Congressman asked Zohran Mamdani to ‘go back to the Third World' for eating with his hands. What happened next
In a viral interview clip with Bon Appétit, Mamdani, who was born in Uganda, spoke about eating with his hands, a practice he said connects him to his roots. 'I have to eat with my hand,' he said. 'In Uganda, we even eat salad with our hands.'
But the clip drew a racially charged response from Republican Congressman Brandon Gill, who reposted it on X with a sneering caption: 'Civilised people in America don't eat like this. If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World.'
Civilized people in America don't eat like this.
If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World. https://t.co/TYQkcr0nFE
— Congressman Brandon Gill (@RepBrandonGill) June 30, 2025
The post unleashed a wave of outrage online, as thousands called out the comment for its ignorance and bigotry. Critics pointed to the hypocrisy in singling out Mamdani, especially in a country where finger food is a staple of fast food culture. 'Do you eat tacos, French fries, or burgers with cutlery? Do you use a fork for Lays too?' one user asked. Another shared a photo of Donald Trump eating pizza with his hands, with the caption: 'The West has fallen.'
The west has fallen https://t.co/8OAABLfwUC pic.twitter.com/vfVmQx2w9v
— Jose Vega — Vote Vega & Sare! (@JosBtrigga) June 30, 2025
The backlash only grew when far-right influencer Laura Loomer jumped in with a vile, Islamophobic slur: 'My dogs are cleaner and more civilized when they eat than little Muhammad.' Her tweet was condemned as racist and dehumanising.
Mamdani, however, chose not to retaliate. 'Be authentic or go home,' he had said in the original clip. 'Growing up in the Global South,' he once noted, 'you come to understand struggle, whether in Uganda, South Africa or Palestine, through a lens of empathy and solidarity.'
Gill, on the other hand, appeared to cherry-pick lines from Mamdani's interview to push a narrative of cultural superiority. 'When you grow up as someone, especially in the Third World, you have a very different understanding of the Palestinian struggle,' Mamdani had said.
But if the Congressman's attempt was to smear Mamdani, it may have backfired. Six months ago, Mamdani was a relatively unknown New York Assemblyman. Now, he has defeated political heavyweight Andrew Cuomo in a stunning Democratic primary upset.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Zelensky signs bill weakening anti-corruption agencies, sparks protests across Ukraine
Thousands of people gathered in Kyiv and other cities across Ukraine on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) to urge the president to veto a controversial bill that threatens anti-corruption infrastructure. It marked the first major rally against the government in more than three years of war. Ukraine's parliament passed legislation that will tighten oversight of two key anti-corruption agencies, which critics say could significantly weaken their independence and give President Volodymyr Zelensky's circle greater sway over investigations. Mr. Zelensky signed the bill into law, according to the parliament's website late Tuesday. Fighting entrenched corruption is crucial for Ukraine's bid to join the European Union and maintain access to billions of dollars in Western aid. The legislation's passage has triggered public outrage in Ukraine, with some saying it appeared to be a greater moral blow than the routine Russian drone and missile attacks. The changes would grant the prosecutor general new authority over investigations and cases handled by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO). 'In effect, if this bill becomes law, the head of SAPO will become a nominal figure, while NABU will lose its independence and turn into a subdivision of the prosecutor general's office,' the agencies said in a joint statement on Telegram. In a post on X, the EU's Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos expressed concern over the vote in the parliament, called the Rada, calling it 'a serious step back.' Ms. Kos added: 'Independent bodies like NABU & SAPO are essential for Ukraine's EU path. Rule of Law remains in the very center of EU accession negotiations." Public pressure While rallies have taken place during the war in Ukraine, they have largely focused on the return of prisoners of war or missing people. Protests, however, remain a traditional form of public pressure in Ukraine, where two previous revolutions were victorious for the public. 'Corruption is a problem in any country, and it must always be fought,' said Ihor Lachenkov, a blogger and activist who urged people to join the protest through his social media platforms, which reach more than 1.5 million followers. 