enrichment is our right, and an inalienable right, and we want to implement this right." Iravani added that he did not think the enrichment will "ever stop."

Bond Traders Basking in Gains Bet Fed Will Fuel Winning Streak
Bond Traders Basking in Gains Bet Fed Will Fuel Winning Streak

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bond Traders Basking in Gains Bet Fed Will Fuel Winning Streak

(Bloomberg) -- US bond traders gutted through turbulence to somehow find themselves notching profits as the first half ends. Now, they're setting up for more gains following a three-week winning streak, with Thursday's jobs report as a potential catalyst. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Sao Paulo Pushes Out Favela Residents, Drug Users to Revive Its City Center Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown The Treasury market is wrapping up its best monthly return since February and its biggest first-half stretch in five years. That's despite some harrowing moments caused by a laundry list of cross-currents, from President Donald Trump's erratic policies to tariff uncertainties, geopolitical eruptions and a Moody's downgrade. While trade negotiations remain in the spotlight, some of the other pressures have eased as the month ends. Yields are near two-month lows, with the benchmark US 10-year note around 4.28%. And investors have largely shrugged off the implication of Trump's tax plan — which is set to face a Senate vote as soon as Monday after a weekend of wrangling in the chamber — to focus on the Federal Reserve, which they expect will cut interest rates at least twice this year. 'There's a market lean towards the Fed cutting rates and a bit of a fear of missing out,' when central bankers eventually resume their rate-easing cycle after pausing since December, said George Catrambone, head of fixed income at DWS Americas. Catrambone has been adding interest-rate exposure, including the 30-year in recent weeks, in part as evidence from auctions shows foreign demand for Treasuries remains intact. Investors who earlier this month saw a July rate cut as negligible are now pricing in nearly 1-in-5 odds for a reduction, with September seen as a lock. Even as Fed officials including Chair Jerome Powell favor waiting for clarity on the economy before easing again, traders are positioning for the possibility of earlier action should key measures such as employment weaken materially and inflation stay under control. Rates options trades flagging the potential for lower yields and a faster pace of Fed easing have picked up markedly, while asset managers favor owning Treasuries in the five-year maturity range that would benefit from an eventual bigger Treasury rally extending into 2026. 'For the Fed to be more pro-active in cutting rates requires labor market deterioration,' said John Madziyire, portfolio manager at Vanguard. 'July is all about payrolls and it's the one thing that can move the market.' Madziyire said owning Treasuries due in five to 10 years was 'attractive as there are signs of the economy slowing, so you are being compensated' for taking on interest-rate risk. The June employment report, due on Thursday given the July 4 holiday on Friday, is forecast to show growth in the workforce easing to about 113,000 new jobs from 139,000 the prior month, according to economists surveyed by Bloomberg. The unemployment rate is seen nudging up to 4.3%, and while still contained, would mark a fresh peak since 2021. A reading like this probably wouldn't force the Fed's hand, though it would add to evidence of slowing growth. A softer report would be a different story. 'If we get a weaker payroll number and we get inflation that still doesn't show a lot of signs of tariffs, then I think July can be live,' said Dan Carter, portfolio manager at Fort Washington Investment Advisors, referring to next month's Fed policy meeting. 'But it could be one of those where it's a close call, and the chair gets his way and they push it to September.' What Bloomberg strategists say ... Whether the Fed follows through with cuts as early as July remains to be seen. But with growth stalling and the labor market starting to show cracks, the bid for duration looks increasingly justified. — Brendan Fagan, FX Strategist, New York Expectations for Fed rate cuts this year have waxed and waned since December. But policymakers' median forecast — which didn't change in March and June — was that the band would decline to 3.75% to 4% by the end of the year, implying two quarter-point cuts. After recent gains, and with the market now in line with the Fed's forecasts, there's a risk of a hiccup should the jobs report surprise on the upside. Trade is also back in focus ahead of Trump's July 9 tariff deadline, with the administration sending mixed signals on the timing and severity of levies. In spite of the June rally, yields are relatively range bound and trading well above their April lows given the macro economic uncertainty that could keep the Fed on the sidelines. Bank of America in their mid-year update said two-year yields will end this year and 2026 at 3.75%, not far from where they are now, with the 10-year at 4.5%. JPMorgan Chase & Co.'s rate strategist on June 13 maintained the firm's call for 10-year yields to reach 4.35% by year-end, higher than where they are now. The bank expects the first Fed rate cut in December, followed by an additional three consecutive cuts early next year. Treasuries were little changed across maturities in early Asia trading on Monday. Behind the Curve? Investors, though, are alert to the prospect that the Fed ends up being behind the curve by waiting for a clearer view on the economy. Powell himself told Congress last week that the Fed can ease sooner and deliver their forecast of at least two quarter-point cuts should hard data in the form of either inflation or job creation significantly weaken. And the jobs market is a lagging indicator, a point not lost on bond traders. Matthew Hornbach, global head of macro strategy at Morgan Stanley told Bloomberg Television last week that the firm sees the 10-year yield ending this year at 4% and 'closer to 3%' by the end of 2026. Hornbach said that while they don't see any easing this year, the central bank 'will cut a lot next year,' once the temporary inflationary impact from tariffs passes and weakness in the labor market really emerges. Disagreements among Fed officials –- who see between zero and three cuts this year and an even wider range of outcomes in 2026 — increases a chance for a policy mistake, said Jamie Patton, co-head of global rates at TCW Group. She's favoring two- and five-year notes, which would benefit the most from a scenario where the Fed eases more than expected. 'There are over a dozen pilots sitting in the cockpit and they're all disagreeing around the altitude of a destination airport,' Patton said. 'That increases the potential for a bumpy landing if you don't know where you're going.' --With assistance from Edward Bolingbroke and Carter Johnson. America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store