Modi and Trump once called each other good friends. Now the US-India relationship is getting bumpy
In India, the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump was seen as a relationship like no other. That is, until a series of events gummed up the works.
From Trump's tariffs and India's purchase of oil from Russia to a U.S. tilt towards Pakistan, friction between New Delhi and Washington has been hard to miss. And much of it has happened far from the corridors of power and, unsurprisingly, through Trump's posts on social media.
It has left policy experts wondering whether the camaraderie the two leaders shared may be a thing of the past, even though Trump has stopped short of referring to Modi directly on social media. The dip in rapport, some say, puts a strategic bilateral relationship built over decades at risk.
'This is a testing time for the relationship,' said Ashok Malik, a former policy adviser in India's Foreign Ministry.
The White House did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
Simmering tensions over trade and tariffs
The latest hiccup between India and the U.S. emerged last week when Trump announced that he was slapping 25% tariffs on India as well as an unspecified penalty because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. For New Delhi, such a move from its largest trading partner is expected to be felt across sectors, but it also led to a sense of unease in India — even more so when Trump, on social media, called India's economy 'dead.'
Trump's recent statements reflect his frustration with the pace of trade talks with India, according to a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal administration thinking. The Republican president has not been pursuing any strategic realignment with Pakistan, according to the official, but is instead trying to play hardball in negotiations.
Trump doubled down on the pressure Monday with a fresh post on Truth Social, in which he accused India of buying 'massive amounts' of oil from Russia and then 'selling it on the Open Market for big profits.'
'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,' he said.
The messaging appears to have stung Modi's administration, which has been hard-selling negotiations with Trump's team over a trade deal by balancing between India's protectionist system while also opening up the country's market to more American goods.
Many expected India to react strongly considering Modi's carefully crafted reputation of strength. Instead, the announcement prompted a rather careful response from India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who said the two countries are working towards a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement.' India's Foreign Ministry also played down suggestions of any strain.
However, experts in New Delhi wonder.
'Strenuous, uninterrupted and bipartisan efforts in both capitals over the past 25 years are being put at risk by not just the tariffs but by fast and loose statements and social media posts,' said Malik, who now heads the India chapter of The Asia Group, a U.S. advisory firm .
Malik also said the trade deal the Indian side has offered to the U.S. is the 'most expansive in this country's history,' referring to reports that India was willing to open up to some American agricultural products. That is a politically sensitive issue for Modi, who faced a yearlong farmers' protest a few years ago.
Trump appears to be tilting towards Pakistan
The unraveling may have gained momentum over tariffs, but the tensions have been palpable for a while. Much of it has to do with Trump growing closer to Pakistan, India's nuclear rival in the neighborhood.
In May, India and Pakistan traded a series of military strikes over a gun massacre in disputed Kashmir that New Delhi blamed Islamabad for. Pakistan denied the accusations. The four-day conflict made the possibility of a nuclear conflagration between the two sides seem real and the fighting only stopped when global powers intervened.
But it was Trump's claims of mediation and an offer to work to provide a 'solution' regarding the dispute over Kashmir that made Modi's administration uneasy. Since then, Trump has repeated nearly two dozen times that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan.
For Modi, that is a risky — even nervy — territory. Domestically, he has positioned himself as a leader who is tough on Pakistan. Internationally, he has made huge diplomatic efforts to isolate the country. So Trump's claims cut a deep wound, prompting a sense in India that the U.S. may no longer be its strategic partner.
India insists that Kashmir is India's internal issue and had opposed any third-party intervention. Last week Modi appeared to dismiss Trump's claims after India's Opposition began demanding answers from him. Modi said that 'no country in the world stopped' the fighting between India and Pakistan, but he did not name Trump.
Trump has also appeared to be warming up to Pakistan, even praising its counterterrorism efforts. Hours after levying tariffs on India, Trump announced a 'massive' oil exploration deal with Pakistan, saying that some day, India might have to buy oil from Islamabad. Earlier, he also hosted one of Pakistan's top military officials at a private lunch.
Sreeram Sundar Chaulia, an expert at New Delhi's Jindal School of International Affairs, said Trump's sudden admiration for Pakistan as a great partner in counterterrorism has 'definitely soured' the mood in India.
Chaulia said 'the best-case scenario is that this is just a passing Trump whim,' but he also warned that 'if financial and energy deals are indeed being struck between the U.S. and Pakistan, it will dent the U.S.-India strategic partnership and lead to loss of confidence in the U.S. in Indian eyes.'
India's oil purchases from Russia are an irritant
The strain in relations has also to do with oil.
