NJ settles lawsuit against Morris County gun store in violation of safety law
FSS Armory, located in the Pine Brook section of Montville, was named in a lawsuit in December 2023 by Matthew Platkin, the state attorney general, along with two Pennsylvania stores for violations through the New Jersey Statewide Affirmative Firearms Enforcement Office.
SAFE was created as a way for the state to go after the gun industry in court for the "violations of the law that harm the health and safety of New Jersey residents," according to a statement from the Attorney General's Office.
According to court documents, FSS "stored loose, unsecured rifles, stacks of handguns and gun boxes in an open room directly under two ground-floor windows" abutting a glass-doored entrance from the parking lot. The documents said the weapons were visible from the outside and in July 2022, posted a picture online showing the loose guns and gun boxes.
In January 2023, the store was burglarized with the thieves breaking the ground floor windows, leaning inside and removing 18 guns within arm's reach. They stole seven pistols, six shotguns, four rifles and one revolver. The alarm wasn't triggered and it wasn't until the owner got to the store the next morning that the police learned of the burglary.
According to the settlement, one of the burglars had searched gun stores in New Jersey on his phone and FSS Armory was part of the search. After the theft of the guns, the burglars traveled to a Passaic jewelry store and held the owners and two customers at gunpoint and stole "a significant amount of jewelry" while injuring one of the owners.
Only nine of the stolen guns have been recovered and have been at a crime scene or on a criminal, Platkin stated.
'This case is a stark example of the consequences that can result when unsecured firearms fall into the wrong hands," Platkin said. "By storing these firearms with inadequate security measures, FSS Armory made it easy for them to be stolen and later used in crimes"
Platkin said other licensed gun retailers "should take heed" of what happened in FFS Armory.
FSS Armory admitted liability for its negligence and for improperly storing the guns in the store. It agreed to several measures, including:
Improving the store's security and firearm storage
The security measures and other compliance obligations are subject to final approval by the SAFE Office
Installing an alarm system capable of making real-time notifications of a break-in on all windows and exterior doors,
Installing bars on all exterior windows that don't allow someone to reach their arm through
Store all shotguns and rifles in a rack with a locking device. Firearms and ammunition should be stored in a heavy-gauge metal cabinet or a heavy-gauge mesh wire cage or secured in a safe or vault. Those displayed in a glass case can remain as long as they are secured with a steel cable or other "adequate-looking device."
Working with the Attorney General to appoint an independent monitor to check its compliance for four years and FSS will bear the costs for the inspection.
FSS is also financially responsible and is required to pay a total of $125,000 to the New Jersey State Department of the Treasury. The first payment of $15,000 is due in 30 days and then payments of $10,000 will continue every month until May 2026.
'Today's settlement agreement demonstrates that our state's firearms industry public safety law works exactly as intended,' Ravi Ramanathan, director of SAFE, said. 'Companies in all industries are held responsible when their actions jeopardize the health and safety of the public."
Once the provisions in the consent judgment are complete, the claims against FFS will be dismissed with prejudice.
This article originally appeared on NorthJersey.com: Morris County NJ gun store settles lawsuit with New Jersey
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
18 hours ago
- NBC News
Columbia Sportswear sues Columbia University, alleging merchandise too similar and causes confusion
For decades, T-shirts, sweatshirts and other clothing under the Columbia Sportswear brand and clothing emblazoned with the Columbia University name coexisted more or less peacefully without confusion. But now, the Portland-based outdoor retailer has sued the New York-based university over alleged trademark infringement and a breach of contract, among other charges. It claims that the university's merchandise looks too similar to what's being sold at more than 800 retail locations including more than 150 of its branded stores as well as its website and third-party marketplaces. In a lawsuit filed July 23 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, Columbia Sportswear, whose roots date back to 1938, alleges that the university intentionally violated an agreement the parties signed on June 13, 2023. That agreement dictated how the university could use the word 'Columbia' on its own apparel. As part of the pact, the university could feature 'Columbia' on its merchandise provided that the name included a recognizable school insignia or its mascot, the word 'university,' the name of the academic department or the founding year of the university — 1754 — or a combination. But Columbia Sportswear alleges the university breached the agreement a little more than a year later, with the company noticing several garments without any of the school logos being sold at the Columbia University online store. Many of the garments feature a bright blue color that is 'confusingly similar' to the blue color that has long been associated with Columbia Sportswear, the suit alleged. The lawsuit offered photos of some of the Columbia University items that say only Columbia. 'The likelihood of deception, confusion, and mistake engendered by the university's misappropriation and misuse of the Columbia name is causing irreparable harm to the brand and goodwill symbolized by Columbia Sportswear's registered mark Columbia and the reputation for quality it embodies,' the lawsuit alleged. The lawsuit comes at a time when Columbia University has been threatened with the potential loss of billions of dollars in government support. Last week, Columbia University reached a deal with the Trump administration to pay more than $220 million to the federal government to restore federal research money that was canceled in the name of combating antisemitism on campus. Under the agreement, the Ivy League school will pay a $200 million settlement over three years, the university said. Columbia Sportswear aims to stop all sales of clothing that violate the agreement, recall any products already sold and donate any remaining merchandise to charity. Columbia Sportswear is also seeking three times the amount of actual damages determined by a jury.
