logo
Could phonics solve California's reading crisis? Inside the push for sweeping changes

Could phonics solve California's reading crisis? Inside the push for sweeping changes

Yahoo02-06-2025
To look inside Julie Celestial's kindergarten classroom in Long Beach is to peer into the future of reading in California.
During a recent lesson, 25 kindergartners gazed at the whiteboard, trying to sound out the word "bee." They're learning the long 'e' sound, blending words such as 'Pete' and 'cheek' — words that they'll soon be able to read in this lesson's accompanying book.
Celestial was teaching something new for Long Beach Unified: phonics.
'It's pretty cool to watch,' she said. 'I'm really anticipating that there's going to be a lot less reluctant readers and struggling readers now that the district has made this shift.'
These phonics-based lessons are on the fast track to become law in California under a sweeping bill moving through the Legislature that will mandate how schools teach reading, a rare action in a state that generally emphasizes local school district control over dictating instruction.
The bill is the capstone to decades of debate and controversy in California on how best to teach reading amid stubbornly low test scores. Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged his support, setting aside $200 million to fund teacher training on the new approach in the May revise of his 2025-26 budget proposal.
"It's a big deal for kids, and it's a big step forward — a very big one," said Marshall Tuck, chief executive of EdVoice, an education advocacy nonprofit that has championed the change.
California has long struggled with reading scores below the national average. In 2024, only 29% of California's fourth-graders scored "proficient" or better in reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP.
The proposed law, which would take effect in phases beginning in 2026, would require districts to adopt instructional materials based on the "science of reading," a systemic approach to literacy instruction supported by decades of research about the way young children learn to read, from about transitional kindergarten through third grade.
The science of reading consists of five pillars: phonemic awareness (the sounds that letters make), phonics, reading fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
'It's finite. There's only 26 letters and 44 sounds," said Leslie Zoroya, who leads an initiative at the Los Angeles County Office of Education that helps districts transition to a science-of-reading approach. "Phonics isn't forever."
Read more: New test score labels seek positivity, ditching the term 'standard not met' for 'below basic'
After a failed effort last year, the bill gained the support this year of the influential California teachers unions and at least one advocacy group for English-language learners. In a compromise, school districts would have more flexibility to select which instructional materials are best for their students and the option to decline teacher training paid for by the state.
For decades, most school districts in California have been devoted to a different approach called "whole language" or "balanced literacy," built on the belief that children naturally learn to read without being taught how to sound out words. Teachers focus on surrounding children with books intended to foster a love of reading and encourage them to look for clues that help them guess unknown words — such as predicting the next word based on the context of the story, or looking at the pictures — rather than sounding them out.
"The majority of students require a more intentional, explicit and systematic approach," Zoroya said. "Thousands of kids across California in 10th grade are struggling in content-area classes because they missed phonics."
California embraced the whole language approach to literacy, which took hold in the 1970s and 1980s, said Susan Neuman, a New York University professor who served as assistant secretary of elementary and secondary education under former President George W. Bush. The state became a national leader in what was considered a progressive and holistic approach to teaching literacy, with a focus on discovering the joy of reading, rather than learning specific skills, she said.
Bush then incorporated a phonics-heavy approach in an initiative that was part of his 2002 launch of No Child Left Behind, which increased the federal role in holding schools accountable for academic progress and required standardized testing. States, including California, received grants to teach a science-of-reading approach in high-poverty schools.
But many teachers in the state disliked the more regimented approach, and when the funding ended, districts largely transitioned back to the whole language approach. In the years since, science of reading continues to draw opposition from teachers unions and advocates for dual-language learners.
Read more: California school enrollment continues to drop as poor and homeless student numbers rise
Many California teachers are passionate about the methods they already use and have chafed at a state-mandated approach to literacy education. Some don't like what they describe as "drill and kill" phonics lessons that teach letter sounds and decoding.
Advocates for multiple-language learners, meanwhile, vociferously opposed adopting the most structured approach, worried that children who were still learning to speak English would not receive adequate support in language development and comprehension.
A 2022 study of 300 school districts in California found that less than 2% of districts were using curricula viewed as following the science of reading.
But the research has become clear: Looking at the pictures or context of a story to guess a word — as is encouraged in whole language or balanced literacy instruction, leads to struggles with reading. Children best learn to read by starting with foundational skills such as sounding out and decoding words.
