Why driving at 80mph won't save you time
The inner digits show speed in the conventional way: in this case miles per hour. In other words, how far you travel at some velocity in a given time. The small digits around the outside are the paceometer: they show the same information but expressed the other way around. Instead of the distance you travel in a given time, this shows the time taken to travel a given distance. (For maths nerds, there is a similar inversion between the way the US and UK measure fuel economy in cars – we use 'miles per gallon' whereas the US and most other countries flip it and measure 'litres per 100km'.) What you will suddenly realise – something not instinctively obvious – is that the relationship between the two measures is completely non-linear. The faster you are going already, the less time you save by going 10mph faster still. Accelerate from 20 to 30mph and you save ten minutes for every ten miles you are travelling. Accelerate from 70 to 80mph and you save under a minute.
As you go faster, everything unpleasant and dangerous – braking distance, energy consumption, risk of accident, risk of fatality, the likelihood of being mistaken for a German – goes up, whereas the very thing you are attempting to achieve, namely a reduction in journey time, is being attained to a smaller and smaller degree.
This shouldn't be an epiphany, but it is. No one who had studied a paceometer would have demanded HS2 travel so needlessly fast. The distance involved is simply too short for the time-saving to be worthwhile. London to Manchester is about 160 miles. At 80mph that takes two hours. At 160mph you save an hour. But accelerate to 240mph and you have a train that can't stop mid-journey and can't go around corners to avoid the attractive parts of the countryside – in return for which you save a paltry 20 minutes. That's less time than you currently waste on the Euston concourse waiting for them to announce the platform number two sodding minutes before the train leaves.
There are a few questions to be asked here. Could the 'paceometer effect' be applied to other metrics? For instance, could you completely disrupt the whole commercial property market by demanding that prices were listed in 'square feet per £1,000' rather than the other way around?
You might reasonably argue that the paceometer makes a case against increasing the speed limits on motorways, since you could save people vastly more time by reducing the incidence of pointless roadworks and contraflows. But you could also use it to argue that the 20mph speed limit in London is absurdly low, since it notionally increases journey time by 50 per cent.
Or maybe not. In my next article, I plan to confuse you still further by suggesting that the funereal 20mph limit in London might not increase journey time by very much at all.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
4 hours ago
- STV News
Operation Sandcastle: The mission to destroy Hitler's chemical weapons
In 1936, a German researcher named Gerhard Schrader created the first ever nerve agent by accident. He was attempting to develop a new insecticide for Germany's food supply, but instead created a deadly chemical weapon, which, while on the brink of war, Hitler would begin developing to use on the Allied forces. Thankfully, the nerve agent was never deployed by the Nazis, and after the war, Britain found itself needing to dispose of what it had seized. Operation Sandcastle was the mission to get rid of a stockpile of more than 71,000 bombs in the sea off the coasts of Scotland and Northern Ireland. Today, 70 years on, there are still many unanswered questions. After discovering that Schrader's insecticide not only killed insects but also the animals around them, researchers began developing it as a weapon as World War II loomed. The nerve agent was called Tabun, from the German word for taboo. While other chemical weapons such as mustard gas and phosgene took hours or days to kill victims, Tabun required only 20 minutes. In 1943, the first large-scale Tabun factory was up and running in Poland. Hitler, however, never sanctioned the use of Tabu. In the years after the war ended, the British captured thousands of German bombs filled with the nerve agent. While most were destroyed, a stockpile was split between Britain and the US. But many of the bombs were leaking or were too dangerous to keep. In 1954, the Ministry of Defence concluded that the Tabun held no value in a world with nuclear weapons and, by then, more advanced chemical weapons like sarin were prevalent. Operation Sandcastle was tasked with dumping the stockpile of Tabun 80 miles north west of Northern Ireland. The stockpile was first brought to Cairnyan, in Dumfries and Galloway, where the weapons were divided among three ships to be ready for scuttling – the act of purposefully sinking a ship. On July 25, 1955, 16,088 bombs were loaded onto the SS Empire Claire before it was towed out to sea. iStock At around 10am, on July 27, TNT charges were used to sink the vessel and its load 2,500 metres down into the depths of the Atlantic Ocean. The MV Vogtland and the SS Kotka were loaded with the rest of Tabun, approximately 26,000 bombs each, and they too were sunk. In 2020, the Ministry of Defence was criticised after it was revealed it lost the records containing the details of 24 chemical weapons, including those of Operation Sandcastle. It was also revealed that the dumped nerve agent was never monitored. Google Earth According to the then-secretary state of defence, there was no monitoring because of the depth of the water and because Tabun is 'destroyed by hydrolysis and rendered harmless in seawater'. After the destruction, the world has not seen the end of chemical weapons. During the Iran-Iraq war beginning in 1980, Iran engaged in chemical warfare against Iraq. It was used in the Tokyo subway terrorist attacks in 1995. In 2012, the Syrian regime used the chemical weapon sarin on its own civilians during the 14-year-long civil war. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Guardian
