Could phonics solve California's reading crisis? Inside the push for sweeping changes
During a recent lesson, 25 kindergartners gazed at the whiteboard, trying to sound out the word "bee." They're learning the long 'e' sound, blending words such as 'Pete' and 'cheek' — words that they'll soon be able to read in this lesson's accompanying book.
Celestial was teaching something new for Long Beach Unified: phonics.
'It's pretty cool to watch,' she said. 'I'm really anticipating that there's going to be a lot less reluctant readers and struggling readers now that the district has made this shift.'
These phonics-based lessons are on the fast track to become law in California under a sweeping bill moving through the Legislature that will mandate how schools teach reading, a rare action in a state that generally emphasizes local school district control over dictating instruction.
The bill is the capstone to decades of debate and controversy in California on how best to teach reading amid stubbornly low test scores. Gov. Gavin Newsom has pledged his support, setting aside $200 million to fund teacher training on the new approach in the May revise of his 2025-26 budget proposal.
"It's a big deal for kids, and it's a big step forward — a very big one," said Marshall Tuck, chief executive of EdVoice, an education advocacy nonprofit that has championed the change.
California has long struggled with reading scores below the national average. In 2024, only 29% of California's fourth-graders scored "proficient" or better in reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, or NAEP.
The proposed law, which would take effect in phases beginning in 2026, would require districts to adopt instructional materials based on the "science of reading," a systemic approach to literacy instruction supported by decades of research about the way young children learn to read, from about transitional kindergarten through third grade.
The science of reading consists of five pillars: phonemic awareness (the sounds that letters make), phonics, reading fluency, vocabulary and comprehension.
'It's finite. There's only 26 letters and 44 sounds," said Leslie Zoroya, who leads an initiative at the Los Angeles County Office of Education that helps districts transition to a science-of-reading approach. "Phonics isn't forever."
Read more: New test score labels seek positivity, ditching the term 'standard not met' for 'below basic'
After a failed effort last year, the bill gained the support this year of the influential California teachers unions and at least one advocacy group for English-language learners. In a compromise, school districts would have more flexibility to select which instructional materials are best for their students and the option to decline teacher training paid for by the state.
For decades, most school districts in California have been devoted to a different approach called "whole language" or "balanced literacy," built on the belief that children naturally learn to read without being taught how to sound out words. Teachers focus on surrounding children with books intended to foster a love of reading and encourage them to look for clues that help them guess unknown words — such as predicting the next word based on the context of the story, or looking at the pictures — rather than sounding them out.
"The majority of students require a more intentional, explicit and systematic approach," Zoroya said. "Thousands of kids across California in 10th grade are struggling in content-area classes because they missed phonics."
California embraced the whole language approach to literacy, which took hold in the 1970s and 1980s, said Susan Neuman, a New York University professor who served as assistant secretary of elementary and secondary education under former President George W. Bush. The state became a national leader in what was considered a progressive and holistic approach to teaching literacy, with a focus on discovering the joy of reading, rather than learning specific skills, she said.
Bush then incorporated a phonics-heavy approach in an initiative that was part of his 2002 launch of No Child Left Behind, which increased the federal role in holding schools accountable for academic progress and required standardized testing. States, including California, received grants to teach a science-of-reading approach in high-poverty schools.
But many teachers in the state disliked the more regimented approach, and when the funding ended, districts largely transitioned back to the whole language approach. In the years since, science of reading continues to draw opposition from teachers unions and advocates for dual-language learners.
Read more: California school enrollment continues to drop as poor and homeless student numbers rise
Many California teachers are passionate about the methods they already use and have chafed at a state-mandated approach to literacy education. Some don't like what they describe as "drill and kill" phonics lessons that teach letter sounds and decoding.
Advocates for multiple-language learners, meanwhile, vociferously opposed adopting the most structured approach, worried that children who were still learning to speak English would not receive adequate support in language development and comprehension.
A 2022 study of 300 school districts in California found that less than 2% of districts were using curricula viewed as following the science of reading.
But the research has become clear: Looking at the pictures or context of a story to guess a word — as is encouraged in whole language or balanced literacy instruction, leads to struggles with reading. Children best learn to read by starting with foundational skills such as sounding out and decoding words.
"Anything that takes your eyes off the text when a kid is trying to figure out a word activates the wrong side of the brain," Zoroya said.
In the last few years, several larger districts in California have started to embrace more structured phonics learning, including Los Angeles Unified, Long Beach Unified and Oakland Unified.
