Exclusive: Scale AI's bigger rival Surge AI seeks up to $1 billion capital raise, sources say
The company, founded by former Google and Meta engineer Edwin Chen, is targeting a valuation of over $15 billion, sources said, cautioning that the talks are still in early stages and the final number could be higher. The funding would be a mix of primary and secondary capital that provides liquidity for the employees.
Surge AI, which has been profitable and bootstrapped by Chen, has raked in over $1 billion in revenue last year, bigger than its better-known competitor Scale AI, which reported $870 million in revenue over the same period of time.
In comparison, Scale AI was valued at $14 billion in a funding round last year, and was mostly recently valued at nearly $29 billion when Meta invested for a 49% stake in the company and poached its CEO Alexandr Wang to be its chief AI officer to lead its new Superintelligence Labs.
Surge AI declined to comment.
Like other Scale AI competitors, Surge AI is benefiting from Scale AI's customer losses following Meta's investment. This includes OpenAI and Scale's largest customer, Google, who are now planning to move away from the platform over concerns that doing business with Scale could expose their research priorities to Meta. Scale has said its business remains strong, and it is committed to protecting customer data.
Surge AI's quiet yet meteoric rise has positioned it as one of the largest players in the crowded data labeling industry, defying the typical Silicon Valley playbook of raising massive rounds of venture capital to fuel growth. Founded in 2020, the San Francisco-based company has largely operated under the radar, known for its premium, high-end data labeling services used by top AI labs, including Google, OpenAI and Anthropic.
As reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) has become more important in training advanced AI systems, the demand for meticulously labeled, nuanced datasets has grown. Surge AI has capitalized on this trend by appealing to a network of highly skilled contractors instead of large pools of low-wage labor.
The outsized funding of Surge would be a test of investor interest in the data labeling sector. Some investors view data labeling as an ongoing necessity for AI development, predicting a continued demand from leading AI labs. Others express concern that the industry's low margins and reliance on human labor could make it vulnerable to automation, as AI technology advances and the need for manual annotation diminishes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
How Trump's big bill will supercharge his immigration crackdown
Thousands of new immigration enforcement officers. Tens of thousands of new detention beds. New fees on asylum applications. And new construction on the border wall. Donald Trump's sweeping spending bill would vastly expand the federal government's immigration enforcement machinery and, if passed by the House, supercharge the president's plan to carry out what he has vowed will be the largest deportation campaign in US history. The measure would authorize what analysts and advocates describe as a level of immigration enforcement spending without precedent in American history. Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful bill' dedicates roughly $170bn for immigration and border-related operations – a staggering sum that would make US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) the most heavily funded law enforcement agency in the federal government, and that critics warn will unleash more raids, disrupt the economy and severely restrict access to humanitarian protections like asylum. 'We've already seen aggressive, indiscriminate immigration enforcement across the country – and protests in reaction to how horribly it's been carried out,' said Daniel Costa, director of immigration law and policy research at the liberal Economic Policy Institute. 'And we're going to see such a massive increase that most people can't even begin to wrap their heads around it.' The 940-page bill passed the Senate on Tuesday, with JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. It now returns to the House, which approved an initial draft by a single vote in May. While some elements of the spending package could still change, the immigration-related provisions in the House and Senate versions are largely aligned. And despite mounting public backlash over the Trump administration's sprawling immigration crackdown – which has separated families and even swept up US citizens – the proposal's 'unimaginable' border enforcement spending has received notably less scrutiny than its tax cuts and deep reductions to social safety net programs like Medicaid. 'It's going to fundamentally transform the immigration system,' said Adriel Orozco, senior policy counsel at the American Immigration Council (AIC). 