South Africa's C20 summit: Addressing inequality and unemployment for youth and women
Image: Supplied/GCIS
The Civil 20 (C20) engagement process will prioritise pressing issues like inequality and unemployment affecting women and youth, gathering insights from grassroots communities ahead of the C20 summit, which will pave the way for the G20 summit in South Africa in November.
This was highlighted during a Pretoria media briefing on Monday by the C20 South Africa leadership team, which gave an update on preparations to deliver the C20 policy pack before the G20 summit.
C20 chairperson Thulani Tshefuta said:'We have taken a conscious decision of making this as the first South African G20 to be less about South Africa but more about Africa as a whole.'
The C20, he said, has established structures representing various sectors, including women, disability, youth, health, and education, to shape the G20's processes and ensure diverse perspectives are considered.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
He mentioned that the C20 held a mid-term policy dialogue from June 22-24, 2025, in Sandton, which was attended by over 300 people in person and more than 1 800 virtually.
He said that the C20 deliberations have thoroughly explored the government's theme, emphasising solidarity, equality, and sustainability.
'Our meaning to the theme is that we have different role players that can play different, but complimentary roles between government and non-government actors. At the very least the volatile geo-political development reflects the vulnerabilities of economies to external shocks, almost instantly finding expression on the daily lives and experiences of the people,' he said.
Tshefuta advocated for economically inclusive growth to achieve shared prosperity, emphasising the need to place people at the forefront of economic activities as active participants, contributors, and beneficiaries.
He stressed that education and health are crucial public services that should be accessible to all, regardless of social status, and that quality services in these areas should be universally available.
He said the approach by governments needs to prioritise job creation and employment opportunities, with a specific focus on addressing youth unemployment.
'There must be a dedicated focus on programmes that will implement youth employment from both government and the private sector. Society must do everything to invest in the lives of young people through education, employment and entrepreneurship and the economy in order for society as a whole to draw the demographic dividend. We can not expect to draw a dividend where we have not made investments,' he said.
Leading up to the G20 summit, the organisation will hold provincial consultations in all nine provinces, prioritising grassroots participation and seeking direct input from the people.
C20 South Africa Sherpa, Mabalane Mfundisi, announced that the C20 will organise people-to-people engagements through sports and culture, including a soccer match and a large concert with a global appeal in each of the nine provinces.
The activities will culminate in a major event on November 15 featuring local artists, and on November 16, a soccer match between a PSL team and a team from another African country, with further details to be announced later.
From November 12 to 14, the C20 will hold a consultation meeting, aiming to bring together 3,000 civil society representatives from around the world to discuss and deliberate on the organisation's policy proposals and documents.
Mfundisi said the government's theme focuses on solidarity, equality, and sustainability, and the C20 is working through its various working groups to identify actions that contribute to achieving the goals.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
5 minutes ago
- eNCA
SA scrambles as US slaps 30% tariff on imports
JOHANNESBURG - President Donald Trump's decision to impose a 30% tariff on South African imports has sent shockwaves through key export sectors particularly agriculture. The citrus industry, which exports significant volumes to the US market, is especially concerned about the looming impact. South Africa is now scrambling to negotiate a better trade deal ahead of the tariff implementation deadline on 1 August. But the pressure doesn't stop there Trump has also threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS countries, raising broader concerns about South Africa's trade future.
SowetanLIVE
17 minutes ago
- SowetanLIVE
SAHRC calls for a commission of inquiry after Mkhwanazi's revelations
The South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) is calling for a commission of inquiry after allegations of corruption and political interference made by KwaZulu-Natal police commissioner Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi against police minister Senzo Mchunu and deputy national commissioner for crime detection Lt-Gen Shadrack Sibiya. The commission said it had written to President Cyril Ramaphosa, calling for the establishment of a commission of inquiry to thoroughly investigate the allegations. On Sunday, Mkhwanazi made damning allegations against Mchunu, accusing the minister of interfering with police investigations and also being an associate of people of questionable character. The commission said it viewed the allegations as a significant challenge for the police service, which plays a vital role in maintaining public order, ensuring the safety of citizens and securing constitutional democracy. 'Given the ongoing issues of unresolved cases involving whistle-blower assassinations, corruption, abductions and gender-based violence (GBV), as well as high crime rates, it is essential for the police to regain the public's trust. The SAPS must use all available resources to resolve cases involving the killing of whistle-blowers, as well as those related to corruption and abduction. It is crucial for SAPS to regain public confidence in its ability to fulfil its mandate effectively,' said the commission. Meanwhile, the South African Council of Churches (SACC) said the allegations were serious and disconcerting to the council. Spokesperson Khuthalani Khumalo said the allegations not only undermine the nation's fight against crime but also cause serious reputational harm to the police service, a key national instrument for keeping the nation safe. 'It is troubling to entertain the thought that someone with all the power and instruments bestowed on him by our constitution and state is possibly using this to facilitate criminality instead of fighting crime. It is a scary thought for our nation. These shocking and distressing allegations reveal a seeming collapse of trust between the ministry and the SAPS itself,' said Khumalo. Khumalo said the allegations have left the South African public uncertain about where the loyalties of the leadership of the national and the provincial police services lie, giving way to the question, 'Who can be trusted when it comes to the fight against crime in South Africa?' As an essential first step in the search for the truth, the SACC is calling on Ramaphosa to establish an impartial investigation into all allegations, regardless of who is implicated and to temporarily suspend all parties implicated pending outcomes of the investigation to protect the integrity of the process. The council also wants the strengthening of oversight mechanisms to prevent future compromises of law enforcement agencies and the protection of whistle-blowers who courageously expose wrongdoing within the system. It called on those implicated, including the minister, to search their conscience and put the country first, by fully and comprehensively co-operating with all investigations. 'This requires that they recuse themselves from state responsibilities as they help society regain confidence in their abilities to lead their respective offices,' said Khumalo. TimesLIVE