"Anything that takes your eyes off the text when a kid is trying to figure out a word activates the wrong side of the brain," Zoroya said.
In the last few years, several larger districts in California have started to embrace more structured phonics learning, including Los Angeles Unified, Long Beach Unified and Oakland Unified.
Recently, these districts have started to see improvement in their reading test scores.
At Long Beach Unified, for example, the district's in-house assessment shows significant gains among kindergarten students. In 2023-24, 78% of them met reading standards, up 13 percentage points from the previous school year. Proficiency rates across first and second grade were above 70%, and transitional kindergarten was at 48%. The district's goal is to hit 85% proficiency across grades by the end of each school year.
In 2019, LAUSD introduced a pilot science-of-reading based curriculum, and adopted it across all schools for the 2023-24 academic year. After the first year, LAUSD reading scores improved in every grade level and across every demographic, chief academic officer Frances Baez said.
From the 2022-23 to the 2023-24 school years, LAUSD's English Language Arts scores improved by 1.9 percentage points — five times more than the state as a whole, which improved by 0.3, she said.
Teresa Cole, a kindergarten instructor in the Lancaster School District, has been teaching for 25 years. So when Lancaster asked her to try out a new way of teaching her students to read three years ago, she wasn't thrilled.
"I was hesitant and apprehensive to try it,' she said, but decided to throw herself into a new method that promised results.
Teaching kindergarten is a challenge, she said, because children come in at vastly different stages. Many are just learning to hold a pencil; others can already read. She was seeing many children under "balanced literacy" lessons slip through the cracks — especially those with limited vocabularies. When she asked them to read words they didn't know, "it almost felt like they were guessing.'
But as she began to teach a phonics lesson each morning and have them read decodable books — which have children practice the new sound they've learned — she noticed that her students were putting together the information much faster and starting to sound out words. "The results were immediate," she said. "We were blown away.'
She was so impressed with the new curriculum that she started training other teachers in the district to use it as well.
Read more: As children's book bans soar, sales are down and librarians are afraid. Even in California
Looking back at her old method of teaching reading, 'I feel bad. I feel like maybe I wasn't the best teacher back then," Cole said. Part of the change, she said, was learning about the science behind how children learn to read. "I would never say to guess [a word] anymore," she said.
This kind of buy-in and enthusiasm from teachers has been key to making the new curriculum work, said Krista Thomsen, Lancaster's director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Department. In schools where the teachers are implementing the program well, scores have started to rise. 'But it's a steep learning curve," she said, especially for teachers who have long taught a balanced literacy approach.
"We are stumbling through this process trying to get it right and making sure that every one of our kids has equitable access to learning how to read,"Thomsen said. "But we have every faith and every intention, and the plan is in place to get it where it should be going."
A bill introduced by Assemblymember Blanca E. Rubio (D-Baldwin Park) last year requiring a science-of-reading approach in California public schools did not even get a first hearing. This year, Rubio introduced another version — Assembly Bill 1121 — that would have required teachers to be trained in a science-of-reading approach.
Opponents included the California Teachers Assn. and English-language learner advocates, who said in a joint letter that the bill would put a "disproportionate emphasis on phonics," and would not focus on the skills needed by students learning English as a second language.
The groups also voiced concern that the bill would cut teachers out of the curriculum-selection process and that mandated training "undermines educators' professional expertise and autonomy to respond to the specific learning needs of their students."
Martha Hernandez, executive director of Californians Together, said the group opposed both bills because they were too narrow in their focus on skills such as phonics. 'They're essential. But English learners need more, right?' she said. "They don't understand the language that they're learning to read.'
Rubio said she was shocked by the pushback. 'I was thinking it was a no-brainer. It's about kids. This is evidence-based." Rubio, a longtime teacher, was born in Mexico, and was herself an English-language learner in California public schools.
In 2024, just 19% of Latino students and 7% of Black students scored at or above "proficient" on the fourth-grade NAEP reading test.
But with the support of Democratic Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister), the groups reached a compromise that not all teachers would be required to participate in the teacher training.
Hernandez said she was pleased that the compromise included more of an emphasis on oral language development and comprehension, which is vital for multi-language learners to succeed.
AB1454 requires the State Board of Education to come up with a new list of recommended materials that all follow science of reading principles. If a district chooses materials not on the list, they have to vouch that it also complies. The state will provide funds for professional development, though districts can choose whether to accept it.
This article is part of The Times' early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review