'It's going to transform our society.' The Senate-passed bill would authorize $45bn to build and operate new immigration detention centers – including facilities for families – marking a 265% increase over Ice's current detention budget and enabling the detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens daily, according to an analysis by theAIC. Experts say language in the bill could allow families to be detained indefinitely, in violation of the Flores settlement, the 1997 consent decree that limits the amount of time children can be detained by immigration officials. The measure would allocate $46.6bn for border wall construction – more than three times what was spent on the barrier during Trump's first term – and provide billions in grant funding to support and expand state and local cooperation with Ice. Though the legislation allots $3.3bn to the agency that oversees the country's immigration court system, it caps the number of immigration judges at 800, despite a massive backlog with millions of pending cases. It also imposes a series of new or elevated fees on immigration services. Asylum seekers – those fleeing persecution – would now be subject to a $100 application fee, plus an additional $100 for every year the application is pending. (The original House bill proposed a $1,000 fee.) Currently there is no fee, and experts warn that the added financial burden would in effect restrict asylum access to those who can afford it. The legislation would also levy new or heightened fees on work permits, nonimmigrant visas and Temporary Protected Status applications, essentially imposing what Orozco calls a 'wealth test' on some of the world's most vulnerable people. An analysis by David Bier, associate director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, argues that even without new funding, immigration enforcement spending was already 'extreme'. Congress had allocated nearly $34bn for immigration and border enforcement in fiscal year 2025 – more than double the combined budget for all other federal law enforcement agencies. That amount, according to the report, is about 36 times the IRS's budget for tax enforcement, 21 times the firearms enforcement budget, 13 times the drug enforcement budget, and eight times more than the FBI's. As the bill heads to the House, it has drawn opposition from some fiscal conservatives, who are furious over projections that the package would add $3.3tn to the national deficit over the next decade, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). In a recent report based on the House's plan, Bier said CBO fails to account for the lost tax revenue from millions of immigrants who would otherwise contribute more in taxes than they receive in public benefits. He projects that mass deportations enabled by the bill could add nearly $1tn to the deficit – roughly a quarter of the bill's total price tag. The White House insists the enforcement spending is worth it. Before the Tuesday Senate vote, Vance dismissed concerns about social safety net cuts and deficit projections, writing on X: 'The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits.' He added that the president's policy package 'fixes this problem'. The proposed spending surge comes as the Trump administration moves aggressively to scale up arrests and deportations of undocumented immigrants. Despite promising a 'worst first' approach focused on violent offenders, Ice arrests of immigrants without any criminal history have skyrocketed since the start of Trump's term, according to a Guardian analysis of federal data. The number spiked even more dramatically after a meeting in late May, during which Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and chief architect of Trump's hardline immigration policies, set a target of 3,000 arrests a day, or one million per year. 'Right now you have masked agents on the streets, collaborating with other federal law enforcement agencies and local law enforcement agencies, to try to meet these quotas for mass deportation,' Orozco said. 'We're just going to see that at a massively larger scale if this bill gets passed.' Following protests that erupted last month in Los Angeles against the administration's immigration sweeps, Trump has directed immigration officials to prioritize enforcement operations in Democratic-run cities. A new NPR/PBS News/Marist poll found that a majority of Americans – 54% – say they believe Ice operations have gone 'too far' while nearly six in 10 do not agree that the administration's deportation policies are making the country safer. 'There's virtually no support for this mass deportation effort outside of [Trump's] rabid Maga base,' said Matt Barreto, a Democratic pollster who studied Latinos and voter sentiment on immigration for decades. 'Other than that, people want immigrants to work here and to be here and to contribute to America.' As the Senate debated the bill on Tuesday, Trump was in Florida, touring the state's new migrant detention camp built in a remote area of the everglades, known as 'Alligator Alcatraz'. 'This is a model,' Trump declared, 'but we need other states to step up.' Critics say there's little evidence to support the White House's contention that mass deportations will benefit the American workers. 'They're going to be deporting not just workers, but also consumers,' Costa said. 'That's a pretty big share of the workforce that you're going to be impacting.' An analysis published on Tuesday by his colleague at EPI, economist Ben Zipperer, estimates mass deportations would result in the loss of nearly 6 million jobs over the next four years, both for immigrants and US-born workers. 'There is no upside to the mass deportations enabled by the Republican budget bill,' Zipperer wrote. 'They will cause immense harm to workers and families, shrink the economy, and weaken the labor market for everyone.'
