City council team wins national award for work to prevent homelessness
An Oxford City Council team has won a national award for its work to prevent homelessness.
The housing needs team was crowned Housing Team of the Year at the Local Government Chronicle Awards 2025 on June 11.
The awards event, with more than 1,200 attendees and more than 100 judges, recognises the best in council achievements across the UK.
The housing needs team was recognised for its prevention efforts, its success in reducing rough sleeping, and its long-term focus on improving outcomes for people in temporary accommodation.
Oxford City Council's housing needs team at the Local Government Chronicle Awards 2025 (Image: Oxford City Council) It was also praised for its multi-pronged and data-driven strategy to prevent homelessness, its commitment to the Housing First approach, and its partnerships with health and other services across the county.
Councillor Linda Smith, cabinet member for housing, said: "I'm absolutely thrilled that our housing needs team has received this national recognition.
"Their commitment, creativity, and relentless focus on reducing homelessness in incredibly challenging circumstances is nothing short of inspirational.
Councillor Linda Smith (Image: Ed Nix) "This award is a testament to years of hard work, strong partnerships, and a shared belief that everyone deserves a safe and stable home. I could not be prouder of the team."
The Local Government Chronicle Awards included a rigorous judging process, with teams presenting their work to panels of senior local government leaders.
A spokesperson for the council said: "To win is a powerful endorsement of Oxford's approach to tackling homelessness and housing insecurity."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The ugly buildings we secretly love
When news came last week that Liverpool's Metropolitan Cathedral of Christ the King – colloquially known as 'Paddy's Wigwam' – had been granted Grade I-listed status, it marked a long-awaited vindication for a building that has weathered its fair share of criticism. The design by Sir Frederick Gibberd, selected from 300 entries worldwide, took shape over five years (1962–67) and sits atop Mount Pleasant, overlooking the city with views stretching to the Mersey estuary beyond. Built quickly and cheaply – as many post-war buildings were – it has been described as 'a gargantuan concrete aberration from the Apollo space programme'. Even as recently as 2013, CNN named it one of the world's ugliest buildings. Inside, of course, the story is very different. Bathed in coloured light from the kaleidoscopic stained glass, the cathedral is an extraordinary space – one that has come to be cherished by Liverpudlians, Catholic or not. It is the latest in a long line of buildings that, though they didn't receive universal acclaim at first, have endured nonetheless. The 1997 vote for Scottish Devolution meant a new parliament was needed, but its birth was, to put it mildly, a car crash. Ten times over budget and years behind schedule, Holyrood's construction became a dream story for the press but a nightmare for MSPs and civil servants, whose mistakes were broadcast daily. The image of the dour, thrifty Scot clashed with the flamboyance of the building's cost and design, hardly endearing it to the public when it opened in 2004. Questions were also raised about the practicality of the joint design by RMJM – one of the world's largest architecture and design firms – and Barcelona-based architect Enric Miralles, who avoided much of the controversy by passing away midway through the project in 2000. Yet opinions shifted after it won the 2005 Stirling Prize, the highest honour in British architecture. Scots, embracing a new era free from Westminster's control, came to see the building as a symbol of a renaissance north of the border. Today, visitors flock to marvel at its outré design. Hillingdon Council's Ford Granada-driving apparatchiks wanted a new HQ, and what they got ended up defining over a decade of suburban style in Britain. If the Hillingdon Civic Centre reminds you of a supermarket, you wouldn't be far off – this became the signature look of Tescos and Safeways across the south. The bulky Civic Centre was designed by Andrew Derbyshire of RMJM and opened in 1979. 'Like any suburban orgy, it was more comical than sexy,' said the architecture journalist Jonathan Meades. 'It was the architectural equivalent of Benny Hill or Sid James: coarse, matey, blokeish, undemanding, unthreatening, accessible.' This building felt like the starting point of a backlash against the progressive and exciting modernism that had flourished during Britain's 'Les Trente Glorieuses'. Over the following 30 years, there was little but disdain for modernist achievements and a widespread retreat from ambition, with brick vernacular becoming especially fashionable in this new, cautious era. Nowadays, modernism and postmodernism have found a warmer welcome. While Hillingdon Civic Centre might not immediately evoke the wild, pastel-coloured tropical postmodernism of John Outram and others, it's certainly an uncle to those buildings. Now listed, it enjoys a bit more affection from the people of Uxbridge. The serpentine teaching block, dubbed the Lasdun Wall, snakes along a ridge where University of East Anglia (UEA) students study, while the eye-popping ziggurats tumbling down towards the River Yare are where they sleep. Space-age chic seems entirely at odds with sleepy Norfolk; architectural