Stewartstown residents share opposition to MARL transmission line
"This is a raising local awareness effort here today, " said Kent Hunter, who lives on the next hill over from the community center. "We probably can't stop this but we can maybe impact where the route eventually ends up."
MARL, as it's called, is a proposed transmission project to build a new 105-mile 500-kilovolt transmission line stretching from Greene County, Pa., to Frederick County, Va. Depending on the route selected, it could pass through Monongalia and Preston counties, along with Hampshire County and Mineral counties, Allegany Garrett county in Maryland and Fayette County in Pennsylvania.
The project also consists of building a new 500 /138-kV substation in Frederick County, Va.
Hunter was one of four speakers to address the residents. He said he learned about MARL in December after NextEra met with the Monongalia County Commission. He was among the landowners on the possible local routes who received a postcard from NextEra in February. Concerned, he contacted former Delegate Barbara Evans Fleischauer and Delegate Evan Hansen, and they got involved in the awareness-and-opposition effort.
Among the concerns Hunter and others cited is, who pays for this. "It just takes away our land, " he said. "It doesn't help us in any way at all that we can find." And it will likely decrease property values of those whose land it crosses.
At a May open house, NextEra's Kaitlin McCormick answered a question from The Dominion Post about the expected local benefits. She cited three: reliable power ; the opportunity for high-demand customers to interconnect ; and local tax revenue — $50 million to $100 million over the 40-year life of the project.
Residents remain skeptical, though. Speakers several times cited a study by Cathy Kunkel, energy consultant at the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, that indicates West Virginia ratepayers will pay more than $440 million in increased electricity rates over the next 40 years for MARL and the related Valley Link Transmission line that is planned to run from the John Amos plant in Putnam County eastward to Frederick County, Md.
PJM Interconnection, the regional 13-state power grid operator, selected MARL and Valley Link, among a number of projects, based on its long-range Regional Transmission Expansion Plan, to address reliability issues associated with loss of power generation sources, support for new power sources and additional electricity demand in the region.
Public perception — echoed in Kunkel's report — ties much of that new demand to data centers in Virginia.
Fleischauer, one of the speakers, said there's not enough local benefit to justify the rate hikes. "We don't see the value in being a pass through."
Speaker Rachel Stevens, who lives just north of Bruceton Mills and whose neighbors are on a potential route, listed several areas of concern about the line. Along with diminished property values and higher electric bills, she cited possible environmental impacts along the route and the impacts on landowners who will be subject to possible eminent domain proceedings for the line's 200-foot right of way.
Speaker Jim Kotcon, a retired WVU professor, explained some of the process ahead. After selecting a route, NextEra is looking to file applications with the state Public Service Commission and other state's regulators early this fall. A project timeline shows expected state regulatory approvals in spring 2027, start of construction in fall 2029, completion by fall 2031 and lines in service by winter 2031.
PSC has 270 days from NextEra's application date to grant or deny approval, he said, and any eminent domain proceedings to gain access to land would begin after that.
He suggested four strategies to respond: take the best possible offer for the right of way (but don't be the first to agree because they get the worst offers); work to get the line moved to another route ; make sure the line avoids public lands (though this would affect more private landowners); or simply just oppose the line.
Fleischauer continued that line of thought. "There's hope that we can do something about this, " she said. The key fight will be when the PSC is considering approval. And "not in my back yard " won't sway them. They will need clear evidence that the line won't benefit West Virginia.
During a public Q &A session, residents cited some other concerns, including the effects on Cheat Lake recreation and business with new, big, unsightly power lines passing overhead. One lakeside landowner said, "It's very disturbing."
There was a general understanding that landowners along all the proposed routes aren't going to want the line in their yards and will be opposing it.
Fleischauer said, "If we are going to succeed, we are going to have to make the most noise."
Another community informational meeting is set for 1 p.m. June 29 at Rexroad Auction in Bruceton Mills.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘How did I get approved for $30,000?': is buy now, pay later headed for a fall?