India had faced strong pressure from the Biden administration to cut back its oil purchases from Moscow during the early months of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Instead, India bought more, making it the second-biggest buyer of Russian oil after China. That pressure sputtered over time and the U.S. focused more on building strategic ties with India, which is seen as a bulwark against a rising China.
Trump's threat to penalize India over oil, however, brought back those issues.
On Sunday, the Trump administration made its frustrations over ties between India and Russia ever more public. Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House, accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, saying it was 'not acceptable.'
Some experts, though, suspect Trump's remarks are mere pressure tactics. 'Given the wild fluctuations in Trump's policies,' Chaulia said, 'it may return to high fives and hugs again.'
___
Associated Press writer Michelle L. Price in Washington contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MetLife (MET) To Report Earnings Tomorrow: Here Is What To Expect
Global insurance giant MetLife (NYSE:MET) will be reporting results this Wednesday afternoon. Here's what investors should know. MetLife beat analysts' revenue expectations by 3% last quarter, reporting revenues of $18.83 billion, up 10.6% year on year. It was a slower quarter for the company, with a significant miss of analysts' book value per share estimates and a miss of analysts' EPS estimates. Is MetLife a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free. This quarter, analysts are expecting MetLife's revenue to be flat year on year at $18.64 billion, in line with its flat revenue from the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings are expected to come in at $2.16 per share. Analysts covering the company have generally reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business to stay the course heading into earnings. MetLife has missed Wall Street's revenue estimates four times over the last two years. Looking at MetLife's peers in the life insurance segment, some have already reported their Q2 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. Corebridge Financial delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 5.8%, beating analysts' expectations by 7.3%, and Lincoln Financial Group reported revenues up 4.4%, topping estimates by 1.1%. Lincoln Financial Group traded up 7.8% following the results. Read our full analysis of Corebridge Financial's results here and Lincoln Financial Group's results here. Debates around the economy's health and the impact of potential tariffs and corporate tax cuts have caused much uncertainty in 2025. While some of the life insurance stocks have shown solid performance in this choppy environment, the group has generally underperformed, with share prices down 2.9% on average over the last month. MetLife is down 5.3% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $94.14 (compared to the current share price of $75). Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most ethics complaints filed against NM lawmakers resolved quietly
Aug. 4—SANTA FE — The recent internal ethics investigation into top Senate Democrat Mimi Stewart marked the first time in years that a complaint against a New Mexico lawmaker led to a public hearing. But there have been no shortage of filed complaints. With the exception of the complaint against Stewart, all other allegations of misconduct filed against lawmakers in the last five years — there have been a total of 17 — were quietly resolved without any details being publicly released, according to legislative records. Some of the complaints that date back to January 2020 were dismissed following an internal investigation, while others were informally settled or withdrawn. The recent trends have prompted some current and former legislators to say flaws in the system need fixing. Former state Sen. Mark Moores, a Republican who stepped down last year, said New Mexico's current legislative ethics system is tainted by partisan politics. "The system is working as intended, because the system was set up so leadership could still retain control," Moores said . He said the system should be changed to more closely model the congressional ethics system, which features an independent, nonpartisan office that reviews allegations of misconduct against members of Congress and staffers. The public currently lacks confidence in New Mexico's legislative ethics system, Moores added, in large part because leading legislators function as gatekeepers of sorts who determine whether complaints filed against lawmakers should move forward. "You're never going to have a fair hearing against anyone in leadership because they appoint their cronies," he said. Sen. Katy Duhigg, D-Albuquerque, said lawmakers have struggled to find the right balance between transparency and protecting themselves from possible politically-driven complaints. "I think each time we see this process used, we see areas that need improvement," said Duhigg, who chairs the Senate Rules Committee. She said she would support changes to the legislative ethics system such as simplifying the wording of ethics policies and protocols, along with mandatory mediation to try to resolve complaints involving legislators and staffers. "I think we are on the right road, but there is room for improvement," Duhigg said. A recent history of tie votes The complaint against Stewart, the Senate's president pro tem since 2021, was filed by a legislative staffer in February after the veteran lawmaker allegedly shouted at her during a heated moment during this year's 60-day legislative session. After an initial panel of lawmakers found probable cause existed to advance the complaint, a legislative ethics hearing subcommittee recommended last week the complaint against Stewart be dismissed. But the recommendation was made via a party-line 4-3 vote, with retired state Supreme Court Justice Richard Bosson siding with the subcommittee's three Senate Democrats. The three Senate Republicans appointed to the panel voted against dismissing the complaint, while maintaining that sanctions should be imposed