historian Elain Harwood called it 'the boldest architecture of any new university', and it became the backdrop to Malcolm Bradbury's novel The History Man. It's heartening that, despite the UEA's stark 1960s campus, it has gained more fans as it has reached middle age. It's not without problems – issues with the fireproof reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC), widely used as a cheap material especially in roofs, have led to the closure of the ziggurats during remediation work. Meanwhile, new extensions to the university have sparked thorough debate. Architecture fans visiting can also explore the Sainsbury Centre next door. Designed by Lord Foster, it opened in 1978 and was hailed as revolutionary for its lightweight, high-tech design, influencing many airports and office buildings throughout the 1980s and 1990s. London's Southbank Centre has long been at the heart of various culture wars. When Churchill's Tories won the autumn 1951 snap election, they sought to dismantle the remains of the Festival of Britain, viewing it as a thoroughly socialist project by Labour's Herbert Morrison – which, of course, it was. The futuristic Skylon was removed, but the Royal Festival Hall survived. The Southbank Centre was expanded in a brutalist style during the 1960s. Its maze of passageways and high walkways confused visitors, while its gruff exteriors offended many sensibilities. In 1988, the then Prince Charles famously likened Denys Lasdun's National Theatre (NT) to a nuclear power station. Today, attitudes have shifted. We now recognise the stark beauty in its complexity and surreal sculptural forms, and the restrained harmony of the theatre complex in particular. John Grindrod wrote in his 2013 book Concretopia that 'Lasdun's interiors have a rather cosy aesthetic,' echoing theatre critic Michael Billington's 1976 view that the NT is 'a superb piece of sculpture.' The entire Southbank complex was designed the way it was because planners insisted on roads and car parks, and even proposed building a heliport next door – hence the Queen Elizabeth Hall's thick, austere walls. Today, the terraces are bustling with diners, while the undercrofts have become a beloved haunt for skateboarders. The residents of Balsall Heath in south Birmingham were certainly grateful when the baths on Moseley Road opened in 1907. Back in 1890, Birmingham was hailed as the 'best-governed city in the world' by Harper's Magazine – a claim that might raise a wry smile from today's locals still waiting for their bins to be collected. Its trams, housing, utilities and public baths were all part of a civic effort to lift the city from industrial slum to modern metropolis. But the baths were not universally loved, and have only narrowly escaped demolition, more due to luck than design. As the 20th century wore on and more homes welcomed bathrooms and washing machines, fewer people needed the bathhouse. And Birmingham (city motto: 'Forward'), spent much of the 1960s demolishing its Victorian and Edwardian architecture, including the grand Central Library and the original New Street Station, as tastes turned against the ornate. In recent years, however, a dedicated campaign has saved the arts-and-crafts building. Now Grade II-listed and undergoing careful restoration, the Moseley Road Baths are protected at last. Scarborough's grande dame was originally conceived as the Cliff Hotel, built at a time when the town was establishing itself as a premier seaside resort following the arrival of the railway on the Yorkshire coast. Visitors came to take the waters, and a grand hotel was needed to accommodate them. But throughout its life, the building has been a victim of its own scale – beset by fires, outbreaks of illness, and now, by its current management. Run as a tired, cut-price hotel, it was dubbed 'the shame of Scarborough' by Tory mayoral candidate Keane Duncan last year. When it opened in the 1860s, it was one of the largest hotels ever built – so large, in fact, that some wondered whether it was all a bit much for the once-sleepy fishing town. The Grand's story is closely tied to that of its architect, the exquisitely named Cuthbert Brodrick. A Hull native, Brodrick also designed Leeds' monumental Town Hall and Corn Exchange – buildings with a distinctive size and swagger that often clashed with the era's more restrained architectural tastes. Brodrick's overblown Oriental Turkish Baths on Cookridge Street in Leeds were unceremoniously demolished in the 1960s – by then, he had well and truly fallen from favour. That changed in 2007, when Jonathan Meades made a film about him for BBC Two, sparking a reappraisal of his work. Today, the Grand is a much-loved landmark on the Yorkshire coast. The Eiffel Tower is perhaps the most famous example of a building once heavily derided that has only grown in popularity with age. Blackpool's imitation, by contrast, was long dismissed as a poor copy aimed at entertaining the lower classes. Like Brighton's more recent i360 seafront tower, it was seen by some as overly tall and something of a white elephant. Today, it's a listed building, and its kitsch swagger has come to define the Blackpool seafront. We'd never dream of demolishing it now – nor its ballroom, the spiritual home of ballroom dancing. Yet in the 1920s, there was serious talk of tearing it all down. It may seem far-fetched, but that's exactly what happened to the similar-looking New Brighton Tower on the Wirral. Despite being even taller than Blackpool's, it