EAFF E-1 Men Preview: South Korea vs. Japan Title Decider
Advertisement
(Photo by)
Overview & Match Information
Fixture: South Korea vs. Japan
Competition: EAFF E-1 Football Championship Matchday 3
Venue: Yongin Mireu Stadium, Yongin
Date: Tuesday 15th July, 7:24 PM KST
It's the big one, the 'Han-Il Jeon,' South Korea versus Japan, two rivals locking horns in a competitive match for the first time since the 2022 competition decider. Korea, as the host nation, will be under a bit of pressure to beat Japan, but with something of a psychological advantage after the resounding 3-0 win in 2022, not to mention convincing performances in their first two matches.
Advertisement
EAFF E-1 Form
South Korea are yet to concede a goal, having kept clean sheets against both China and Hong Kong. The 3-0 victory over China to start the competition was then followed up by a 2-0 win over Hong Kong with a heavily rotated starting XI.
Hong Kong 0-2 South Korea Highlights
Japan are the tournament's top scorers, having hit Hong Kong for six in the first game thanks in part to four goals in the first half from Ryo Germain. The 6-1 triumph was followed up by a routine win over China, thanks to goals from Mao Hoseyo and Henry Heroki Mochizuki.
Japan 2-0 China Highlights
Head-to-Head
Japan have won the last two meetings, both by the same 3-0 scoreline. The most recent was the 2022 EAFF E-1 title decider with Yuki Soma, Sho Sasaki, and Shuto Machino on target. Before that, in March 2021, Japan ran out 3-0 in a friendly thanks to goals from Miki Yamane, Daichi Kamada, and Wataru Endo. Before that, Korea had remained unbeaten in three against Japan with back-to-back wins in the 2017 and 2019 EAFF competitions.
Advertisement
In EAFF action, there have been 15 total encounters with Japan earning six wins, Korea four, and five draws. Overall, from 71 meetings, Korea have 36 wins, Japan have 17, with 18 draws.
South Korea in Focus with Seo Bo-won
How have Korea's performances been in the first two games?
First of all, Coach Hong Myung-bo utilized a back-three formation, likely with strong opponents at the World Cup in mind. However, since he adopted a more defensive back-three against China in the first match and a more attacking version against Hong Kong in the second, this could indicate a focus on tactical flexibility. Of course, simply using wingers as wing-backs doesn't necessarily equate to being 'flexible,' but at the very least, it shows an effort to address the lack of a Plan B, which the national team struggled with during the third round of World Cup qualifiers. That said, it's a bit concerning that against Hong Kong, players seemed to focus on personal showcases rather than team play. They clearly see this tournament as their last chance to make the final World Cup squad and are playing with urgency, but at times their style appears a bit selfish. Still, the two clean-sheet wins are a satisfactory result.
Advertisement
Japan next in a big game that will decide the tournament, what are you expecting to see from Hong Myung-bo tactically?
While Japan seems to be treating this tournament as a true 'testing ground,' Korea has taken a less experimental approach in terms of squad selection and match management. This makes it harder to predict what tactics Japan might bring, but regardless, Korea needs a proactive approach that doesn't shrink in the face of pressure. I believe this is the best way to truly assess the gap in quality between the two teams. If Coach Hong shares this view, we're likely to see a match with intense physical duels and fast-paced passing to draw out that contrast. Given the hot and humid conditions, I expect both teams will try to decide the game in the first half, and experiment with new options in the second half when the tempo drops.
Korea lost 3-0 to Japan in the last EAFF. What went wrong in that game, and what do Korea need to do this time?
In the last edition of this tournament, Paulo Bento's Korean team couldn't even approach Japan's penalty area. That's how good Hajime Moriyasu's Japan was in terms of ball possession, compactness, and especially their rapid ball progression. Rather than blaming Bento's tactics, I'd say Japan simply played extremely well. In this tournament, too, they've maintained that same tactical identity. The midfielders and wingers combine smoothly to create space, and they've had no problem breaking down deep-lying defensive teams like Hong Kong. What's more, Moriyasu's side now has continuity—and that's where I see the real difference in quality.
Advertisement
Who will be Korea's key players against Japan?
That's quite a tough question… But I would say Lee Dong-gyeong is the most likely key player. Whether or not he can get enough touches on the ball could determine the direction of the match. In fact, for Lee Dong-gyeong to get those touches, Kim Jin-gyu needs to establish a strong presence in midfield. Both players will play crucial roles against Japan. If Lee Dong-gyeong can get the ball in the final third, I believe we might even be able to take the initiative in the match. He has become a more creative player and currently looks to have the sharpest shooting instincts.