Recently, these districts have started to see improvement in their reading test scores.
At Long Beach Unified, for example, the district's in-house assessment shows significant gains among kindergarten students. In 2023-24, 78% of them met reading standards, up 13 percentage points from the previous school year. Proficiency rates across first and second grade were above 70%, and transitional kindergarten was at 48%. The district's goal is to hit 85% proficiency across grades by the end of each school year.
In 2019, LAUSD introduced a pilot science-of-reading based curriculum, and adopted it across all schools for the 2023-24 academic year. After the first year, LAUSD reading scores improved in every grade level and across every demographic, chief academic officer Frances Baez said.
From the 2022-23 to the 2023-24 school years, LAUSD's English Language Arts scores improved by 1.9 percentage points — five times more than the state as a whole, which improved by 0.3, she said.
Teresa Cole, a kindergarten instructor in the Lancaster School District, has been teaching for 25 years. So when Lancaster asked her to try out a new way of teaching her students to read three years ago, she wasn't thrilled.
"I was hesitant and apprehensive to try it,' she said, but decided to throw herself into a new method that promised results.
Teaching kindergarten is a challenge, she said, because children come in at vastly different stages. Many are just learning to hold a pencil; others can already read. She was seeing many children under "balanced literacy" lessons slip through the cracks — especially those with limited vocabularies. When she asked them to read words they didn't know, "it almost felt like they were guessing.'
But as she began to teach a phonics lesson each morning and have them read decodable books — which have children practice the new sound they've learned — she noticed that her students were putting together the information much faster and starting to sound out words. "The results were immediate," she said. "We were blown away.'
She was so impressed with the new curriculum that she started training other teachers in the district to use it as well.
Read more: As children's book bans soar, sales are down and librarians are afraid. Even in California
Looking back at her old method of teaching reading, 'I feel bad. I feel like maybe I wasn't the best teacher back then," Cole said. Part of the change, she said, was learning about the science behind how children learn to read. "I would never say to guess [a word] anymore," she said.
This kind of buy-in and enthusiasm from teachers has been key to making the new curriculum work, said Krista Thomsen, Lancaster's director of Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Department. In schools where the teachers are implementing the program well, scores have started to rise. 'But it's a steep learning curve," she said, especially for teachers who have long taught a balanced literacy approach.
"We are stumbling through this process trying to get it right and making sure that every one of our kids has equitable access to learning how to read,"Thomsen said. "But we have every faith and every intention, and the plan is in place to get it where it should be going."
A bill introduced by Assemblymember Blanca E. Rubio (D-Baldwin Park) last year requiring a science-of-reading approach in California public schools did not even get a first hearing. This year, Rubio introduced another version — Assembly Bill 1121 — that would have required teachers to be trained in a science-of-reading approach.
Opponents included the California Teachers Assn. and English-language learner advocates, who said in a joint letter that the bill would put a "disproportionate emphasis on phonics," and would not focus on the skills needed by students learning English as a second language.
The groups also voiced concern that the bill would cut teachers out of the curriculum-selection process and that mandated training "undermines educators' professional expertise and autonomy to respond to the specific learning needs of their students."
Martha Hernandez, executive director of Californians Together, said the group opposed both bills because they were too narrow in their focus on skills such as phonics. 'They're essential. But English learners need more, right?' she said. "They don't understand the language that they're learning to read.'
Rubio said she was shocked by the pushback. 'I was thinking it was a no-brainer. It's about kids. This is evidence-based." Rubio, a longtime teacher, was born in Mexico, and was herself an English-language learner in California public schools.
In 2024, just 19% of Latino students and 7% of Black students scored at or above "proficient" on the fourth-grade NAEP reading test.
But with the support of Democratic Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas (D-Hollister), the groups reached a compromise that not all teachers would be required to participate in the teacher training.
Hernandez said she was pleased that the compromise included more of an emphasis on oral language development and comprehension, which is vital for multi-language learners to succeed.
AB1454 requires the State Board of Education to come up with a new list of recommended materials that all follow science of reading principles. If a district chooses materials not on the list, they have to vouch that it also complies. The state will provide funds for professional development, though districts can choose whether to accept it.
