logo
Despite protests, Pueblo city councilor avoids censure over alleged 'transphobic' comments

Despite protests, Pueblo city councilor avoids censure over alleged 'transphobic' comments

Yahoo2 days ago
An effort to censure Pueblo City Councilor Roger Gomez failed to receive enough support from council members despite roughly 100 people showing up to protest outside Pueblo City Hall on July 28.
A successful censure would have included removing Gomez from his leadership position as work session chair. Censure efforts, spearheaded by Councilor Sarah Martinez and supported by Pueblo Mayor Graham, followed a July 14 statement in which Gomez said his constituents had expressed anxieties about a library employee's gender identity and stated that the library should be "a family center."
The Pueblo City-County Library District reported to city staff that Gomez also visited the library on July 17 to inquire about "LGBTQIA+ collections, programs, and transgender library staff," according to a city of Pueblo background paper.
Protestors crowded City Hall at 5 p.m. while waving rainbow folding fans in the 98-degree heat and calling for Gomez to be censured. By 7 p.m., city council chambers were packed to capacity. Many protestors stayed until the end of the meeting — around 11:45 p.m. — to hear the result of Pueblo City Council's vote on the censure and a citizen-filed ethics complaint against Gomez. The ethics complaint also failed to pass.
Local librarian says Gomez's comments were 'transphobic and dehumanizing'
Lev Frank, a local librarian, told members of council before the censure vote that he and another co-worker received transphobic comments from Gomez.
"The incident report of this is public record... He misgendered me and my coworker repeatedly, and he used dehumanizing language — calling my co-worker an 'it,'" Frank said.
"His conduct has also made me materially unsafe... It's not just because his comments were cruel, transphobic and dehumanizing, but because anybody who wants to cause me or my co-worker harm now knows exactly where to find me."
Frank was one of five individuals who made a public comment in favor of censuring Gomez shortly before the July 28 vote.
Mayor: Gomez's conduct has 'brought embarrassment' to city council
Graham also delivered a statement. In addition to referring to Gomez's July comments as "discrimination," the mayor referred to March 17 email comments made by Gomez about Graham as "sexual harassment."
"His conduct, both in the public and behind closed doors, has brought embarrassment to the city council and dysfunction to our city government," Graham said. "He should not have a leadership role in this council. This resolution before you is to remove him as work session chair, which is a privilege as a stepped-up position to represent this City Council."
Gomez defends comments, censure effort fails
City Council President Mark Aliff and Councilors Joe Latino and Regina Maestri were the three council members who voted against censuring Gomez. Martinez and Councilors Brett Boston and Dennis Flores voted in favor of censure. A majority was needed for the censure to pass.
While Gomez recused himself from voting, he did read a statement prior to the vote in which he said there was "no truth" in allegations of his prejudice toward the LGBTQ+ community and that he did not at any time "insult" or "berate" library staff.
"Furthermore, absolutely no proof of these false and fabricated allegations has been produced nor substantiated by anyone, including the city officials who are making these spurious claims," Gomez said in his statement. "The behavior that has been attributed to me in the media is nothing more than rumors and innuendo and unsubstantiated hearsay."
In addition to reading transcripts from Gomez's July 14 statement questioning a library employee's gender identity and an incident report describing events that took place on July 17, council reviewed audio clips from an interview that Gomez did with KOYC Radio.
In the interview, Gomez described going to the library and seeing a person whom he wasn't sure "what he was looking at," and that children may get "confused" by the person's gender identity.
Colorado State House: Pueblo GOP Chair announces 2026 run for fellow Republican's seat
Pueblo Chieftain reporter James Bartolo can be reached at JBartolo@gannett.com. Support local news, subscribe to the Pueblo Chieftain at subscribe.chieftain.com.
This article originally appeared on The Pueblo Chieftain: Effort to censure Pueblo City Councilor Roger Gomez fails in 3-3 vote
Solve the daily Crossword

Hashtags

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll: Nearly 70% of Americans — including a majority of Republicans — think the government is hiding something about Jeffrey Epstein
Poll: Nearly 70% of Americans — including a majority of Republicans — think the government is hiding something about Jeffrey Epstein

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: Nearly 70% of Americans — including a majority of Republicans — think the government is hiding something about Jeffrey Epstein

