U.S. Turns Eight Migrants Over to South Sudan, Ending Weeks of Legal Limbo
The U.S. military plane took off around 8:30 p.m. Eastern time, according to Tricia McLaughlin, a Homeland Security spokeswoman. A picture shared by Homeland Security showed the men apparently aboard the airplane, handcuffed and shackled at their ankles, surrounded by uniformed personnel.
It remains unclear whether South Sudan's government in Juba has detained the men, or what their ultimate fate might be. The 13-year-old country is on the brink of a civil war; the State Department has warned against travel there because of the risk of 'crime, kidnapping and armed conflict.' In court on Friday, a Justice Department lawyer read from a diplomatic note that said South Sudan would give the men immigration status to allow them to remain there at least temporarily.
The flight marks the end of a saga in which the eight men had been shackled for weeks inside an air-conditioned shipping container on a U.S. military base in Djibouti, in the Horn of Africa. Before coming to the United States, the men hailed from Vietnam, Mexico, Laos, Cuba and Myanmar. Just one is from South Sudan, a violence-plagued country. All had been convicted of serious crimes in the United States, though many had either finished or were about to finish serving their sentences.
At issue in the lengthy legal battle was how much due process the government needs to provide to migrants before deporting them to so-called 'third-countries,' places other than where they are from, and where they might be at risk of torture. Federal law places limits on deportations to places where migrants' 'life or freedom would be threatened.' The principle that migrants should not be deported to places where they would be at risk of torture or persecution is enshrined in international law.
The Supreme Court twice weighed in, each time agreeing that the Trump administration could send the men to South Sudan.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration has begun garnishing wages of student loan borrowers in default. These are the benefits businesses can offer employees to help with their debt
A few years ago, it seemed like the dream of widespread student debt forgiveness was alive and well. And although the hopes of millions of borrowers across the country have since been dashed, there are moves that employers can make to help workers toiling under the burden of defaulted loans and garnished wages. Student loan borrowers were able to take advantage of a repayments pause when the COVID pandemic began in 2020, but that expired in September of 2023. That same year, the Supreme Court struck down then-President Biden's decision to cancel up to $20,000 in debt for qualified borrowers. And in May of 2025, a five-year reprieve for student loan borrowers who were in default on their loans expired. That means that collections are now in play, and the Department of Education can garnish wages, tax refunds, and federal benefits. 'Resuming collections protects taxpayers from shouldering the cost of federal student loans that borrowers willingly undertook to finance their postsecondary education,' the Department of Education (DOE) wrote in a statement late April. 'There will not be any mass loan forgiveness.' This isn't just a problem for an unlucky few. Around 20.5% of student loan borrowers have a payment that's past due by 90 days or more, according to a TransUnion analysis. And around 5.3 million defaulted borrowers will get a notice from the Treasury Department that their wages could potentially be garnished, according to a May statement from the DOE. Workers of all ages have already been struggling for years with student loan repayment. But the latest move from the Trump administration has made the issue even more urgent. There are several different ways that employers can help their workers with student loan repayments, including through retirement benefits, educational assistant programs, and paid time off exchanges. Fortune sat down with benefits experts, who say that while offering these benefits do come with challenges, they can go a long way toward improving employee financial wellbeing. 'Business leaders can't ignore this financial pressure anymore,' says Jeremy Yonan, VP of total rewards at job site Indeed. 'Student loan debt isn't just a personal challenge, it's actually a business imperative because the ripple effect comes up in every corner of the workplace.' Many workers burdened by student loans face a tough financial tradeoff: either reduce their debt or invest in their future. That means they often miss out on contributing to their retirement plans, and their employer's valuable contributions. The Secure 2.0 Act of 2022 aimed to fix that problem. Companies can take the funds they'd use to match employee retirement contributions and instead use them to help them pay off student loans. 'When companies offer a contribution into retirement savings in connection with their student loan payments, they are helping to protect the financial future of those employees who are largely sidelined and sitting out of their primary benefit that they offer, which is the retirement match,' says Laurel Taylor, CEO of Candidly, a financial wellness company. Financially, this process is easy for employers because the money is essentially repurposed so it doesn't cost businesses extra to provide the benefit. But few employers are currently taking advantage of it because of the administrative burden. Only 11% of Candidly customers have launched the student loan retirement match in connection with secure 2.0. Benefit, according to Taylor. Goldman Sachs Ayco, an arm of the bank that specializes in workplace financial planning, says that while 31% of their corporate clients offer student loan assistance, only 10% do so through retirement. As the student loan crisis becomes more dire, however, we might see more businesses offer the benefit to their workforce. 'When employees start to see their wages garnished, it might lead some companies to accelerate adoption on the 401(K) side if participation is high enough,' says Kris Battistoni, VP of compensation and benefits solutions at Goldman Sachs Ayco. Companies that offer employees a certain number of days of paid-time off may want to consider a program that allows workers to exchange their unused time and dedicate those funds towards paying off student loan debt. The benefit is that it costs the employer itself very little, as they have already budgeted that time into their balance sheet. The drawback is that it can come with administrative burdens, because HR managers have to comply with a variety of state laws around what employees can and can't do with their PTO. There are, however, a variety of B2B businesses out there tailored to handle services like these. Businesses should also be aware that critics of these PTO exchanges argue that they incentivize employees to disregard work-life balance, which could lead to additional stress and burnout. The program also won't work for companies with flexible or unlimited PTO. 'The PTO model is interesting, because the biggest criticism that we've seen and heard and had had conversations with employers about is it sort of diminishes quality of life,' Stacey MacPhetres, senior director of education finance for EdAssist by Bright Horizons, which helps employers manage education benefits, tells Fortune. One of the easiest and most impactful ways to provide help to people with student loans is offering them financial counseling services. Student loan borrowers often have more than one loan in play at a time, with different interest rates and timelines. That can make it hard to figure out exactly how much of one's paycheck should be allocated toward paying off the debt, and which loans should be prioritized, says MacPhetres. 