'Ukraine has far fewer resources than Russia in this war," he said. "If we misuse them, or worse, allow them to end up in the pockets of thieves, our chances of victory diminish. All our resources must go toward the fight.' The Ukrainian branch of Transparency International criticized parliament's decision, saying it undermines one of the most significant reforms since what Ukraine calls its Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and damages trust with international partners. The group urged Mr. Zelensky to veto the law, warning that otherwise he would share responsibility with the Rada for "dismantling Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure.' Many protesters carried signs reading 'Veto the law,' 'Protect the anti-corruption system, protect Ukraine's future,' or simply 'We are against it.' The mood of anger and frustration among the war-weary Ukrainians prevailed in the crowd. Some protesters accused Ukraine's leadership of prioritising loyalty and personal connections over the fight against corruption. 'Those who swore to protect the laws and the Constitution have instead chosen to shield their inner circle, even at the expense of Ukrainian democracy,' said veteran Oleh Symoroz, sitting in a wheelchair because both his legs were amputated after he was wounded in 2022. 'Instead of setting an example of zero tolerance for corruption, the president is using his power to take control of criminal cases involving his allies,' he said. On Monday, Ukraine's domestic security agency detained two NABU officials on suspicion of links to Russia and searched other agency employees on unrelated allegations. Mr. Zelensky's office didn't respond to a request for comment. Last week, the president carried out a reshuffle of his wartime Cabinet, a move widely viewed as further consolidating power within his inner circle.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
India's West Asia Drift: From Moral Voice to Strategic Silence
Published : Jul 23, 2025 07:24 IST - 9 MINS READ It is a high-stakes game for India in West Asia given that it has over 90 lakh citizens living and working in the region. These workers, most of them blue-collar, remit an estimated $30 billion to the country annually. Three West Asian countries, namely Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), accounted for nearly 40 per cent of India's total oil imports in June 2025, underlining yet again the critical importance of the region for us. Indians of all religions work in West Asian countries in a variety of roles, skilled and unskilled. Skilled workers such as nurses and technicians earn substantial wages, sending high remittances to families in India. So, how does India engage politically with the region? Does it understand the region sufficiently to advance its interests? Are India's interests served solely by trade ties and monetary interests or does New Delhi have a role to play a role in the politics of the region? West Asia remains one of the most disturbed regions in the world, to put it mildly. Rivalries have long defined the region: Israel-Iran, US-Iran, Israel-Palestine, and Iran-Saudi Arabia are just some of those that have impeded the progress of the region. Loss of India's voice At the heart of all issues here is Israel, a state that has put itself above the law and killed more than 58,000 Palestinians since the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023. Over half of those killed by Israel are Palestinian women and children. On this most critical conflict in West Asia, India has lost its voice. Its failure to speak clearly and directly against Israel's daily massacre of Palestinians shows how closely the Central government's foreign policy is allied with Israel. As India cultivates various kingdoms in West Asia, it is clear that India's approach to the Palestine issue and to the US' attack on Iran on June 22, in conjunction with Israel, is no longer being seen through the prism of the basic protection of human lives or a violation of sovereign sanctity. For the record, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's tweet on the social media platform X after the Hamas attack of October 7, 2023, was clear and direct. His government stood in solidarity with Israel at 'this difficult hour' after being 'deeply shocked' by the news of the terrorist attacks. However, official statements have lacked this clarity or directness when it comes to Palestine or Iran. Toeing Israel's line Since Modi came to power in 2014, there has been a sustained effort to dilute India's support for the Palestinian cause and to address instead the repeated Israeli complaints about India's voting record at the UN. Indian statements, mostly general in nature, have avoided naming Israel as the state responsible for the relentless bombing of the Palestinians and the denial of food, medicine, and shelter to hundreds of thousands of people. Diplomatic both-siding is no substitute for upholding humanitarian values. Also Read | One year of Gaza War: Mental scars and a lifetime of invisible trauma On June 12, India abstained from voting on a UN General Assembly resolution calling for an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza and aid access to the starving people there. The resolution strongly condemned 'the use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare and the unlawful denial of humanitarian access and depriving civilians... of