logo
Does University of Florida have a permanent ‘interim' leadership problem?

Does University of Florida have a permanent ‘interim' leadership problem?

Miami Herald08-07-2025
Last August, the University of Florida's then-Faculty Senate Chair Sarah Lynne was hoping the school would have found permanent replacements for several of its temporary leadership appointments by the end of the academic year.
At her final meeting as chair on May 1, she offered a stark update to the faculty senators: 'Not a lot has happened in the last nine months.'
'I'd like to see a little bit less 'interim' in some of these titles,' she added. 'But we'll see how that goes.'
For several years, Florida's flagship university has faced top-level turbulence — from Ben Sasse's short and controversial presidency, to a brief return of longtime leader Kent Fuchs, and most recently, a failed bid to appoint Santa J. Ono, the former president of the University of Michigan. That volatility has rippled through the institution, affecting leadership at every level.
Sasse's 17-month tenure ended last July, leaving five of UF's 16 colleges without permanent deans — including four of its most prominent academic units: the College of Medicine, Herbert Wertheim College of Engineering, Levin College of Law, and the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences.
UF's top academic officer is also there temporarily, with no clear succession plan for interim Provost Joe Glover. Four other high-level posts — including chief financial officer and general counsel — are held by interim appointees. And the director of UF's much-ballyhooed, GOP-backed Hamilton School for Classical and Civic Education is soon departing for the University of Texas at Austin.
Holding out for a permanent president
UF had pinned its hopes on Ono to stabilize its leadership crisis, offering him a contract with directives to hire academic leaders 'firmly aligned' with Florida's higher education agenda. But the State University System's Board of Governors rejected Ono's nomination last month in a 10-6 vote, citing his past support for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs.
More than a month later, UF has yet to announce a plan to replace interim President Fuchs, whose contract ends July 31. A university spokesperson declined to comment on the succession plan or the status of dean searches.
Days before Ono emerged as the sole finalist of UF's presidential search on May 4, Fuchs paused all dean selections until his successor was in office and scrapped the liberal-arts dean search amid conservative backlash to the final four candidates — even as the school was on the brink of making a final hire.
At the time, Fuchs said he froze hiring for positions including the liberal-arts dean to avoid drawing political scrutiny upon the presidential search.
'It would have been a mistake — an absolute mistake — for us to make a decision and to announce it and let the consequences flow,' Fuchs said at the May 1 Faculty Senate meeting. 'Letting things calm down, letting us then evaluate and specifically the next president — who, again, I'm absolutely convinced will have exactly the right set of values — is the right thing.'
The canceled liberal-arts dean search cost UF tens of thousands. Public records obtained by the Miami Herald in May show UF paid $29,208 to WittKieffer, the headhunting firm hired for the process, as part of a $146,300 contract. UF has not responded to requests for records that would show how much it paid SP&A Executive Search, the boutique firm that helped recruit Ono. SP&A earned nearly $293,000 for the search that brought in Sasse.
The leadership freeze has disrupted multiple colleges. The College of the Arts canceled its dean search without explanation, according to a June 27 memo from interim Dean Jennifer Setlow, who plans to stay another year. The status of the College of Engineering's dean search is unclear, though candidates were still scheduled to visit campus in May, according to the interim provost's remarks at that month's Faculty Senate meeting.
Meanwhile, interim deans are cycling out. The College of Liberal Arts and Sciences is now on its second interim dean in a year, with Kevin Ingersent taking over from Mary Watt on Monday.
Engineering Dean Forrest Masters, who's held the interim role since 2023, is leaving this month to become dean at Oregon State University. Warren Dixon, chair of the mechanical and aerospace engineering department, will step in as interim dean on July 11.
Progress despite setbacks
UF's leadership churn has been so persistent that Fuchs has floated the idea of removing the 'interim' title altogether from some positions, according to Faculty Senate minutes from March.
The interim label often signals temporary stewardship, which can undercut authority and morale. Such leaders must juggle administrative duties with academic work — usually for significantly less pay than permanent appointees.
Melissa Johnson, interim director of the UF Honors Program for nearly three years, earns less than half of her predecessor's salary. Yet, students and faculty now view her as the program's de-facto director, she said in an interview.
Though her 'interim' title persists, Johnson takes pride in tangible progress — including a new strategic plan for the program.
'In a lot of cases, interim leaders are really seen as placeholders just kind of maintaining the status quo,' she said. 'That has never been anything I've been comfortable with.'
Other interim leaders are also pushing forward. Johnson pointed to the Levin College of Law, where bar passage rates rose by more than 10 percentage points last year under Merritt McAlister, who's served as interim dean since June 2023.
Still, UF's stop-start approach to leadership takes its toll. Johnson was a finalist for the permanent honors director position in 2023, but Sasse quietly canceled the search. Two years later, it hasn't resumed.
'There's definitely a sense of uncertainty after several years of high level leadership changes and competing priorities,' Johnson said. 'But there's also this sense of restlessness as we wait for more permanent leadership. We need that overarching vision to set UF in forward motion again. It's exciting to think about getting that spark back across campus.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Human Rights Watch says Israel committing war crimes in alleged killings of Gazans at aid sites

