logo
I ran 40 miles with the Cloudsurfer 2 vs. On Cloudmonster 2 — which shoe should you buy?

I ran 40 miles with the Cloudsurfer 2 vs. On Cloudmonster 2 — which shoe should you buy?

Tom's Guide14-06-2025
The On Cloudmonster 2 is a cushioned daily trainer that's a little firmer than most running shoes these days, including the Cloudsurfer 2. It's a good option for long runs, and despite being heavier than the Cloudsurfer 2, it's more responsive and similarly versatile.
The On Cloudsurfer 2 is a comfortable daily trainer with a smooth, rockered ride. It's softer than the Cloudmonster 2, as well as being lighter and cheaper, but it's not the most durable shoe and also feels a bit flat on longer runs or when running at faster paces.
The On Cloudsurfer 2 and On Cloudmonster 2 are both comfortable running shoes that are great for daily training, but they have different feels on the run that may make them suitable for different kinds of runners.
I've done around 40 miles of running in each shoe, and below you'll find my direct comparison of their relative strengths and weaknesses. Check out our On Cloudmonster 2 review and On Cloudsurfer 2 review for a more detailed take on each shoe.
The On Cloudmonster 2 is the more expensive of the two shoes, costing $180 / £170 compared to $160 / £150 for the On Cloudsurfer 2. However, the Cloudmonster 2 is also the older of the two shoes, so it's a little more likely to feature in sales — it's currently in the On last season sale for $140, so it's worth checking when comparing the two shoes.
The On Cloudmonster 2 is currently available in 11 colors, while the Cloudsurfer 2 is currently available in five colors.
At 10.7oz for a US men's size 9.5, the Cloudmonster 2 is the heavier shoe, with the Cloudsurfer 2 tipping the scales at 9.7oz in the same size.
Part of that weight difference is down to the fact that the Cloudmonster 2 has a higher stack of foam in its midsole and a lower drop with a 6mm heel-to-toe offset — the Cloudsurfer 2 has a 9mm drop.
I found that both shoes fit me well enough in my normal running shoe size, but as someone with a narrow foot, the Cloudmonster 2 did feel very wide and roomy in the toe-box — I preferred the snugger fit of the Cloudsurfer 2.
The Cloudsurfer 2's upper is thicker and more padded around the tongue and collar, with the Cloudmonster 2 using a more breathable material and a thinner tongue.
Both uppers flex well and support the foot securely around the midfoot and heel, but the Cloudmonster 2's upper might feel less oppressive if you're always running in hot conditions.
By far the biggest difference in the design of the two shoes is how their midsoles are set up. The Cloudsurfer 2 uses On's soft Helion foam with a series of holes designed to collapse like dominoes and create a rockered feel to the ride.
This CloudTecPhase design makes the ride smoother than that of the Cloudmonster 2, which has three layers of foam in its midsole.
The Cloudmonster 2 uses Helion foam for its top layer, and then the bottom is On's distinctive CloudTec pods, which are made from a firmer and heavier material than Helion.
There is also a nylon-blended plate, "Speedboard," in the midsole of the Cloudmonster 2, which helps stabilize the high stack of foam and speed up the transition from heel to toe.
Both shoes have pods on the outsole of the shoe, with rubber covering the forefoot and heel, leaving some exposed foam in the midsole.
I didn't notice a difference in the grip of the two shoes, which have both delivered reliable traction in the wet, and neither outsole is showing any undue signs of wear and tear after around 40 miles of running.
I used both the On Cloudsurfer 2 and On Cloudmonster 2 for a variety of training runs, mostly at an easy pace, with some faster intervals thrown in.
In my testing, I found that both shoes excelled in similar runs and had the same weaknesses — both are good for easy runs and neither feels that responsive at pace, but they have quite different ride feels.
The On Cloudsurfer 2 is a lot softer than the Cloudmonster 2, and the rocker is very noticeable on the run. It has a smooth feel that feels great for ticking over at a relaxed pace.
At faster paces, I found that the soft foam flattened out and the shoe didn't give a lot back in terms of energy return. It's quite a light shoe and you can run quickly in it, but it doesn't feel as good as it does for easy runs.
In contrast, the Cloudmonster 2 has a firmer ride and doesn't roll through as smoothly, but the midsole setup is a bit more responsive and bouncy.
I found the Cloudmonster 2 better for long runs than the Cloudsurfer 2, and although it's heavier, it was as good for faster runs as the Cloudsurfer 2 because the midsole foam provides more energy return.
Overall, neither are shoes I'd describe as exceptionally versatile, but both are good daily trainers that work well for easy runs and can handle speedwork reasonably well.
I'd pair either with a lighter shoe for fast runs myself, but if you want one shoe for everything, both can do the job.
My preferences skew towards lighter and rockered running shoes, so I'd reach for the On Cloudsurfer 2 myself. I found it more fun to run in, and it was easy to get into a good rhythm on easy runs thanks to the rockered midsole.
It's also cheaper and lighter, and the fit is a little better for me because I have a narrow foot. I love the look of the Cloudsurfer 2 as a casual shoe, too.
The On Cloudmonster 2 has its strengths, though. I think it will be more durable thanks to its firmer midsole foam, and it holds up better on long runs when the Cloudsurfer 2 can start to feel a little flat. It also feels more natural when walking than the softer Cloudsurfer 2.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Earthquake inside Apple' — AI efforts just dealt another major blow
'Earthquake inside Apple' — AI efforts just dealt another major blow