The Guardian
11 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Tesla vehicle deliveries drop sharply as Musk backlash affects demand
Tesla posted another big drop in quarterly deliveries on Wednesday, putting it on course for its second straight annual sales decline as demand falters due to backlash over CEO Elon Musk's political stance and an aging vehicle lineup. Tesla said it delivered 384,122 vehicles in the second quarter, down 13.5% from 443,956 units a year ago. Analysts had expected it to report deliveries of about 394,378 vehicles, according to an average of 23 estimates from financial research firm Visible Alpha, though projections went to as low as 360,080 units based on estimates from 10 analysts over the past month. Analysts use the number of vehicles delivered to customers as a metric of success to evaluate both automotive sales and production. 'The market is reacting to the deliveries not being as bad as potentially thought with multiple analysts cutting their forecasts over the past week,' said Seth Goldstein, senior equity analyst at Morningstar. The stock has lost 25% of its value so far this year as investors feared brand damage in Europe, where sales have slumped most sharply, and in the US from Musk's embrace of rightwing politics and his role in spearheading the Trump administration's cost-cutting effort. The day Trump and Musk split publicly in early June, Tesla lost some $150bn in market value. Its share price has somewhat recovered in the ensuing month, but Trump and Musk have likewise reignited their feud as they spar over Trump's sweeping tax bill. Tesla's plummeting deliveries in a steadily growing global EV market come despite Musk saying in April that sales had turned around. The company refreshed its top-selling Model Y crossover earlier this year to boost demand, but the redesign forced a production halt and prompted some buyers to delay purchases in anticipation of the updated version. Most of Tesla's revenue and profit come from its core EV business, and much of its trillion-dollar valuation hangs on Musk's big bet on converting its vehicles into robotaxis. Tesla last month rolled out a robotaxi service in limited parts of Austin, Texas, for a select group of invitees and with several restrictions, including having a safety monitor in the front passenger seat. The pilot was limited, though, with only about a dozen Robotaxis on the road. The US National Highway and Transportation Safety Administration opened an investigation into the launch of the autonomous ride service. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The automaker had said it would start producing a cheaper vehicle, expected to be pared-down Model Y, by June's end. While a cheaper model might help bolster sales, Wall Street expects a second consecutive annual sales decline this year. To achieve Musk's target of returning to growth this year, Tesla would need to hand over more than a million units in the second half - a record and a tough challenge, according to analysts, despite typically stronger sales in the second half.
The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Amazon, Starbucks among companies to face boycotts this month over workers' rights and DEI policy changes
Several popular companies are facing boycott calls this month over workers' rights and Diversity, Equity and Inclusion policy changes. The grassroots advocacy group The People's Union USA has pushed for month-long boycotts of Amazon, Starbucks and Home Depot starting July 1. John Schwarz, founder of The People's Union, explained why people are boycotting the companies in a recent Instagram video. He mentioned Amazon Prime Day deals, which will run from July 8 to July 11. ' Behind those illusionary deals are workers who are suffering. They're working in extreme heat on their feet with no time to breathe. They are pushing their bodies to the limit so [Amazon founder] Jeff Bezos can throw a multimillion-dollar wedding in Venice,' Schwarz said. 'That is a man getting rich while the people making it possible are being pushed to the edge, while they barely make a livable wage. ' Bezos and his new bride, Lauren Sánchez, threw an extravagant wedding in Italy last week with a guest list of about 200 people, including politicians, Hollywood A-listers, and international royalty. The couple asked their guests to make donations to support Venice instead of giving them wedding gifts. In September 2024, Amazon announced it was increasing fulfillment and transportation employees' base wages to an average of more than $22 per hour, or $29 per hour when accounting for the value of elected benefits. ' Starbucks is no better. They talk about community and values, but they actually fire workers who are trying to organize and unionize. They have literally shut down entire stores the second that people start coming together to organize,' Schwarz continued. Former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz denied during a Senate hearing in March 2023 that the company had ever broken federal labor law. ' And then there's Home Depot,' Schwarz said. 'They quietly erased their diversity, equity, and inclusion page as if standing for fairness or for equality or for representation was something to be ashamed of. That was a choice, and they made it loud and clear.' The Home Depot now has a page on its website titled 'WeAreTHD,' which focuses on company culture and workers' opportunities, such as 'competitive wages and benefits.' In a statement to The Independent, a spokesperson for Home Depot said, 'For over 45 years, our business success has been driven by our eight core values, including respect for all people and taking care of our people. 'We're proud to have a culture that welcomes everyone, and we believe it helps us achieve our business goals by supporting associates, building relationships and fostering innovation. As we continually refine our communications, we have been using 'WeAreTHD,' which we have long used to represent the welcoming culture that we've built here.' The Independent has also reached out to Amazon and Starbucks for comment. Schwarz made a follow-up video on July 1, announcing the start of the month-long boycotts. ' We are boycotting Amazon and every company tied to it from Zappos to Whole Foods, to Twitch, to Audible, all of it. We are boycotting Starbucks. We are boycotting Home Depot, and we are holding this entire corrupt system accountable,' he said.