About a quarter believe the well-connected sex offender committed suicide. Twice as many think he was murdered. Bipartisanship is rare in U.S. politics these days. But according to a new Yahoo/YouGov poll, there's now at least one thing that more than two-thirds of Americans seem to agree on: that the government is 'hiding' information about convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 24 to 28, shows that a clear consensus has formed across party lines about how the government has handled the questions surrounding Epstein's life and death. When respondents are told that President Trump's Justice Department has 'concluded that Epstein did not have a 'client list' of famous associates who engaged in wrongdoing with him,' 69% of them still say the government is 'hiding information about Epstein's client list.' That group includes a majority of Republicans (55%). Just 8% of Americans, meanwhile, say the government isn't concealing information about a client list. About a quarter of U.S. adults (23%) believe the Justice Department's conclusion that Epstein died by suicide after hanging himself in jail. The rest think Epstein was murdered (47%) or say they're not sure what happened (30%). Nearly as many Republicans (42%) as Democrats (51%) believe Epstein was killed. As a result, nearly seven in 10 Americans (67%) say the government is hiding information about Epstein's death. Again, that group includes a majority of Republicans (52%). What do people think is going on? About half of Americans (48%) — including 81% of Democrats and 53% of independents — think the government is hiding information about Epstein's client list 'because it would implicate Trump.' Even among Republicans, 13% say the same and 16% say they're unsure. The new Yahoo/YouGov poll comes amid ongoing right-wing backlash over how the administration has handled its investigation into Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial for allegedly paying dozens of teenage girls, some as young as 14, to perform sex acts. The disgraced financier has long been the focus of conspiracy theories that claim he was murdered to conceal the names of powerful people on a secret 'client list.' During the 2024 campaign, Trump said he would consider releasing additional government files on Epstein. Then, after returning to the White House, he directed the Justice Department to conduct an exhaustive review of any evidence it had collected. Earlier this month, the DOJ and FBI released a two-page joint memo concluding that Epstein had 'committed suicide in his cell" and compiled no such 'client list' — echoing previous findings by the Biden administration. The move enraged some Trump loyalists, who accused the president and his administration of breaking their promise to release all of the Epstein files. It also put the spotlight back on Trump's own relationship with Epstein. Speaking to reporters Monday in Scotland, Trump said he never visited Epstein's notorious private island, even when given the chance. 'I never had the privilege of going to his island, and I did turn him down,' Trump said. 'But a lot of people in Palm Beach were invited to his island. In one of my very good moments, I turned it down. I didn't want to go to his island.' Low marks for the administration's approach For the president, the Epstein controversy now seems to be creating a credibility gap with the public — including some of his own supporters. Just 21% of Americans approve of the way the president is handling the investigation, his lowest rating this year on any individual issue; nearly three times as many (61%) disapprove. Meanwhile, 44% of Republicans — roughly half the number who applaud his approach to immigration — approve of how Trump has dealt with the investigation. A majority of Americans (55%) say the president has 'not gone far enough' in his efforts to 'get to the bottom' of the Epstein case; combined, less than a quarter say that his approach has been about right (16%) or that it has gone too far (7%). A third of Republicans (33%) say Trump has not gone far enough. Attorney General Pam Bondi — the face of the administration's Epstein efforts — is now deeply unpopular: 26% of Americans say they have a favorable opinion of her. And while confidence in the Justice Department wasn't high the last time Yahoo and YouGov asked about it, in August 2022 — back then, 44% said they had 'a lot' of confidence or 'some' confidence in the DOJ; 56% said they had 'a little' or 'none' — today those numbers are even worse: 39% and 61%, respectively. Why the Epstein story has broken through The new Yahoo/YouGov poll suggests three potential explanations. First, ubiquity: Nearly all respondents (91%) have heard either a lot (50%) or a little (41%) about the story. That's the fourth highest 'heard a lot' score recorded in any Yahoo/YouGov poll since 2020; only the Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022 (70%), Will Smith slapping Chris Rock at the Academy Awards that same year (66%) and Trump getting indicted in 2023 (57%) have topped it. Meanwhile, a full 84% of Americans say they think Epstein was guilty — including 91% of Democrats, 90% of independents and 77% of Republicans. Second, Epstein's bipartisan circle. In the poll, respondents were reminded that Epstein 'had a wide circle of influential friends and acquaintances, including former President Bill Clinton and President Donald Trump.' Then they were asked if either president 'engaged in crimes' with the financier — and nearly half of Americans said yes for Clinton (47%) and Trump (48%). In contrast, the share who said the two presidents did not engage in crimes with Epstein —12% for Clinton, 26% for Trump — was much lower. Conspiracy theories may be more attractive when they have the power to hurt the other side as well. Third, conspiracy theories in general seem to have become more mainstream recently. For example, a majority of Democrats (51%) believe "many top politicians are involved in child sex-trafficking rings.' A majority of Republicans (51%) believe that "regardless of who is officially in charge of the government and other organizations, there is a single group of people who secretly control events and rule the world together.' A majority of Democrats (57%) believe 'the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pa. was staged in order to help him win the 2024 election.' A majority of Republicans (58%) believe 'Trump's would-be assassin, Thomas Matthew Crooks, didn't act alone.' And a majority of Republicans (63%) also believe that former President Barack Obama 'committed treason to try to sabotage Donald Trump in the 2016 election' — as Trump has been claiming lately, without proof. What's next? Americans are clear about what they want: More than eight in 10 (84%) say they would approve of the government 'releasing all of the information it has on Jeffrey Epstein.' Just 5% would disapprove. Conversely, more than two-thirds of Americans (69%) disapprove of the decision last week by Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican, to send "the U.S. House of Representatives home early for the summer to avoid having to vote on releasing the Epstein files.' Only 10% approve. Previously, Johnson had said that Congress 'should put everything out there and let the people decide it.' With Dylan Stableford __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us.
Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us.