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

'Earthquake inside Apple' — AI efforts just dealt another major blow

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Apple's push to catch up in the AI race has hit another serious roadblock. The company has lost Ruoming Pang, the highly respected leader of its foundation models team, to Meta — and insiders say the ripple effects are already being felt across Apple's AI division. Pang, who joined Apple in 2021 from Google DeepMind, was central to the company's efforts to build its own large language models (LLMs). His departure, along with that of several close collaborators, signals deeper unrest within Apple's AI ranks. As reported by The Information, Pang's exit and its aftermath has led to an 'earthquake inside Apple." Why Pang's exit matters Pang was known for his hands-on technical contributions, including developing a key open-source training tool for Apple's AI models. Under his leadership, Apple made strides in shrinking LLMs to run efficiently on iPhones, a critical part of its 'on-device AI' strategy. But those advances came with internal tensions. According to reporting from The Information, Pang's team had wanted to release some of Apple's AI models as open source earlier this year. This move could have shown progress while inviting collaboration from outside researchers. But Apple exec Craig Federighi reportedly shut it down, concerned it would expose performance compromises Apple made to run the models on iPhones. That disagreement was just one of many signs of friction between Apple's research-driven foundation models team and its product-focused leadership. A shift in power (and priorities) Earlier this year, Apple reorganized its AI efforts following delays to its revamped Siri assistant. The Siri team was pulled from longtime AI chief John Giannandrea and placed under Federighi, who also oversees Apple's software division. Meanwhile, Pang's team remained with Giannandrea, but the separation highlighted a growing divide between R&D and product execution. Now, with Pang gone and several of his top researchers either leaving or exploring offers from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta, Apple faces a major talent drain at a critical moment. Bloomberg recently reported that Apple is testing outside models, including those from OpenAI and Google, to power Siri, a move that reportedly disheartened many on the internal AI team. The bigger picture While Apple made headlines with its Apple Intelligence announcement in June, integrating ChatGPT into iPhones and showcasing writing and image-generation tools, the company's own foundation models remain behind closed doors. Insiders say there's still a lack of clear direction about whether Apple wants to compete head-to-head with models like GPT-4 or build more narrow, hardware-optimized tools. In an interview with Tom's Guide following WWDC 2025, Craig Federighi, Apple's senior vice president of software engineering, and Greg Joswiak, the senior vice president of worldwide marketing, made it clear that Apple doesn't want to make a chatbot. Without Pang's leadership and vision, some fear Apple's internal AI efforts could stagnate, or become overly reliant on outside partners. Others remain optimistic that the hiring of Zhifeng Chen, a former Google engineer now leading the foundation models team, will bring fresh momentum. Either way, Apple's AI ambitions face a decisive inflection point. As rivals like Meta, OpenAI and Google continue to poach top researchers and ship headline-grabbing models, Apple must prove it's still a serious contender in the generative AI era. More from Tom's Guide Claude 4 vs ChatGPT explained: What each AI does best — and how to choose the right one No, The Simpsons didn't predict that — here's how AI is fueling viral hoaxes (and how to spot them) I upgraded to Alexa+ for my busy family — here's what it did surprisingly well Sign in to access your portfolio

Ambiq Launches Two New Edge AI Runtime Solutions
Ambiq Launches Two New Edge AI Runtime Solutions

Hamilton Spectator

time2 days ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Ambiq Launches Two New Edge AI Runtime Solutions