When Nicole Hartman purchased her home in Berwick, Pennsylvania, in 2019, the place needed remodeling. The 44-year-old home help aide needed to replace the hot water heater, get two new appliances and fix a water issue, along with making the home more medically accessible for her children. With loans taken out for the home itself, it was impossible for Hartman, 44, and her husband to get personal loans to cover the renovations, so for the first time in her life, she opened up credit cards. And after maxing out those cards, she went on to use Affirm, which offers buy-now, pay-later (BNPL) services that allow customers to pay out their purchases in installments. By 2023, Hartman had $30,000 of debt on Affirm and $88,000 of credit card debt. Her household income is $150,000 a year. 'How I was able to, at one time, have almost $30,000 on Affirm is insane to me,' Hartman said. 'Like how did I even get approved for $30,000? It just blows my mind.' Credit card debt has ballooned to more than $1tn in the US over the last several years, and consumer advocates are worried that the debt burden is even worse with the growth of BNPL. 'Companies like BNPL because it leads people to spend more and make things look more affordable than they are, by focusing people's attention on one-quarter of the price rather than the full price,' said Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center. 'It can lead people to take on more debt than they can really afford.' Interactive In recent months, BNPL companies such as Klarna and Affirm have been expanding their reach across different retailers, partnering with companies such as DoorDash, Walmart and eBay so that nearly every purchase can be made using BNPL. At the same time, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the US federal agency that was built after the Great Recession to be a consumer watchdog, has largely been gutted by the Trump administration. Last month, the CFPB said it wouldn't enforce regulation against BNPL companies that put them under similar regulations that credit card companies must follow. Related: New York watchdog warns Trump cuts will usher in 'open season' for scammers BNPL companies say that their services offer a healthier alternative to credit cards because they are fixed terms and can be interest-free. And the BNPL companies are more accessible for those who don't have high credit scores as BNPL doesn't require the same hard credit score checks as credit cards. But easier access to credit often comes at a higher price. 'Each purchase is essentially a different line of credit, and so each has a different repurchase schedule. You buy something and every two weeks, you get a deduction from your bank account, and that can be difficult for people to manage,' said Ed deHaan, a professor at Stanford's Graduate School of Business. 'You can do what's called 'debt stacking': max out one BNPL, and go to another.' Research that DeHaan and colleagues published in 2023 found that while many BNPL users were able to make their payments without problems, other users were prone to overspending with BNPL and started to see early indicators of financial distress, such as not paying down other credit balances, within weeks of using the services. 'What you need to think about is the rest of the consumer's portfolio. If they're making BNPL payments … maybe they're not paying off their credit card, maybe they're not paying their cellphone bill, and that's actually more concerning,' DeHaan said. 'They're essentially substituting one payment for another.' The CFPB in January published a report showing that the majority of BNPL borrowers had multiple loans at once and were more likely to have higher balances on other forms of credit, such as credit cards. Kelly Klingaman, a financial adviser in Austin, Texas, said that she often works with clients who have built up BNPL debt with purchases that they bought largely on a whim. 'It's offered to you anytime you check out now,' Klingaman said. 'You may not be fully aware of the total interest you're paying and how it may be really jacking down your overall finances.' Now that BNPL can be used to make smaller purchases, like everyday groceries or necessities, data has shown more Americans may be turning to it for necessities. In a recent survey from LendingTree, nearly a quarter of BNPL users in the US said they have used the service to pay for groceries. Four out of 10 users also said they've had a late payment on the platform. Data compiled by the Federal Reserve shows that about 68% of BNPL users with family incomes under $50,000 said that using the services were the only way they could afford their purchase. Only 32% of those with family incomes over $100,000 said the same. And the service is used more by Americans with lower credit scores. Only 10% of those with credit scores above 720, which is considered to be a very good credit score, use BNPL, compared with 30% of those with credit scores below 620. BNPL 'is promoted as purely free, interest-free, affordable payments that are ended fairly quickly. It could be useful for occasional larger purchases, but it's really quite ill-suited for everyday use. It makes no sense to put off three-quarters of the price of this week's groceries when you have more groceries to buy in the coming weeks,' Saunders said. 