time3 hours ago

Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review

WASHINGTON -- Day camp providers and schools are warning that a Trump administration funding freeze could wreck summer for low-income American families and wipe out some after-school programming next year. The administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated. Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable after-school care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach children who are learning English. Even classes or camps underway this summer could be in jeopardy. For instance, the Boys and Girls Clubs of America depend on some of the withheld money to run camps and other summer programming for low-income students. If funding isn't restored soon, the programming may end mid-season, said Boys and Girls Club President Jim Clark. After-school programming in the fall could also take a hit. 'If these funds are blocked, the fallout will be swift and devastating,' Clark said. As many as 926 Boys and Girls Clubs could close, affecting more than 220,000 kids, the group said. Programs that rely on the money were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned that 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press. The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not respond to a request for comment. In Gadsden City Schools in Alabama, officials say they'll have no choice but to shutter their after-school program serving more than 1,200 low-income students if federal funds aren't released. There's no other way to make up for the frozen federal money, said Janie Browning, who directs the program. Families who rely on after-school programs would lose an important source of child care that keeps children safe and engaged while their parents work. The roughly 75 employees of the district's after-school programs may lose their jobs. 'Those hours between after school and 6 o'clock really are the hours in the day when students are at the most risk for things that may not produce great outcomes,' Browning said. 'It would be devastating if we lost the lifeline of afterschool for our students and our families.' Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, said withholding the money could cause lasting damage to the economy. Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement. The six grant programs under review include one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for after-school and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the Afterschool Alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year. Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and efforts to reduce class size; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read. These programs account for over 20% of the federal money the District of Columbia receives for K-12 education, according to an analysis by the Learning Policy Institute, a think tank. California alone has over $800,000 in limbo, while Texas has over $660,000. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year," said Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology. The loss of funds could 'put several more school districts in extreme financial distress,' said Chris Reykdal, superintendent of public instruction in Washington state. Districts have already adopted budgets, planned programming and hired staff, assuming they'd receive the money, Reykdal said. If the funding freeze remains, children learning English and their parents would be especially affected. Some districts use the money to pay for summer programming designed for English learners, family engagement specialists who can communicate with parents and professional development training for staff. Rural districts would be hit the hardest. 'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.' Umatilla School District in rural eastern Oregon — with a sizable population of migrant families and students learning English — relies heavily on federal funding for its after-school and summer school programs. Superintendent Heidi Sipe says she is meeting with state officials soon to find out if the district will have to plan an early end to summer school, an option 20% of students are using. Come this fall, if federal money stays frozen, she'll have to lay off staff and eliminate after-school programs attended by around half the district's students. 'It's an essential service in our community because we don't have any licensed child care centers for school-age children,' she said. Sipe said it's particularly frustrating to deal with these funds being put into limbo because the school district was in the middle of a five-year grant period. 'It feels preventable,' she said, 'and it feels as though we could have done a better job planning for America's children.'

Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review
Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review

Hamilton Spectator

time4 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Day camp, summer school and after-school programs in limbo during Trump administration review