objects indispensable to their survival, including wilfully impeding relief supply and access'. But India did not join the 149 countries that voted for the UN resolution. Instead, it chose to stay in the camp of the 19 countries that abstained, while 12 nations, including the US, voted against the resolution. All South Asian nations, and Myanmar, voted in favour of the resolution, as did France and the UK. But India stood out. The General Assembly resolution, initiated by Spain, came after the US vetoed a similar resolution in the Security Council. While India's clear tilt towards Israel is because the Modi government and its right-wing supporters see Israel as a 'model' to emulate, the increased trade and military ties with Israel also play a role. The Modi government also does not want to displease the US or US President Donald Trump in any way. Remember India's silence on the tariffs imposed by the US and the repeated claims by Trump that he was the one who engineered the ceasefire between India and Pakistan during the conflict in May. Dialogue and diplomacy In an explanation of its vote to abstain at the General Assembly, an Indian representative claimed that there was 'no other way to resolve conflicts but through dialogue and diplomacy'. Given that India has not chosen to use dialogue and diplomacy with Pakistan, this claim not only rings hollow but is a contradiction of the aggressive language its party members and supporters use in public and on media channels. On June 14, India distanced itself from a Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) statement condemning Israeli military strikes on Iranian territory. The SCO said: 'Such aggressive actions against civilian targets, including energy and transport infrastructure, which have resulted in civilian casualties, are a gross violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. They constitute an infringement on Iran's sovereignty, cause damage to regional and international security, and pose serious risks to global peace and stability.' And this is what India had to say a day before on Israel's military strikes on Iran: 'We are deeply concerned at the recent developments between Iran and Israel. We are closely monitoring the evolving situation, including reports related to attacks on nuclear sites. India urges both sides to avoid any escalatory steps. Existing channels of dialogue and diplomacy should be utilised to work towards a de-escalation of the situation and resolving underlying issues.' There was no naming of Israel as the aggressor. No saying that Israel violated Iran's sovereignty. Nothing. Instead, India claimed to be monitoring the situation and urged 'both sides' to avoid escalatory steps. Israel had struck first, but India resorted to both-siding, as it has been doing of late between Israel and Palestine as well. On June 24, the External Affairs Ministry said: 'We have been following developments overnight relating to the conflict between Iran and Israel, including the US action against Iran's nuclear facilities and Iranian retaliation against US military bases in Qatar.' Stumbling vishwaguru This fuzzy logic approach is a far cry from what Modi once promised. Speaking in Sydney in November 2014, he had claimed that India would regain its lost status of 'vishwaguru' and would once again provide leadership to the world. If this were true, given India's relationships with key players in West Asia, one wonders why it is not mediating between Israel and the Palestinians, or why India is not helping Iran to talk to the US, or why India is not acting as a bridge between Iran and Israel. Given India's acclaimed new stature in the Modi era, it would have been fitting that New Delhi used its good offices to help resolve the many conflicts raging today. Instead, India proclaims dialogue for the rest of the world but not in its immediate neighbourhood. Interestingly, members of the all-party delegations who travelled overseas to convey India's point of view after Operation Sindoor said that they were repeatedly asked why India had nothing to say on the issue of Palestine. Change in stance vis-a-vis Palestine From refusing to agree to the creation of Israel at the UN in November 1947 to being among the first nations to recognise the Palestinian state in the 1980s, India has never baulked in its open and full-throated support not just to the Palestinian people but to all those engaged in anti-colonial struggles. Today, the situation is vastly altered. Notwithstanding Trump repeatedly equating Prime Minister Modi with Pakistan Army chief Asim Munir, India has stood with the US as it facilitates Israel's genocide. In the Russia-Ukraine war, however, India returned to its more traditional pro-Russia stance, even continuing trade in defiance of the US. India's membership of forums such as the SCO and BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Asia) has increasingly become a problem in its diplomatic negotiations with the US. With a bully like Trump in power, someone who recently threatened an extra 10 per cent tariff on countries that side