Congressman asked Zohran Mamdani to ‘go back to the Third World' for eating with his hands. What happened next
In a viral interview clip with Bon Appétit, Mamdani, who was born in Uganda, spoke about eating with his hands, a practice he said connects him to his roots. 'I have to eat with my hand,' he said. 'In Uganda, we even eat salad with our hands.'
But the clip drew a racially charged response from Republican Congressman Brandon Gill, who reposted it on X with a sneering caption: 'Civilised people in America don't eat like this. If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World.'
Civilized people in America don't eat like this.
If you refuse to adopt Western customs, go back to the Third World. https://t.co/TYQkcr0nFE
— Congressman Brandon Gill (@RepBrandonGill) June 30, 2025
The post unleashed a wave of outrage online, as thousands called out the comment for its ignorance and bigotry. Critics pointed to the hypocrisy in singling out Mamdani, especially in a country where finger food is a staple of fast food culture. 'Do you eat tacos, French fries, or burgers with cutlery? Do you use a fork for Lays too?' one user asked. Another shared a photo of Donald Trump eating pizza with his hands, with the caption: 'The West has fallen.'
The west has fallen https://t.co/8OAABLfwUC pic.twitter.com/vfVmQx2w9v
— Jose Vega — Vote Vega & Sare! (@JosBtrigga) June 30, 2025
The backlash only grew when far-right influencer Laura Loomer jumped in with a vile, Islamophobic slur: 'My dogs are cleaner and more civilized when they eat than little Muhammad.' Her tweet was condemned as racist and dehumanising.
Mamdani, however, chose not to retaliate. 'Be authentic or go home,' he had said in the original clip. 'Growing up in the Global South,' he once noted, 'you come to understand struggle, whether in Uganda, South Africa or Palestine, through a lens of empathy and solidarity.'
Gill, on the other hand, appeared to cherry-pick lines from Mamdani's interview to push a narrative of cultural superiority. 'When you grow up as someone, especially in the Third World, you have a very different understanding of the Palestinian struggle,' Mamdani had said.
But if the Congressman's attempt was to smear Mamdani, it may have backfired. Six months ago, Mamdani was a relatively unknown New York Assemblyman. Now, he has defeated political heavyweight Andrew Cuomo in a stunning Democratic primary upset.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
Phone jammers, masked guards: Why Zohran Mamdani's lavish Uganda wedding bash is receiving flak
New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a Democratic socialist, is facing backlash over his three-day wedding celebrations with artist Rama Duwaji at his family's lavish compound in Uganda last week. As per reports, the property had tight security, with around nine masked guards watching one gate. The Indian-origin politician's festivities, however, have sparked anger. Here's why read more New York mayoral candidate, State Rep. Zohran Mamdani (D-NY) kisses the hand of his wife Rama Duwaji as they celebrate during an election night gathering at The Greats of Craft LIC on June 24, 2025 in the Long Island City neighborhood of the Queens borough in New York City on June 24. File Photo/AFP New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has been in the limelight since besting Andrew Cuomo to win the Democratic nomination to run the city last month. The Indian-origin socialist's shocking victory has brought him to the centre stage of US politics. Besides his views, Mamdani has also been making headlines for his personal life. The 33-year-old, who married artist and animator Rama Duwaji in February, reportedly held a lavish three-day celebration to celebrate his wedding at his family's luxurious estate in Uganda last week. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The festivities, however, have sparked controversy. Here's why. Mamdani's wedding bash in Uganda Zohran Mamdani, the son of Indian filmmaker Mira Nair and renowned Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani, celebrated his wedding with Rama Duwaji, 27, at a lavish compound owned by his family in Uganda, as per a New York Post report. The private compound is located in the posh Buziga Hill area outside the capital city of Kampala. The neighbourhood is home to some of Uganda's richest, including billionaire businessman Godfrey Kirumira. Mamdani was born in Uganda and spent the first few years of his life there before moving to the US at the age of seven. The Queens politician returned to his birthplace to mark his love for his wife. Duwaji and Mamdani, who met on the dating app Hinge, had eloped in February. The couple hosted wedding celebrations at the compound guarded by masked security guards, with guests partying until midnight last week, reported New York Post. Mamdani's family home is secluded and spread over two acres of lush gardens, surrounded by trees, with at least three security gates. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A witness told The Post that the security was so tight that one gate was being watched by around nine guards. 'Outside the Mamdani house were more than 20 special forces command unit guards, some in masks, and there was a phone-jamming system set up — and all for the strictly invite-only Mamdani event,' the witness added. Guests were served fruit juices and they danced to music from a local DJ last Thursday (July 24). As per a witness, Mamdani is believed to have addressed guests later that night, with the party ending after midnight. 'Then on Friday, inside the compound, there were military style tents being taken down when the party had finished,' they added. 