WASHINGTON (AP) — Day camp providers and schools are warning that a Trump administration funding freeze could wreck summer for low-income American families and wipe out some after-school programming next year. The administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for after-school and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities . The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated. Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable after-school care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach children who are learning English . Even classes or camps underway this summer could be in jeopardy. For instance, the Boys and Girls Clubs of America depend on some of the withheld money to run camps and other summer programming for low-income students. If funding isn't restored soon, the programming may end mid-season, said Boys and Girls Club President Jim Clark. After-school programming in the fall could also take a hit. 'If these funds are blocked, the fallout will be swift and devastating,' Clark said. As many as 926 Boys and Girls Clubs could close, affecting more than 220,000 kids, the group said. Programs that rely on the money were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned that 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press. The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not respond to a request for comment. After-school child care at risk In Gadsden City Schools in Alabama, officials say they'll have no choice but to shutter their after-school program serving more than 1,200 low-income students if federal funds aren't released. There's no other way to make up for the frozen federal money, said Janie Browning, who directs the program. Families who rely on after-school programs would lose an important source of child care that keeps children safe and engaged while their parents work. The roughly 75 employees of the district's after-school programs may lose their jobs. 'Those hours between after school and 6 o'clock really are the hours in the day when students are at the most risk for things that may not produce great outcomes,' Browning said. 'It would be devastating if we lost the lifeline of afterschool for our students and our families.' Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance, said withholding the money could cause lasting damage to the economy. Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement. What the money funds The six grant programs under review include one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for after-school and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the Afterschool Alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year. Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and efforts to reduce class size ; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read. These programs account for over 20% of the federal money the District of Columbia receives for K-12 education, according to an analysis by the Learning Policy Institute, a think tank. California alone has over $800,000 in limbo, while Texas has over $660,000. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year,' said Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology. The loss of funds could 'put several more school districts in extreme financial distress,' said Chris Reykdal, superintendent of public instruction in Washington state. Districts have already adopted budgets, planned programming and hired staff, assuming they'd receive the money, Reykdal said. If the funding freeze remains, children learning English and their parents would be especially affected. Some districts use the money to pay for summer programming designed for English learners, family engagement specialists who can communicate with parents and professional development training for staff. Rural districts would be hit the hardest. 'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.' Umatilla School District in rural eastern Oregon — with a sizable population of migrant families and students learning English — relies heavily on federal funding for its after-school and summer school programs. Superintendent Heidi Sipe says she is meeting with state officials soon to find out if the district will have to plan an early end to summer school, an option 20% of students are using. Come this fall, if federal money stays frozen, she'll have to lay off staff and eliminate after-school programs attended by around half the district's students. 'It's an essential service in our community because we don't have any licensed child care centers for school-age children,' she said. Sipe said it's particularly frustrating to deal with these funds being put into limbo because the school district was in the middle of a five-year grant period. 'It feels preventable,' she said, 'and it feels as though we could have done a better job planning for America's children.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at .

Canada Day turns into grande fête and rebuke of Trump's call for becoming 51st state
Canada Day turns into grande fête and rebuke of Trump's call for becoming 51st state

USA Today

time4 hours ago

  • USA Today

Canada Day turns into grande fête and rebuke of Trump's call for becoming 51st state