AUSTIN, Texas, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ambiq Micro, Inc. ('Ambiq'), a technology leader in ultra-low-power semiconductor solutions for edge AI, today unveils HeliosRT (Runtime) and HeliosAOT (Ahead-of-Time), two new edge AI runtime solutions optimized for the Ambiq Apollo Systems-on-Chip (SoCs) family. These developer tools are designed to significantly enhance the performance and energy efficiency of AI models for the unique demands of edge computing environments. Addressing Critical Edge AI Challenges As AI workloads increasingly migrate to edge devices, developers face growing pressure to deliver high performance within strict power budgets. Traditional AI frameworks often struggle in ultra-low-power scenarios, making it difficult to deploy sophisticated AI models in battery-powered devices, such as wearables, hearables, IoT sensors, and industrial monitors. Ambiq's new runtime solutions expand its growing portfolio of developer-centric tools, designed to help engineers unlock the full potential of Apollo SoCs. HeliosRT and HeliosAOT offer flexible, high-performance deployment options for edge AI across a wide range of applications, from digital health and smart homes to industrial automation and beyond. HeliosRT: Power-Optimized LiteRT HeliosRT is a performance-enhanced implementation of LiteRT (formerly TensorFlow Lite for Microcontrollers) that is tailored for energy-constrained environments. Fully compatible with existing TensorFlow workflows, HeliosRT introduces key improvements: HeliosAOT: Compiling LiteRT to Optimized C Code HeliosAOT introduces a ground-up, ahead-of-time compiler that transforms TensorFlow Lite models directly into embedded C code for edge AI deployment. This innovative approach offers runtime-level, or better, performance with additional benefits: 'The intersection of developer experience and power efficiency is our north star,' said Carlos Morales, VP of AI at Ambiq. 'HeliosRT and HeliosAOT are designed to integrate seamlessly with existing AI development pipelines while delivering the performance and efficiency gains that edge applications demand. We believe this is a major step forward in making sophisticated AI truly ubiquitous.' Powered by SPOT® and Real-World Success Both Helios solutions are built on Ambiq's patented Sub-threshold Power Optimized Technology (SPOT), which is the foundation behind over 270 million devices deployed worldwide. Leveraging years of hardware-software co-design, these tools deliver measurable performance gains and streamlined deployment for developers targeting the edge. Availability Both solutions are supported with robust documentation, ready-to-use examples, and dedicated engineering assistance for Ambiq customers. About Ambiq Ambiq's mission is to enable intelligence (artificial intelligence (AI) and beyond) everywhere by delivering the lowest power semiconductor solutions. Ambiq enables its customers to deliver AI compute at the edge where power consumption challenges are the most profound. Ambiq's technology innovations, built on the patented and proprietary sub-threshold power optimized technology (SPOT), fundamentally deliver a multi-fold improvement in power consumption over traditional semiconductor designs. Ambiq has powered over 270 million devices to date. For more information, visit . Contact Charlene Wan VP of Corporate Marketing and Investor Relations cwan@ +1.512.879.2850 A photo accompanying this announcement is available at

AI-Powered Smart Devices Help Older Adults Age at Home, Survey Finds
AI-Powered Smart Devices Help Older Adults Age at Home, Survey Finds

CNET

time7 days ago

  • CNET

AI-Powered Smart Devices Help Older Adults Age at Home, Survey Finds

Older adults often find artificial intelligence smart home devices and voice assistants useful in helping them age in place, according to a new survey by the University of Michigan. More than half of people surveyed aged 50 and older have used generative AI tools they spoke or typed messages to, according to the National Poll on Healthy Aging, released by the U-M Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation. By comparison, a June Pew Research Center poll found that 25% of US adults 50 to 64 and 10% of those 65 and older had used ChatGPT, OpenAI's flagship AI tool and the most popular chatbot. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) The Michigan survey, a telephone poll of 2,883 adults ages 50 to 97 across the US, looked not only at text-based chatbots like ChatGPT but also voice assistants like Amazon's Alexa and Apple's Siri. Most significantly, the survey found nearly all older adults want to be sure when they're receiving information generated by AI. "AI is here to stay. Many older adults seem to know about its benefits, yet most want more information about potential risks when using AI technologies," Robin Brewer, an assistant professor in the U-M School of Information, said in a statement. "The near-universal interest in clear labeling of AI-generated information should also be heeded by policymakers and the AI industry." Smart home devices help older adults maintain independence The Michigan researchers found 51% of Americans aged 50 or older had used voice assistants in the past year, with 80% of those saying the devices helped them live independently and safely at home. AI-powered home security devices, like smart locks, cameras and alarm systems, were used by 35% of the adults, with 96% saying they helped them live independently. "Smart home devices frequently suggest using their latest features to watch over older relatives or help them live better lives," CNET smart home expert Tyler Lacoma said. "AI face recognition, for example, can send alerts to a family member if it spots someone leaving their home or granny pod to go shopping. Smart locks, meanwhile, make sure that older users never forget to lock the doors when they leave. I'm curious to see what the newest AI voice assistants like Gemini and Alexa Plus will bring to the table for older adults, perhaps by making more complex home technology easier to use with simple conversation." Another 14% of adults reported using AI to receive health-related information, although 47% of them said they'd rather interact with a person or by phone for that kind of information. Older adults are generally skeptical of AI Just 35% of the older adults surveyed said they'd be interested in using AI in their day-to-day lives, and while 58% expressed interest in knowing more about the benefits of AI, even more, at 81%, said they wanted to know more about the risks. Just over half of them said they thought AI would do more harm than good. That split generally aligns with the results of a broader Pew survey from earlier this year, which found 51% of Americans were more concerned than excited about AI. Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways You Can Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts The older adults in the Michigan survey also expressed understandable skepticism about the information generated by AI models, with 47% saying they had little or no trust in it. A similar portion said they weren't confident they could detect when it's incorrect. That problem is significant, especially as more information-gathering tools like search engines are built primarily on AI. Experts advise that you should always double-check information before making an important decision. "This inability to tell verified information from false information, whether in the form of text, image, video or audio, is especially important when it comes to health information," poll director Dr. Jeffrey Kullgren said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store