'Then what looked like Mamdani personal security guards took over at the gates.' Mamdani had previously confirmed his trip to Uganda on his Instagram, saying he would stay there until the end of the month. Why Mamdani's wedding bash is facing flak Zohran Mamdani, who says he wants to raise taxes on the top one per cent of New Yorkers, is facing backlash over his reported extravagant wedding festivities. Andrew Cuomo, who is still in the NYC mayoral race as an independent, took a potshot at his rival. In a poll on X, he asked his followers to vote on whether Mamdani's three-day wedding was 'champagne socialism' or 'trust fund socialism.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Correct term? — Andrew Cuomo (@andrewcuomo) July 27, 2025 Some locals found the wedding bash 'insensitive' as Uganda was in mourning for former Ugandan Supreme Court Judge George Kanyeihamba, who lived just three minutes from Mamdanis' house. Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni visited Kanyeihamba's residence to pay his last respects and 'the street was blocked by the president's cars,' a local was quoted as saying. 'Because of the culture here, it was insensitive to have a wedding celebration in the same week as mourning – or 'Okukungubaga' – as it's called here,' another told The Post. 'He has not even been buried, and we have his friends coming to give last words and to mourn before the burial next week, yet Mamdani is celebrating his wedding for three days,' the source added. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As reports of Mamdani's lavish wedding celebrations surfaced, X users also took a jibe at the socialist candidate. One posted, 'Zohran Mamdani wants to ban all guns and defund the police, then flies to Uganda for his wedding, guarded by masked special forces at his family's multimillion-dollar compound. Socialism for thee, not for me.' Another user mocked him as 'man of the people'. 'Zohran Mamdani: Nothing says American like getting married on your family's luxury Uganda compound. A man of the people,' they wrote. 'Mamdani clearly doesn't see the irony—his wealth and lavish lifestyle, including that Uganda wedding bash with armed guards, stem directly from capitalism. As a self-proclaimed Democratic Socialist, he thrives while pushing policies like defunding the NYPD and rent freezes that could financially ruin everyone else,' another tweeted. With inputs from agencies
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Cannot switch off economy': Indian envoy hits back at West's pressure on oil imports from Russia
India's High Commissioner to the UK, Vikram Doraiswami, hit back at the West's pressure on New Delhi to halt oil imports from Russia, emphasising that the country cannot simply 'switch off its economy' due to geopolitical tensions. In an interview with Times Radio recently, he further pointed out the inconsistency in the West's stance, highlighting that several European partners continue to buy rare earth and other energy products from the same countries that they refuse to let India buy from. 'Don't you think that that seems a little odd?' Doraiswami said. When questioned about India's close ties with Russia and President Vladimir Putin, he said that New Delhi's relationship with Moscow is built on various metrics. 'One of these is our long-standing security relationship that goes back to an era in which some of our Western partners wouldn't sell us weapons but would sell them to countries in our neighbourhood that use them only to attack us,' the Indian envoy said. He further termed New Delhi's ties with Moscow an 'energy relationship', which he said was the outcome of 'everybody else buying energy from sources that we used to buy from earlier'. 'So we've been displaced out of the energy market largely, and the costs have gone up. We are the third-largest consumer of energy in the world. We import over 80% of our product. What would you have us do? Switch off our economy,' Doraiswami said. 'We also see around us relationships that other countries maintain for their own convenience with countries that are a source of difficulty for us. Do we ask you to come up with a little test of loyalty?' he said. Affirming India's stance on the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the Indian envoy said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has repeatedly asserted that this was not an era of war and that New Delhi is 'very keen' for the conflict to stop. 'He's made that point repeatedly, including with the president of Russia and with the president of Ukraine (Volodymyr Zelensky),' he said. 'We are very keen for this terrible conflict to stop, as we are keen for conflicts across the world to stop,' Mr Doraiswami added. India traditionally relied on the Middle East for its oil supplies. However, following Western sanctions against Moscow due to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the country began offering oil at discounted prices to attract new buyers.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Why illegal migrants are a bigger crisis for UK than US
Migrants becoming a hot button issue in the US has so engrossed the media space that similar crises in other Western countries, especially the UK, have almost escaped notice read more Britain has to face up to the fact that it is no longer an Empire with millions of acres of land at its disposal; it is a tiny island which is trying desperately to keep its faltering economy above the water. Representational image: REUTERS A photograph of anti-migrant protesters at London's Canary Wharf last week in an inside page of a major British daily this week included a Sikh waving a placard saying 'Stop calling us Far Right. Protect our women & children' and there was at least one other south Asian in the frame. But the overwhelming impression in the British media is that only gangs of white, Far-Right thugs are on the rampage to stop the influx of poor, starving, non-white asylum seekers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That is clearly not the correct