Canada Day has taken on new significance to many Canadians this year, given Trump's unwelcome suggestion that Canada should become the 51st state MONTREAL ― Canadians didn't take Donald Trump seriously at first when he suggested Canada should become the 51st state. 'They thought, 'He's just fooling around. He's just joking. He's just being provocative,'' said Daniel Béland, director of McGill University's Institute for the Study of Canada. Not anymore. So hundreds of Canadians flocked to Montreal's Place d'Armes, a square in the city's Old Montreal neighborhood across from the Notre-Dame Basilica, on July 1 to kick off Canada Day, a time to celebrate the 158th anniversary of their country's birth and all things Canadian. Volunteers wandered through the crowd and handed out miniature Canadian flags, which people waved while posing for selfies. Others affixed the red-and-white drapeaux to shirts, shorts and hats, turning them into a fashion statement as much as a political one. From a park bench, Filippa Contarini watched the flag-waving crowd and counted all the things she loves about being Canadian. 'Our beautiful country, our very open, very free, liberal country – I love it,' said Contarini, a small Canadian flag tucked into the back strap of her hat. 'I love the French. I love the English. I love it all.' One thing she doesn't love? Donald Trump. 'He's like a big bully – that's how I see him. And he's very ignorant,' she said. 'He keeps saying Canada should be the 51st state. No, no, no. That's never going to happen. This is him being an idiotic child.' Across the Great White North, Canadians marked Canada Day with parades, festivals, pledges of national unity and uncharacteristic displays of patriotism. Canadians are usually known more for their friendliness and hospitality than for showy demonstrations of pride. That is associated more with their bigger, boisterous neighbors to the south. But Canada Day has taken on new significance to many Canadians this year, given Trump's unwelcome suggestion that Canada should become the 51st state, his threat to slap punitive tariffs on Canadian products and his dismissive attitude toward their leaders, especially former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, whom he repeatedly mocked as 'governor.' 'The world is changing. Old friendships are fraying,' Trudeau's successor, Prime Minister Mark Carney, said in a Canada Day message posted on social media. Carney never mentioned Trump by name, but there was little doubt who he was talking about when he said Canada's economy has been impacted 'by a trade war we didn't start.' But 'as the world becomes more divided and dangerous,' he said, 'Canadians are uniting.' More: Canada scraps digital services tax to advance stalled US trade talks Swell of Canadian pride Recent polls back him up. Canadian pride surged after Trump took office in January and opened his war of words and tariffs. A survey in March by the Harris Poll Canada, in partnership with Petro-Canda, reported a major shift across the country and noted that Canadians were rallying together with a renewed sense of unity and pride that seemed to be growing every week. Seven in 10 Canadians said they were proud to be Canadian, up from 63% a month earlier. Eight in 10 said it is important to buy Canadian products and support Canadian companies. Ninety-two percent said regardless of what happens with Trump's tariffs, they intend to give more support to Canadian companies in the future. Patriotism surged even in Quebec, where for decades a separatist movement has pushed for independence from Canada. Flag makers have reported a boost in sales of the Canadian Maple Leaf. Businesses have embraced a 'Buy Canada' movement and removed U.S.-made products from their shelves. T-shirts warning that Canada is not for sale have appeared in souvenir shop windows. A poll taken in May by the Association for Canadian Studies suggested that Canadian pride dipped in Quebec after the federal elections in April, when Carney was chosen to succeed Trudeau as prime minister. Even so, 76% of people in Quebec said they were proud to be Canadian. Timeline: A look at key moments in Trump's feud with Canada There's no real mystery what's behind the swell of patriotism, Béland said. 'The timing of this is quite clearly in sync with the rhetoric about the 51st state and the return of Donald Trump to the White House,' he said. Canada Day celebrations across Montreal From Place d'Armes, the Canada Day crowd marched through the streets of Old Montreal, a brass band leading the way. Elderly couples held hands. Parents pushed strollers down the streets and hoisted young children on their shoulders so they would get a better view. A woman in a wheelchair rolled through the crowd, a Maple Leaf windmill attached to the back of her chair, twirling furiously in the breeze. Down brick streets, past art galleries, souvenir shops and restaurants, the procession marched for nearly a mile to the Old Port of Montreal, along the St. Lawrence River. There, thousands of people attended the official festival, which kicked off with a 21-gun salute, followed by the raising of the Canadian flag and a swearing-in ceremony for two dozen new Canadian citizens. Dozens of booths offered family-friendly activities, such as drawing and face painting. Shirley Desserud, a high school teacher who was born in Niagara Falls, Canada, but is spending the summer in Montreal, wore a white T-shirt that announced, 'I Am Canadian.' It's no longer enough for Canadians just to be proud of their heritage, she said. Because of Trump, they have to stand up and proclaim it. 'We're friendly, we're polite,' she said, 'but we're really pissed off at your president.' Canada is larger than the United States in terms of total land area, but the U.S. has a lot more people and power. Desserud recalled former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, father of Justin Trudeau, once saying that being neighbors with the United States is like sleeping next to an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered the beast might be, Trudeau said, everyone is affected by its every twitch and grunt. 'Now,' Desserud said, 'the elephant is on crack.' Kirk Anderson from Denver, who was visiting Montreal with his family, said he decided to attend the Canada Day festivities to show solidarity with America's northern neighbors. 'I would like to tell Canadians that there are a lot of us in the United States who do not want Trump to be president and who love Canada as it is,' he said. More: Trump is the 'X factor' as Canada elects a prime minister Ida Degano, who was with her husband Benny, said Trump's suggestion that Canada become part of the United States is offensive. 'It hurts my heart,' she said, adding that Trump should watch his mouth 'because he cannot rule the world.' Degano, who lives outside of Toronto, came to Canada from Italy in 1953, her husband came four years later, and together they have been able to build a good life in their adopted country, she said. To Americans whose views about Canada may be shaped by Trump's remarks, Degano offers a suggestion. 'Come and visit Canada and see how we live,' she said. Follow Michael Collins on X @mcollinsNEWS.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store