Hamilton Spectator
2 days ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Appeals judges order ICC prosecutor to recuse himself from Venezuela investigation
THE HAGUE, Netherlands (AP) — Appeals judges at the International Criminal Court on Friday ordered chief prosecutor Karim Khan to recuse himself from an investigation into Venezuela, citing a conflict of interest. Khan's sister-in-law, international criminal lawyer Venkateswari Alagendra, has been part of a team representing the government of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and the five-judge appeals panel at the ICC says her involvement creates an issue of 'bias' for the prosecutor. The British barrister, who is currently on leave from the court , stepped down temporarily pending an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct. Alagendra and Khan worked together previously on cases, including as defense counsel for Kenyan President William Ruto and for Seif al-Islam Gadhafi, the son of the late Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi. Alagendra is the sister of Khan's wife, human rights lawyer Shyamala Alagendra. The Washington-based Arcadia Foundation, which focuses on human rights issues in Venezuela, filed a complaint with the court in 2024, asking for Khan to be removed from the case over a conflict of interest. The court dismissed the initial complaint in February. In written filings, Khan told the court he could not 'recall' any discussion with his sister-in-law about the facts of the case and did not attend any meetings where she was present. The ICC has an ongoing investigation into violence that followed Venezuela's 2017 election but has so far not sought any arrest warrants. Khan announced in late 2021 that he was opening the investigation after a lengthy preliminary probe and an official referral — a request to investigate — in 2018 from Argentina, Canada, Colombia, Chile, Paraguay and Peru. However, the full-scale investigation was put on hold when Venezuelan authorities said they wanted to take over the case. The ICC is a court of last resort that only takes on cases when national authorities are unwilling or unable to investigate, a system known as complementarity. Khan pressed ahead with efforts to continue the court's first investigation in Latin America. ICC judges agreed with Khan and authorized him to resume investigations in Venezuela in 2023 . Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Prosecutors cite Diddy's freak offs in opposing his latest bail try: He's no 'ordinary John'
Sean "Diddy" Combs is no "mere John," federal prosecutors say in urging he be kept behind bars. Combs is "far from being an ordinary and casual consumer of commercial sex," they argue, lambasting the rap mogul and his baby oil-soaked history of freak offs in an 11-page court filing opposing his latest bail effort. Combs hopes to be set free from a notorious Brooklyn jail pending his October 3 sentencing. He argues that last month's split verdict found him guilty of being, at most, a "John" who paid for male escorts he didn't even sleep with. Instead, his lawyers argue, trial testimony consistently described Combs sitting in the corner of a series of luxury hotel suites in Miami, New York, and Los Angeles, watching, masturbating, and recording as his girlfriends had sex with muscular strippers and porn stars. But if Combs is a John, he's a very, very bad one, prosecutors say in opposing bail in a filing made public early Friday. "The defendant transported individuals for the purpose of prostitution on hundreds of occasions over the course of decades," wrote the five remaining members of the Manhattan-based prosecution team — minus lead attorney Maurene Comey. (Comey, who also prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, is the daughter of former FBI director and longtime Trump nemesis James Comey. She was fired by the Department of Justice two weeks after the Combs verdict.) Far from being a "mere John," the remaining team wrote, Combs "plied Cassie Ventura and Jane (as well as male commercial sex workers) with drugs to ensure their continued participation in the days-long freak offs." R&B artist Ventura spent four days on the stand describing Combs' violence and her own regret and humiliation in the decade ending in 2018. The second girlfriend, who testified as Jane Doe, told a similar tale from dating Combs in 2021 to 2024. Combs "used violence against both Ms. Ventura and Jane in connection with freak offs, and employed a small army of personal staff to ensure that his every need was met during freak offs," the prosecutors' filing tells US District Judge Arun Subramanian.. "The defendant's actions surely distinguish him from an ordinary 'John.'" In his own filing earlier this week, Combs had asked Subramanian to let him live at his Miami mansion on $50 million bail in the two months between now and sentencing. His lawyers argued that the stakes are lower now, because he has been cleared of the most serious charges against him. On July 2, the jury in Combs' six-week Manhattan trial rejected prosecutors' allegations that he sex-trafficked two girlfriends. The jury also rejected a racketeering charge that alleged he ran Combs Global, his multimillion-dollar media, entertainment, and lifestyle empire, as a criminal enterprise. Combs was found guilty only of the least serious counts he had faced. The jury convicted on two violations of the federal Mann Act, finding that Combs caused the two girlfriends and several male escorts to be transported across state lines for purposes of commercial sex acts. The felony Mann Act convictions are flawed and should be tossed out, Combs argues. Combs "lacked a commercial motive and did not intend for paid escorts to have sex with him," his lawyers argued Wednesday night in a legal filing signed by defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro. Instead, Combs was creating "amateur porn," filming as the male escorts had sex with longtime girlfriend Shapiro argued. Combs was "primarily a bystander" to the encounters, Shapiro argued. "Paying people to film them in sexual performances is protected by the First Amendment," she also argued. This is Combs' fifth attempt at bail since his September arrest. In denying the previous bail attempts, Subramanian said that by law, Combs' felony conviction requires that he remain in jail pending sentencing. In previous bail denials, Subramanian and two other judges cited Combs' admitted domestic violence against his girlfriends, including in the months before his September arrest, when he knew he was under investigation. They also cited prosecution allegations that Combs possessed illegal drugs when he was arrested and had tried to obstruct the trial by reaching out to witnesses from jail before it started, claims the defense has denied. Prosecutors have said they plan to seek a sentence of five years or more on the two Mann Act convictions.