'It prompts people into spending more than they can really afford.' In the first three months of 2025, Klarna said that its customer credit losses, which are due to late or missed payments, shot up 17% compared with the same period last year. The company absorbed $137m worth of these losses. Overall, the company said it doubled its losses from the first quarter from $99m this year compared with $47m last year – reports about which led many on social media to believe that Klarna was going bankrupt. But the company said that its losses stemmed from one-time costs, including from reducing its workforce by 40% after making heavy investments into AI. And the company actually saw its revenue increase 13%, to $700m, in the first three months of the year, compared with the same period last year, and its user base climbed 20%, to 100m. In a statement to NBC News, Klarna said that the increase in consumer credit losses 'does not tell you much about the US consumer' and said that credit losses made up 0.54% of all 'gross merchandise value' for loans – a slight increase from 0.51% last year, 'but still very low', the company said. Under the Biden administration, the CFPB had started to regulate BNPL servicers such as credit card companies, requiring that BNPL companies provide users with legal protections that are offered to credit card holders, such as the right to dispute charges. Last month, the CFPB said it will no longer enforce these regulations against BNPL services, saying that it will 'keep its enforcement and supervision resources focused on pressing threats to consumers'. Hartman said that while she was initially grateful that she was allowed access to more than $100,000 in credit, which she ultimately paid down completely, the process of learning how expensive it was to use such easy credit was painful. 'It's just so eye-opening how much interest you're getting charged on, for things you didn't really need,' she said. 'It helped us when we needed it, but we ended up paying probably twice as much than we needed to.' Hartman said that self-education, including learning the dangers of easy credit, enabled her to pay down her consumer debt in less than two years. 'Had I been taught these things in school, I would have had a different outlook,' she said. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA IV&V in Fairmont faces drastic funding cut
Jul. 5—dbeard @ MORGANTOWN — NASA's Katherine Johnson Independent Verification & Validation Facility in Fairmont could see a drastic budget cut under President Trump's Fiscal Year 2026 Discretionary Budget Request. But members of West Virginia's Congressional delegation are working to prevent it As part of an overall proposed NASA budget cut, Johnson IV &V would see its funding fall from its current $43.3 million (from FY 2024) to $13.8 million in FY 2026 — just one third of the current budget. NASA is working on answers to questions from The Dominion Post about the ramifications of the cut and will provide those next week. In its 2026 Budget Technical Supplement, the agency says, "In FY 2026, NASA plans to significantly reduce and restructure both the NASA Engineering and Safety Center and Independent Verification and Validation program as part of the effort to consolidate the overall Agency Technical Authority program. In FY 2026, NASA will allocate $9.9 million for IV &V to ensure the program can provide software assurance support to the future Moon to Mars programs." The Dominion Post reached out to Sens. Shelley Moore Capito and Jim Justice, and Rep. Riley Moore for comments on the proposal. Capito spokeswoman Kelley Moore (no relation) said Capito "is aware of the proposed cuts to NASA that would impact the mission and the facility at Katherine Johnson IV &V." She has been in contact with leadership at the facility, Goddard Space Flight Center, which oversees the work at IV &V, and NASA Headquarters. "It has also been conveyed to NASA and to the Senate Appropriations Committee that Sen. Capito will oppose any cuts to this facility that would impact workforce or its mission, " Moore said. Moore noted that since NASA does not have an administrator or a nominee at this time, there has not been a budget hearing where this topic could be raised. "Regardless, Sen. Capito is working hard to protect this facility that she so proudly helped name around this time in 2019." Justice did not respond to several requests for comment. Moore said, "I am closely tracking the proposed cuts to NASA's Fairmont facility. I have been in constant communication with the appropriations subcommittee chairman who oversees its funding, and will use my position on the Appropriations Committee to fight for the important work being done there." Here's a breakdown of the numbers that factor into IV &V's budget — with several layers of authority above IV &V. IV &V overall falls under NASA's Safety, Security and Mission Services. That budget was cut from $3.131 billion in FY 2024 to $3.092 billion in FY 2025 and will fall to $2.118 billion in FY 2026 the federal fiscal year begins Oct. 1). Under SS &MS, is Engineering Safety & Operations. Its budget will fall from $1.088 billion in FY 2024 to $620.3million in FY 2026 and $446.5 million in FY 2027. And under ES &O, the Agency Technical Authority funding will fall from $196.1 million in FY 2024 to $69.6 million in FY 2026. "The Agency Technical Authority program protects the health and safety of NASA's workforce by evaluating programs, projects, and operations to ensure safe and successful completion. ATA capabilities provide expert technical excellence, mission assurance, and technical authority agency wide." IV &V falls directly under the Agency Technical Authority, with funding from several accounts. Funding from the Safety, Security and Mission Services account will be cut from $39.2 million to $9.9 million — for software assurance support for Moon and Mars programs, as mentioned above. Funding from the Exploration account will go from $3.3 million to $2 million. Funding from the Space Operations account will go from $800, 000 to $700, 000. One account source will see an increase: Science account funding will go from $0 in FY 2024 to $1.2 million for FY 2026. A footnote hints at some flexibility: "The IV &V program will work with Mission Directorate to adjust FY 2026 allocations as the FY 2026 operating plan is developed." Some information provided to The Dominion Post noted that cuts to IV &V have been proposed in the past, but not to this extent.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