in the case. The presence of a retired judge or attorney on the subcommittee was due to a 2022 rule change that was intended to allow for tie votes to be broken, said Randall Cherry, the Legislative Council Service's assistant director for legislative affairs. Before that change was made, several internal ethics probes stalled due to tie votes, according to legislators familiar with the investigations. Transparency issues and concerns One of the reasons the public is left in the dark about most legislative ethics investigations is the existence of confidentiality provisions in both state law and the Legislature's anti-harassment policy. Specifically, the policy stipulates that harassment complaints and documents related to any investigation shall be kept confidential, even under New Mexico's public records law. The confidentiality provision was challenged in a 2022 lawsuit filed by a lobbyist who had accused then-Sen. Daniel Ivey-Soto of sexual harassment. But the lawsuit was dismissed a year later. Amanda Lavin, the legal director of the New Mexico Foundation for Open Government, said citizen complaints are generally required to be made public under a Court of Appeals ruling. She also said the open government group believes any disciplinary action taken by the Legislature against its own members should be public information. But Lavin also pointed out the Legislature is not subject to New Mexico's Open Meetings Act, and state law allows legislators to hold certain types of meetings behind closed doors. "There are a lot of things they can discuss in private and then not even have to disclose what was discussed," Lavin said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans make gains in New Mexico voter registration, including in Santa Fe County
While New Mexico remains solidly blue territory, Republicans continue to make gains in the state's voter registration rolls. The GOP even added more voters in Santa Fe County, one of the most liberal and Democratic-performing areas in the state. Granted, the 5.8% year-over-year increase in registered Republicans in Santa Fe County equates to only about 1,000 voters, but it reflects a statewide trend. The number of registered Republicans across New Mexico grew from 421,653 in July 2024 to 436,647 last month, an increase of nearly 15,000 voters, according to the latest voter registration data. At the same time, Democrats lost just over 11,000 voters. Despite Republicans' gains, the proportion of voters in each major political party remains relatively flat in the state, with Democrats accounting for about 43% of the electorate and Republicans 32% — although, the GOP added a percentage point and Democrats lost one. The increase in Republican voters may reflect a Democratic Party struggling to find its message, Brian Sanderoff, an Albuquerque political analyst and respected pollster, said Monday. "I think the Democratic Party is trying to find its way, especially at the national level, and that can impact voter registration statistics," he added. The Republican Party of New Mexico started the year with the ambitious goal of registering 25,000 new voters, and Sanderoff said it has been doing a good job registering voters at the "grassroots level." The party's executive director, Leticia Muñoz, said everything the party does revolves around voter outreach. "RPNM takes great pride in the work being done by grassroots volunteers to register voters around the state over the last 5 years," she said in a statement. Muñoz also credits the commander in chief. "President [Donald] Trumps' policies continue to benefit New Mexicans greatly, which is another reason we're seeing many voters registering Republican," she said. A spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico downplayed the increase in registered Republicans. "There is a significantly smaller number of Republicans in New Mexico anyway, so any percentage change will look more dramatic than the reality of the total numbers," Daniel Garcia said in a statement. "I suppose the New Mexico GOP has to spin something to look like good news," he added. "They're obviously in a tough place trying to explain why voters should support quid pro quo immunity deals for child predator Ghislaine Maxwell and the GOP's signature accomplishment — their unpopular 'Big Beautiful Bill' that will close hospitals, eliminate health care coverage, and take away food assistance right here in New Mexico. Not to mention they'll have to explain to voters why they think tariffs, inflation, and privatizing Social Security will make us 'great again.' ' Voter registration data shows a slight increase in independent or "decline-to-state" voters, a number that grew from 315,772 to 320,988. The percentage of unaffiliated voters has been rising over the past decade and a half, a trend that will likely continue after New Mexico adopted a "semi-open primary" system, which allows voters who don't state a party affiliation to cast a ballot in a Democratic or Republican primary without changing their registration. In the state's most populous counties — Bernalillo, Doña Ana and Santa Fe, which are crucial in a statewide race — Democrats have a comfortable edge over Republicans. In those three counties combined, there are 324,152 registered Democrats and 177,070 registered Republicans. Independents are closing in on Republicans, though. The data show 168,351 "decline-to-state" voters in those three counties. Muñoz said Republicans are intent on gaining even more ground. "RPNM will continue our goal to flip New Mexico," she said, adding it's taken six to eight years to flip other blue states red. Asked whether Republicans' gains would affect the governor's race next year, Sanderoff said changes in voter registration are used to measure the direction of the state, but he noted Democrats maintain an advantage. "If you're consistently seeing Republicans make voter registration gains and Democrats stagnating on voter registration statistics, that is a barometer that one looks at to measure the political mood," he said. "It can be a predictor, but it's all relative, and you still have the lopsided voter registration edge that the Democrats have in terms of the actual numbers."