- Korean football journalistSeo Bo-won
The Opposition with Sean Carroll
(Photo by)
What have you thought of Japan's performances so far?
I think they've been steady but unspectacular. With a lot of uncapped players (and, in Yuto Nagatomo, one who just made his first appearance for 950 days) and having started with two totally different XIs in their two games, that's perhaps to be expected, though. Overall, they've still managed to control both games, but the Korea game will be the real test.
Advertisement
Who have been their most important players?
That's a tricky one on account of the rotation. Yuki Soma has looked a level above on his third straight appearance in the competition, Satoshi Tanaka impressed in central midfield against China, and both Ryo Germain and Mao Hosoya have shown they can finish up front.
Who will be key for Japan to get the win?
It sounds obvious, but I think the centre backs and strikers. I expect it to be a game of few chances, so there's no room for errors at the back or profligacy in front of goal.
They will have the psychological advantage over Korea after the last meeting. Could this lead to complacency? How seriously are Japan taking this competition, and generally, how seriously does the JFA take it?
I'm not sure the last game really factors into it, as the squads are so different. Moriyasu takes every game seriously and will be demanding the same of his players, and while overseas players obviously can't be called up, I get the impression the JFA see this tournament as a useful exercise to run the rule over players not ordinarily afforded the opportunity to play for their country.
Advertisement
It depends who starts to an extent (Keisuke Osako looks certain to be in goal for instance, so if his Sanfrecce Hiroshima teammate Hayato Araki is in the back three, that will negate the issue a little), but the fact that there is no existing partnership at centre back means Korea could cause problems there.
- Japanese football expert & journalist Sean Carroll
What to Watch
With Japan's superior goal difference (7-5), Korea will have to win to secure the title; a draw won't do and would mean Japan make it back-to-back titles for the first time. This means Korea will have to attack and will have to pick their moments. Japan's quick passing and deadliness in transitions could prove fatal if Korea go in all guns blazing and leave themselves exposed. Central midfield selection will be key, players who can go box-to-box while in attack, Korea will have to be clinical. Joo Min-kyu might just be the man for Hong Myung-bo looks to to lead the line, as he did against China.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘Laughing Stock' NY Post brutally mocked for claiming Trump received ‘huge applause' at FIFA Club World Cup final
The New York Post is currently facing online ridicule from liberals and progressives after the conservative tabloid claimed that Donald Trump received 'huge applause' at Sunday's FIFA World Club final, which saw the president roundly booed both before and after the contest. In what is seen as something of a test run for next year's World Cup, which the United States is hosting alongside Canada and Mexico, the world's best club soccer teams have spent the past few weeks playing in cities across the country, culminating in Sunday's final at MetLife Stadium, New Jersey. 'That's why many world leaders and sports fans have been scrutinizing the club games for on- and off-field clues about America's ability to host,' the Washington Post noted. 'The skepticism is driven by concerns over whether a president who has taken actions to close America's borders and imposed wholesale bans on residents from some countries can host a quadrennial celebration of global camaraderie and athleticism.' Trump's presence at Sunday's finale between Chelsea and Paris Saint-Germain, therefore, was met with quite a bit of resistance from soccer fans. While there was a smattering of cheers and chants of 'USA! USA!' from nearby attendees when the president and First Lady Melania Trump were first spotted in their suite, the stadium erupted in jeers when the jumbotron showed him during the national anthem, prompting the camera to quickly pan away. The 80,000 fans also made their displeasure with Trump known following Chelsea's victory, showering the commander-in-chief in boos as he made his way onto the pitch with FIFA chief Gianni Infantino to present the trophy. The stadium music eventually drowned the crowd out. Trump's continued presence during the trophy presentation drew ire from fans online. The trophy presentation also included a bizarre moment when the president remained on stage with the team as they posed for a victory photo, leading some players – such as Chelsea captain Reece James and star winger Cole Palmer – to express confusion over Trump awkwardly crashing their celebration. While social media was awash with videos of the MetLife crowd loudly booing the president, the Post – owned by right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch and a corporate cousin of Fox News – attempted to give a positive spin to the reaction Trump received at the championship match. 'President Trump and first lady Melania arrive at MetLife Stadium to huge applause for FIFA Club World Cup final,' the Post headlined its story on the president's appearance. Despite the article's title boasting that Trump and his wife were met with a warm reception, the piece itself did not contain any mentions of the supposed 'huge applause' for the president outside of a caption for one of the photos within the body of the story. 'President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump arrived at the FIFA Club World Cup final in MetLife Stadium Sunday, getting a preview of the even grander soccer tournament the US is set to host next year,' New York Post politics reporter Ryan King wrote, adding: 'The president and first lady were seen waving to the crowd as they took their seats to watch the big game.' The president was roundly jeered by fans on Sunday when the stadium's jumbotron showed him during the playing of the national anthem, prompting the camera to quickly pan away. (AP) With the right-wing tabloid promoting the article on social media with the same headline, it didn't take long for critics to call out the paper for trying to cover for the president while misleading its readers. 'LAUGHING STOCK!!! The New York Post is getting clowned online after falsely claiming Trump received 'huge applause' at the FIFA Club World Cup Final—when in reality, he was loudly booed by the crowd,' anti-Trump digital media outlet MeidasTouch tweeted, adding that the Post was 'desperately trying to defend Donald Trump as his Epstein scandal tanks his approval.' 'Is the 'huge applause' in the room with us now? Because here's what actually happened,' liberal podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen snarked, sharing a field-level video from Agence France-Presse correspondent Danny Kemp of the stadium raining down boos on Trump. 'By 'huge applause,' they mean 'lots of boos,'' finance journalist James Surowiecki quipped, while author Tom Watson added: 'He was brutally booed.'
