'Poland, once the spearhead of NATO and EU enlargement, could become the country that closes the door to new members'
Will Poland be the country that, paradoxically, closes that cycle? The victory on Sunday, June 1, of the nationalist conservative candidate Karol Nawrocki in the presidential election, with the backing of the far right, over centrist Rafal Trzaskowski, legitimately raises that question.
The result itself may seem insignificant: Nawrocki won by only a slim majority (50.89%) and, under Polish institutions, it is the prime minister who governs, in this case the highly experienced Donald Tusk. In theory, the center-right government retains power in Warsaw. But the president has the power to block legislation, thanks to a veto right over laws passed by parliament and certain appointments made by the government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
24 minutes ago
- Euronews
Fourteen member states oppose the Commission's EU budget overhaul
With the proposal for the next EU budget after 2027 just around the corner, the political landscape is far from calm. The latest sign of unrest: fourteen member states have endorsed a non-paper opposing the European Commission's plans to centralise the management and distribution of EU funds. 'Only a distinct and robust budget and a region-based allocation methodology, reflecting the different development levels of regions, together with a stand-alone Cohesion Policy dedicated legislation, can ensure that the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) will deliver long-term unity, competitiveness and convergence across EU regions,' states the document. Bulgaria, Czechia, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia and Slovakia signed the non-paper on 'Cohesion Policy in the Future MFF,' aiming to secure a separate pot for narrowing the socio-economic gap between the richest and poorest European regions. The call from more than half of the member states comes in response to a leak about the Commission's plans to create a single funding pot for each EU country (covering around 530 programmes) and to link the receipt of funds to the fulfilment of policy objectives. The potential centralisation of the management and access to EU money would give greater power to national governments and Brussels, while proving detrimental to regions and other departments within the European Commission. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen is expected to present the budget proposal for the next long-term financial period (2028–2034) on July 16 — but criticism from regions, member states, MEPs, and industry representatives continues to mount. Both Poland and the centre-left Socialists and Democrats (S&D) group in the European Parliament have raised concerns about the Commission's intention to merge dozens of individual funding streams into a single cash pot per member state, as detailed in their respective position papers on the next MFF. 'We will strongly oppose the 'one national plan per member state' approach, as well as the possibility for national plans to be underpinned by a 'payments against reforms' rule,' the Socialists wrote in a letter to von der Leyen sent on Monday. The Socialists — the second-largest group in the Parliament — also called on the Commission chief to propose a larger and more ambitious long-term budget, exceeding the current 1% of the EU's GDP, which is equivalent to around €1.2 trillion. Poland's conservative government, meanwhile, emphasized that future reforms should not lead to further centralisation or the merging of funding instruments. 'Regions should remain at the core of cohesion policy,' its position paper, dated 1 July, states. The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and cohesion policy together account for more than two-thirds of the total EU budget — and Poland, which receives the most funding from cohesion policy, insists that their combined share in the MFF should not be less than it is currently. 'One of the priorities of the next MFF should be increasing the importance of economic, social, and territorial cohesion within the EU and striving for convergence,' Poland defends in its position paper. 'Competitiveness and cohesion are the two sides of the same coin,' they conclude.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
How could the US-China trade rearrangement affect Europe?
Since United States President Donald Trump's inauguration, he has announced more than 50 new or revised tariffs, including pauses, backdowns, escalations and de-escalations. As the state of US-China trade relations remains uncertain, many US firms are considering alternative sources of supply. Without a shift to different sources, prices may rise, and US companies and consumers might need to reduce or replace one product with another, virtually similar one. In this scenario, Europe could play a key role, both as an exporter and an importer. "Europe faces an increasingly difficult challenge: how to transition from being a recipient of decisions made by China and the US to actively shaping its own future," stated Francesca Ghiretti, director of the RAND Europe China Initiative, in a commentary piece. On average, Europe already supplies 55% of the available global export market for products which the US imports from China. According to nine varied simulations conducted by the global management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, the European Union, along with Norway, Switzerland, and the UK, could potentially replace about 30% to 65% of US imports from China with its exports, even in the face of high US tariffs on European goods. In each simulation, it is assumed that the value of US imports from China for each product falls to zero, and that instead, the US sources each product from other exporters. Products trade Europe's role in this scenario is most pronounced when it comes to electronics, other manufacturing, and textiles. The US has $191 billion, $52 billion, and $45 billion within each of these industries to rearrange, respectively. These are the same sectors for which the US currently imports mainly from China. In electronics, especially, Europe could be the primary substitute supplier in the US market. Another example is toys. Europe could supply the US market with Czech and German toys, replacing those made in China. This could see European consumers increasingly buy Chinese-made toys. As Europe has increased its exports to the US, it has also become a significant destination for Chinese exports, absorbing up to 55% of China's current shipments to the US. This shift could lead to deeper trade interdependence between Europe and China, as well as geopolitical tensions. "The next months and years will challenge whether Europe can stay the course, or it will lose itself trying to respond to ongoing challenges," said Francesca Ghiretti.
Euronews
3 hours ago
- Euronews
Merz faces Pride flag fallout after saying Bundestag 'not a circus'
German Chancellor and CDU party leader Friedrich Merz is facing significant backlash from his political opponents after rejecting calls to fly a Pride flag at the Bundestag, which he said was "not a circus tent where any flag could be hoisted". In an appearance on public broadcaster ARD on Tuesday, Merz defended his party's lawmakers and Bundestag President Julia Klöckner — who previously declined to display the rainbow flag for Christopher Street Day on 26 July — saying the banner should only be flown on 17 May, the International Day Against Homophobia. "On all other days, the German flag and the European flag are flown at the German Bundestag and no other. And this decision is the right one," he said. In Germany, Christopher Street Day is observed in memory of the 1969 Stonewall riots in New York — the first major LGBTQ+ community uprising against persecution — and is typically marked by Pride events across the country. In previous years, the rainbow flag was displayed at the Bundestag building during Pride events, and prior chancellors have participated in Christopher Street Day celebrations. Merz's words have sparked considerable criticism from the opposition. Sophie Koch, the government's queer commissioner and centre-left SPD lawmaker questioned whether the statement implied LGBTQ+ community were "circus animals". Green Party leader in the Bundestag, Katharina Dröge, stated that the rainbow flag represents "a group that is increasingly affected by hostility, violence and hatred" and thus has its place in parliament. Green-led lawmakers also staged a protest in the Bundestag chamber, wearing clothes that collectively formed the rainbow flag.