had few defenders when it was demolished in 1919 after just 20 years. Its ballroom – where the Beatles played no fewer than 27 concerts – met the same fate in 1969, following a major fire. A gothic wedding cake by the Thames, Strawberry Hill House is a singular and delightfully eccentric creation – perfectly in keeping with its owner, Horace Walpole. An unmarried enigma and gothic novelist who puzzled polite society, Walpole built his fantastical home in Twickenham as a whimsical homage to medieval cathedrals and castles. It was a world away from the architectural fashions of the mid-1700s and, at first, had few admirers. Slowly but surely, people began to visit, drawn in by the fairytale interiors and jaunty gardens, and Strawberry Hill House grew into an attraction. A century later, gothic revival (an architectural style) had become a full-blown Victorian obsession – just look at the Houses of Parliament – so Walpole's creation no longer seemed quite so outlandish. Architecture critic Ian Nairn once remarked that 'Walpole's stucco fancy' was 'prettier and less finicking than you'd expect'. A high-profile restoration in the 2000s, featured on TV, brought a new wave of admirers. Today, the house welcomes around 25,000 visitors a year. Like the face of an ageing celebrity, Buckingham Palace has had more alterations over the years than you can shake a Botox syringe at. Throughout its life, it has endured feelings ranging from antipathy to outright hostility from its residents. The original house, built in 1703 by William Winde, was – using the polite parlance of stately home design – 'improved' countless times. It was so often disliked that entire sections were torn down and rebuilt. John Nash's lavish 1820s redesign nearly bankrupted the Royal household, and he was promptly sacked. When Queen Victoria made it her primary residence in 1837, the palace still failed to charm – particularly Prince Albert. Albert tried to modernise it with plumbing, lighting and even toilets for servants. But, like many of his descendants, he preferred to be elsewhere. His own pet project, Osborne House on the Isle of Wight, was met with a lukewarm response thanks to its oddly Italianate style. The late Queen favoured Windsor and Balmoral; the current King prefers Highgrove and Clarence House. Yet today, tourists flock to the Palace's current form, fronted by Aston Webb's century-old Portland stone façade. More state venue than family home, it may have finally found its purpose. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a relationship psychotherapist – this is how to put your divorce behind you
Most relationship counsellors are in the business of keeping people together. Ann Hogan is more interested in what drives them apart. As a counsellor and psychotherapist with 25 years of experience, Hogan has seen hundreds of unhappy couples and lovelorn individuals sit on her couch. The times have changed, with some 40 per cent of marriages in Britain now ending in divorce, but heartbreak hasn't. 'We all go through the same things, perhaps just in different ways,' Hogan says. 'There's always loss, grief, anger, a change in your sense of self.' What is different when it comes to parting ways today is that 'there's an awful lot of pressure to get over it and move on swiftly', says Hogan. 'Twenty years ago there was more understanding that divorce is a really hard, life-changing experience, even if there was also more stigma back then.' Another big shift: breakups are no longer consigned to our teenage years or 20s. Though divorce rates have risen, there are far fewer divorces taking place within the first decade of marriages, in England and Wales. A quarter of couples who married in 1995 were divorced by 2000, but of those who married in 2012, just 17 percent had split by 2017. It's midlife where many of us now have our toughest breakups 'but there's little said about how this is different and sometimes much harder than a relationship ending earlier in life, because of a longer shared history', Hogan says. The end of a relationship is painful, Hogan believes, but it needn't be painful forever. Her new book, The Way Up After Your Breakup, is meant as a guide for people in the midst of heartbreak, to help them make sense of what has happened and put the past behind them, 'as life moves on whether you want it to or not', Hogan says. Here is what you need to know to move on with it. Sometimes the toughest breakups are the ones we don't expect, says Hogan. Not only do we need to deal with the shock of the sudden loss – the 'weeks spent sobbing into your pillow', as Hogan puts it – we are also left with many more questions than answers. 'Making sense of what happened is an important part of recovering,' she says, 'but at some point you just have to accept that things are how they are, even if you were happy once.' You can also 'use this period to try to understand more about the other person, and yourself', says Hogan. That means going through all of the confusing and troubling thoughts that crop up, without getting stuck in them. Hogan suggests journaling, 'writing it all down but never sending it'. The beauty of this is that 'you can look back in six months' time and see how much you have really moved on, even if it still feels fresh'. It's essential to grieve, but it needn't take up your whole day, says Hogan. It's easy to spend all of your time in a spiral of questions. 