Exxon, Chevron profits to drop to lowest point since pandemic, analysts say
The April-June quarter covered a volatile period in which the OPEC+ group of producers continued raising their production volumes, putting pressure on crude prices and in turn cutting the profits of oil firms. Oscillating tariff policy from U.S. President Donald Trump's administration also added to fears about weakening economies and oil demand.
Global benchmark Brent crude prices declined 11% during the quarter from the previous three months, while U.S. natural gas futures declined 9%.
While investors had previously been watching whether producers would cut spending in response to lower prices, the market is now likely to focus more on company-specific results and commentary about the macroeconomic environment, said Jeoffrey Lambujon, an analyst with TPH Energy Research, in a note last week.
Exxon, the top U.S. oil producer, is expected to post $6.67 billion in adjusted earnings for the second quarter, or $1.56 per share, according to the consensus analyst estimates compiled by LSEG.
That would be a 27% drop from the year-ago quarter and the lowest earnings since 2021, after the COVID-19 pandemic sank global demand.
The company had signaled earlier this month that lower oil and gas prices could cut about $1.5 billion from its earnings compared with the first quarter.
One bright spot is improved refining margins, which Exxon said could help boost second-quarter earnings by about $300 million, but refining is a smaller portion of its business compared with oil and gas production.
The company has several projects slated for start-up in the second half of the year that should drive stronger earnings, said Jason Gabelman, an analyst with TD Cowen in a July 10 research note.
These include Yellowtail, a fourth floating production, storage and offloading vessel in the prolific Stabroek Block in Guyana, the lucrative oil hotspot where profits soared 64% last year.
Wall Street expects Chevron, the No.2 U.S. oil producer, to report $3 billion in adjusted earnings, or $1.70 per share, down 33% from the same period a year ago and also the lowest in four years.
Chevron closed its acquisition of smaller oil producer Hess on July 18 after triumphing in a legal challenge from Exxon that delayed the deal close by over a year.
Chevron said the deal will lead to $1 billion in cost synergies by the end of the year. It will provide updated financial guidance for the combined company during its investor day in November.
The company could report about 1% lower production volumes compared with the first quarter following a well blowout in Colorado, and a two-week production shutdown at the Leviathan gas field in Israel during the country's conflict with Iran, said Barclays analysts in a July 13 note.
French oil major TotalEnergies (TTEF.PA), opens new tab last week reported its lowest profit in four years as higher production was not enough to make up for lower oil prices.
On Thursday, British oil major Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab reported a profit that tumbled by almost a third. Rival BP (BP.L), opens new tab will release results next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's Dalmia Bharat Sugar posts quarterly profit fall on lower sugar production
Aug 5 (Reuters) - India's Dalmia Bharat Sugar and Industries ( opens new tab posted a near 30% fall in first-quarter profit on Tuesday, dragged by lower sugar production. The company reported a net profit after tax of 383.7 million rupees ($4.37 million) for the quarter ended June 30, compared with 547.3 million rupees a year ago. The New Delhi-based firm, which supplies sugar to companies such as Coca-Cola (KO.N), opens new tab, Britannia ( opens new tab and Dabur ( opens new tab, posted a 2% fall in quarterly revenue. For further earnings highlights, click [here] KEY CONTEXT India's sugar output for the 2025 marketing year, ending in September, is projected to fall below domestic consumption for the first time in eight years. This decline is primarily attributed to reduced sugarcane availability in key producing states, driven by the adverse effects of El Niño and limited groundwater. PEER COMPARISON * The mean of analyst ratings standardised to a scale of Strong Buy, Buy, Hold, Sell, and Strong Sell ** The ratio of the stock's last close to analysts' mean price target; a ratio above 1 means the stock is trading above the PT APRIL-JUNE STOCK PERFORMANCE -- All data from LSEG IBES -- $1 = 87.7950 Indian rupees
The Guardian
6 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Three major chemical companies agree to pay $875m to New Jersey over PFAS claims
Chemours, DuPont and Corteva have agreed to pay $875m over 25 years to the state of New Jersey to settle environmental claims including pollution linked to Pfas, or forever chemicals, the companies said on Monday. Lawsuits accusing major chemical companies of polluting US drinking water with toxic Pfas chemicals led to over $11bn in settlements in 2023, with experts predicting that new federal regulations and a growing awareness of the breadth of the contamination will spur more litigation and settlements. Pfas are a class of chemicals that are used in a wide range of products including non-stick cookware and firefighting foams. They are commonly called 'forever chemicals' as these substances do not break down easily in the human body or nature, and are associated with certain cancers, hormonal dysfunction and other diseases. The payments announced on Monday, whose present value is about $500m before taxes, will start no earlier than 1 January 2026. Chemours will make half of the settlement payments, while DuPont will pay 35.5% and Corteva the rest, the companies said in a statement. In 2023, the three firms reached a settlement agreement with the US state of Ohio for $110m to resolve claims associated with Pfas. That same year, 3M agreed to pay $10.3bn to settle hundreds of claims that the company polluted public drinking water with the chemicals, while Chemours, DuPont and Corteva reached a similar deal with US water providers for $1.19bn. Of the total settlement announced on Monday, $16.5m is attributed to alleged Pfas contamination unrelated to the companies' operating sites.