time15 minutes ago

Human Rights Watch says Israel committing war crimes in alleged killings of Gazans at aid sites

The international NGO Human Rights Watch (HRW) on Friday accused Israel of war crimes and violations of international law because of the killings of people near food aid distribution sites in Gaza -- as well as deprivation of food, aid and other basic services. There have been several mass casualty events near the four sites run by the U.S.- and Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) since it began operating in late May, HRW said. In a statement in response to the HRW report, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it allows the GHF "to operate independently" in the distribution of aid and that troops operate "in proximity" to make sure food is delivered in an orderly fashion.' The HRW's report came as U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee visited Gaza on Friday, inspecting food aid delivery. In previous incidents, the IDF has said that it only fires "warning shots" at crowds and when it feels like its personnel are in danger. At least 58 people were killed near Zikim aid distribution center on Wednesday, according to the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health, and another 14 were killed near an aid center in Muraj in southern Gaza, local hospital authorities confirmed to ABC News. In response to the Zikim shooting, the IDF said troops fired "warning shots in the area, not directed at the gathering, in response to the threat posed to them." The Israeli government has also previously claimed that Hamas shoots people waiting in food lines and films the events for propaganda videos. Hamas has denied these claims. "Israeli forces are not only deliberately starving Palestinian civilians, but they are now gunning them down almost every day as they desperately seek food for their families," Belkis Wille, associate crisis and conflict director at HRW, said in a statement. "U.S.-backed Israeli forces and private contractors have put in place a flawed, militarized aid distribution system that has turned aid distributions into regular bloodbaths." HRW called on nations to pressure Israel to stop using deadly force as a crowd control method, to lift restrictions on aid entering Gaza and to end the GHF system. Meanwhile, in its statement, the IDF accused Hamas of starving and endangering the population in order to maintain control over the strip and taking actions "to prevent the success of food distribution in Gaza." "The IDF stresses that, as part of its operational management of the main access routes to the distribution areas, IDF forces are conducting systematic review processes in order to improve the operational response in the area and minimize, as much as possible, any friction between the civilian population and IDF forces," the statement read, in part. "As part of these efforts, IDF forces have recently worked to reorganize the area by installing new fences, placing signs, opening additional routes, and more." "Additionally, following reports of civilian casualties near distribution areas, in-depth examinations were conducted by the Southern Command, and the incidents are under review by the authorized bodies within the IDF," the statement continued. Meanwhile, a hunger crisis is reportedly worsening across Gaza. At least 159 people have died from starvation and malnutrition, including at least 90 children, according to the Hamas-run Ministry of Health, since the war began in the wake of the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack on southern Israel. Aid slowly resumed entry into Gaza after Israel instituted an 11-week total blockade on all humanitarian supplies entering the strip earlier this year. The blockade caused widespread malnutrition and conditions likely to lead to famine, according to the U.N. and aid groups. Israeli officials have long accused Hamas of stealing aid, which Hamas denies. Earlier this week, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the idea that Israel is applying a campaign of starvation in Gaza is "a bold-faced lie," adding that "there is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza." However, a new report on Tuesday from the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, a global initiative monitoring hunger, said that "the worst-case scenario of famine is playing out in the Gaza Strip," and that "access to food and other essential items and services has plummeted to unprecedented levels." Additionally, a USAID analysis appeared to undercut some of the assertions about the extent to which Hamas had allegedly stolen humanitarian aid. A presentation reviewed by ABC News, examining more than 150 reported incidents involving the theft or loss of U.S.-funded humanitarian aid in Gaza, showed that the group failed to find any evidence that Hamas engaged in widespread diversion of aid to cause the amount of hunger seen in the strip. On Friday, Witkoff wrote in a post on X that he and Huckabee spent the previous day meeting with Israeli officials to discuss the humanitarian situation in Gaza "Today, we spent over five hours inside Gaza -- level setting the facts on the ground, assessing conditions, and meeting with [GHF] and other agencies," Witkoff wrote. "The purpose of the visit was to give [President Donald Trump] a clear understanding of the humanitarian situation and help craft a plan to deliver food and medical aid to the people of Gaza." It came amid Trump's plan to expand aid deliveries to Gaza, although there are no signs the White House is moving away from the GHF. Hamas senior official Izzat al-Risheq criticized the visit in a statement. "Witkoff's visit to Gaza is nothing but a publicity stunt aimed at containing the growing outrage over the U.S.-Israeli partnership in starving our people in the Strip," he said. "Witkoff sees in Gaza only what the occupation wants him to see, viewing the ongoing tragedy through a misleading Israeli lens."