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are you concerned about starvation in Gaza? Should US do more to help? Tell us.

As the images of hunger and desperation keep coming at us, we're hearing more and more people weigh in on Gaza, with news coverage picking up on voices ranging from heads of government to internet celebrities. But what do you think? Those recently criticizing Israel include people like popular children's content creator "Ms. Rachel," who said she'll no longer work with anyone not speaking out about Gaza, as well as right-wing congressional member Marjorie Taylor Greene, who called the situation "genocide." They point to children perishing in the Palestinian enclave where the death toll, made up mostly of civilians, now exceeds 60,000. Greene's Republican Party has historically stood with Israel, but continued reports of starvation and civilian suffering are peeling away supporters, such as the United Kingdom, which announced it would recognize Palestine as a country if Israel doesn't improve conditions for noncombatants. But outspoken allies of Israel, from the president to the creator of a culture-defining comedy, say we should remember the horrific surprise attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, that kicked off the war and killed 1,200 Israelis, a majority of them civilians. Of the 251 hostages taken on that day, there are 50 still in captivity. Actor and comedian Jerry Seinfeld has made a statement about living briefly in the Jewish state and the heartbreak he felt over the Oct. 7 atrocities, saying, "I will stand with Israel." President Donald Trump, meanwhile, recently said recognizing Palestine as a nation and similar pressure on Israel amount to "rewarding Hamas." 'Every ounce of food': Trump presses Israel on starvation in Gaza; 'children look very hungry' What is the US doing in Israel, Gaza? In terms of actions to stop the humanitarian crisis, the United States pressured Israel to allow aid after it cut off deliveries in March by the United Nations and other groups for 11 weeks because Israeli officials said Hamas was seizing food. The U.N. said those renewed deliveries were a "drop in the ocean" of what was urgently needed. Now $30 million in U.S. aid is to be delivered through a controversial private, for-profit U.S. and Israel-backed contractor, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation. Critics say GHF is not getting enough food to people, who are being killed as they try to get help from the aid sites. People are starving in Gaza. Why are we so comfortable just letting that happen? | Opinion Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, is set to travel to Israel on July 31, Thursday, to address the humanitarian crisis. Witkoff called off the most recent efforts to broker a ceasefire deal on July 24, saying Hamas showed "a lack of desire.' Should the US do more to help Palestinians? Should celebrities be weighing in? Now we're asking you, our readers, if you think the U.S. government is taking the right actions in terms of Israel and Gaza. And who do you think should be weighing in on the argument? Fill out our form below or send us an email to forum@ with the subject line "Forum Gaza." We'll pick a collection of responses to share in a follow-up post. Here are some questions to help you respond: Does the U.S. have a responsibility to do more to end the hunger crisis in Gaza? Why or why not? Is it helpful to have celebrities and other people not involved with foreign policy weigh in? Or does it distract? Why or why not? How would the recognition of a Palestinian state change the situation? What factors about the war in Gaza are not being covered enough in the news? Joel Burgess is a Voices editor for the USA TODAY Network. Do you want to take part in our next Forum? Join the conversation by emailing forum@ can also follow us on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and sign up for our Opinion newsletter to stay updated on future Forum posts. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Should US, Trump recognize a Palestinian state? Tell us | Opinion

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store