This article is part of The Times' early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to latimes.com/earlyed.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
3 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Some education grants in limbo were used for ‘leftwing agenda,' Trump administration says
The Trump administration has accused states and schools of using federal education grants earmarked for immigrants' children and low-income students to help fund 'a radical leftwing agenda.' The administration this week withheld more than $6 billion intended for after-school and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more, saying it would review the grants to ensure they align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The freeze sent schools and summer camp providers scrambling to determine whether they can still provide programs like day camps this summer or after-hours child care this fall. On Wednesday, the Office of Management and Budget said an initial review showed schools used some of the money to support immigrants in the country illegally or promote LGBTQ+ inclusion. The administration said it hadn't made any final decisions about whether to withhold or release individual grants. 'Many of these grant programs have been grossly misused to subsidize a radical leftwing agenda,' the Office of Management and Budget said in a statement. It said New York schools had used money for English language instruction to promote organizations that advocate for immigrants in the country illegally. Washington state used the money to direct immigrants without legal status toward scholarships the Trump administration says were 'intended for American students.' Grant funds also were used for a seminar on 'queer resistance in the arts,' the office said. Officials from New York and Washington state didn't immediately respond to requests for comment. Advocates for low-income and immigrant children connected the grant freeze to the Trump administration's larger crackdown on immigrants. Two of the federal programs put on hold were appropriated by Congress to help support English proficiency of students still learning the language and migrant children who move with their parents to follow agricultural and other jobs. School districts use the $890 million earmarked for English learners in a wide range of purposes, from training teachers' aides who work with English learners, to running summer schools designed for them, to hiring family liaisons who speak the parents' native languages. The $375 million appropriated for migrant education is often used to hire dedicated teachers to travel close to where students live. By 'cherrypicking extreme examples,' the administration is seeking to conflate all students learning English with people who are in the country illegally, said Amaya Garcia, who directs education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank in Washington, D.C. In reality, the majority of English learners in public schools were born in the United States, according to data from the Migration Policy Institute. 'The way they're framing it is that we're using this money for undocumented students and families,' said Margarita Machado-Casas, president of the National Association of Bilingual Educators. 'It's a distraction. A distraction from what's actually happening: that 5.3 million English learners who speak lots of different languages, not just Spanish, will suffer.' Even if the students lack legal status, states may not deny public education to children in the country illegally under a 1982 Supreme Court decision known as Plyler v. Doe. Conservative politicians in states such as Oklahoma, Texas and Tennessee have pursued policies that question whether immigrants without legal residency should have the right to a public education, raising the possibility of challenges to that landmark ruling. Meanwhile, states and school districts are still trying to understand what it will mean for their students and their staff if these funds never arrive. In Oregon, eliminating grants for English learners and migrant students would 'undermine the state's efforts to increase academic outcomes for multilingual students, promote multilingualism, close opportunity gaps and provide targeted support to mobile and vulnerable student groups,' said Liz Merah, spokeswoman for the state's Department of Education.


San Francisco Chronicle
5 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California schools reel from Trump's sudden cutoff of $1 billion in federal funds
For months, the leaders of Bay Area schools already dealing with budget deficits and declining enrollment have been pinching pennies, trimming staff and wringing their hands, hoping the federal funding allocated to them months ago would land in their bank accounts as promised in early July. On June 30, at the 11th hour, the Trump administration announced that $7 billion in grants for after-school programs, literacy instructions and other support services, would remain in Washington, D.C., with the funds 'under review' to ensure they aligned with presidential priorities. There was no indication whether California schools would see their $1 billion share before classes start in the fall — or if the check will ever be in the mail. In Oakland, where budget officials had cobbled together just enough money to stay in the black this upcoming school year, the estimated $9.3 million in frozen federal funds was a gut punch. The district was counting on that money to pay salaries and ensure it had the cash flow to pay bills, said Lisa Grant-Dawson, chief budget officer. Some staff have already been hired and, based on contractual requirements, cannot now be let go, she added. 'Without those funds, or delay of those funds, we still have to make good on our obligations,' she said. 'Our federal dollars are significant. The uncertainty is very bad.' The frozen funds included several specific grant programs for teacher training, after-school services, academic enrichment (college counseling, accelerated learning, technology, mental health services), English language learning, migrant education and adult education. The biggest chunks of federal funding for schools — money for disadvantaged students, special education programs and school meals — have continued to flow to districts across the country. In San Francisco, officials said they were expecting at least $7 million from that federal funding to pay for staff and extra services for the neediest students. Like many Bay Area districts, the city has been stretching every dollar it has to pay for basics, such as salaries and electricity, and to keep up with leaking roofs and broken boilers — while at the same time making cuts to close a $114 million deficit. The federal grants specifically pay for the extras, officials said. 