picture, as a few candid photos show. It's not only the white nativists who are alarmed at the boatloads of 'asylum seekers' arriving on British shores to increase the burden on already inadequate public services—even as scores of more prosperous Britons flee to escape rising taxes. Britons with businesses struggling to survive or even those living in neighbourhoods where changing demographics have caused huge tensions are worried. Migrants becoming a hot button issue in the US—a country built by successive generations of emigration from Europe and elsewhere—has so engrossed the media space that similar crises in other Western countries, especially the UK, have almost escaped notice. And yet, given that the UK has such a large population of what is largely now third or fourth generation British-Indians, the warning signals should be heeded about rising public apprehensions about migrants. Many of those agitated on both sides of the migration issue are unable to understand that all migrants are not the same; nor are their intentions. Former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's parents, for instance, did not go to Britain from East Africa to live off welfare and create mini ethnic enclaves. They were hardworking professionals who contributed meaningfully to their adoptive country and assimilated even as they preserved their own cultural best practices. The waves of migrants who have arrived in Britain in the 21st century do not all fall into the Sunaks' category of new arrivals. Many of them have made little effort to support themselves financially and far too many of them have been unable to integrate with or even understand the society they are now part of. And the incomprehension is mutual because the newcomers are not very willing to let the locals into their close-knit social and even religious network. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The result is the latest phase of unrest and demonstrations at hotels in various English counties that have been mandated by the government to house migrants. And the catalyst—several recent violent incidents in the UK allegedly linked to migrants—make President Donald Trump's views on similar happenings in the US seem scarily prophetic. Except that Britain is far smaller and more densely populated than the US and therefore more vulnerable to rising tensions. It is germane to note that the people preemptively described as 'asylum seekers and refugees' arriving in the UK by boats across the English Channel from Europe are mostly Muslim and mostly from the Middle East, from Iran to Syria, though the two largest nationalities right now are Pakistani and Afghan. Ukrainians are another cohort. In 2024, a record 1.8 lakh asylum applications were made in the UK (the highest since 2002) and most of them were permitted to stay. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The trial and sentencing of an 18-year-old Somali-British national to 52 years in jail for killing three girls (aged 6 to 8, each was stabbed over 80 times) revealed that he had been flagged thrice in the five years before his murderous rampage, but investigators did not act on any of the complaints. The same reluctance to follow up cases of Pakistani-British men grooming and sexually exploiting white girls in northern England also showed institutional laxness. That has given rise to very justified fears among the public that their government is not willing to understand the ramifications of years of deference to multiculturalism, and that its institutions are chary of taking action for fear of being pulled up for racism. Protesters also believe if something is not done to regulate the flow of different kinds of migrants—winnowing out freeloaders and allowing in only those who can benefit the UK—there will be hell to pay. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Branding all anti-illegal-migrant protesters as 'Far Right' does not do any cause any favours. The key word is 'illegal' which is often deliberately omitted in reports to further the narrative that opposition to this ingress comes only from one quarter. There is also a big difference between migrants and asylum seekers. Migrants can be qualified professionals moving for career advancement, but the latter almost always implies that the state will have to look after them Lodging migrants, whether families or single men, in hotels situated in small communities pending processing is also an ill-thought measure, as integration there is even more difficult than in big cities. An Ethiopian asylum seeker arrested and charged this month with trying to forcibly kiss a local teenager in one such small community—to which he has registered a plea of not guilty—highlights the inherent danger of summarily accommodating migrants just anywhere. Opting to house asylum seekers in cities also draws flak as can be seen from the uproar over a four-star hotel in London's once glitzy Canary Wharf being kitted out with new mattresses, sanitaryware etc to house migrants. Instances of local police forces escorting 'pro-migrant' activists to places where the 'anti-migrant' camps are protesting—in the name of the democratic right to protest—only make matters worse as they increase the public's suspicion of official bias. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Britain has to face up to the fact that it is no longer an Empire with millions of acres of land at its disposal; it is a tiny island which is trying desperately to keep its faltering economy above the water. It may be flattering that so many refugees still consider the UK to be an attractive destination, but the fact is, there is no land to house them and no public willingness to accommodate them economically, socially or culturally. Seeing it as anything else is self-delusional. The author is a freelance writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