'Try saying to yourself, yes I'll cry and I'll worry, but I'm only going to do that between seven and eight o'clock,' she suggests. This way 'you can process the feelings without letting them consume your whole life'. It's easy to get wrapped up in guilt, whether you were the one to end the relationship or the one left regretting going out with your friends that Saturday instead of staying at home with your spouse. There might also be huge guilt over how your split could affect any children that you share. 'Hurting someone that you love is a very hard thing to come to terms with,' Hogan says. For that reason 'people really need to have self-compassion', says Hogan. 'You need to hold onto the fact that you did this because you think it's the best thing for yourself, and probably for everyone else, too.' It's crucial not to get trapped in regret, either. 'No relationship is completely good or bad – even if you really do think it was 90 per cent bad by the end, there will still be happy shared memories and good times to look back on, so there will probably be some regret.' To counter either, 'make a list of all the reasons why you know that the breakup is right, and look at it every day if you need to', Hogan advises. 'This will help you to stick to your guns and not get carried away with guilt.' It's more socially acceptable to break up these days, which comes with its own challenges as well as freedoms. 'Where people might have stayed together because it was 'good enough' in the past, they often end relationships now, as they realise that they've grown apart from their partner and that they're no longer as compatible as they once were,' says Hogan. This is a common scenario in midlife, she adds, where no one is at fault, but the relationship simply isn't making one or both people happy. If you're the one calling time on a partnership like this, then know that it's perfectly OK to do so, but it can also be helpful to acknowledge that our expectations from relationships these days have made the game much harder. 'When I look at my parents' marriage, for instance, I don't think my father ever expected my mother to bring up the children and keep a nice house, and go to work, and at the same time look perfect and be a thousand per cent in bed,' says Hogan. 'Similarly, my father went to work and made money, and he wasn't expected to change nappies or do the shopping.' The majority of couples expect more from each other now, so if you're in this boat, remind yourself that 'there is more pressure these days to do it all', and that love sometimes just won't be enough to keep a partnership together. We're often told that it's the mature thing to stay friends with our exes, to chat properly if we bump into them in Sainsbury's and always have a date in the diary for a catch-up lunch. Usually this does more harm than good, Hogan believes. 'If you don't really want to be friends, then stop maintaining the relationship,' she says. When it comes to tricky midlife breakups, where finances are inevitably involved, few people end their partnerships on a whim. 'Chances are that you found your partner too unreasonable to live with, and they're very unlikely to become more reasonable once you've broken up,' Hogan points out. Managing a relationship where you have shared children is different, but in that case 'it's all about having firm boundaries and respect for each other', says Hogan. And while she 'would never judge' someone who has sex with their ex, she does steer against it. 'Breakups usually aren't cut and dried things, so having sex with your former partner, even if it's tempting, will complicate things further,' Hogan explains. 'There needs to be a period of reflection where you come to terms with your part in the end of the relationship, and theirs. It has to come sooner or later and by keeping that door open, you're prolonging your own heartache.' 'The Way Up After Your Breakup: What you need to know to put the past behind you' by Ann Hogan (Ortus Press, £11.99) is out now Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Care home staff grant resident's long-held wish
A resident's long-held wish has come true thanks to the kindness of care home staff. Katie Lowe, who has lived at Longueville Court in Orton for a year, had always wanted to enjoy an afternoon tea and a shopping trip. After learning of her dream through the home's 'wishing tree', staff organised an afternoon tea at The Kitchen in Spalding followed by shopping at Springfields. Ms Lowe said: "It was a lovely afternoon. Katie Lowe's wish come true with afternoon tea at The Kitchen (Image: Longueville Court care home) "The food at The Kitchen was wonderful, and the staff were very accommodating. "It is such an amazing feeling to know that such a loving group of people care so much about me that they helped me tick a wish off my bucket list." Recommended Reading: How big would Glastonbury Festival be in Peterborough? General manager Krzyszotof Krzyszofiac said: "We believe that every moment is worth cherishing. Resident, Katie Lowe, at Longueville Court care home had always wanted to have afternoon tea followed by shopping (Image: Longueville Court care home) "We want everyone we care for to know how important they are to us here at Longueville Court. "It is testament to the hard work and dedication of the team here in making our resident's wishes come true. "It was wonderful to see how happy Katie was." Keep up to date with the latest news across Peterborough by signing up to our newsletter email alerts here Have you got a story you want to share with us? Get in touch at: news@