'These funds are intended to supplement, not replace, the core services we provide — and they are especially critical in supporting our most vulnerable and at-risk students,' said district spokeswoman Laura Dudnick. 'While we remain hopeful for a positive resolution at the federal level, we are also exploring the use of reserve funds to help mitigate potential shortfalls and ensure continued support for those who need it most.' Public officials as well as education organizations criticized the decision to withhold the money, questioning the legality of holding back monies approved and allocated by Congress as well as the morality of pulling funds from schools with one day's notice. 'These funds were passed by Congress and promised to communities months ago. They are not optional. They are not political bargaining chips,' said the California Afterschool Advocacy Alliance in a statement. 'In cities like Fresno, Bakersfield, Oakland, and Los Angeles, administrators are already being forced to consider if they will have to cancel youth activities mid-summer, lay off trained staff, and abandon fall hiring plans — all because this administration failed to release funds that are legally required and universally relied upon.' School officials, however, had been braced for such a scenario. They watched as the Trump administration terminated or reneged on congressionally approved funding across several federal agencies, gutting spending on research or programs related to health, education, criminal justice and the environment, as well as funding for foreign aid and disaster relief. It was unclear whether the freeze in funding was related to President Trump's threats to withhold federal funding based on state or local education policies related to transgender rights or diversity, equity and inclusion. All states appeared among those waiting for the funds meant to arrive in July. State officials and private law firms have already sued the administration over the president's unilateral decisions to block or discontinue various federal funds already appropriated by Congress, including a multi-state coalition that includes California. 'This hack job has been done under the flimsy premise of 'changed agency priorities' — even when this funding has been previously appropriated by Congress and awarded to the states,' said state Attorney General Rob Bonta, in a statement regarding the lawsuit in late June. 'For federal funding to work, the states that receive that funding need to be able to plan ahead, make investments, and be confident that this funding will not be terminated on a whim.' It was unclear whether another lawsuit would follow related to the education funding, which so far was only on hold and under review, to ensure 'taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities.' 'California and other states have already filed suit against the Trump Administration based on prior acts to unlawfully withhold funding because we refuse to conform with the President's political ideology,' said state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond in a statement. 'Courts have already taken action in our favor in these cases. California will continue to pursue all available legal remedies to the Trump Administration's unlawful withholding of federal funds appropriated by Congress.' Yet the last-minute withholding of the grant money left local school leaders scrambling to stop what would be a domino effect across entire communities. Local nonprofits, including literacy organizations and after-school providers, were counting on the $9.3 million and what it would mean for Oakland. 'There are people relying on that income,' Grant-Dawson said. 'It will impact our entire community.'


Politico
16 hours ago
- Politico
Kilmar Abrego Garcia describes ‘severe beatings' and ‘psychological torture' in Salvadoran prison
The Salvadoran prison where Abrego was initially housed, known as the Anti-Terrorism Confinement Center or by its Spanish-language acronym CECOT, is reputed to be rife with gang violence and human rights abuses. But there are few first-hand accounts of treatment there because El Salvador's president, Nayib Bukele, has vowed that its prisoners will never be released. Abrego's account of physical and psychological torture stands in stark contrast to the portrayal by the Trump administration and Bukele, who posted a photo of what he claimed was Abrego having 'margaritas' with Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), after the senator secured a meeting with Abrego in April. (Van Hollen has since said the margaritas were staged by Salvadoran officials). The Trump administration told a federal judge in May, after Abrego had been moved out of CECOT to another prison, that he was 'in good health' and had 'gained weight.' But Abrego said he lost 31 pounds at CECOT in his first two weeks there. And he reported witnessing and suffering harrowing violence and abuse. Abrego's lawyers presented his account in a 40-page proposed amendment to a lawsuit over his deportation. Spokespeople for the White House and for the Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comments on Abrego's new claims. Abrego allegedly entered the U.S. illegally around 2011 and had lived in Maryland for more than a decade when the Trump administration deported him. The deportation violated a 2019 order from an immigration judge who barred the U.S. from sending Abrego to El Salvador because he faced a danger of gang violence there. The Supreme Court noted that the deportation was 'illegal' after a Justice Department lawyer admitted that the deportation had been a mistake. 'Whoever enters here doesn't leave' In the new court filing, Abrego described being the first person off an airplane in El Salvador after the Trump administration flew him there with more than 200 men on March 15. He recalled bright lights illuminating the airfield and cameras trained on him while officials forcefully guided him — shackled in chains — to a bus. The next day, Bukele triumphantly circulated cinematically edited videos of the deportees being handed over to Salvadoran authorities.