CAPITOL ROUNDUP: State leaders unite to support farmers, food banks, families
Jul. 5—WILKES-BARRE — Gov. Josh Shapiro visited Destiny Dairy Bar in Carlisle this week, alongside Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding and the bipartisan chairs of the Pennsylvania General Assembly's Agriculture Committees — Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski, Rep. Dan Moul, Sen. Elder Vogel, and Sen. Judy Schwank. The Governor was joined by this group of bipartisan legislative leaders, who recently sent a joint letter to Congress urging federal officials to restore the $13 million in federal funding that the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) abruptly and unlawfully terminated earlier this year. Together, they highlighted the critical importance of the Commonwealth's Local Food Purchase Assistance Program, which has supported 189 Pennsylvania farms and 14 food banks — helping farmers feed families in need. "Pennsylvania farmers work hard every day to put food on our tables — and with Washington breaking its promise to them, we're standing up for our farmers and food banks," said Shapiro. "This funding helps hundreds of family farms and food banks feed people in need. This isn't a partisan issue — it's about doing what's best for Pennsylvania farmers and communities, and about making sure the federal government keeps the contract it made with the people of Pennsylvania." Representatives Pashinski and Moul and Senators Vogel and Schwank are also calling on Congress to act swiftly to restore this critical funding for Pennsylvania's farmers and families. In their joint letter, they wrote: "As members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly, we work across the aisle to uphold support for our farmers and food system in every community. The USDA's decision not only jeopardizes food access but also undermines the farmers who are the foundation of our food system and work tirelessly to keep America fed." Since 2022, nearly $30 million in LFPA funding has helped small and mid-sized farms across Pennsylvania supply fresh, locally grown products to food banks — keeping every federal dollar in the Commonwealth — and supporting farmers in the dairy, produce, meat, poultry, egg and grain sectors. Agriculture remains a cornerstone of Pennsylvania's economy, with more than 53,000 farms generating $132.5 billion annually and supporting 600,000 jobs. "This isn't just a bureaucratic disagreement — it's about real people, real livelihoods, and real meals for families who need them," said Redding. "We are deeply grateful to our legislative leaders for standing with us and ensuring that agriculture remains a united front in Pennsylvania." Meuser co-sponsors Reliable Power Act U.S. Rep. Dan Meuser, R-Dallas, co-sponsored H.R. 3616 — the Reliable Power Act — legislation that aims to ensure federal agencies consider the impact of their regulations on electric grid reliability before finalizing new rules. The bill is a direct response to growing concerns that rushed, ideologically-driven policies from the Biden Administration put America's power supply at risk. The Reliable Power Act aims to strengthen coordination between federal agencies and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission whenever new regulations could impact electric generation or threaten the long-term dependability of the bulk-power system. Meuser said it builds on the framework of previous grid reliability legislation by requiring annual assessments of electric reliability and empowering FERC to intervene if a proposed regulation would compromise the grid's integrity. Meuser said the bill prevents any federal rule from moving forward if it's determined to cause a substantial negative effect on grid reliability. He said this ensures agencies like the EPA can't implement new mandates without first understanding their real-world consequences for energy access, affordability and reliability — particularly in high-demand regions like Pennsylvania. "As we pursue energy innovation and independence, we must not sacrifice reliability," said Meuser. "This legislation is about keeping the lights on, protecting jobs, and ensuring that working families and small businesses aren't harmed by short-sighted or poorly coordinated federal policies. The Reliable Power Act makes clear that federal agencies must evaluate the consequences of their actions before putting our electric grid at risk." The legislation reported favorably out of the Energy and Commerce Committee by a vote of 28-23 and awaits further consideration in the House. Pennsylvania remains in strong fiscal standing The Shapiro Administration reported this week that the Commonwealth ended the 2024 — 25 Fiscal Year collecting $321 million more in revenue than originally estimated, further strengthening its position at the start of the fiscal year. The Commonwealth is sitting on a nearly $11 billion surplus, including the General Fund surplus and the Budget Stabilization Fund (i.e. rainy day fund). In total, the Commonwealth collected $46.4 billion in General Fund revenue in FY 2024 — 25, $321 million, or 0.7% above initial estimates from last June. Comparatively, the Commonwealth further outperformed the Independent Fiscal Office (IFO)'s original projection, which was $639 million below actual collections, or 1.4% off. Final collections were also within the 2% forecast range targeted by the Pennsylvania Department of Revenue. A recent bond refinancing will save taxpayers more than $71 million over the life of the bonds. Altogether, through bond refinancing completed under Shapiro, taxpayers will benefit from $193 million in savings over the next decade. Moody's Ratings, Fitch Ratings and S&P Global Ratings all reaffirmed Pennsylvania's positive rating status, citing responsible budgeting and a solid financial position. Reach Bill O'Boyle at 570-991-6118 or on Twitter @TLBillOBoyle.