with BRICS (India is a founder-member) and 100 per cent tariff on countries that buy oil from Russia, India might find its balancing act coming to an end. It needs to be mentioned here that India's shifting votes on West Asian issues were also seen when the Manmohan Singh government voted with the US and against Iran at the International Atomic Energy Agency in September 2005. The vote created considerable consternation in the country and eventually resulted in the Left parties withdrawing support to the coalition government at the Centre. There was also considerable pressure on Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee to send Indian troops to Iraq in 2003 as India and the US moved closer after the Kargil War of 1999. However, after consideration, the government decided against it because, as a senior official in the Vajpayee government told this writer, Indian troops would be seen as mercenaries. Equally, the weak-kneed response from West Asian countries to the ongoing genocide of Palestinians has also made it easier for India to take a pro-Israeli position. Even countries like Egypt and Saudi Arabia have not gone beyond issuing statements. Engaging with West Asia For long, India has stressed the 'personal' nature of ties between Modi and the leaders of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar and the importance of this in promoting India's interests in West Asia. However, in 2022, when two BJP functionaries made comments against Prophet Muhammad, there were strong statements from Qatar and protests from other West Asian countries. In a tweet, Lolwah al-Khater, the then Assistant Foreign Minister of Qatar, had said: 'The Islamophobic discourse has reached dangerous levels in a country long known for its diversity and coexistence. Unless officially and systemically confronted, the systemic hate speech targeting Islam in India will be considered a deliberate insult against 2 billion Muslims.' Also Read | Gaza: Scarred, ruined, and silenced by death Although the BJP took some belated action against the officials, the incident revealed that the world closely watches India and tracks hate speech by top-level members of the ruling party. One also recalls the uproar when the BJP's IT cell trolled Maldives, resulting in some diplomatic unpleasantness. Given the fact that key functionaries of the BJP have demonstrated a clear and consistent anti-Muslim bias, this story is far from over. Countries often stay quiet to serve or protect their own interests but speak up when pushed. In a world where colonial prejudices and policies have staged a vicious return, India would do well to re-embrace independent thinking, respect for the lives of people cutting across race and religion, and upholding the sovereignty of nation states across the world, which were once the hallmarks of its diplomacy. Amit Baruah was The Hindu's Diplomatic Correspondent and Foreign Editor of Hindustan Times. He is now an independent journalist.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Columbia Punishes 80 Students Over Anti-Israel Protests
Columbia University said Tuesday it has issued various punishments, including expulsions and degree revocations, against various students involved in anti-Israel protests on campus. The sanctions, which a student group said targeted nearly 80 people, come as the New York institution negotiates with President Donald Trump's administration to restore $400 million in cut federal funding. Trump has applied intense pressure on the prestigious university and others, accusing them of failing to address alleged anti-Semitism amid nationwide protests last year against Israel's war in Gaza. Columbia, which was the epicenter of the campus protests, has agreed to implement a series of policy reforms in an attempt to regain the federal funding, sparking anger from many students. Fellow Ivy League institution Harvard has also been targeted with billions in funding cuts, but is fighting the pressure campaign in court. The latest sanctions by Columbia stem from a library sit-in this past May, as well as an encampment set up during alumni weekend in spring 2024, the university said in a statement. The library protest disrupted hundreds of students during an exam study period, it said, with punishments including "probation, suspensions (ranging from one year to three years), degree revocations, and expulsions." "The University does not release individual disciplinary results of any student," the statement said. It did not specify which punishments had been issued for the spring 2024 encampment, which occurred after larger protests -- including the occupation of an academic building -- but Columbia said it was "the final set of findings from that period." The student group Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which calls for the school to cut all financial ties with Israel, said the library-related sanctions "hugely exceed precedent for teach-ins or non-Palestine-related building occupations." "We will not be deterred. We are committed to the struggle for Palestinian liberation," the group said.