'It's incredibly beneficial to offer, not just the monetary contribution, but expert coaching behind the scenes to make sure that those funds are being applied in the most expedient way, based on what the employee wants to accomplish,' she says. Student loan education is just as important as the ability to pay off the debt, experts say, especially if planners can help employees refinance their loans to get a better interest rate. That kind of personalized assistance can not only help with student loans, but also ease worker anxiety around their finances. 'From recent grads and mid-career professionals to parents helping get through college, having that personalized care for different life stages can provide real short term relief,' says Yonan. 'It's not just about the case investment, it's also about education.' Employers have long been able to help workers fund their education through educational assistance programs. Businesses are allowed to contribute $5,250 per employee per year towards tuition, books, or supplies, or courses. But in 2020, the program was expanded to include the ability for companies to put this money towards paying off student loan debt, according to the IRS. Many employers have questions about how they can make sure the money is being used as intended. That's because employees mostly self-certify that they've spent the money on loans, and businesses need to find an efficient way to verify that without invading privacy in the process, says Jonathan Barber, VP head of compensation and benefits solutions, at Goldman Sachs Ayco. 'I think companies thus far are uncomfortable with it because they want to verify that they're actually doing something to pay off the debt and not just giving employees funds.' Under current law, the program is set to expire at the end of 2025, according to the IRS. But experts that Fortune spoke with are confident that the program will be made permanent through legislation later this year. This story was originally featured on
CBS News
3 hours ago
- CBS News
NYC Deputy Mayor Kaz Daughtry on cooperating with ICE: "It's important to have a seat at the table"
New York City's Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Kaz Daughtry sat down with CBS News New York's Marcia Kramer for this week's episode of "The Point." Kaz Daughtry on immigration enforcement A new poll shows public opinion has shifted on cooperating with ICE agents, with the public now just about evenly divided between those who support cooperating with ICE and those who don't. Why is that? "When it comes to working with the feds in regards to immigration, we only deal with criminal enforcement, Marcia. That's it. And the feds know ... we can not get involved involved in civil immigration matters. Criminal matters? We are all in," Daughtry said. "We can not get involved ... for civil immigration stuff. We can't do that. Hands off. They know it, we know it, and we don't try to skirt around it and see how we can work with them." Daughtry said he's been criticized for working with the feds on criminal investigations involving transnational gangs. "These are people ... bad people, bad people ... murders, robberies, they came here and they victimized New Yorkers," Daughtry said. "Taking these transnational gang members off our streets is helping New Yorkers." What about the concerns of the immigrant community about using city services? "Have you ever heard of a case where the feds, ICE, HSI going into one of our public schools?" Daughtry said. "Have you ever heard of an incident where the feds or ICE were going into a house of worship? This is why it's important to have a seat at the table, to see what's on the menu, and to be on the menu. And that's what the open dialogue between this administration and the federal authorities is all about." Daughtry also spoke about the meeting he had with President Trump. "We had conversations on the golf course. They will remain private," Daughtry said. "I will share this piece of information with you. The president is all about public safety. New York is a very special place to him. We have a connection - he was born in Queens. I was born in Queens. And he wants the best stuff to happen for New York City." Daughtry on use of drones in public safety Daughtry said he's hoping to install drones on the roofs of certain police precincts and fire department stationhouses. "I want the drones on top of the firehouses, so when they get the call ... as soon as the drones get that alert, the drone would dispatch before the fire truck even comes out of the house," Daughtry said. "Then they can see exactly where the fire's at, and they can have an attack plan ... in place before they even get to the fire." Daughtry also talked about the NYPD pursuing anti-drone technology, to take down hostile drones. He described using drones to shoot nets around hostile drones, which then deploy parachutes so that the hostile drones can safely land. Daughtry also described his desire to have a public-facing drone dashboard, so people can see how the NYPD drones are being used. "They can see exactly what the call is, and they would know that that drone was there to help them, instead of spy on them," Daughtry said. Ken Jenkins on Westchester County and immigration enforcement Westchester County Executive Ken Jenkins said police in his county would work with the feds on criminal matters, not civil. "As far as civil immigration matters, the county's not doing the federal government's job. If someone comes in with a judicial warrant, we honor those judicial warrants and we follow the law. But as far as just working with someone on a civil immigration matter, that is not our job to do. We help our federal law enforcement partners do what they need to do," Jenkins said. Jenkins also spoke about the impact on Westchester County from the so-called "Big Beautiful Bill" passed by Congress and signed into law by President Trump. "The impact is huge. Six billion dollars of impact to all of our hospitals. We have world-class hospitals in Westchester County," Jenkins said. "The reduction is two-fold. So if someone is not on Medicaid anymore, they don't even have the insurance even at a minimum level, that hospital now is going to take that person in in the most expensive care possible - in an emergency room. And now, they're not going to get reimbursed for even that. So now the hospitals are going to be having challenges, which they already are, and people are not going to get served." Your Point: Should bodega cats be legal? Bodega cats, though beloved by many, are technically not legal. A new law looks to change that. What do New Yorkers think?
Wall Street Journal
6 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
How Abortion Bans Are Affecting Where Women Live and Work
Alana Tedmon and her husband moved to the outskirts of Dallas in June 2022, attracted by the lower cost of living and proximity to family. That same month, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and Texas followed by banning abortion through all nine months of pregnancy. 'It seemed like people were always trying to change the legislation around abortion every single year but I never thought it would really happen legitimately,' she said.