Reuters
6 minutes ago
- Reuters
Easy to lose, hard to restore: US data trust on the line
WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Donald Trump's move to fire the head of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics has put trust in U.S. data reporting mechanisms on the line just as demand for reliable diagnoses of the health of the world's largest economy is bigger than ever. Examples from elsewhere show credibility is easily lost and hard to restore. A first test will be the choice to replace Erika McEntarfer, accused without evidence by Trump of manipulating U.S. job numbers after weaker-than-expected growth and large downward revisions were reported last week. "Imagine if one of your concerns is that there's a lackey in charge of the agency and the numbers are fake," said Michael Strain, director of economic policy studies at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, of an appointment Trump has said to expect within days. "That's a whole other level of problems." Policymakers, businesses and investors are scrambling to understand how Trump's attempt to up-end the global trade system will affect prices, employment and household wealth. Central banks, which once tried to guide market bets on rate moves months down the line, now say decisions are "data-dependent." The rub is that data collection is proving to be harder. Debt-laden governments have, as McEntarfer experienced, cut resources in their data departments; phone surveys, the go-to method for much macro research, are struggling to produce adequate samples as many households do without fixed lines. Trump's implicit accusation of partisanship by "this Biden Political Appointee" adds the troubling factor of a political dimension usually indicative of countries dogged by wider doubts over their democratic checks and balances. The key lesson from past examples of loss of data confidence is that it can take years for trust to be restored. When Argentina last year reported its first single-digit inflation in months, sceptics questioned the data and recalled the massive underreporting of inflation in the 2000s and 2010s for which it was censured by the International Monetary Fund. "They manipulated the data for a long time," said Aldo Abram of libertarian think tank Liberty and Progress Foundation in Buenos Aires. "It's logical people remember this and continue having doubts." Turkey has changed the head of its TUIK statistics institute four times since 2019, with opposition parties arguing the changes were political. Roger Marks, fixed income analyst at asset manager Ninety One, said the result for investors has been a "gradual erosion of our trust in the numbers." For Greece, whose efforts during the 2000s to conceal mounting public deficits fed that decade's sovereign debt crisis, it has been an equally long haul back to credibility. It required the overhaul of its ELSTAT statistics agency in 2016 and the creation of an international panel of experts to appoint its chief statistician - steps that have meant its hard-fought efforts to improve its budget are now unquestioned. It also prompted European governments to grant the Eurostat statistics arm of the European Union powers to check suspect national statistics reported to it. Longstanding doubts over the accuracy of Chinese statistics - with even former Premier Li Keqiang acknowledging in 2007 the country's output figures were man-made - have obscured genuine efforts to improve data quality, such as a new measure of youth unemployment excluding students that was released early in 2024. "There were genuine methodological reasons for the change, but because of the history around Chinese data a lot of people, particularly foreign investors, just didn't really trust that," Julian Evans-Pritchard, an analyst with Capital Economics. "That underscores to me that once you undermine confidence in the data, it is quite hard to restore that confidence." Faced over the years with patchy official data, watchers of emerging economies have long sought to corroborate those numbers with other datasets. Capital Economics' China Activity Proxy is based on 18 indicators from freight traffic to electricity consumption. Another metric is found in the data and sentiment surveys provided by independent researchers in all the big economies. But they can only sketch in one perspective on the picture. "An awful lot of it is soft data: 'How do you feel? What do you think's going on?'" said Erik Weisman, chief economist and portfolio manager at MFS Investment Management in Boston. "They're not asking for specifics. They're not asking, how many widgets did you produce? How many insurance policies did you produce? How many hours worked?," he said, adding that the concerns raised by the sacking of McEntarfer could nonetheless force analysts to turn increasingly to those other sources. The most urgent question now is whether the breach in credibility which the Trump intervention has opened is now widened further or mended. Enrico Giovannini, former chief statistician for the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), said there was more scope in the U.S. for political appointments of key statistics roles than in other advanced economies which tended to make long, fixed-term appointments. "So the incoming government has to wait (to replace them), said Giovannini, who has also served in two Italian governments. "In the U.S., the spoils system works," he said of the practice of party supporters getting rewarded with government jobs. The International Statistical Institute, a professional organization for data collectors, issued a statement late on Monday that said Trump's move violated U.N. principles aimed at protecting fact-based statistics and called on his government to take steps to restore public confidence in U.S. federal data. William Wiatrowski, the BLS' deputy commissioner, will serve as acting commissioner until a successor to McEntarfer is named. Beyond that choice, some fear that further dangers may emerge from a Trump executive order on federal hiring intended to reserve posts for candidates who can prove they are "dedicated to the furtherance of American ideals, values, and interests." Aaron Sojourner, a senior researcher at the W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, said such a move would, if passed by Congress, apply to many jobs in federal economic statistical agencies. "This proposal would convert many of those jobs into political jobs where people can be fired for any reason if they displease a political leader," Sojourner said.