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Building cultures that outlast politics – moving forward from the seeming collapse of DEI and BEE
In 2020, the murder of George Floyd shook the world and reawakened global demands for racial justice. Boardrooms pledged diversity. Governments proclaimed equity. Corporations rushed to signal solidarity. But just five years later, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the United States have crumbled under executive orders, while in South Africa, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) faces deep public disillusionment. Both DEI and BEE were concessions — important, symbolic acknowledgements of injustice, but negotiated within old systems that largely remained intact. DEI largely diversified workplaces superficially, without transferring real decision-making power or wealth. BEE enabled the emergence of a black elite, but often left structural economic inequality untouched for the majority of South Africans. To more effectively reach equity in historically segregated societies, we need to rethink our system by legislating culture and quality of life in workplaces. True inclusion means that marginalised communities must not only feel empowered, but also be structurally positioned to participate in and shape economically empowered spaces. Structural cul-de-sac The history of economic power in South Africa reveals the structural cul-de-sac that BEE cannot escape, as much as it tries. Starting in the 1600s, Dutch settlers introduced the notion of racialised labour exploitation through enslavement in the Cape, concentrating wealth in the hands of elite white Dutch settlers via stolen bodies and land. Soon after taking power in the 1800s, British colonists freed enslaved persons but maintained racialised exploitative labour and land appropriation practices. By the Union of South Africa in 1910, the British colonial government had implemented a series of land and labour laws that favoured the white colonial elite and disempowered black communities. So, when the National Party took over in 1948, economic policies favouring a white-controlled capitalistic system were firmly rooted in how South African culture, society and politics played out. We all know what happened after. BEE We had an opportunity to right the ship in 1994. When the ANC government signed BEE into law in 2003, it seemed like a way to reverse long-standing policies that had repeatedly pushed black communities to the back of the economic line. Yet more than 20 years later, it's largely failed to do so. When reviewing BEE from a DEI perspective, we see a number of flaws. For one, South African diversity efforts through BEE and similar policies have focused primarily on statistical representation rather than quality of opportunities and equitable chance of success. Because BEE employs 'black' to envelop every non-white person, it retains the uncomplicated notion that racial dynamics are only black versus white. It does not account for ethnic differences within that broad category of 'black.' As a result, BEE focuses on statistical representation rather than quality of opportunities and equitable chance of success, making it easy to rig for the wealthy elite. BEE may be embedded in law, but much of its practical impact has been reduced to compliance exercises, targets for black shareholding and senior appointments that can be gamed without fundamentally shifting economic ownership or decision-making power. Furthermore, like DEI in the US, BEE relies on obedience and goodwill within existing societal frameworks, making both schemes politically vulnerable from the start. DEI programmes can be undone almost overnight through presidential decree. BEE policies risk favouring the elite and leave ordinary citizens behind. Transformation failure Recent articles on issues like corruption have demonstrated just how BEE and related policies have failed to transform South African workplaces. The writers speak to a South Africa that feels trapped in a cycle of economic diversity efforts, corruption and continued entrenchment of racial and class stratification. This collapse is no accident. It reflects a deeper flaw in how both DEI and BEE were conceived: seeking justice through symbolic inclusion, not through the material realities of lived dignity. BEE was not a form of reparations; it did not redistribute land or wealth to those historically excluded. Instead, it offered a pathway for a few to ascend within systems that remained structurally unequal. Similarly, DEI diversified leadership optics without altering who controls opportunity or capital. In post-apartheid South Africa and post-civil rights America, white citizens often anchor their sense of justice in how far we've come from the horrors of apartheid and slavery. Black citizens, by contrast, anchor theirs in how far we still are from the promises of freedom — a future of dignity, opportunity and ownership. Psychologists call this 'anchoring bias', or the tendency to judge progress based on the reference point we're first given. National justice efforts will continue to rise and fall with political tides unless we re-anchor them in systems of power: ownership, education, and everyday workplace dignity, not just in how far we've come, but in how just the present truly is. Some answers The path forward will be tough, but it can be walked. First, BEE should be capped for certain business owners who meet agreed-upon high-grossing income levels. Second, all BEE candidates who reach that income level should be required by law to use x percent of that income towards uplifting the communities that they come from through scholarships and a minimum amount of start-up funding for local black businesses. As part of this scheme, the donating business would also provide mentorship to help the receiving business(es) understand how to expend that money in the most successful and equitable way possible. Finally, both black and white firms need to focus on inclusion training. All businesses have to recognise their ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic class diversity in order to create equitable workspaces and, in the process, become highly lucrative. While some businesses voluntarily participate in inclusion training, not all do, creating an unequal playing field across the country. As a result, the government could mandate cultural transformation as part of its economic policies, crafting a sound-proof solution that is resilient in the face of party politics. While legislation and policy reform are vital, they must be matched by deep culture work – in classrooms, boardrooms and leadership teams. We cannot legislate dignity into someone's daily experience without also transforming how people lead, communicate and relate to one another. That's why grassroots approaches like the Anti-Racist Hot Dog that blend storytelling, education and collective practice are so critical. These kinds of approaches work with schools and companies to turn inclusion into a lived experience — not a checkbox.