7 hours ago
- The Guardian
Drayton and Mackenzie by Alexander Starritt review – a warmly comic saga of male friendship
Scottish-German author Alexander Starritt's debut, The Beast, followed a tabloid journalist; his second novel, We Germans, was about a Nazi. His new book gets us rooting for two wealthy management consultants fresh out of Oxford, both of them men (assuming you haven't already tuned out). I suspect his agent might have found it easier to pitch a novel about sex criminals, not least because Drayton and Mackenzie's approach is so unfashionably traditionalist: it's a chunky, warmly observed, 9/11-to-Covid saga that, while comic in tone and often extremely funny, doesn't labour under any obligation to send up its protagonists, still less take them down. James Drayton, born to north London academics, is a socially awkward high achiever who privately measures himself against Christopher Columbus and Napoleon. Joining the McKinsey consultancy firm after coming top of his year in philosophy, politics and economics hasn't eased the pressure he has always felt to 'come up with something so brilliant it was irrefutable, like the obliterating ultra-white light of a nuclear bomb'. The key to his sense of destiny arrives in the unlikely shape of a slacking junior colleague, Roland Mackenzie, who graduated with a 2:2 in physics (for James, a shame akin to 'admitting erectile dysfunction'). Mutual suspicion thaws when they're tasked with restructuring an Aberdeen oil firm in possession of the patents for a pioneering underwater turbine – tempting James and Roland to poach their star engineer, quit McKinsey and go it alone in green energy. It's a mark of Starritt's confidence that the quest to harness tidal power – the book's main business – gets going only 200 pages in. We feel in safe hands from the start, reassured that he knows the story's every last turn ('In later years, when he was the subject of articles and interviews …' begins a line about James on the second page, his A-levels barely over). But we're kept on our toes: while the narration hews to the point of view of the central duo, it fills in the period backdrop – bailouts, Brexit – by dipping unpredictably into the perspective of real-life figures such as the Italian politician and former president of the European Central Bank Mario Draghi, seen delivering his famous 2012 speech vowing to save the euro 'whatever it takes'. As James and Roland jet around the world for venture capital, Starritt grants hefty speaking parts to PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel and Elon Musk (is he allowed to do that?, I asked myself: always a sign of a writer up to something exciting). The plot is crammed with curveballs for the plucky entrepreneurs, whether it's a shattered undersea cable, a coma caused by undiagnosed diabetes, or the dilemma that ensues when James and Roland fall for the same woman, having spent much of the novel joking uneasily about going to bed with each other. With a joyful knack for pithy analogy, the writing holds our attention as much as the events: the aforementioned relationship wrangle induces a 'low eczemal itch of guilt' in the eventual girlfriend-stealer, while new parents drive home from the maternity ward feeling 'like random civilians handed suits and guns and told to protect a miniature, defenceless president'. There's pathos as well as laughter in the protagonists' beer-and-Champions League blokeishness, a way to keep unvoiced feeling at bay. When Roland, nearly 30, wistfully recalls a teenage holiday fling, he thinks that 'she was probably someone's mum by now', a line hinting at his deep-lying sense of stasis, even as the company's ambition grows: not just electricity, but rocket fuel. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion Because it concentrates on personalities rather than systems or ideas – not unlike Richard T Kelly's 2023 North Sea oil novel, The Black Eden – Drayton and Mackenzie probably won't be called 'cli-fi' in the way that the novels of Richard Powers are, but it's a reminder that science fiction isn't the only game in town in terms of writing about the environment and technology. Yet while there's no shortage of chat about electrolysers and optimal blade rotation, Starritt keeps his focus on the human story of invention: dangling quietly over the action is the fact that James, lauded as a visionary, relies mostly for his ideas on other people. In the end, though, critique of disruptor-era genius is less important here than feeling and friendship; the winningly Edwardian, even Victorian, approach to storytelling extends right to the heart-swelling deathbed climax. It might have been subtitled A Love Story. Drayton and Mackenzie by Alexander Starritt is published by Swift (£16.99). To support the Guardian buy a copy at Delivery charges may apply.
Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Meet the battle-ready cyborg cockroaches that humans can control for SPY missions
Human operators will be able to control them by zapping their tiny brains with electrical pulses BUGGING OUT Meet the battle-ready cyborg cockroaches that humans can control for SPY missions Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) FIRST there were spy bees, now there are battle-ready cockroaches. Technology is changing, and therefore, so is warfare. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 A human-controlled spy cockroach could go on secret spy missions to expose information about enemy positions Credit: SWARM Biotactics 3 The bio-robotic startup secured €10 million in seed funding last month to help get its bugs onto the battlefield Credit: Reuters It might feel plucked out of science fiction, but German military tech company SWARM Biotactics is working on cyborg cockroaches that can spy behind enemy lines. The insects - hailed for being remarkably durable - are equipped with miniature backpacks fitted with cameras and other tools to gather data on enemies in real time. Human operators will be able to control them by zapping their tiny brains with electrical pulses. Each zap allows humans to control the insects' movements remotely, meaning they don't have to enter hostile environments themselves in order to gather information. "Our bio-robots - based on living insects - are equipped with neural stimulation, sensors, and secure communication modules," Swarm Biotactic's CEO Stefan Wilhelm told Reuters. "They can be steered individually or operate autonomously in swarms." For example, a human-controlled spy cockroach could go on secret spy missions to expose information about enemy positions. The bio-robotic startup secured €10 million in seed funding last month that will help get its bugs onto the battlefield. "Conventional systems fail where control is needed most - denied zones, collapsed infrastructure, politically complex terrain," said Wilhelm. "SWARM is the first company building an entirely new category of robotics: biologically integrated, AI-enabled, and mass-deployable systems for persistent intelligence in places no drone or ground robot can reach. Watch terrifying 'terminator' robot dogs with AI-targeted rifles being tested by US Marines "This funding moves us from deep tech to deployment - delivering the infrastructure democracies need to operate more smartly, more safely, and with total tactical awareness.' But SWARM aren't the only ones trying to bio-hack insects. A team of scientists in China claimed they have created the world's lightest mind control device for bees. While the device is strapped to a bee's back, three needles are pierced into the bee's brain. Operators can then send electronic pulses into the bee's brain and command it to fly in whichever direction they want. During tests, published in the Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering earlier this month, the bees obeyed their operator's commands with 90 per cent accuracy. Beyond warfare, mind-controlled bugs could be used to help disaster relief operations. UKRAINE WAR SHIFT Wilhelm believes Europe is entering a decade where "access, autonomy, and resilience define geopolitical advantage". And Russia's invasion of Ukraine seemed to spark that shift, dozens of sources from across business, investment and government told Reuters. Sven Weizenegger, who heads up the Cyber Innovation Hub - the tech accelerator for the German armed forces, said the war in Ukraine removed a stigma towards working in the defence sector. "Germany has developed a whole new openness towards the issue of security since the invasion," he told the outlet. The country has been shaped by the trauma of Nazi militarism and a strong post-war pacifist ethos that has been reflected in its relatively small and cautious defence sector, Reuters noted. But Germany plans to nearly triple its regular defence budget to around €162 billion ($175 billion) per year by 2029. Much of that money will go into reinventing the nature of warfare, Reuters reported, citing sources. Sources also claimed that Chancellor Friedrich Merz sees artificial intelligence (AI) and start-up technology as key to its defence plans. The German leader is reportedly slashing red tape to connect startups directly to its military.