Democrats blast GOP-proposed Texas congressional maps in redistricting showdown

timean hour ago

Democrats blast GOP-proposed Texas congressional maps in redistricting showdown

Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett said Friday that GOP-proposed congressional maps in Texas would draw her out of the district where she lives, part of a redistricting effort Democrats say is aimed at at picking up five seats to keep Republican control of the U.S. House of Representatives. During public testimony at a hearing on the plan in the state capitol, Crockett said she had been asked to confirm her home address by the legislature, she said, ahead of the previous field hearings. "In addition to the fact that I know that this legislature did ask us as members of Congress to confirm our addresses, I don't know how many of us actually still reside in the districts that we represent. I do not currently reside in my district based upon the plan that has been drawn, which is another red flag," she said. She alleged that some other members had also been drawn out of their seats. More broadly, Crockett attacked the proposed maps as discriminatory and the map "does nothing but divide, distract and depress," she said. Democratic Rep. Lloyd Doggett, who currently represents Texas' 37th Congressional District but would be in the same district as fellow Democratic Rep. Greg Casar if the new maps go through, told the hearing that he is an "unusual opponent of this plan" because more than half of the people in the district he represents, which he said he's filed for reelection in, are still there. "This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map. It was not requested by any Republican or any Democrat in Texas. It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas legislature," Doggett said. Republican state Rep. Todd Hunter, who filed the bill containing the new maps and chaired the 2021 redistricting committee in the legislature, told the hearing that "political performance" was part of the considerations when drawing the maps. Hunter also said later that the "newly drawn districts now trend Republican in political performance. Doesn't guarantee electoral success. Does not guarantee; that's up to the candidates, but it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts." Redistricting in both red and blue states has often been alleged to be partisan; the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that federal courts cannot police partisan gerrymandering. Outside of the hearing, protesters gathered in the capitol's rotunda to slam the maps, according to photos shared by state Rep. Gene Wu and former U.S. Rep. Colin Allred. Some Republicans have defended the proposed new maps and redistricting effort. Texas Republican Sen. John Cornyn, responding on Thursday to the proposed new congressional maps in his home state, said, "Texas has changed, like many other states, and there are a lot more Republican voters, and they're underrepresented in the current maps. And so this is a chance to align the population changes and the voting changes in Texas with those maps, so that everybody gets fair representation."

Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge
Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Texas is redrawing congressional map for GOP gains, House Republicans acknowledge

Texas legislators are redrawing the state's congressional map to advantage Republican candidates, GOP lawmakers said at a state House hearing Friday, setting aside a legal justification offered by the U.S. Department of Justice and making their political motivations explicit for the first time. 'Different from everyone else, I'm telling you, I'm not beating around the bush,' Rep. Todd Hunter, the Corpus Christi Republican carrying the bill, said about the goal of the map. 'We have five new districts, and these five new districts are based on political performance.' Texas Republicans launched the redistricting effort after pressure from President Donald Trump's political operatives, who demanded state leaders redraw the map to help Republicans maintain their slim House majority ahead of a potentially difficult midterm election. The House redistricting committee released its proposed redo of the map Wednesday. It slices up districts in the Houston, Austin and the Dallas areas, yielding five additional districts that would have voted for Trump by at least 10 percentage points in 2024. In 2024, Trump won 56.2% of votes in Texas. Under the current lines, Republicans hold 66% of Texas' 38 House seats. The new map aims to push that share to 79%. 'Political performance does not guarantee electoral success — that's up to the candidates,' Hunter said. 'But it does allow Republican candidates the opportunity to compete in these districts.' Gov. Greg Abbott, in adding redistricting to the special session agenda, cited a letter from the Justice Department claiming that four Texas districts were unconstitutionally racially gerrymandered. But on Friday, state Republicans were unequivocal that their goal was not to fix racial gerrymandering — which several have testified under oath does not exist in the current map — but to give the GOP the greatest chance of controlling as many as 30 congressional districts. 'These districts were drawn primarily using political performance,' Hunter said, citing Republican gains made across the state since the Legislature last redistricted in 2021, especially among Latino voters. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2019 that states can draw electoral maps on partisan grounds. But under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, the map cannot diminish the voting power of people of color. At Friday's hearing, Democrats argued that the proposed map unconstitutionally packed voters of color into some districts while spreading them throughout others to reduce their ability to elect their preferred candidates. 'Every citizen should have equal access to choose their representation, instead of crowding Black people to the point that all the Black people in the state only have two representatives, and all the Latinos in the state are crowded up to the extent that their voting power is diminished,' U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas told state lawmakers during the hearing. Though people of color make up most of Texas and have driven almost all of the state's population growth in recent years, the new map creates 24 districts that are majority-white — two more than the current map, which is under trial for possibly violating the Voting Rights Act. Republicans rejected the idea that the proposed map would suppress voters of color, noting that it would create one new majority Hispanic district and two new majority Black districts. But all three are almost precisely 50% Black or Hispanic, which Democratic lawmakers said at the hearing is not enough to ensure they're able to elect their candidates of choice. U.S. Rep. Marc Veasey of Fort Worth, whose seat would be partially dismantled under the new lines, noted that his district was drawn by a federal court 'to ensure that communities of color, Black and brown Texans, could finally have a voice in Congress.' 'Now, that voice is again under threat,' he said. 'This is a map that was drawn behind closed doors — as we've heard here today — to dismantle representation and weaken our power in turn.' It could take months, if not years, to resolve any legal challenge against the proposed map. A lawsuit against Texas' current maps, passed in 2021, finally went to trial last month, almost four years and several election cycles after they went into effect. In the meantime, Republicans in the Legislature have the votes to pass the map as it's drafted. Chairman Cody Vasut, an Angleton Republican, said the committee, which has 12 Republicans and nine Democrats, will vote to advance the map Friday evening or Saturday. It could be on the House floor as soon as Tuesday, he said. Democrats, locked out of power in the statehouse, have few tools at their disposal to fight the map's passage. The nuclear option is to flee the state and deny Republicans a quorum to pass any legislation — an expensive and politically tenuous move that state House Democrats were still considering ahead of the full chamber vote. At Friday's hearing, the only time the public would have to comment on the House's proposed map, Democrats begged Republicans to slow or stop redistricting entirely. 'This is not a Texas map. It is a Trump map,' said U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, an Austin Democrat. 'It was imposed by President Trump, who has a stranglehold on Congress, and the only question here is whether he also has a stranglehold on this Texas Legislature.' The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store