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
'No need to complain' – German football legend urges Marc-Andre Ter Stegen to leave Barcelona
Much has been made of Marc-Andre Ter Stegen's situation at Barcelona over the last few weeks, with the club captain having been replaced as starting goalkeeper for the 2025-26 season. Joan Garcia and Wojciech Szczesny are Hansi Flick's options going forward, which means that the German is in a tricky situation. Flick told Ter Stegen last week that he will almost certainly not play for Barcelona next season, but despite this, the 33-year-old is determined to stay and force his way into contention. The club want him to leave, but he is under no obligation to seek an exit, given that his contract runs until 2028. Advertisement Ter Stegen has options to leave, and according to German football legend Lothar Matthaus, he should take one of them, as he told Bild (via MD). 'He has to leave, he won't play there again. I understand Ter Stegen. He has played well, he has been captain and he has his life in Barcelona. But he has to accept it. Barcelona have other ideas, other plans. 'These are decisions that must be accepted. There is no need to complain, it is part of football. It is not an isolated incident. It's not Hansi Flick, it's Barcelona. And nothing is bigger than the club, and that also applies to Barcelona.' Image viaAdvertisement Ter Stegen has a big decision to make It must remembered that a World Cup year has now started, with the next tournament taking place in North America next summer. As things stand, Ter Stegen will be Germany's starter, but that could change if he sidelined for the entirety of the 2025-26 season. Barcelona are hoping that Ter Stegen relents once the gravity of that situation kicks in, but for now, he is still looking to remain at the club he joined over a decade ago. However, that stance could change in the coming weeks.


Hamilton Spectator
7 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Contingency plans unclear for 2026 World Cup wildfire smoke risks
While some organizations have published clear air quality thresholds or contingency protocols for wildfire smoke, FIFA's plans remain unclear less than a year out from the 2026 World Cup. A day after Toronto's air quality was among the worst in the world, the organizing committee for the World Cup in Canada declined to reveal guidelines for postponement or air-quality-related contingencies with FIFA. No policies are posted publicly. The World Cup will run from June 11 to July 19, 2026. Canada will stage 13 games — seven in Vancouver and six in Toronto. The Air Quality Health Index rating for Toronto was over 10, or 'very high risk,' on Monday morning, dropping to a 'high risk' rating of 8 by late afternoon. In the CFL, meanwhile, games can't be played when the AQHI surpasses a threshold of seven, according to an agreement between the league and its players. CFL stadiums are also equipped with air-quality sensors to provide real-time readings. The CFL postponed the Saskatchewan Roughriders-Calgary Stampeders game in Regina from Friday night to Saturday afternoon this past weekend due to air quality issues, as wildfires from northern Saskatchewan pushed the AQHI above 10. Many minor soccer associations in Canada also recommend delaying or rescheduling games if the AQHI is 7 or higher. Dr. Andrew Halayko, a professor of physiology and pathophysiology at the University of Manitoba, calls anything above 10 a 'no-brainer' for postponing sporting events. He also believes sporting events on days when the AQHI rises higher than 7 should be rescheduled due to health concerns. Halayko adds that while people should be able to make their own health decisions, sometimes the general population needs guidance. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2025.